RESUMEN
Anti-CD20 therapy to deplete B cells is highly efficacious in preventing new white matter lesions in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but its protective capacity against gray matter injury and axonal damage is unclear. In a passive experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model whereby TH17 cells promote brain leptomeningeal immune cell aggregates, we found that anti-CD20 treatment effectively spared myelin content and prevented myeloid cell activation, oxidative damage, and mitochondrial stress in the subpial gray matter. Anti-CD20 treatment increased B cell survival factor (BAFF) in the serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and leptomeninges of mice with EAE. Although anti-CD20 prevented gray matter demyelination, axonal loss, and neuronal atrophy, co-treatment with anti-BAFF abrogated these benefits. Consistent with the murine studies, we observed that elevated BAFF concentrations after anti-CD20 treatment in patients with RRMS were associated with better clinical outcomes. Moreover, BAFF promoted survival of human neurons in vitro. Together, our data demonstrate that BAFF exerts beneficial functions in MS and EAE in the context of anti-CD20 treatment.
Asunto(s)
Encefalomielitis Autoinmune Experimental , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Neuroprotección , Encéfalo , Sustancia Gris , Presentación de Antígeno , Atrofia , Encefalomielitis Autoinmune Experimental/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
One of the biggest challenges in managing multiple sclerosis is the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations and progression trajectories. It still remains to be elucidated whether this heterogeneity is reflected by discrete immune signatures in the blood as a surrogate of disease pathophysiology. Accordingly, individualized treatment selection based on immunobiological principles is still not feasible. Using two independent multicentric longitudinal cohorts of patients with early multiple sclerosis (n = 309 discovery and n = 232 validation), we were able to identify three distinct peripheral blood immunological endophenotypes by a combination of high-dimensional flow cytometry and serum proteomics, followed by unsupervised clustering. Longitudinal clinical and paraclinical follow-up data collected for the cohorts revealed that these endophenotypes were associated with disease trajectories of inflammation versus early structural damage. Investigating the capacity of immunotherapies to normalize endophenotype-specific immune signatures revealed discrete effect sizes as illustrated by the limited effect of interferon-ß on endophenotype 3-related immune signatures. Accordingly, patients who fell into endophenotype 3 subsequently treated with interferon-ß exhibited higher disease progression and MRI activity over a 4-year follow-up compared with treatment with other therapies. We therefore propose that ascertaining a patient's blood immune signature before immunomodulatory treatment initiation may facilitate prediction of clinical disease trajectories and enable personalized treatment decisions based on pathobiological principles.