Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of ropivacaine mesylate and ropivacaine hydrochloride for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after transabdominal hysterectomy / 中华麻醉学杂志
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-525529
Biblioteca responsável: WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect of ropivacaine mesylate with ropivacaine HC1 for patient-controlled epidural analgesia ( PCEA) after transabdominal hysterectomy. Methods Forty-four ASA 1 or D patients aged 18-65 yrs weighing 45-80 kg undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy performed under epidural anesthesia with either 0.75% ropivacaine HO (control group, n = 22) or 0.894% ropivacaine mesylate (study group, n= 22) . An epidural catheter was placed at L2,3 and advanced 3 cm into the epidural space. After operation PCEA was performed with 0.2% ropivacaine HCl ( control group) or 0.237 % ropivacaine mesylate (study group) respectively. Postoperative pain was assessed using VAS (0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) . Motor blockade was assessed using the Bromage scoring system. The patients' satisfaction level and adverse events were also recorded. Results There were no significant differences in VAS scores, motor blockade and incidence of adverse events between the two groups. The number of effective pressing in study group was significantly less than that in control group. Starting from 4h after operation the drug consumption in study group was significantly less than that in control group. Conclusion 0.237 % ropivacaine mesylate can be used for PCEA after transabdominal hysterectomy as safely as 0.2% ropivacaine HCl.

Texto completo: Disponível Base de dados: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Ano de publicação: 1996 Tipo de documento: Artigo
Texto completo: Disponível Base de dados: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Ano de publicação: 1996 Tipo de documento: Artigo
...