Global justice and the opportunity costs of conservation.

Opportunity costs can represent a significant portion of the costs associated with conservation projects and frequently outstrip other kinds of cost. They are typically understood to refer to the benefits someone would have obtained if conservation projects had not required them to give up current activities, such as farming or hunting or if the land had been available for uses other than conservation. This familiar way of identifying opportunity costs is flawed, however, because it threatens to condone, or take advantage of, the injustices that many people face that affect their opportunities. I integrated ideas from the political theory of global justice to examine how the analysis of opportunity costs illustrates the importance of considering conservation and issues of global justice together, rather than thinking about them in isolation. I distinguish four baselines for defining opportunity costs. A status quo baseline defines opportunity costs by asking what people would have earned had a conservation project not happened. A willingness to accept baseline defines them by asking people what it would take to make them indifferent to whether a conservation project takes place or not. An antipoverty baseline suggests that opportunity costs have been met when people affected by a project are not left in poverty. An egalitarian baseline suggests opportunity costs have been met when people are not left in relative disadvantage, with worse than average opportunities. I argue that the egalitarian baseline is the most acceptable from the point of view of justice. Such a baseline would suggest that, in practice, many of the world's poor are being unjustly treated, or even exploited, as a result of conservation activities.

Los costos de oportunidad pueden representar una porción significativa de los costos asociados con los proyectos de conservación y con frecuencia superan otros tipos de costos. Comúnmente se entiende que estos costos se refieren a los beneficios que alguien habría obtenido si los proyectos de conservación no los hubieran requerido para renunciar a ciertas actividades, como la agricultura o la cacería, o si la tierra hubiera estado disponible para otros usos además de la conservación. Sin embargo, esta manera familiar de identificar los costos de oportunidad es defectuosa ya que amenaza con perdonar, o aprovechar, las injusticias que muchas personas enfrentan y que afectan sus oportunidades. Integré ideas de la teoría política de la justicia global para examinar cómo el análisis de los costos de oportunidad ilustra la importancia de considerar en conjunto la conservación y los temas de justicia global, en lugar de considerarlos de manera aislada. Distingo cuatro líneas base para definir los costos de oportunidad. Una línea base de orden establecido define los costos de oportunidad al preguntar a las personas lo que habrían obtenido de no haberse realizado un proyecto de conservación. Una línea base de la voluntad de aceptación las define al preguntar a las personas qué necesitarían para volverse indiferentes a si se realiza o no un proyecto de conservación. Una línea base de antipobreza sugiere que los costos de oportunidad se han cumplido cuando las personas afectadas por un proyecto no quedan en la pobreza. Una línea base igualitaria sugiere que los costos de oportunidad se han cumplido cuando las personas no quedan en una desventaja relativa, con peores oportunidades al promedio. Argumento que la línea base igualitaria es la más aceptable desde el punto de vista de la justicia. Dicha línea base sugeriría que, en la práctica, muchas de las personas que viven en pobreza son tratadas injustamente, o incluso explotadas, como resultado de las actividades de conservación.

Eliminating morbidity caused by neglected tropical diseases by 2030.

The objective of this manuscript is to provide selective examples of the work of the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Parasite Epidemiology and Control which contribute to the WHO goal of eliminating neglected tropical diseases by 2030. This PAHO/WHO CC specifically aligns its activities with the Sustainable Development Goals and with the goals outlined in the WHO Road Map for Neglected Tropical Diseases 2021-2030. Its role is to contribute to advancing global action on NTDs, primarily through policy development and knowledge translation. Three important projects have recently been completed: 1. Finalizing the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the NTD Road Map (published May 2021; this PAHO/WHO CC was a member of the working group); 2. Developing new guidelines for the preventive chemotherapy of Taenia solium taeniasis (published September 2021; this PAHO/WHO CC was co-Chair; and 3. Formulating a policy brief on deworming for adolescent girls and women of reproductive age (published January 2022; this PAHO/WHO CC is co-lead). These projects are the result of the integration of expertise and experience from multiple partners, including from PAHO and WHO (where both organizations provided key leadership), this PAHO/WHO CC, government ministries, civil society organizations and universities, among others. In conclusion, this PAHO/WHO CC contributes timely guidance to country-led evidence-informed public health policy, to cost-effective program implementation and to the identification of priority research topics - all focused, ultimately, on eliminating NTD-attributable morbidity by 2030.

El objetivo de este artículo es proporcionar ejemplos seleccionados de la labor del centro colaborador de investigación y capacitación en epidemiología y control de parásitos de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud (OPS/OMS), que contribuye al objetivo de la OMS de eliminar las enfermedades tropicales desatendidas para el 2030. Este centro colaborador de la OPS/OMS alinea sus actividades específicamente con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y con los objetivos descritos en la Hoja de ruta sobre enfermedades tropicales desatendidas 2021-2030 de la OMS. Su función es contribuir al avance de las medidas mundiales sobre las enfermedades tropicales desatendidas, principalmente mediante la elaboración de políticas y la traducción de conocimiento. Recientemente se han completado tres proyectos importantes: 1) finalización del marco de seguimiento y evaluación de la Hoja de ruta sobre enfermedades tropicales desatendidas (publicado en mayo del 2021; este centro colaborador de la OPS/OMS formó parte del grupo de trabajo); 2) elaboración de nuevas directrices para la quimioterapia preventiva de la teniasis por Taenia solium (publicado en septiembre del 2021; este centro colaborador fue copresidente); y 3) formulación de un informe de políticas sobre la desparasitación de las adolescentes y las mujeres en edad reproductiva (publicado en enero del 2022; este centro colaborador fue coautor). Estos proyectos son el resultado de la integración del conocimiento y la experiencia de múltiples asociados, como la OPS y la OMS (ambas organizaciones ofrecieron un liderazgo clave), este centro colaborador de la OPS/OMS, así como varios ministerios gubernamentales, organizaciones de la sociedad civil y universidades, entre otros. En conclusión, este centro colaborador de la OPS/OMS ofrece orientaciones oportunas para las políticas de salud pública basadas en la evidencia lideradas por los países, la ejecución de programas costo-efectivos y la determinación de los temas de investigación prioritarios, todo ello destinado, en última instancia, a eliminar la morbilidad atribuible a las enfermedades tropicales desatendidas para el 2030.

O objetivo deste manuscrito é fornecer exemplos seletivos do trabalho do Centro Colaborador de Pesquisa e Treinamento em Epidemiologia e Controle de Parasitos da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde/Organização Mundial da Saúde (OPAS/OMS) que contribuem para a meta da OMS de eliminar até 2030 as doenças tropicais negligenciadas. Este CC da OPAS/OMS alinha especificamente suas atividades com os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável e com as metas delineadas no Roteiro da OMS para Doenças Tropicais Negligenciadas 2021-2030. Seu papel é contribuir para o avanço da ação global contra doenças tropicais negligenciadas, principalmente por meio do desenvolvimento de políticas e da tradução de conhecimentos. Três importantes projetos foram concluídos recentemente: 1. Finalização da Estrutura de Monitoramento e Avaliação do Roteiro para as DTN (publicada em maio de 2021 ­ este CC da OPAS/OMS foi membro do grupo de trabalho); 2. Desenvolvimento de novas diretrizes para a quimioprofilaxia da teníase por Taenia solium (publicado em setembro de 2021 ­ este CC da OPAS/OMS foi copresidente); e 3. Formulação de orientação para políticas de desparasitação para adolescentes e mulheres em idade reprodutiva (publicado em janeiro de 2022 ­ este CC da OPAS/OMS foi cogestor). Esses projetos são o resultado da integração de conhecimentos e experiência de múltiplos parceiros, incluindo a OPAS e a OMS (onde ambas as organizações forneceram liderança essencial), este CC da OPAS/OMS, ministérios governamentais, organizações da sociedade civil e universidades, entre outros. Em suma, este CC da OPAS/OMS contribui com orientações oportunas para uma política de saúde pública liderada pelos países e informada com base em evidências, para a implementação de programas com boa relação custo-benefício e para a identificação de tópicos prioritários de pesquisa ­ todos focados, em última análise, na eliminação da morbidade atribuível às DTN até 2030.

La pobreza extrema es prioridad: Un argumento sobre la distribución equitativa de la vacuna contra el COVID-19 en Perú.

La humanidad ya dispone de vacunas eficaces contra el COVID-19. En Perú se administraron 86 millones de dosis para cubrir la demanda de 33 millones de peruanos. Para ello, se ha priorizado la vacunación en grupos clave: personal de salud, sujetos con condiciones de salud preexistentes y mayores de 65 años. Sin embargo, dada la problemática social y la situación de la salud pública en Perú, este trabajo defiende que la prioridad de la vacunación debe centrarse en la población que vive en extrema pobreza. El método utilizado fue una argumentación ética sobre la distribución de la vacuna contra el COVID-19 en Perú. Esta argumentación se basa en el análisis de la población peruana que vive en extrema pobreza, la cual presenta diferentes estratos de vulnerabilidad, y que, ante una eventual infección por SARS-CoV-2, se irían agravando uno tras otro, a través de un efecto en cascada. Este escenario daría lugar a nuevas vulnerabilidades de las ya existentes, causando mayores daños. Los esfuerzos de vacunación en esta población clave les brindaría oportunidad de seguir encontrando formas de llevar alimentos a sus hogares, reduciendo significativamente el riesgo de contagio en su entorno y mitigando el efecto devastador de las enfermedades locales a las que ya está expuesta. Se plantean cuatro objeciones relacionadas con este argumento, con sus correspondientes respuestas. El acceso prioritario a la vacuna reduciría significativamente el daño a las personas que viven en la extrema pobreza, haciendo prevalecer los principios de justicia y equidad.

Mental health and sleep quality of low-income mothers of one-year-olds during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social restrictions created an unprecedented context for families raising young children. Although studies have documented detrimental effects of the pandemic on maternal well-being, less is known about how the pandemic specifically impacted low-income mothers. We examined depression, anxiety, and sleep quality among low-income mothers of one-year-olds during the early months of the pandemic using data from the Baby's First Years study. Focusing on the control group (n = 547), we compared mothers interviewed before March 14th, 2020 (n = 342) to mothers interviewed between March 14th and June 30th, 2020 (n = 205) to determine whether the pandemic was associated with differences in mental health and sleep quality. Mothers were recruited from four cities in the United States, and most of the sample identified as Hispanic (42.2%) or Black, non-Hispanic (38.6%). We found that mothers interviewed during the pandemic reported better mental health and sleep quality. While we cannot speak to longer-term impacts of the pandemic, it is possible low-income mothers experienced relief from daily stressors during the initial shelter-in-place orders, which may have led to improvements in well-being. These results have implications for understanding how complex life stressors influence mental health and sleep quality among low-income mothers raising young children.

La pandemia del COVID-19 y las subsecuentes restricciones sociales crearon un contexto sin precedentes para las familias que estaban criando niños pequeños. Aunque los estudios han documentado los efectos perjudiciales de la pandemia sobre el bienestar materno, menos se conoce acerca de cómo la pandemia específicamente tuvo un impacto sobre madres de bajos recursos económicos. Examinamos la depresión, ansiedad y calidad del sueño entre madres de bajos recursos económicos de niños de un año de edad durante los primeros meses de la pandemia usando datos del estudio Primeros Años del Bebé. Enfocándonos en el grupo de control (n = 547), comparamos las madres entrevistadas antes del 14 de marzo de 2020 (n = 342) con madres entrevistadas entre el 14 de marzo y el 30 de junio de 2020 (n = 205) para determinar si la pandemia se asociaba con diferencias en salud mental y calidad del sueño. A las madres se les reclutó en cuatro ciudades de Estados Unidos y la mayor parte del grupo muestra se identificaron como Hispanas (42.2%) o Negras no Hispanas (38.6%). Encontramos que las madres entrevistadas durante la pandemia reportaron mejor salud mental y calidad del sueño. A pesar de que no podemos hablar sobre el impacto a largo plazo de la pandemia, es posible que las madres de bajos recursos económicos experimentaran alivio en los factores diarios de estrés durante el inicial mandato de quedarse en su casa, lo cual pudiera haber llevado a mejoras en el bienestar. Estos resultados tienen implicaciones para comprender cómo los complejos factores de estrés influyen en la salud mental y la calidad del sueño entre madres de bajos recursos económicos que crían a niños pequeños.

La pandémie du COVID-19 et les restrictions sociales qui en ont découlé ont créé un contexte sans précédent pour les familles élevant de jeunes enfants. Bien que des études aient documenté des effets préjudiciables de la pandémie sur le bien-être maternel, on en sait moins sur la manière dont la pandémie a spécifiquement impacté les mères de milieux défavorisés. Nous avons examiné la dépression, l'anxiété, et la qualité du sommeil chez des mères de milieux défavorisés avec un enfant d'un an durant les premiers mois de la pandémie, en utilisant des données de l'étude Baby's First Years. Nous concentrant sur le groupe de contrôle (n = 547), nous avons comparé des mères interviewées avant le 14 mars 2020 (n = 342) à des mères interviewées entre le 14 mars et le 30 juin 2020 (n = 205) afin de déterminer si la pandémie était liée à des différences en santé mentale et en qualité de sommeil. Les mères ont été recrutées dans quatre villes des Etats-Unis et la plupart de l'échantillon s'identifiait comme Hispanique (42,2%) ou Noires, non hispaniques (38,6%). Nous avons trouvé que les mères interviewées Durant la pandémie faisaient état d'une meilleure santé mentale et d'une meilleure qualité de sommeil. Bien que nous ne puissions pas parler des impacts de la pandémie à long terme, il est possible que les mères de milieux défavorisés aient fait l'expérience d'un soulagement des facteurs de stress quotidiens durant la période initiale de confinement, ce qui pourrait avoir mené à des améliorations dans le bien-être. Ces résultats ont des implications pour la compréhension de la manière dont des facteurs de stress complexes influencent la santé mentale et la qualité du sommeil chez les mères de milieux défavorisés élevant de jeunes enfants.

Enhancing maternal sensitivity in contexts of urban extreme poverty in Sierra Leone: A pilot study.

This pilot study presents preliminary data on the efficacy of Strong Bonds, Strong Pikin (SBSP), a brief intervention program that aims to enhance sensitivity among mothers who care for their preschool children in a slum settlement in Freetown (Sierra Leone). SBSP adapts principles of attachment theory to intervention within a non-Western cultural setting, where families suffer from extreme poverty. A combination of psychoeducation, group work, video-feedback, and storytelling defines the methodology of the program. Maternal sensitivity, parenting stress, and the use of violent discipline practices were measured before (pretest) and after the intervention (posttest) in a sample of 43 mothers who participated in the program. Analyses showed a significant increase in observed maternal sensitivity, as well as a decrease in mother-reported parenting stress, child problems, and use of violent discipline practices from pretest to posttest. These results are discussed in terms of the potential value of culturally sensitive, attachment-centered interventions with caregivers who raise their children in non-Western settings affected by economic vulnerability.

Este estudio experimental presenta información preliminar acerca de la efectividad de "Fuertes Lazos, Fuertes Niños" (Strong Bonds, Strong Pikin - SBSP) un programa de intervención breve para mejorar la sensibilidad entre madres que cuidad a sus niños de edad prescolar en un asentamiento de barrios bajos en Freetown (Sierra Leona). El programa SBSP adapta principios de la teoría de la afectividad para la intervención dentro de un escenario cultural no occidental, donde las familias sufren extrema pobreza. Una combinación de educación sicológica, trabajo de grupo, información acerca de videos, así como el recuento de historias definen la metodología del programa. La sensibilidad materna, el estrés de crianza y el uso de severas prácticas de disciplinas del tipo "disciplinaviolenta" se midieron antes (pre-examen) y después de la intervención (posterior al examen) en un grupo muestra de 43 madres que participaron en el programa. Los análisis mostraron un aumento significativo en la observada sensibilidad materna, así como una reducción en el estrés de crianza reportado por la madre, problemas del niño y el uso de severas prácticas de disciplinas del tipo "disciplinaviolenta" desde el pre-examen hasta después del examen. Estos resultados se discuten en términos del valor potencial de las culturalmente sensibles intervenciones centradas en la afectividad con cuidadores que crían a sus niños en asentamientos no occidentales afectados por la vulnerabilidad económica.

Cette étude pilote présente des données préliminaires sur l'efficacité de « Strong Bonds, Strong Pikin ¼ (SBSP), un programme d'intervention brève qui a pour but d'améliorer la sensibilité chez les mères qui prennent soin de leur enfant d'âge préscolaire dans un bidonville de Freetown en Sierra Leone. Le SBSP adapte les principes de la théorie de l'attachement à une intervention dans un contexte non-occidentale, où les familles souffrent d'une pauvreté extrême. Une combinaison de psychoéducation, de travail de groupe, de commentaires vidéo, et de d'art de conter définit la méthodologie de ce programme. La sensibilité maternelle, le stress de parentage et l'utilisation de pratiques disciplinaires dures et violentes sont mesurés avant (prétest) et après l'intervention (post-test) chez un échantillon de 43 mères qui ont participé au programme. Les analyses ont montré une augmentation importante dans la sensibilité maternelle observée ainsi une baisse dans le stress de parentage rapporté par les mères, une baisse des problèmes avec l'enfant et une baisse dans l'utilisation de pratiques disciplinaires dures et violentes du prétest au post test. Ces résultats sont discutés en termes de valeur potentielle d'interventions sensibles culturellement adaptées et centrées sur l'attachement avec des personnes qui élèvent leurs enfants dans des contextes non-occidentaux et affectées par une vulnérabilité économique.

Uncovering Multidimensional Poverty Experiences in Shaping Children's Socioemotional Trajectories during the First 6 Years of Schooling.

The extant literature has attested to the importance of poverty on child well-being generally using a unidimensional approach. Researchers have yet to establish solid evidence on how multiple dimensions of poverty (e.g., depth, volatility, and spells of exposure) might be associated with children's socioemotional well-being during their early school years. Building upon Bronfenbrenner's bioecological systems theory, this study used latent class analysis to identify poverty patterns by incorporating multiple dimensions of poverty and investigated the relationship between multidimensional poverty patterns and children's socioemotional trajectories from kindergarten through fifth grade. Using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999 (ECLS-K), a longitudinal dataset featuring a nationally representative cohort of children in the United States (N ≈ 20,090), the analysis identified seven poverty groups. Each group exhibited a unique poverty or economic pattern that incorporates the three poverty dimensions. Growth-curve results indicate that multidimensional poverty patterns were significantly associated with externalizing and internalizing behaviors both at kindergarten and over time by fifth grade. Children with the acutest form of economic deprivation-extreme poverty, volatile income, and multiple spells of poverty exposure-were reported to have the worst outcomes. The significant variations in children's socioemotional trajectories due to different poverty patterns highlight the importance of poverty reduction and prevention strategies corresponding to those patterns for optimal effect. This study suggests a focus not just on helping families exit poverty temporarily, but on improving their economic security as a way to nurture children's socioemotional well-being.

La bibliografía existente ha avalado la importancia de la pobreza en el bienestar de los niños, generalmente usando un enfoque unidimensional. Los investigadores aun tienen que demostrar con pruebas sólidas cómo las múltiples dimensiones de la pobreza (p. ej.: la profundidad, la volatilidad y los periodos de exposición) podrían estar asociadas con el bienestar socioemocional de los niños durante sus primeros años de escolarización. Basándose en la teoría bioecológica de sistemas de Bronfenbrenner, este estudio utilizó el análisis de clases latentes para identificar patrones de pobreza incorporando varias dimensiones de pobreza e investigó la relación entre los patrones multidimensionales de pobreza y las trayectorias socioemocionales de los niños desde el jardín de infantes hasta quinto grado. Utilizando el Estudio longitudinal de la primera infancia, promoción de jardín de infantes de 1998-99 (ECLS-K), un conjunto de datos longitudinales que presenta una cohorte de niños de los Estados Unidos representativa a nivel nacional (N ≈ 20,090), el análisis identificó siete grupos de pobreza. Cada grupo expuso un patrón económico o de pobreza único que incorporó las tres dimensiones de pobreza. Los resultados de la curva de crecimiento indican que los patrones multidimensionales de pobreza estuvieron asociados significativamente con conductas exteriorizadas e interiorizadas tanto en el jardín de infantes como en transcurso del tiempo hasta quinto grado. Se informó que los niños con la forma más aguda de privación económica-pobreza extrema, ingresos volátiles y varios periodos de exposición a la pobreza-tuvieron los peores resultados. Las variaciones significativas en las trayectorias socioemocionales de los niños debido a diferentes patrones de pobreza destacan la importancia de la reducción de la pobreza y de las estrategias de prevención correspondientes a esos patrones para lograr un efecto óptimo. Este estudio sugiere enfocarse no solo en ayudar a las familias a salir de la pobreza temporariamente, sino en mejorar su seguridad económica como forma de promover el bienestar socioemocional de los niños.

Incorporating basic needs to reconcile poverty and ecosystem services.

Conservation managers frequently face the challenge of protecting and sustaining biodiversity without producing detrimental outcomes for (often poor) human populations that depend on ecosystem services for their well-being. However, mutually beneficial solutions are often elusive and can mask trade-offs and negative outcomes for people. To deal with such trade-offs, ecological and social thresholds need to be identified to determine the acceptable solution space for conservation. Although human well-being as a concept has recently gained prominence, conservationists still lack tools to evaluate how their actions affect it in a given context. We applied the theory of human needs to conservation by building on an extensive historical application of need approaches in international development. In an innovative participatory method that included focus groups and household surveys, we evaluated how human needs are met based on locally relevant thresholds. We then established connections between human needs and ecosystem services through key-informant focus groups. We applied our method in coastal East Africa to identify households that would not be able to meet their basic needs and to uncover the role of ecosystem services in meeting these. This enabled us to identify how benefits derived from the environment were contributing to meeting basic needs and to consider potential repercussions that could arise through changes to ecosystem service provision. We suggest our approach can help conservationists and planners balance poverty alleviation and biodiversity protection and ensure conservation measures do not, at the very least, cause serious harm to individuals. We further argue it can be used as a basis for monitoring the impacts of conservation on multidimensional poverty.

Incorporación de las Necesidades Básicas para Reconciliar a la Pobreza y a los Servicios Ambientales Resumen Los administradores de la conservación frecuentemente enfrentan el reto de proteger y mantener la biodiversidad sin producir resultados perjudiciales para las poblaciones humanas (comúnmente pobres) que dependen de los servicios ambientales para su bienestar. Sin embargo, las soluciones benéficas para ambos son comúnmente elusivas y pueden cubrir compensaciones y resultados negativos para las personas. Para tratar con dichas compensaciones se requiere la identificación de umbrales ecológicos y sociales para determinar el espacio de solución aceptable para la conservación. Aunque el bienestar humano como concepto ha ganado prominencia recientemente, los conservacionistas carecen de herramientas para evaluar cómo afectan sus acciones en un contexto dado. Aplicamos la teoría de las necesidades humanas a la conservación al basarnos en una aplicación histórica extensiva de estrategias de necesidades en el desarrollo internacional. Evaluamos cómo se cumplen las necesidades humanas con base en umbrales relevantes localmente en un método participativo innovador que incluyó grupos de enfoque y censos de hogares. Después establecimos conexiones entre las necesidades humanas y los servicios ambientales por medio de grupos de enfoque con informantes clave. Aplicamos nuestro método en la costa oriental de África para identificar los hogares que no podrían cumplir con sus necesidades básicas y para descubrir el papel de los servicios ambientales en el cumplimiento de estas necesidades. Esto nos permitió identificar cómo los beneficios derivados del ambiente estaban contribuyendo al cumplimiento de las necesidades básicas y nos permitió considerar las repercusiones potenciales que podrían surgir por medio de cambios en la provisión de los servicios ambientales. Sugerimos que nuestra estrategia puede ayudar a los conservacionistas y a los planificadores a balancear el alivio de la pobreza y la protección de la biodiversidad y a asegurar que las medidas de conservación, como mínimo, no causen daño serio a los individuos. También sustentamos que puede usarse como base para el monitoreo de los impactos de la conservación sobre la pobreza multidimensional.

CAREGIVER'S DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS AND YOUNG CHILDREN'S SOCIOEMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELAYS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN POOR RURAL AREAS OF CHINA.

Poverty and its associated factors put people at risk for depression. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of depressive symptoms (DS) of primary caregivers and socioemotional development (SED) delays of young children in poor rural areas of China, and to explore the association between them. Cross-sectional data of 2,664 children aged 3 to 35 months and their primary caregivers were used for analysis. Characteristics of the child, caregiver, and family were collected through face-to-face caregiver interviews. DS were assessed by the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (W.W. Zung, 1965, as cited in World Health Organization, ), and SED was evaluated by the Ages and Stage Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (J. Squires, D. Bricker, & L. Potter, 1997). The χ2 test, stratification analysis, and logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association. Among the caregivers, 40.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [38.4, 42.1]), reported DS. Caregivers who were male, older and ethnic minorities as well as had a low level of education, a low family income, or more children were more likely to have DS. Of the children, 24.4% (95% CI [22.8, 26.0]) were recognized with SED delays. Older children displayed more delays than did younger children, but no significant differences between males and females were found. SED delays were significantly associated with mother outmigrating, male caregivers, older age, ethnic minorities, and low education or families with a single parent, low-income, and having more children. Caregivers having DS, odds ratio (OR) = 2.40, 95% CI [1.99, 2.88], was a significant predictor of increased odds of SED delays; other factors were single-parent family, OR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.37, 2.89], inadequate care, OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.30, 2.21], physical punishment, OR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.33, 1.95], ethnic minorities, OR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.17, 1.71], and child age in months, OR = 1.03, 95% CI [1.02, 1.04], according to the logistic regression analysis. DS are prevalent among caregivers with young children in poor rural areas. Interventions to improve the mental health of caregivers and their parenting behaviors are needed to improve children's SED.

The Integration of Family and Group Therapy as an Alternative to Juvenile Incarceration: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation Using Parenting with Love and Limits.

The current study employed a quasi-experimental design using both intent-to-treat and protocol adherence analysis of 155 moderate- to high-risk juvenile offenders to evaluate the effectiveness of Parenting with Love and Limits® (PLL), an integrative group and family therapy approach. Youth completing PLL had significantly lower rates of recidivism than the comparison group. Parents also reported statistically significant improvements in youth behavior. Lengths of service were also significantly shorter for the treatment sample than the matched comparison group by an average of 4 months. This study contributes to the literature by suggesting that intensive community-based combined family and group treatment is effective in curbing recidivism among high-risk juveniles.

MATERNAL PERCEPTIONS OF PARENTING FOLLOWING AN EVIDENCE-BASED PARENTING PROGRAM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF LEGACY FOR CHILDRENTM.

This article presents the findings of a qualitative study of maternal perceptions of parenting following participation in Legacy for ChildrenTM (Legacy), an evidence-based parenting program for low-income mothers of young children and infants. To further examine previous findings and better understand participant experiences, we analyzed semistructured focus-group discussions with predominantly Hispanic and Black, non-Hispanic Legacy mothers at two sites (n = 166) using thematic analysis and grounded theory techniques. The qualitative study presented here investigated how mothers view their parenting following participation in Legacy, allowing participants to describe their experience with the program in their own words, thus capturing an "insider" perspective. Mothers at both sites communicated knowledge and use of positive parenting practices targeted by the goals of Legacy; some site-specific differences emerged related to these parenting practices. These findings align with the interpretation of quantitative results from the randomized controlled trials and further demonstrate the significance of the Legacy program in promoting positive parenting for mothers living in poverty. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding real-world context regarding program efficacy and the benefit of using qualitative research to understand participant experiences.

PREDICTORS OF INFANT AND TODDLER BLACK BOYS' EARLY LEARNING: SEIZING OPPORTUNITIES AND MINIMIZING RISKS.

Using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) data set (U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, 2001), this study examined child, family, and community factors in the early years (infant and toddler years) to predict the cognitive and language outcomes for preschool-age Black boys in relation to Black girls and White boys. Findings indicate that Black children face many challenges, with Black boys experiencing less sensitive parenting as compared to their peers. We live in a highly complex, racialized environment. While there are universal indicators that predict children's preschool outcomes such as strong social positioning and positive parenting, there are, in addition, some indicators that are more beneficial for Black boys' early development, including a stable, less urban home environment with parents engaging in "tough love."

PUBLIC POLICY, CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH AND BOYS AT RISK: CHALLENGING, ENDURING AND NECESSARY PARTNERSHIP.

Research findings documenting the issues and challenges of boys prebirth through age 5 years have barely penetrated the arena of public policy making nor has it permeated the public agenda of politicians, government, or other funding stakeholders. The purpose of this article is to articulate pathways for researchers to enter into the policy-making process. We review critical issues related to implementing the process of public policy. We argue that the policy process needs to be informed by more dynamic theoretical models of human development, and that researchers and clinicians need to be exposed more deeply to the processes required to inform and subsequently change public policy. We contend that most quantitative research on boys at risk occurs at the micro- and the mesosystem level rather than at the exo- and the macrosystem levels where structural societal policies embedded in economic and racial inequities contribute to risk. Researchers, clinicians, and policy makers need to create collaborative partnerships designed to develop, advocate, and implement more evidence-based policies designed to enhance the quality of life for boys at risk.

EARLY HEAD START FAMILIES' EXPERIENCES WITH STRESS: UNDERSTANDING VARIATIONS WITHIN A HIGH-RISK, LOW-INCOME SAMPLE.

The federal Early Head Start program provides a relevant context to examine families' experiences with stress since participants qualify on the basis of poverty and risk. Building on previous research that has shown variations in demographic and economic risks even among qualifying families, we examined possible variations in families' perceptions of stress. Family, parent, and child data were collected to measure stressors and risk across a variety of domains in families' everyday lives, primarily from self-report measures, but also including assay results from child cortisol samples. A cluster analysis was employed to examine potential differences among groups of Early Head Start families. Results showed that there were three distinct subgroups of families, with some families perceiving that they experienced very high levels of stress while others perceived much lower levels of stress despite also experiencing poverty and heightened risk. These findings have important implications in that they provide an initial step toward distinguishing differences in low-income families' experiences with stress, thereby informing interventions focused on promoting responsive caregiving as a possible mechanism to buffer the effects of family and social stressors on young children.

Rotavirus vaccines contribute towards universal health coverage in a mixed public-private healthcare system.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate rotavirus vaccination in Malaysia from the household's perspective. The extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA) framework quantifies the broader value of universal vaccination starting with non-health benefits such as financial risk protection and equity. These dimensions better enable decision-makers to evaluate policy on the public finance of health programmes. METHODS: The incidence, health service utilisation and household expenditure related to rotavirus gastroenteritis according to national income quintiles were obtained from local data sources. Multiple birth cohorts were distributed into income quintiles and followed from birth over the first five years of life in a multicohort, static model. RESULTS: We found that the rich pay more out of pocket (OOP) than the poor, as the rich use more expensive private care. OOP payments among the poorest although small are high as a proportion of household income. Rotavirus vaccination results in substantial reduction in rotavirus episodes and expenditure and provides financial risk protection to all income groups. Poverty reduction benefits are concentrated amongst the poorest two income quintiles. CONCLUSION: We propose that universal vaccination complements health financing reforms in strengthening Universal Health Coverage (UHC). ECEA provides an important tool to understand the implications of vaccination for UHC, beyond traditional considerations of economic efficiency.

Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods.

Alternative livelihood project (ALP) is a widely used term for interventions that aim to reduce the prevalence of activities deemed to be environmentally damaging by substituting them with lower impact livelihood activities that provide at least equivalent benefits. ALPs are widely implemented in conservation, but in 2012, an International Union for Conservation of Nature resolution called for a critical review of such projects based on concern that their effectiveness was unproven. We focused on the conceptual design of ALPs by considering their underlying assumptions. We placed ALPs within a broad category of livelihood-focused interventions to better understand their role in conservation and their intended impacts. We dissected 3 flawed assumptions about ALPs based on the notions of substitution, the homogenous community, and impact scalability. Interventions based on flawed assumptions about people's needs, aspirations, and the factors that influence livelihood choice are unlikely to achieve conservation objectives. We therefore recommend use of a sustainable livelihoods approach to understand the role and function of environmentally damaging behaviors within livelihood strategies; differentiate between households in a community that have the greatest environmental impact and those most vulnerable to resource access restrictions to improve intervention targeting; and learn more about the social-ecological system within which household livelihood strategies are embedded. Rather than using livelihood-focused interventions as a direct behavior-change tool, it may be more appropriate to focus on either enhancing the existing livelihood strategies of those most vulnerable to conservation-imposed resource access restrictions or on use of livelihood-focused interventions that establish a clear link to conservation as a means of building good community relations. However, we recommend that the term ALP be replaced by the broader term livelihood-focused intervention. This avoids the implicit assumption that alternatives can fully substitute for natural resource-based livelihood activities.

[Geohelminths]. / Geohelmintos.

Millions of people in in rural areas and deprived tropical and subtropical regions are infected by soil-transmitted helminths: Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus), and Strongyloides stercoralis. Large migratory flows have made their worldwide distribution easier. Besides being debilitating and producing a significant mortality, they cause high morbidity, leading to physical and intellectual impairment in millions of children who live in poverty. Along with the use of benzimidazoles (albendazole and mebendazole), large-scale international campaigns for treatment and prevention have decreased the number of affected individuals. However, re-infestations and benzimidazole-resistance are frequent, so there needs to be awareness about the importance and consequences of these neglected parasites.

Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia.

The potential impacts of payments for environmental services (PES) and protected areas (PAs) on environmental outcomes and local livelihoods in developing countries are contentious and have been widely debated. The available evidence is sparse, with few rigorous evaluations of the environmental and social impacts of PAs and particularly of PES. We measured the impacts on forests and human well-being of three different PES programs instituted within two PAs in northern Cambodia, using a panel of intervention villages and matched controls. Both PES and PAs delivered additional environmental outcomes relative to the counterfactual: reducing deforestation rates significantly relative to controls. PAs increased security of access to land and forest resources for local households, benefiting forest resource users but restricting households' ability to expand and diversify their agriculture. The impacts of PES on household well-being were related to the magnitude of the payments provided. The two higher paying market-linked PES programs had significant positive impacts, whereas a lower paying program that targeted biodiversity protection had no detectable effect on livelihoods, despite its positive environmental outcomes. Households that signed up for the higher paying PES programs, however, typically needed more capital assets; hence, they were less poor and more food secure than other villagers. Therefore, whereas the impacts of PAs on household well-being were limited overall and varied between livelihood strategies, the PES programs had significant positive impacts on livelihoods for those that could afford to participate. Our results are consistent with theories that PES, when designed appropriately, can be a powerful new tool for delivering conservation goals whilst benefiting local people.

Profiling unauthorized natural resource users for better targeting of conservation interventions.

Unauthorized use of natural resources is a key threat to many protected areas. Approaches to reducing this threat include law enforcement and integrated conservation and development (ICD) projects, but for such ICDs to be targeted effectively, it is important to understand who is illegally using which natural resources and why. The nature of unauthorized behavior makes it difficult to ascertain this information through direct questioning. Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, has many ICD projects, including authorizing some local people to use certain nontimber forest resources from the park. However, despite over 25 years of ICD, unauthorized resource use continues. We used household surveys, indirect questioning (unmatched count technique), and focus group discussions to generate profiles of authorized and unauthorized resource users and to explore motivations for unauthorized activity. Overall, unauthorized resource use was most common among people from poor households who lived closest to the park boundary and farthest from roads and trading centers. Other motivations for unauthorized resource use included crop raiding by wild animals, inequity of revenue sharing, and lack of employment, factors that created resentment among the poorest communities. In some communities, benefits obtained from ICD were reported to be the greatest deterrents against unauthorized activity, although law enforcement ranked highest overall. Despite the sensitive nature of exploring unauthorized resource use, management-relevant insights into the profiles and motivations of unauthorized resource users can be gained from a combination of survey techniques, as adopted here. To reduce unauthorized activity at Bwindi, we suggest ICD benefit the poorest people living in remote areas and near the park boundary by providing affordable alternative sources of forest products and addressing crop raiding. To prevent resentment from driving further unauthorized activity, ICDs should be managed transparently and equitably.

[Child health environment in the context of relocating of camp site families to social housing]. / Salud ambiental infantil en el contexto de la reubicación de familias de campamentos a viviendas sociales.

INTRODUCTION: Housing interventions aimed at overcoming poverty can lead to changes in the health status of children by modifying risk factors in their physical and social environment OBJECTIVE: the aim was to identify children's environmental health factors to change with the relocation of families from slums to public housing. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in children ages 2-8 years old of families relocated to public housing (n=115) who were compared to children residing in slums (n=88) in Santiago, Chile. Family socioeconomic characteristics, indoor environment and neighborhoods were collected. It was included respiratory symptoms, accidents and maternal-child care of children. χ2, Fisher and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare groups. RESULTS: There were differences in households related to pets keeping, presence of humidity/molds in homes, types of fuels, and perceived safety problems in neighborhoods (p<0.05). The families from slums reported higher tenancy of pets (73.8% v/s 32.2%%), humidity/molds in homes (43.,2% v/s 18.3%), use of wood for heating (39.8% v/s 0.0%), compared with families of public housing. Residents of public housing perceived more safety problems in neighborhood, and children have more asthma related symptoms and have lower diversity of accidents in home. CONCLUSION: Among the factors studied, indoor air quality and safety in neighborhoods could be linked to changes from the relocation of families. This reinforces the need to deepen the positive and negative influences of residential mobility of these groups focused on child welfare perspective.

Accounting for the impact of conservation on human well-being.

Conservationists are increasingly engaging with the concept of human well-being to improve the design and evaluation of their interventions. Since the convening of the influential Sarkozy Commission in 2009, development researchers have been refining conceptualizations and frameworks to understand and measure human well-being and are starting to converge on a common understanding of how best to do this. In conservation, the term human well-being is in widespread use, but there is a need for guidance on operationalizing it to measure the impacts of conservation interventions on people. We present a framework for understanding human well-being, which could be particularly useful in conservation. The framework includes 3 conditions; meeting needs, pursuing goals, and experiencing a satisfactory quality of life. We outline some of the complexities involved in evaluating the well-being effects of conservation interventions, with the understanding that well-being varies between people and over time and with the priorities of the evaluator. Key challenges for research into the well-being impacts of conservation interventions include the need to build up a collection of case studies so as to draw out generalizable lessons; harness the potential of modern technology to support well-being research; and contextualize evaluations of conservation impacts on well-being spatially and temporally within the wider landscape of social change. Pathways through the smog of confusion around the term well-being exist, and existing frameworks such as the Well-being in Developing Countries approach can help conservationists negotiate the challenges of operationalizing the concept. Conservationists have the opportunity to benefit from the recent flurry of research in the development field so as to carry out more nuanced and locally relevant evaluations of the effects of their interventions on human well-being.