Diagnostic reference level: an important tool for reducing radiation doses in adult and pediatric nuclear medicine procedures in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish a concise method for determining a diagnostic reference level (DRL) for adult and pediatric nuclear medicine patients on the basis of diagnostic procedures and administered radioisotope as a means of controlling medical exposure. METHODS: A screening was carried out in all Brazilian Nuclear Medicine Service (NMS) establishments to support this study by collecting the average activities administered during adult diagnostic procedures and the rules applied to adjust these according to the patient's age and body mass. Percentile 75 was used in all the activities administered as a means of establishing DRL for adult patients, with additional correction factors for pediatric patients. Radiation doses from nuclear medicine procedures on the basis of average administered activity were calculated for all diagnostic exams. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 107 NMSs in Brazil agreed to participate in the project. From the 64 nuclear medicine procedures studied, bone, kidney, and parathyroid scans were found to be used in more than 85% of all the NMSs analyzed. There was a large disparity among the activities administered, when applying the same procedures, this reaching, in some cases, more than 20 times between the lowest and the highest. Diagnostic exams based on Ga, Tl, and I radioisotopes proved to be the major exams administering radiation doses to patients. On introducing the DRL concept into clinical routine, the minimum reduction in radiation doses received by patients was about 15%, the maximum was 95%, and the average was 50% compared with the previously reported administered activities. CONCLUSION: Variability in the available diagnostic procedures as well as in the amount of activities administered within the same procedure was appreciable not only in Brazil, but worldwide. Global efforts are needed to establish a concise DRL that can be applied in adult and pediatric nuclear medicine procedures as the application of DRL in clinical routine has been proven to be an important tool for controlling and reducing radiation doses received by patients in medical exposure.

Dose Calibrator Linearity Testing: Radioisotope (99m)Tc or (18)F? An Alternative for Reducing Costs in Nuclear Medicine Quality Control.

Dose calibrator linearity testing is indispensable for evaluating the capacity of this equipment in measuring radioisotope activities at different magnitudes, a fundamental aspect of the daily routine of a nuclear medicine department, and with an impact on patient exposure. The main aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of substituting the radioisotope Fluorine-18 ((18)F) with Technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) in this test, and to indicate it with the lowest operational cost. The test was applied with sources of (99m)Tc (62 GBq) and (18)F (12 GBq), the activities of which were measured at different times, with the equipment preadjusted to measuring sources of (99m)Tc, (18)F, Gallium-67 ((67)Ga), and Iodine-131 ((131)I). Over time, the average deviation between measured and expected activities from (99m)Tc and (18)F were, respectively, 0.56 (±1.79)% and 0.92 (±1.19)%. The average ratios for 99(m)Tc source experimental activity, when measured with the equipment adjusted for measuring (18)F, (67)Ga, and (131)I sources, in real values, were, respectively, 3.42 (±0.06), 1.45 (±0.03), and 1.13 (±0.02), and those for the (18)F source experimental activity, measured through adjustments of (99m)Tc, (67)Ga, and (131)I, were, respectively, 0.295 (±0.004), 0.335 (±0.007), and 0.426 (±0.006). The adjustment of a simple exponential function for describing (99m)Tc and (18)F experimental activities facilitated the calculation of the physical half-lives of the radioisotopes, with a difference of about 1% in relation to the values described in the literature. Linearity test results, when using (99m)Tc, through being compatible with those acquired with (18)F, imply the possibility of using both radioisotopes during linearity testing. Nevertheless, this information, along with the high potential of exposure and the high cost of (18)F, implies that (99m)Tc should preferably be employed for linearity testing in clinics that normally use (18)F, without the risk of prejudicing either the procedure itself or the guarantee of a high-quality nuclear medicine service.

Dose calibrator linearity test: (99m)Tc versus (18)F radioisotopes.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing (18)F with (99m)Tc in dose calibrator linearity testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test was performed with sources of (99m)Tc (62 GBq) and (18)F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical (99m)Tc and (18)F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. RESULTS: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical (99m)Tc and (18)F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the (99m)Tc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure (99m)Tc and (18)F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the (18)F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. CONCLUSION: The results of the linearity test using (99m)Tc were compatible with those obtained with the (18)F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in (18)F acquisition suggest (99m)Tc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use (18)F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a viabilidade de substituir o radioisótopo 18F pelo 99mTc no teste de linearidade em medidores de atividade. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: O teste foi realizado empregando-se fontes de 99mTc (62 GBq) e 18F (12 GBq), cujas atividades foram mensuradas até valores abaixo de 1 MBq. As razões e desvios entre as atividades experimentais e teóricas foram calculados e comparados. RESULTADOS: Os desvios médios entre as atividades experimentais e teóricas para o 99mTc e 18F foram, respectivamente, 0,56 (± 1,79)% e 0,92 (± 1,19)%. A razão média entre as atividades indicadas pelo equipamento para a fonte de 99mTc quando mensurada no equipamento pré-ajustado para medir o 99mTc e 18F foi 3,42 (± 0,06), e para o 18F este valor foi 3,39 (± 0,05), razões consideradas constantes ao longo de todo o período de medida. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados do teste utilizando o 99mTc são compatíveis com os adquiridos com o 18F, implicando na possibilidade de utilização de ambos os radioisótopos na realização do teste de linearidade. Esta informação, aliada ao elevado potencial de exposição e custos de aquisição do 18F, sugere que o 99mTc seja empregado na realização do teste de linearidade para clínicas que utilizam 18F, sem prejuízo para o procedimento e garantia da qualidade de um serviço de medicina nuclear.

Applicability of the Appropriate use Criteria for Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy.

Background: Appropriateness Criteria for nuclear imaging exams were created by American College of Cardiology (ACC) e American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) to allow the rational use of tests. Little is known whether these criteria have been followed in clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate whether the medical applications of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in a private nuclear medicine service of a tertiary cardiology hospital were suitable to the criteria of indications proposed by the American medical societies in 2005 and 2009 and compare the level of indication of both. Methods: We included records of 383 patients that underwent MPS, November 2008 up to February 2009. Demographic characteristics, patient's origin, coronary risk factors, time of medical graduation and appropriateness criteria of medical applications were studied. The criteria were evaluated by two independent physicians and, in doubtful cases, defined by a medical expert in MPS. Results: Mean age was 65 ± 12 years. Of the 367 records reviewed, 236 (64.3%) studies were performed in men and 75 (20.4%) were internee. To ACC 2005, 255 (69.5%) were considered appropriate indication and 13 (3.5%) inappropriate. With ACC 2009, 249 (67.8%) were considered appropriate indications and 13 (5.2%) inappropriate. Conclusions: We observed a high rate of adequacy of medical indications for MPS. Compared to the 2005 version, 2009 did not change the results.

Outpatient radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer: a safe nuclear medicine procedure.

PURPOSES: To evaluate the dosimetric effect of outpatient radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer in members of a patient's family and their living environment, when using iodine-131 doses reaching 7.4 GBq. The following parameters were thus defined: (a) whole-body radiation doses to caregivers, (b) the production of contaminated solid waste, and (c) radiation potential and surface contamination within patients' living quarters. METHODS: In total, 100 patients were treated on an outpatient basis, taking into consideration their acceptable living conditions, interests, and willingness to comply with medical and radiation safety guidelines. Both the caregivers and the radiation dose potentiality inside patients' residences were monitored by using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Surface contamination and contaminated solid wastes were identified and measured with a Geiger-Müller detector. RESULTS: A total of 90 monitored individuals received a mean dose of 0.27 (±0.28) mSv, and the maximum dose registered was 1.6 mSv. The mean value for the potential dose within all living quarters was 0.31 (±0.34) mSv, and the mean value per monitored surface was 5.58 Bq/cm(2) for all the 1659 points measured. The overall production of contaminated solid wastes was at a low level, being about 3 times less than the exemption level indicated by the International Atomic Energy Agency. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the treatment of thyroid cancer by applying radioiodine activities up to 7.4 GBq, on an outpatient basis, is a safe procedure, especially when supervised by qualified professionals. This alternative therapy should be a topic for careful discussion considering the high potential for reducing costs in healthcare and improving patient acceptance.

Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes / Teste de linearidade em medidor de atividade: utilização do radioisótopo 99mTc versus 18F

Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service. .

Objetivo: Avaliar a viabilidade de substituir o radioisótopo 18F pelo 99mTc no teste de linearidade em medidores de atividade. Materiais e Métodos: O teste foi realizado empregando-se fontes de 99mTc (62 GBq) e 18F (12 GBq), cujas atividades foram mensuradas até valores abaixo de 1 MBq. As razões e desvios entre as atividades experimentais e teóricas foram calculados e comparados. Resultados: Os desvios médios entre as atividades experimentais e teóricas para o 99mTc e 18F foram, respectivamente, 0,56 (± 1,79)% e 0,92 (± 1,19)%. A razão média entre as atividades indicadas pelo equipamento para a fonte de 99mTc quando mensurada no equipamento pré-ajustado para medir o 99mTc e 18F foi 3,42 (± 0,06), e para o 18F este valor foi 3,39 (± 0,05), razões consideradas constantes ao longo de todo o período de medida. Conclusão: Os resultados do teste utilizando o 99mTc são compatíveis com os adquiridos com o 18F, implicando na possibilidade de utilização de ambos os radioisótopos na realização do teste de linearidade. Esta informação, aliada ao elevado potencial de exposição e custos de aquisição do 18F, sugere que o 99mTc seja empregado na realização do teste de linearidade para clínicas que utilizam 18F, sem prejuízo para o procedimento e garantia da qualidade de um serviço de medicina nuclear. .

Could the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with 3.7 and 5.55 GBq of (131I)NaI, on an outpatient basis, be safe?

OBJECTIVES: The first objective of this study was to evaluate the radiological impact on relatives and the environment because of outpatient treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with 3.7 and 5.55 GBq of (131I)NaI. The second objective was to determine, analyze, and evaluate whole-body radiation dose to caregivers, the production of contaminated solid waste, and the potentiality of radiation dose and surface contamination existing inside patients' households. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated on an outpatient basis, taking into consideration their acceptable living conditions, interests, and willingness to comply with medical and radiation-safety guidelines. The caregivers themselves, as well as the potentiality of the radiation dose inside patients' residences, were monitored with a thermo-luminescence dosimeter. Surface contamination and contaminated solid wastes were identified and measured by using a Geiger-Müller detector. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty-six monitored individuals received accumulated effective radiation doses of less than 1.0 mSv, and only one 2.8 mSv, throughout the 7 days of measurement. The maximum registered value for the potential of radiation dose inside all living areas was 1.30 mSv. The monitored surface contamination inside patients' dwellings showed a mean value of 4.2 Bq/cm for all surfaces found to be contaminated. A total of 2.5 l of contaminated solid waste was generated by the patients with 3.33 MBq of all estimated activity. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with 3.7 and 5.55 GBq of (131I)NaI, on an outpatient basis, can be safe when overseen by qualified professionals and with an adapted radiation-protection guideline. Even considering the radioiodine activity level and the dosimetric methodology applied here, negligible human exposure and a nonmeasurable radiological impact to the human environment were found.

[Radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer: radiologic impact of out-patient treatment with 100 to 150 mCi Iodine-131 activities]. / Radioiodoterapia do carcinoma diferenciado da tireoide: impacto radiológico da liberação hospitalar de pacientes com atividades entre 100 e 150 mCi de iodo-131.

PURPOSE: To evaluate exposure and dosimetry to family members and environment due to outpatient radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with 100-150mCi of iodine-131 on an out-patient basis. Family members dosimetry (n = 27) and potential doses inside the house were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Surface contamination and radioactive wastes were also monitored. RESULTS: Less than 1.0 mSv doses were found in 26 co-habitants and 2.8 mSv in a single case (inferior to the acceptable value of 5.0 mSv/procedure). Potential doses in the houses were inferior to 0.25 mSv, excluding the patients bedroom (mean value = 0.69 mSv). Surface contamination (mean = 4.2 Bq.cm-2) were below clearance levels. Radioactive wastes generated had a volume of 2.5 liters and a total activity estimated in 90 microCi, with a calculated exposure close to the background radiation levels. CONCLUSIONS: No radiological impact was detected after iodine therapy with 100-150 mCi on an out-patient basis followed by experienced professionals.

Applicability of the Appropriate use Criteria for Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy / Aplicabilidade dos Critérios de Adequação em Cintilografia Miocárdica

Background: Appropriateness Criteria for nuclear imaging exams were created by American College of Cardiology (ACC) e American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) to allow the rational use of tests. Little is known whether these criteria have been followed in clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate whether the medical applications of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in a private nuclear medicine service of a tertiary cardiology hospital were suitable to the criteria of indications proposed by the American medical societies in 2005 and 2009 and compare the level of indication of both. Methods: We included records of 383 patients that underwent MPS, November 2008 up to February 2009. Demographic characteristics, patient's origin, coronary risk factors, time of medical graduation and appropriateness criteria of medical applications were studied. The criteria were evaluated by two independent physicians and, in doubtful cases, defined by a medical expert in MPS. Results: Mean age was 65 ± 12 years. Of the 367 records reviewed, 236 (64.3%) studies were performed in men and 75 (20.4%) were internee. To ACC 2005, 255 (69.5%) were considered appropriate indication and 13 (3.5%) inappropriate. With ACC 2009, 249 (67.8%) were considered appropriate indications and 13 (5.2%) inappropriate. Conclusions: We observed a high rate of adequacy of medical indications for MPS. Compared to the 2005 version, 2009 did not change the results. .

Fundamento: Os critérios de adequação para os exames de imagem nuclear foram criados pelo American College of Cardiology (ACC) e pela American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) com o objetivo de permitir o uso racional dos exames. Pouco se sabe se esses critérios têm sido seguidos nas indicações da prática clínica. Objetivo: Avaliar se os pedidos médicos de cintilografia de perfusão miocárdica (CPM), em serviço privado de medicina nuclear de um hospital cardiológico terciário, adequavam-se aos critérios de indicações propostos pelas sociedades médicas americanas em 2005 e 2009 e comparar o grau de indicação entre ambos. Métodos: Foram incluídos 383 prontuários de pacientes submetidos à CPM de novembro de 2008 a fevereiro de 2009. As características demográficas, a origem do paciente, os fatores de risco coronariano, o tempo de formatura do médico e os critérios de adequação dos pedidos foram considerados. Os critérios foram avaliados por dois médicos independentes e, nos casos duvidosos, definidos por um especialista em CPM. Resultados: A média de idade foi de 65 ± 12 anos. Dos 367 prontuários analisados, 236 (64,3%) exames foram realizados em homens e 75 (20,4%) foram em pacientes internados. Aplicando-se os critérios do ACC de 2005, 255 (69,5%) das indicações foram consideradas adequadas e 13 (3,5%) inadequadas. Aplicando-se os critérios do ACC de 2009, 249 (67,8%) das indicações foram consideradas adequadas e 13 (5,2%) inadequadas. Conclusões: Foi observada uma elevada taxa de adequação das indicações médicas de CPM. Comparada com a edição de 2005, a versão de 2009 não alterou a taxa de exames adequados ou inadequados. .

Radioiodoterapia do carcinoma diferenciado da tireoide: impacto radiológico da liberação hospitalar de pacientes com atividades entre 100 e 150 mCi de iodo-131 / Radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer: radiologic impact of out-patient treatment with 100 to 150 mCi Iodine-131 activities

OBJETIVO: Determinar exposições decorrentes da radioiodoterapia ambulatorial do carcinoma diferenciado da tireoide (CDT) sobre os familiares dos pacientes e o meio ambiente. MÉTODOS: Administraram-se 100 a 150 mCi de (131I)NaI para tratamento ambulatorial de 20 pacientes com CDT. Monitorizaram-se com dosímetros termoluminescentes as doses de radiação recebidas por familiares (n = 27) e potenciais de dose nas residências. Também foram monitorizadas contaminação de superfície e rejeitos radioativos. RESULTADOS: Registraram-se doses < 1,0 mSv em 26 acompanhantes e 2,8 mSv em um caso, inferiores ao aceitável para exposições médicas (5,0 mSv/procedimento). Excetuando-se o quarto dos pacientes (média = 0,69 mSv), determinou-se potencial de dose nas residências < 0,25 mSv. A contaminação de superfícies (4,2 Bq.cm-2) não ultrapassou níveis de liberação, sem representar riscos mesmo em simulações do pior cenário. Os rejeitos radioativos tiveram volume de 2,5 litros e atividade estimada em 90 µCi (média = 4,5 µCi/paciente). CONCLUSÕES: Não foi constatado impacto radiológico ao meio ambiente ou aos familiares de pacientes tratados ambulatorialmente com 100 a 150 mCi de iodo-131 e acompanhados por profissionais qualificados.

PURPOSE:To evaluate exposure and dosimetry to family members and environment due to outpatient radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with 100-150mCi of iodine-131 on an out-patient basis. Family members dosimetry (n = 27) and potential doses inside the house were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Surface contamination and radioactive wastes were also monitored. RESULTS: Less than 1.0 mSv doses were found in 26 co-habitants and 2.8 mSv in a single case (inferior to the acceptable value of 5.0 mSv/procedure). Potential doses in the houses were inferior to 0.25 mSv, excluding the patients bedroom (mean value = 0.69 mSv). Surface contamination (mean = 4.2 Bq.cm-2) were below clearance levels. Radioactive wastes generated had a volume of 2.5 liters and a total activity estimated in 90 µCi, with a calculated exposure close to the background radiation levels. CONCLUSIONS: No radiological impact was detected after iodine therapy with 100-150 mCi on an out-patient basis followed by experienced professionals.