Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 130
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 15, 2024 Jan 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189994

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the characteristics associated with the need for urinary intervention for a blunt renal injury with collection system involvement using a computed tomography (CT) protocol for trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal CT images of patients with blunt renal injuries from 2016 to 2020 were reviewed. Patients with low-grade renal trauma, non-collecting system involvement, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade V shattered kidney, and emergent nephrectomy were excluded. The largest perinephric mass thickness was measured in the axial view using CT, and a cutoff value was obtained using a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Risk factors for further urinary intervention were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 70 patients included in this study, those with perinephric mass thicknesses < 25 mm (n = 36) had a significantly lower rate of urinary intervention than those with perinephric mass thicknesses ≥ 25 mm (0 vs. 5; p = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the follow-up durations of the groups (19 days vs. 38 days; p = 0.198). More than 90% of the perinephric mass in the < 25 mm group resolved within a median follow-up duration of 38 days, whereas nearly half of the ≥ 25 mm group had a residual perinephric mass during a median follow-up duration of 19 days. CONCLUSION: The initial CT protocol for trauma was useful for predicting the need for further urinary interventions for collecting system injuries. A perinephric mass thickness < 25 mm is predictive of a low likelihood of requiring urinary intervention.


Asunto(s)
Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(1S Suppl 1): S27-S32, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285992

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often experience concurrent facial bone fractures. In 2021, a prediction model with 10 variables was published and precisely predicted concomitant facial fractures in TBI patients. Herein, external validation and simplification of this model was performed. METHODS: Traumatic brain injury patients treated at a major referral trauma center were retrospectively reviewed for 1 year. The original prediction model (published in 2021), which was developed from a rural level II trauma center, was applied for external validation. A new and simplified model from our level I trauma center was developed and backwardly validated by rural level II trauma center data. RESULTS: In total, 313 TBI patients were enrolled; 101 (32.3%) had concomitant facial fractures. When the previous prediction model was applied to the validation cohort, it achieved acceptable discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.713 and good precision, with a Brier score of 0.083. A new and simplified model with 6 variables (age, tooth rupture, epistaxis, facial lesion, eye injury, and intracranial hemorrhage) was created with excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.836) and good precision (Brier score of 0.055). The backward validation of this new model also showed excellent discrimination in the cohort used to develop the original model (AUC = 0.875). CONCLUSION: The original model provides an acceptable and reproducible prediction of concomitant facial fractures among TBI patients. A simplified model with fewer variables and the same accuracy could be applied in the emergency department and at higher- and lower-level trauma centers.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Fracturas Craneales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/complicaciones , Fracturas Craneales/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Curva ROC , Centros Traumatológicos
3.
Surg Endosc ; 37(1): 371-381, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35962229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the management of blunt splenic injury (BSI) and highlight the role of splenic artery embolization (SAE). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with BSI over 15 years. Splenic injuries were graded by the 2018 revision of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS). Our hospital provide 24/7 in-house surgeries and 24/7 in-house interventional radiology facility. Patients with BSI who arrived hypotensive and were refractory to resuscitation required surgery and patients with vascular injury on abdominal computed tomography were considered for SAE. RESULTS: In total, 680 patients with BSI, the number of patients who underwent nonoperative management with observation (NOM-obs), SAE, and surgery was 294, 234, and 152, respectively. The number of SAEs increased from 4 (8.3%) in 2001 to 23 (60.5%) in 2015 (p < 0.0001); conversely, the number of surgeries decreased from 21 (43.8%) in 2001 to 4 (10.5%) in 2015 (p = 0.001). The spleen-related mortality rate of NOM-obs, SAEs, and surgery was 0%, 0.4%, and 7.2%, respectively. In the SAE subgroup, according to the 2018 AAST-OIS, 234 patients were classified as grade II, n = 3; III, n = 21; IV, n = 111; and V, n = 99, respectively.; and compared with 1994 AST-OIS, 150 patients received a higher grade and the total number of grade IV and V injuries ranged from 96 (41.0%) to 210 (89.7%) (p < 0.0001). On angiography, 202 patients who demonstrated vascular injury and 187 achieved hemostasis after SAE with a 92.6% success rate. Six of the 15 patients failed to SAE preserved the spleen after second embolization with a 95.5% salvage rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the superiority of the 2018 AAST-OIS and support the role of SAE in changing the trend of management of BSI.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
World J Surg ; 47(10): 2357-2366, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433919

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify factors related to delayed intervention in abdominal trauma patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy using a nationwide databank. METHODS: From 2017 to 2019, abdominal trauma patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy were retrospectively evaluated using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Patients who underwent delayed interventions after a primary diagnostic laparoscopy were compared with those who did not. Factors associated with poor outcomes that are usually correlated with overlooked injuries and delayed interventions were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 5221 studied patients, 4682 (89.7%) underwent inspection without any intervention. Only 48 (0.9%) patients underwent delayed interventions after primary laparoscopy. Compared with patients receiving immediate interventions during primary diagnostic laparoscopy, patients receiving delayed interventions were more likely to have small intestine injuries (58.3% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001). Among patients with hollow viscus injuries, a significantly higher probability of overlooked injuries that required delayed intervention was observed in patients with small intestine injuries (small intestine injury: 16.8%; gastric injury: 2.5%; large intestine injury: 5.2%). However, delayed small intestine repair did not significantly affect the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.249), acute kidney injury (AKI) (p = 0.998), or hospital length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.053). In contrast, significantly positive relationships between delayed large intestine repair and poor outcomes were observed (SSI, odds ratio = 19.544, p = 0.021; AKI, odds ratio = 27.368, p < 0.001; LOS, ß = 13.541, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most examinations and interventions (near 90%) were successful during primary laparoscopy for abdominal trauma patients. Small intestine injuries were easily overlooked. Delayed small intestine repair-related poor outcomes were not observed.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 72: 170-177, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37536089

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans are usually needed in the emergency department (ED) to evaluate intra-abdominal injuries associated with pelvic fractures. Three-dimensional (3-D) images for pelvis reconstruction are also needed for planning surgical fixation after admission. This study investigates the advantages integrating a one-stage computed tomography (CT) scan with these two diagnostic modalities simultaneously to reduce the time to surgery and improve the outcomes of pelvic fracture fixation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (2018-2021) of patients with pelvic fractures was performed. Patients were categorized into the one-stage CT group or the two-stage CT group, and propensity score matching was used to address biases. The outcome measures included time to surgical fixation, time to CT scan for 3-D pelvis reconstruction, and overall length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-four pelvic fracture patients who underwent definite surgical fixation were identified. Of those, 320 underwent a one-stage CT scan, while the remaining 124 underwent a two-stage CT scan. After well-balanced matching, those in the one-stage CT group had a significantly shorter time to surgical fixation than those in the two-stage CT group (4.6 vs. 6.8 days, p < 0.001). Even among critically ill patients necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the one-stage CT scan group had a shorter time to definitive surgical fixation (5.5 vs. 7.2 days, p = 0.002) and a shorter hospital stay (19.0 vs. 32.7 days, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: A one-stage contrast-enhanced CT scan combined with simultaneous 3-D pelvis reconstruction is promising for expediting surgical fixation in pelvic fracture patients. This innovative strategy may improve patient outcomes by facilitating timely surgical interventions and minimizing delays associated with additional CT scans.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Huesos Pélvicos , Humanos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fijación de Fractura , Huesos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Pelvis , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
6.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 269, 2023 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37142974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains challenging surgically due to its high mortality, especially in older individuals. Computed tomography (CT)-measured skeletal muscle mass is a effective predictor of the surgical outcomes in older patients with abdominal emergencies. The purpose of this study is to assess whether a low CT-measured skeletal muscle mass can provide extra value in predicting PPU mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled older (aged ≥ 65 years) patients who underwent PPU surgery. Cross-sectional skeletal muscle areas and densities were measured by CT at L3 and patient-height adjusted to obtain the L3 skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). Thirty-day mortality was determined with univariate, multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, 141 older patients were included; 54.8% had sarcopenia. They were further categorized into the PULP score ≤ 7 (n=64) or PULP score > 7 group (n=82). In the former, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between sarcopenic (2.9%) and nonsarcopenic patients (0%; p=1.000). However, in the PULP score > 7 group, sarcopenic patients had a significantly higher 30-day mortality (25.5% vs. 3.2%, p=0.009) and serious complication rate (37.3% vs. 12.9%, p=0.017) than nonsarcopenic patients. Multivariate analysis showed that sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in patients in the PULP score > 7 group (OR: 11.05, CI: 1.03-118.7). CONCLUSION: CT scans can diagnose PPU and provide physiological measurements. Sarcopenia, defined as a low CT-measured SMG, provides extra value in predicting mortality in older PPU patients.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/diagnóstico por imagen , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo
7.
J Endovasc Ther ; : 15266028221128200, 2022 Oct 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36214460

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Most blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) may be treated using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and most blunt abdominal traumas (BATs) are managed conservatively. We hypothesized that severe trauma that needs TEVAR may increase the risk of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage in patients with concomitant BTAI and BAT because of the potential hemorrhagic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, blood loss, consequent need for blood transfusion, and procedure-associated heparinization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, blunt trauma patients with concomitant severe chest trauma and abdominal trauma who could be managed conservatively were studied. The probability of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage was compared between patients with concomitant BTAI who received or did not undergo TEVAR. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) were used to eliminate discrepancies between these 2 groups. RESULTS: Among the 341 studied patients, there were 26 patients with BTAI, and 19 of them underwent TEVAR. Delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients (21.1%, 4/19) who underwent TEVAR. Both PSM and IPTW showed that patients who underwent TEVAR for concomitant BTAI had a greater delayed need for blood transfusions and a larger proportion of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage than patients who did not undergo the procedure. The MLR analysis showed that TEVAR for BTAI was an independent risk factor for delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage (odds ratio: 10.534, 95%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: An increased probability of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage in patients with BAT (who could be managed conservatively) was observed in patients who underwent TEVAR for concomitant BTAI. CLINICAL IMPACT: More attention should be give in patients with high grade aortic injuries and concomitant abdominal trauma.

8.
World J Surg ; 46(12): 2882-2889, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36131183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with unconsciousness and normal initial head computed tomography (CT) present a clinical dilemma for physicians and neurosurgeons in the emergency department (ED). We recorded how long it took for patients to regain consciousness and evaluated the patients' characteristics. METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, TBI patients with unconsciousness and normal initial head CT [Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score < 13, negative CT scan and normal laboratory test results] were evaluated. Patients who regained consciousness were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analyses were used to evaluate independent factors for regaining consciousness. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in this study. Fifty-eight (75.3%) patients regained consciousness, most within one day (43.1%). Nineteen (24.7%) patients never regained consciousness. MLR analysis showed that initial GCS score (odds 1.85, p = 0.017), early airway protection in ED (odds 25.02, p = 0.018) and 72-h GCS score improvement by two points (odds 0.02, p = 0.001) were independent factors for regaining consciousness. Overall, 94.1% of patients who received early airway protection and improved 2 points in 72-h GCS score regained consciousness. The association between days to M5 status and days to M6 status (consciousness) was highly significant. Fewer days to M5 status were highly associated with needing fewer days to regain consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: For TBI patients with unconsciousness and normal initial head CT, a higher probability of regaining consciousness was observed in those who underwent early airway protection and who improved 2 points in 72-h GCS score. Regaining consciousness within a short period could be expected in patients with M5 status.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Inconsciencia , Humanos , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Inconsciencia/diagnóstico por imagen , Inconsciencia/etiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
9.
BMC Surg ; 22(1): 271, 2022 Jul 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35836219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are the most common thoracic injury in patients who sustained blunt trauma, and potentially life-threatening associated injuries are prevalent. Multi-disciplinary work-up is crucial to achieving a comprehensive understanding of these patients. The present study demonstrated the experience of an acute care surgery (ACS) model for rib fracture management from a single level I trauma center over 13 years. METHODS: Data from patients diagnosed with acute rib fractures from January 2008 to December 2020 were collected from the trauma registry of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Information, including patient age, sex, injury mechanism, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) in different anatomic regions, injury severity score (ISS), index admission department, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), total admission LOS, mortality, and other characteristics of multiple rib fracture, were analyzed. Patients who received surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) were analyzed separately, and basic demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between acute care and thoracic surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 5103 patients diagnosed with acute rib fracture were admitted via the emergency department (ED) of CGMH in the 13-year study period. The Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TR) received the most patients (70.8%), and the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (CTS) received only 3.1% of the total patients. SSRF was initiated in 2017, and TR performed fixation for 141 patients, while CTS operated for 16 patients. The basic demographics were similar between the two groups, and no significant differences were noted in the outcomes, including LOS, LCU LOS, length of indwelling chest tube, or complications. There was only one mortality in all SSRF patients, and the patient was from the CTS group. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care surgeons provided good-quality care to rib fracture patients, whether SSRF or non-SSRF. Acute care surgeons also safely performed SSRF. Therefore, we propose that the ACS model may be an option for rib fracture management, depending on the deployment of staff in each institute.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas , Cirujanos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos
10.
BMC Emerg Med ; 22(1): 36, 2022 03 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed. METHODS: Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Traumatismos del Cuello , Quemaduras/terapia , Disnea , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Examen Físico , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Surg Endosc ; 35(12): 6623-6632, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33258028

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common surgical emergency. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) provides a reliable algorithm for the treatment of AC patients to achieve optimal outcomes. However, the economic benefits have not been validated. We hypothesize that good outcomes and cost savings can both be achieved if patients are treated according to the TG18. METHOD: This retrospective study included 275 patients who underwent cholecystectomy in a 15-month span. Patients were divided into three groups (group 1: mild AC; group 2: moderate AC with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class ≤ 2 and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≤ 5; and group 3: moderate AC with ASA class ≥ 3, CCI score ≥ 6, or severe AC). Each group was further divided into two subgroups according to management (followed or deviated from the TG18). Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and hospital costs were compared. RESULTS: For group 1 patients, 77 (81%) were treated according to the TG18 and had a significantly higher successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) rate (100%), lower hospital cost ($1896 vs $2388), and shorter hospital stay (2.9 vs 8 days) than those whose treatment deviated from the TG18. For group 2 patients, 50 (67%) were treated according to the TG18 and had a significantly lower hospital cost ($1926 vs $2856), shorter hospital stay (3.9 vs 9.9 days), and lower complication rate (0% vs 12.5%). For group 3 patients, 62 (58%) were treated according to the TG18 and had a significantly lower intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (9.7% vs 25%), but a longer hospital stay (12.6 vs 7.8 days). However, their hospital costs were similar. Early LC in group 3 patients did not have economic benefits over gallbladder drainage and delayed LC. CONCLUSION: The TG18 are the state-of-the-art guidelines for the treatment of AC, achieving both satisfactory outcomes and cost-effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tokio , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
World J Surg ; 45(4): 1080-1087, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454793

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common procedure for cholelithiasis paid by diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) systems. However, acute cholecystitis (AC) patients usually have heterogeneous conditions that compromise the successful implementation of DRGs. We evaluated the quality/efficiency of treating AC patients under the DRG system in Taiwan. METHODS: All AC patients who underwent LC between October 2015 and December 2016 were included. Patient demographics, treatment outcomes, and financial results were analyzed. Patients were reimbursed by one of the two DRG schemes based on their comorbidities/complications (CC): DRG-1, LC without CC; and DRG-2, LC with CC. Hospitals were reimbursed the costs incurred if they were below the lower threshold (balanced sector); with the outlier threshold if costs were between the lower and outlier thresholds (profitable sector); and with the outlier threshold plus 80% of the exceeding cost if costs were higher than the outlier threshold (profit-losing sector). RESULTS: Among 246 patients, 114 were paid by DRG-1, and 132 were by DRG-2. In total, 195 of 246 patients underwent LC within 1 day after admission, and patients with mild AC had shorter hospital stays than those with moderate or severe AC. The complication rate was 7.3% with only one mortality. In total, 92.1% of patients in DRG-1 and 90.9% of patients in DRG-2 were profitable. The average margin per patient was 11,032 TWD for DRG-1 and 24,993 TWD for DRG-2. CONCLUSIONS: DRGs can be well adopted for acute care surgery, and hospitals can still provide satisfactory services without losing profit.


Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Medicare , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Hospitales , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Prospectivos , Taiwán , Estados Unidos
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 39: 121-124, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is among the most difficult challenges in trauma treatment. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) screening for suspicious BCVI in patients with polytrauma. METHODS: We reviewed the trauma registry and medical records of patients with head and neck injuries from a Level I trauma center between January 2012 and December 2016. Those receiving CTA within 24 h of presentation at the emergency department were the primary CTA group; those who received CTA after 24 h were the delayed CTA group. The basic demographics, indications for CTA, CTA severity grading, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In all, 228 patients received brain CTA. Most were male (75%); the mean age was around 40 years. The 38 patients with positive BCVI had a significantly higher ratio of severe chest trauma (52.6% vs 25.8%, p = 0.001); 26 of them received primary CTA and 12 received delayed CTA. Patients with polytrauma predominated in the delayed CTA group (66.7% vs 30.8%, p = 0.037). Of the patients in the primary CTA group, 26.9% received CTA due to symptomatic presentation (p = 0.047). Patients in the delayed group had better neurological outcomes (83% neurologically intact, vs 38.5%, p = 0.01) and lower mortality (0% vs 26.9%, p = 0.047). The only independent positive prognostic factor was initial motor response ≥M5 (Odds Ratio 21.46, 95% Confidence Interval 2.01-228.71). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with polytrauma, performing brain CTA for BCVI screening in the first 24-h or after may not affect clinical outcome. Initial motor response is the sole indicator for outcome. Delaying the study for to the next 24-hour can be considered in such patients, when regarding hemodynamic stability, the dose of contrast medium, and the radiation exposure.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuroimagen/métodos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Tardío , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
14.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 33(9): 2479-2490, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818749

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been shown to be an independent negative predictor of surgical outcomes in geriatric patients. Traditional measurements of muscle strength and mass are impractical in emergency settings, and computed tomography (CT)-measured skeletal muscle mass has been proposed as an alternative. However, the cutoff values for low muscle mass are still unknown, and their impact on abdominal emergencies in the elderly population is unclear. METHODS: A total of 462 young trauma patients aged 18-40 years were analyzed to establish sex-specific reference cutoff values for the CT-measured muscle index (MI) and muscle gauge (MG) values. The impacts of low MI and MG values were investigated in 1192 elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) undergoing abdominal surgery. RESULTS: The sex-specific cutoff values for MI and MG were determined by adopting European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 guidelines. The correlation between MG and aging was significantly stronger than that between MI and ageing. With regard to the MG, the L4 psoas muscle gauge (L4 PMG) was further investigated in an elderly cohort owing to its high predictive value and ease of use in the clinical setting. A low L4 PMG value was an independent risk factor for overall complications and mortality in elderly patients with abdominal emergencies. CONCLUSION: The current study was the largest study investigating the correlations between MG values and aging in the Asian population. A low L4 PMG value may help surgeons during preoperative decision making regarding geriatric patients with abdominal emergencies.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas , Sarcopenia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fuerza Muscular , Músculo Esquelético , Músculos Psoas/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculos Psoas/patología , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcopenia/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
15.
World J Surg ; 44(9): 2985-2992, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32383055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The advanced technology of interventional radiology may contribute to a rapid and timely angioembolization for hemostasis. We hypothesized that unstable hemodynamics is no longer an absolute contraindication of nonoperative management (NOM) in blunt splenic injury patients using rapid angioembolization. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2019, blunt splenic injury patients with unstable hemodynamics [initial pulse >120 beats/min or systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg] were included. Either emergency surgery or angioembolization was performed for hemostasis because of their unstable status. The characteristics of patients who underwent angioembolization or surgery were compared in each group (all patients, patients with hypotension, patients without response to resuscitation and hypotensive patients without response to resuscitation). RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included in the current study. With respect to all patients, 68.5% (N = 50) of patients underwent NOM with angioembolization for hemostasis. Patients who underwent angioembolization for hemostasis had a significantly lower base deficit (5.3 ± 3.8 vs. 8.3 ± 5.2 mmol/L, p = 0.006) and a higher proportion of response to resuscitation (82.0% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001) than did patients who underwent surgery. However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of hypotension (58.0% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.558) between these two groups. There were 44 patients with hypotension, and the angioembolization could be performed in 65.9% (N = 29) of them. Patients who underwent angioembolization had a significantly higher proportion of response to resuscitation than did patients who underwent surgery (89.7% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001). In hypotensive patients without response to resuscitation (N = 13), 23.1% (N = 3) of the patients underwent angioembolization successfully. There was no significant difference in time to hemostasis procedure between patients who underwent angioembolization or surgery (24.7 ± 2.1 vs. 26.3 ± 16.7 min, p = 0.769). The demographics, vital signs, blood transfusion amount, injury severity, mortality rate and length of stay of patients who underwent angioembolization were not significantly different from patients who underwent surgery in each group. CONCLUSIONS: With a short preparation time of angioembolization, the NOM could be performed selectively for hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury. The base deficit serves as an early detector of the requirement of surgical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Humanos , Hipotensión/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resucitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas no Penetrantes/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
16.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(8): e17686, 2020 08 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32857060

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The application of mobile health (mHealth) platforms to monitor recovery in the postdischarge period has increased in recent years. Despite widespread enthusiasm for mHealth, few studies have evaluated the usability and user experience of mHealth in patients with surgical drainage. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to (1) develop an image-based smartphone app, SurgCare, for postdrainage monitoring and (2) determine the feasibility and clinical value of the use of SurgCare by patients with drainage. METHODS: We enrolled 80 patients with biliary or peritoneal drainage in this study. A total of 50 patients were assigned to the SurgCare group, who recorded drainage monitoring data with the smartphone app; and 30 patients who manually recorded the data were assigned to the conventional group. The patients continued to record data until drain removal. The primary aim was to validate feasibility for the user, which was defined as the proportion of patients using each element of the system. Moreover, the secondary aim was to evaluate the association of compliance with SurgCare and the occurrence of unexpected events. RESULTS: The average submission duration was 14.98 days, and the overall daily submission rate was 84.2%. The average system usability scale was 83.7 (SD 3.5). This system met the definition of "definitely feasible" in 34 patients, "possibly feasible" in 10 patients, and "not feasible" in 3 patients. We found that the occurrence rates of complications in the SurgCare group and the conventional group were 6% and 26%, respectively, with statistically significant differences P=.03. The rate of unexpected hospital return was lower in the SurgCare group (6%) than in the conventional groups (26%) (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients can learn to use a smartphone app for postdischarge drainage monitoring with high levels of user satisfaction. We also identified a high degree of compliance with app-based drainage-recording design features, which is an aspect of mHealth that can improve surgical care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Aplicaciones Móviles/normas , Telemedicina/métodos , Diseño Centrado en el Usuario , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
17.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(4): 603-607, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29941322

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, pelvic fracture-related acute retroperitoneal hemorrhage (ARH) is life threatening and difficult to control. However, the use of angioembolization to treat fracture-associated ARH improves the hemodynamic stability of patients with pelvic fractures. The role of angioembolization in the management of patients with pelvic fracture-related ARH was examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a large case series of patients with pelvic fractures between January 2010 and December 2014. Comparisons were made between patients with and without ARH. In addition, the characteristics of mortality were delineated, whereas the causes of death in patients with pelvic fracture were discussed and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1070 patient records were reviewed during the 60-month study period, and the overall mortality rate of pelvic fracture was 7.7% (82/1070). However, there were only seven patients who died due to uncontrolled ARH (0.7%). The patients with ARH had more injuries to other organs than did the patients without ARH (head: 79.7% vs. 31.7%, p < 0.001; chest: 50.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001; abdomen: 72.0% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.001; spine: 12.6% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001; extremities: 69.2% vs. 44.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The treatment for pelvic fracture patients declared dead upon arrival remains limited. However, pelvic fracture-related ARH could be controlled effectively with angioembolization. In addition to ARH, injuries to other organs may play a key role in the mortality of patients with pelvic fractures.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Hemorragia/terapia , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Adulto , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/mortalidad , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espacio Retroperitoneal/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán , Centros Traumatológicos , Adulto Joven
18.
World J Surg ; 42(7): 2028-2035, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29299644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Corrosive ingestion results in necrosis of the digestive tract, spillage of intraluminal fluid, and spread of bacteria that threatens the lives of patients. Some authors advise extensive surgery, although others recommend conservative operation. This study presents the outcomes of the patients of corrosive injury who undergo emergent surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review including patients with corrosive injury from Jan 2007 to Dec 2013. We retrieved and analyzed the demographic characteristics, injury location and extent, endoscopic grade, presence of surgery, surgical timing and procedure, and mortality. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 112 patients; 23 of the patients underwent an emergent operation. Patients who needed emergent surgery had the worse endoscopic severity and a higher mortality rate of 47.8% (12/23). Perforation of the digestive tract [odds ratio (OR) 13.5, p = 0.011] and unscheduled reoperation (OR 13.2, p = 0.033) were factors that predict mortality. CONCLUSION: Corrosive injury resulted in a dismal prognosis, especially when patients required an operation. The mortality is related to digestive tract perforation and unscheduled reoperation. Inadequate resection might lead to unscheduled reoperations, which lead to a dismal prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras Químicas/cirugía , Cáusticos/toxicidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/lesiones , Tracto Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Quemaduras Químicas/diagnóstico , Quemaduras Químicas/mortalidad , Ingestión de Alimentos , Urgencias Médicas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Surg Endosc ; 29(6): 1394-9, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25171885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard treatment of acute appendicitis for the general population; however, there is still some doubt regarding its safety for pregnant patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the maternal outcome of pregnant patients with acute appendicitis following either an open appendectomy (OA) or LA from a population-based database. METHODS: This study is based on the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with both ICD-9-CM codes for appendicitis (540.9, 540.0, and 540.1) and pregnancy (V22) in the same admission were considered to have acute appendicitis during pregnancy. These patients were divided into three groups according to the type of treatment: LA, OA, and non-operative treatment. Outcome measures that were compared between the groups included maternal complications such as preterm labor, abortion, and the need of cesarean section. Besides, the differences of medical expenditure and length of hospital stay between the groups were also analyzed. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2010, a total of 859 pregnant women who had acute appendicitis were identified. They had increased risks for preterm labor, abortion, and increased requirement of cesarean section compared to the control group (i.e., those without acute appendicitis). Among the three groups, the non-operated group has the highest risk of preterm labor. Patients who underwent LA did not have any increased risk of maternal complications compared to the OA group. Furthermore, LA patients had shorter hospital stay than OA. CONCLUSION: Compared to non-operative treatment, appendectomy is the preferred treatment for pregnant patients who have acute appendicitis. LA can be performed safely in pregnant patients without bringing additional maternal complications compared to OA.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/cirugía , Adulto , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Taiwán , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda