Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Second trimester cervical length measurement for prediction spontaneous preterm birth in an unselected risk population
Article em En | WPRIM | ID: wpr-46655
Biblioteca responsável: WPRO
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the predictive capacity of cervical length (CL) measurement underwent during the second trimester ultrasound for prediction preterm birth <32, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation in an unselected risk population.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed with 751 singleton pregnancies between 20 and 24+6 weeks of gestation. The CL measurement (mm) using the transvaginal route was obtained in a sagittal view and the calipers positioned to measure the linear distance between the triangular area of echodensity at the external os and the internal os. To compare the preterm (<37 weeks) and term births (≥37 weeks), we used unpaired t test. We assessed whether the CL measurement was dependent of gestational age by performing a linear regression and assessing the coefficient of determination (R²). We additionally assessed the accuracy of CL measurement to predict preterm birth by assessing the area under receiver operating characteristics curves with its respective confidence intervals (CIs) 95%.

RESULTS:

Preterm birth <37 weeks was found in 13.6% (102/751) of pregnant women. Short cervix (≤25 mm) was found in 2.7% (20/751) of pregnancies. Only 30% (6/20) of pregnant women with short cervix have used progesterone to prevent preterm birth. There was a weak correlation between CL measurement and gestational age at delivery (R²=0.01, P=0.002). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the ability of CL measurement to predict preterm birth <32, 34, and 37 weeks, showed an area under the curve of 0.693 (95% CI, 0.512 to 0.874), 0.472 (95% CI, 0.353 to 0.591), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.426 to 0.555), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

There was a weak correlation between CL measurement and gestational age at delivery. In an unselected population, CL measurement screening at 20 to 24+6 weeks of gestation does not seem to be a good predictor of preterm birth.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: WPRIM Assunto principal: Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez / Progesterona / Modelos Lineares / Colo do Útero / Programas de Rastreamento / Estudos Retrospectivos / Curva ROC / Estudos de Coortes / Ultrassonografia / Idade Gestacional Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: WPRIM Assunto principal: Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez / Progesterona / Modelos Lineares / Colo do Útero / Programas de Rastreamento / Estudos Retrospectivos / Curva ROC / Estudos de Coortes / Ultrassonografia / Idade Gestacional Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article