A randomized, prospective comparison of pain after gasless laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
; 5(2): 149-53, 1998 May.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-9564062
ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE:
To compare pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation by gasless laparoscopy versus carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum.DESIGN:
Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison (Canadian Task Force classification I).SETTING:
Private obstetric-gynecology hospital associated with a university resident teaching program. PATIENTS Women age 21 to 42. INTERVENTION Single-puncture laparoscopic tubal ligation was performed with a silicone elastomer band. Gasless laparoscopy was performed with a Laprolift and traditional laparoscopy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Postoperative pain in the shoulder and periumbilical and lower pelvic regions was measured by visual analog scale on the day of surgery and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14. MEASUREMENTS AND MAINRESULTS:
Of the 67 patients, 54 provided visual analog scales for analysis, 30 in the gasless group and 24 in the traditional group. No statistical difference was seen in scores for shoulder, periumbilical, and pelvic pain between techniques.CONCLUSION:
Patients undergoing gasless laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy experience similar postoperative pain.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Dor Pós-Operatória
/
Pneumoperitônio Artificial
/
Esterilização Tubária
/
Dióxido de Carbono
/
Laparoscopia
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Etiology_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
Assunto da revista:
GINECOLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
1998
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos