Unemployment in inner-city renal transplant recipients: predictive and sociodemographic factors.

ABSTRACT

Studies of dialysis patients report unemployment rates of 60% to 75%; however, it is generally believed that following transplantation, improvement in well-being and removal of time constraints imposed by the dialytic regimen afford improvement in employment status. We studied 58 stable renal transplant recipient attending an outpatient transplant clinic by questionnaire, administered anonymously. Only 25 (43%) of the patients were currently employed. Employed and unemployed patients did not differ when compared for age, gender, race, cause of renal disease, type of transplant or prior dialysis, time on dialysis or time since transplantation, years of education, or prestige score or classification ("blue collar" v "white collar") of prior job. In the employed group, 24 (96%) patients had worked before developing kidney disease compared with 23 (70%) patients in the unemployed group (P < 0.05). While on dialysis, 19 (79%) of the employed patients continued working compared with 10 (30%) of the unemployed patients (P < 0.005). Major reasons for discontinuing work after starting dialysis for both groups were subjective illness (feeling too sick, 51%), followed by interference of the dialysis regimen with time necessary for work (32%). Only 15% of the previously employed patients did not work after transplantation because of feeling too sick. By multiple logistic regression, the strongest predictors of employment posttransplant were being more than 1 year posttransplant (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 5.5) and having been employed before transplantation (odds ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.60 to 9.02). Over half of the unemployed patients (20 [61%]) expressed interest in job training. Eighty percent to 90% of patients in both groups were insured by Medicare, with the second greatest number insured by Medicaid. Of the 15 unemployed patients insured by Medicaid, 67% reported that their decision not to work was related to fear of losing Medicaid benefits because they could not afford medications without it. Despite no difference in actual type of insurance carried, 17 (51%) of the unemployed patients believed their health insurance coverage was inadequate compared with four (12%) of the employed patients (P = 0.005, chi-squared test). Unemployment remains a significant problem for our population of inner-city renal transplant recipients. Attention to job retention or retraining during the early renal disease and dialysis therapy period may promote better rehabilitation following transplantation. However, for this population, with limited employment opportunities, removal of disincentives to work, including loss of Insurance and Inability to pay for medications, will be necessary before we can provide optimal rehabilitation for renal transplant recipients from all social strata.