Perivascular vasopressin versus tourniquet as haemostatic agents during myomectomy: a prospective randomised trial - abstract

ABSTRACT

This study sought to assess the efficacy of perivascular vasopressin compared to tourniquet in minimising bleeding and its sequelae at myomectomy. It was a prospective randomized trial carried out at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica. Thirty-eight women with symptomatic uterine fibroids scheduled for myomectomy were recruited after satisfying eligibility criteria. There were 18 patients in the vasopressin group and 20 in the tourniquet group. Myomectomy was performed after the injection perivascularly of either 10 units vasopressin in 20 ml normal saline or with the use of a Foley catheter tourniquet around the uterine vessels. The efficacy of each method was measured by looking at differences in pre- and post-operative haemoglobin and haematocrit, changes in intraoperative pulse and blood pressure, measured blood loss, need for blood transfusion and evidence of post-operative febrile morbidity. Pre-operative variables were almost identical in both groups. The use of vasopressin resulted in less blood loss with a mean of 254 ml versus 401 ml for tourniquet (p = 0.09) approaching significance. This resulted in a similar fall in the haemoglobin mean, 1.7 versus 2.2 (p = 0.248). Of the 20 patients who received tourniquet 5 had to have blood transfusion compared to one of the 18 receiving vasopressin. There were no significant differences in highest post-operative pulse and temperature. The results suggest that vasopressin is as effective in preventing blood loss as the tourniquet and is probably better, reducing the need for transfusion during myomectomy (AU)