Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 and P.1
Paola Stefanelli; Filippo Trentini; Giorgio Guzzetta; Valentina Marziano; Alessia Mammone; Piero Poletti; Carla Molina Grane'; Mattia Manica; Martina del Manso; Xanthi Andrianou; Patrizio Pezzotti; Marco Ajelli; Giovanni Rezza; Silvio Brusaferro; Stefano Merler; - COVID-19 National Microbiology Surveillance Study Group.
Afiliação
  • Paola Stefanelli; Istituto Superiore di Sanita'
  • Filippo Trentini; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • Giorgio Guzzetta; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • Valentina Marziano; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • Alessia Mammone; Ministero della Salute
  • Piero Poletti; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • Carla Molina Grane'; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • Mattia Manica; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • Martina del Manso; Istituto Superiore di Sanita'
  • Xanthi Andrianou; Istituto Superiore di Sanita'
  • Patrizio Pezzotti; Istituto Superiore di Sanita'
  • Marco Ajelli; Indiana University School of Public Health
  • Giovanni Rezza; Ministero della Salute
  • Silvio Brusaferro; Istituto Superiore di Sanita'
  • Stefano Merler; Bruno Kessler Foundation
  • - COVID-19 National Microbiology Surveillance Study Group;
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254923
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (B.1.1.7, P.1 and B.1.351) have emerged in different continents of the world. To date, little information is available on their ecological interactions. Based on two genomic surveillance surveys conducted on February 18 and March 18, 2021 across the whole Italian territory and covering over 3,000 clinical samples, we found significant co-circulation of B.1.1.7 and P.1. We showed that B.1.1.7 was already dominant on February 18 in a majority of regions/autonomous provinces (national prevalence 54%) and almost completely replaced historical lineages by March 18 (dominant in all regions/autonomous provinces, national prevalence 86%). At the same time, we found a substantial proportion of cases of the P.1 lineage on February 18, almost exclusively in Central Italy (with an overall prevalence in the macro-area of 18%), which remained at similar values on March 18, suggesting the inability by this lineage to outcompete B.1.1.7. Only 9 cases from variant B.1.351 were identified in the two surveys. At the national level, we estimated a mean relative transmissibility of B.1.1.7 (compared to historical lineages) ranging between 1.55 and 1.57 (with confidence intervals between 1.45 and 1.66). The relative transmissibility of P.1 estimated at the national level varied according to the assumed degree of cross-protection granted by infection with other lineages and ranged from 1.12 (95%CI 1.03-1.23) in the case of complete immune evasion by P.1 to 1.39 (95%CI 1.26-1.56) in the case of complete cross-protection. These observations may have important consequences on the assessment of future pandemic scenarios.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...