Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HIV-1 viral load: comparative evaluation of three commercially available assays in Argentina.
Hodara, V; Monticelli, A; Pampuro, S; Salomón, H; Jauregui Rueda, H; Libonatti, O.
Afiliação
  • Hodara V; Department of Microbiology, University of Buenos Aires' School of Medicine, Argentina.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9695883
ABSTRACT
Viral load (HIV-RNA copies per milliliter of plasma) has good correlation to prognosis considering progression to AIDS. The evaluation of commercial kits to measure viral load has become a need to find the most specific, sensitive and reproducible procedure to follow up HIV-infected patients. Hereby, a comparative analysis was done by using three different assays available in Argentina for quantitation of HIV-RNA in plasma. A plasma panel 20 from HIV-1 infected individuals (9 asymptomatic and 11 symptomatic) and 9 from HIV-1 seronegative individuals was studied. Samples were run by Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (Roche Diagnostic System, USA) Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA 2.0 Assay (Chiron Corporation, USA) and NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT (Organon Teknika, Holland). RNA was extracted from 0.2 ml of plasma for Amplicor, 0.1 ml and 1 ml of plasma for NASBA and, duplicates of 1 ml of plasma was centrifuged and pellet was used for bDNA assay no RNA extraction step. For a given specimen, a log difference of < 0.5 between assays was considered as concordant result. All seronegative samples were bellow the detection limit for all assays (Amplicor 200 c/ml, NASBA 400 c/ml and Quantiplex (bDNA) 500 c/ml). Two samples from asymptomatic patients were not detectable by NASBA (Sensitivity 90%) Sensitivity was increased to 100% by using 1 ml of plasma. All samples were detectable by the other assays (sensitivity 100%). For NASBA-bDNA, 74% samples were concordant, 35% for Amplicor-bDNA and 53% for NASBA-Amplicor. By using 1 ml of plasma from asymptomatic patients, concordance was 65% for NASBA-bDNA and 60% for NASBA Amplicor. Comparing samples from asymptomatic patients, only 22% was concordant in both cases. Reproducibility of NASBA was low (33% with differences lower than 0.5 Log) when 0.1 and 1 ml were used. Due to the levels of concordance of these results, it would be suggested to use always the same technique to follow up HIV-1 infection. The reproducibility of the assays should be tested by every laboratory and for every technician in charge of the assay in order to have confidence in the results specially to follow up HIV-infected patients or to monitor anti-viral therapies.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: RNA Viral / Infecções por HIV / HIV-1 / Carga Viral Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: Acta Physiol Pharmacol Ther Latinoam Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: RNA Viral / Infecções por HIV / HIV-1 / Carga Viral Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: Acta Physiol Pharmacol Ther Latinoam Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina