[The hemodynamics laboratory without cine film. A comparison between the production costs of 35-mm film and the recordable compact disk]. / Il laboratorio di emodinamica cineless. Confronto tra costi di produzione del film 35 mm e del compact disk recordable.

BACKGROUND: For more than 35 years, cine film has been used as the standard recording medium for coronary angiography. At present, the DICOM and the CD-R format have been established as the standard media for the transport of cardiac angiographic images in place of cine angiographic film. The aim of the study was to compare the media production costs between two cardiac catheterization laboratories, with and without cine film. METHODS: We collected data from two different laboratories in the same geographic area which perform about 1000 procedures/year, using a similar digital x-ray imaging system. In one lab, images are recorded on 35-mm film at 25 frames/sec. In the other one, the image support is based on a CD-R. For each laboratory we considered both direct patient and variable equipment costs. Direct patient costs in the film-lab include: cine film, processing chemicals, processing labor, chemical disposal, maintenance; in the digital lab: CD-R costs and masterization time. Equipment costs in the film-lab include: cine camera, cine film processor and cine projector; in the filmless lab a DICOM formatter and a review workstation. The equipment amortization costs are considered over a three-year period. RESULTS: Total direct patient costs are 90,000 lira for the film and 14,000 lira for the CD-R. Equipment costs are 193,000,000 lira in the film-lab and 150,000,000 lira in the filmless one. Overall cost per patient is 154,300 lira for the cine film and 64,000 lira for the CD-R. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the media costs per patient for a digital DICOM CD-R format system are substantially less than for 35-mm film, permitting savings of more than 90,000,000 Italian lira per year in a mid-volume cardiac catheterization laboratory.