Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Hand-Held Dynamometry for the Assessment of Knee Muscle Strength in Patients With Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the concurrent validity, reliability, and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the hand-held dynamometry (HHD) for knee strength measurement in patients with revision total knee arthroplasty (r-TKA). DESIGN: A reliability and validity analysis. SETTING: Orthopedic and physical therapy services of university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 42 patients with r-TKA (N=42). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knee muscle strength assessments were performed by 2 physiotherapists in 3 different sessions by using HHD. Participants were instructed to exert a maximal force for lasting 5 seconds against HHD. The first examiner performed the strength testing, and after 30-minutes rest, the second examiner performed the same procedure for inter-examiner reliability. One hour after the initial testing, the first examiner reperformed the strength testing for intra-examiner reliability. The correlations of the knee extensors and knee flexors strength with 50-foot walking test and 30-second chair stand test were assessed for concurrent validity. RESULTS: The inter-examiner reliabilities of knee extensors and flexors strength measurements were 0.97 and 0.95, respectively. The SEM and the minimal detectable changes at 95% confidence level (MDC95) for knee extensors were 10.39 and 28.65 Newton-meters (Nm), and SEM and MDC95 for knee flexors were 8.70 and 23.99 Nm, respectively. The intra-examiner reliabilities of knee extensors and flexors strength measurements were 0.96. SEM and MDC95 for knee extensors were 12.00 and 33.09 Nm, and SEM and MDC95 for knee flexors were 7.78 and 21.45 Nm, respectively. The knee muscle strength showed strong significant correlations with physical performance tests (all, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The HHD is a reliable and valid method for assessment of static knee strength after r-TKA. The HHD can be used to quantify changes in knee strength and also assists the clinicians to determine the effect of rehabilitation programs on muscle strength following r-TKA surgery.

Incidence and related risk factors for postoperative delirium following revision total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common surgical complication. However, the incidence and risk factors associated with postoperative delirium after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) have not been comprehensively explored through extensive national databases. METHODS: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), the largest comprehensive U.S. hospital healthcare database, we undertook a retrospective investigation involving 127,400 patients who underwent rTKA between 2010 and 2019. We assessed various aspects, including patient demographics, hospital characteristics, pre-existing medical conditions, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing rTKA between 2010 and 2019 was 0.97%. The highest incidence rate of 1.31% was recorded in 2013. Notably, this patient cohort demonstrated advanced age, increased burden of co-morbidities, prolonged hospital stays, increased hospitalization costs, and elevated in-hospital mortality rates (P < 0.001). Moreover, non-elective admissions, non-private insurance payments, and a preference for teaching hospitals were commonly observed among these patients. During their hospitalization, individuals who developed delirium subsequent to rTKA were more prone to experiencing certain perioperative complications. These complications encompassed medical issues like acute myocardial infarction, continuous invasive mechanical ventilation, postoperative shock, sepsis, stroke and other medical problems. Additionally, surgical complications including hemorrhage / seroma / hematoma, irrigation and debridement, prosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, and wound dehiscence / nonunion were noted. Several risk factors were found to be linked with the development of POD. These included advanced age (≥ 75 years), alcohol abuse, coagulation disorders, congestive heart failure, depression, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and more. Conversely, female sex, having private insurance, and undergoing elective hospitalization emerged as protective factors against POD. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the general prevalence of POD in rTKA is relatively low according to NIS. There was a significant connection between the POD of rTKA and advanced age, prolonged length of stay (LOS), more in-patients' costs, higher in-hospital mortality rate, increased comorbidities, postoperative medical complications and postoperative surgical complications. This study helps to understand the risk factors associated with POD to improve poor outcomes.

Imaging in revision total knee arthroplasty: A novel 3D classification system for tibial bone defects.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the study was to use pre-revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) computer-tomography (CT)-images to analyse typical tibial bone defects and create a new schematic three-dimensional (3D)-classification system. The secondary purpose was to investigate the association between defect size and implant selection at the time of revision surgery. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with preoperative CT-scans underwent revision of a primary TKA. CT-image segmentation with the 3D-Slicer Software was performed retrospectively, and a new three-dimensional classification system was used to grade tibial bone defects. The location of tibial bone defects was recorded for all cases. Volumetric 3D bone defect measurements were used to investigate the association between the bone defect volume, the indication for rTKA, and the use of modular revision components. The t-test, the Mann-Whitney-U test, and the Fisher's exact-test were used for group comparisons, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multiple group comparisons. RESULTS: The most common anatomic regions for both contained and uncontained tibial bone defects were the anteromedial epiphysis (N = 50; mean epiphyseal-defect: 5.9 cm³) and metaphysis (N = 15; mean metaphyseal-defect: 9.6 cm³). A significant association was found between patients with preoperative metaphyseal defects (N = 22) and the use of tibial augments (N = 7) (p = 0.04). The use of cones/sleeves was associated with a significantly increased 3D-CT volume of the preoperative metaphyseal bone defects (p = 0.04). Patients with osteoporosis had significantly larger volumetric defects in the metaphysis (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results emphasise the importance of considering the three-dimensional nature of tibial defects in rTKA. The findings suggest that an understanding of the volume of the defect size through CT imaging can predict the need for augments and cones/sleeves and, especially in patients with osteoporosis can help the surgeon identify larger metaphyseal defects and ensure optimal metaphyseal fixation through appropriate implant selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Big data analysis reveals significant increases in complications, costs, and hospital stay in revision total knee arthroplasty compared to primary TKA.

INTRODUCTION: Despite significant advancements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), some patients require revision surgery (R-TKA) due to complications such as infection, mechanical loosening, instability, periprosthetic fractures, and persistent pain. This study aimed to explore the specific causes leading to R-TKA, associated complications, including infection, mechanical failure, and wound issues, as well as costs, mortality rates, and hospital length of stay (LOS) using data from a large national database. METHODS: Data from the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS), the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient care database in the United States were analysed from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019. The study included 44,649 R-TKA cases, corresponding to 223,240 patients, with exclusions for nonelective admissions. Various statistical analyses were used to assess clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, LOS, and hospitalization costs. RESULTS: Among 2,636,880 TKA patients, 8.4% underwent R-TKA. R-TKA patients had higher rates of chronic conditions, including mental disorders (36.4%) and renal disease (9.9%). Additionally, these patients often experienced instability, necessitating revision surgery. Infection (22.3%) was the primary reason for R-TKA, followed by mechanical loosening (22.9%) and instability. Compared to primary TKA patients, R-TKA patients exhibited higher in-hospital mortality (0.085% vs. 0.025%), longer LOS (3.1 vs. 2.28 days), and higher total charges ($97,815 vs. $62,188). Postoperative complications, including blood transfusion (4.6% vs. 1.3%), acute kidney injury (4.4% vs. 1.8%), venous thromboembolism (0.55% vs. 0.29%), infection, and wound problems, were significantly higher in R-TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed insights into t LOS, costs, and complications associated with specific etiologies of revision TKA. Our findings emphasize the need for targeted preoperative optimization and patient education. This approach can help reduce the incidence and burden of R-TKA, improve patient care, optimize resource allocation, and potentially decrease the overall rates of complications in revision surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Complications Rates Among Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19 Postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced a new set of challenges for the arthroplasty community, including the management of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and its potential impact on postoperative recovery. This study sought to characterize the risks of postoperative COVID-19 infection among rTKA patients. METHODS: A large national database was utilized to query 8,022 total patients who underwent rTKA between 2018 and 2021, of which 60 had a COVID diagnosis within 90 days after surgery (rTKA/COVID positive). These patients were 1:10 propensity-score matched to 600 rTKA patients who did not have a 90-day postoperative COVID diagnosis (rTKA/COVID negative) and 600 COVID positive patients who did not undergo rTKA. Controlling for potential confounders, multivariate logistic regressions were utilized to compare 90-day postoperative complications between groups. RESULTS: Compared to rTKA/COVID negativepatients, the rTKA/COVID positive cohort had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR = 32.4, P < .001), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 32.4, P < .001), and 90-day readmissions (OR = 2.1, P = .02). Similarly, the rTKA/COVID positive cohort had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (OR = 4.3, P = .001), PE (OR = 36.8, P < .001), and DVT (OR = 36.8, P < .001) compared to COVID positive patients who did not undergo rTKA. CONCLUSIONS: Revision total knee arthroplasty patients diagnosed with COVID-19 postoperatively had increased rates of thromboembolic events, pneumoniae, and 90-day readmissions. Risk mitigation efforts would suggest extending the prophylactic anticoagulation period for rTKA patients diagnosed with postoperative COVID-19.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Outpatient Setting: A Growing Alternative.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have focused on the safety and efficacy of performing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an outpatient setting. Despite being associated with greater costs, much less is known about the accompanying impact on revision TKA (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to describe the trends in costs and outcomes of patients undergoing inpatient and outpatient rTKA. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted using commercial claims databases. Patients who underwent 1-component and 2-component rTKA in an inpatient setting, hospital outpatient department (HOPD), or ambulatory surgery center (ASC) from 2018 to 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day episode-of-care costs following rTKA. Secondary outcomes included surgical cost, 90-day readmission rate, and emergency department visit rate. Covariates for analyses included patient demographics, surgery type, and indication for revision. RESULTS: There were 6,515 patients who were identified, with 17.0% of rTKAs taking place in an outpatient setting. On adjusted analysis, patients in the highest quartile of 30-day postoperative costs were more likely to be those whose rTKA was performed in an inpatient setting. One-component revisions were more common in an outpatient setting (HOPD, 50.7%; ASC, 62.0%) compared to an inpatient setting (39.6%). The 90-day readmission rates were higher (P = .003) for rTKAs performed in inpatient (+9.2%) and HOPD (+8.6%) settings compared to those in an ASC. CONCLUSIONS: The ASC may be a suitable setting for simpler revisions performed for less severe indications and is associated with lower costs and 90-day readmission and emergency department visit rates.

Is Hospital-Based Outpatient Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Safe? An Analysis of 2,171 Outpatient Aseptic Revision Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been well-established as a safe and effective procedure; however, the safety of outpatient revision TKA remains unclear. Therefore, this study utilized a large database to compare outcomes between outpatient and inpatient revision TKA. METHODS: An all-payor database was queried to identify patients undergoing revision TKA from 2010 to 2022. Patients who had diagnosis codes related to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were excluded. Outpatient surgery was defined as a length of stay < 24 hours. Cohorts were matched by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, comorbidities (diabetes, obesity, tobacco use), components revised (1-versus 2-component), and revision etiology. Medical complications at 90 days and surgical complications at 1 and 2 years postoperatively were evaluated through multivariate logistic regression. A total of 4,342 aseptic revision TKAs were included. RESULTS: No differences in patient characteristics, procedure type, or revision etiologies were seen between groups. The outpatient cohort had a lower risk of PJI (odds ratio (OR): 0.547, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.337 to 0.869; P = .012), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.393, 95% CI: 0.225 to 0.658; P < .001), transfusion (OR: 0.241, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.750; P = .027), reoperation (OR: 0.508, 95% CI: 0.305 to 0.822; P = .007), and any complication (OR: 0.696, 95% CI: 0.584 to 0.829; P < .001) at 90 days postoperatively. At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, outpatient revision TKA patients had a lower incidence of revision for PJI (OR: 0.332, 95% CI: 0.131 to 0.743; P = .011 and OR: 0.446, 95% CI; 0.217 to 0.859; P = .020, respectively) and all-cause revision (OR: 0.518, 95% CI: 0.377 to 0.706; P < .001 and OR: 0.548, 95% CI: 0.422 to 0.712; P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that revision TKA can be safely performed on an outpatient basis in appropriately selected patients who do not have an increased risk of adverse events relative to inpatient revision TKA. However, we could not ascertain case complexity in either cohort, and despite controlling for several potential confounders, other less tangible differences could exist between groups.

Outcomes of Liner Exchange Versus Component Revision for the Treatment of Stiffness Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with liner exchange (LE) versus component revision (CRev) for stiffness post-TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all rTKA performed for stiffness after primary TKA using our institutional database (2003 to 2021). Cases with infection, loosening, or < two years follow-up were excluded. There were 129 rTKA included, 91 in the LE, and 38 in the CRev cohorts. The mean follow-up was 8.5 years (range, two to 21). The LE and CRev cohorts had similar baseline demographics (P > 0.05), previous manipulation (P = 0.45), time from primary TKA (P = 0.14), and pre-rTKA arc of motion (AOM) (P = 0.08). The primary outcomes were the achievement of a successful range of movement (ROM), defined as flexion ≥ 90° with an extension deficit of ≤ 10°, and AOM improvement. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare survival free from re-revision between cohorts. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, 69% achieved a successful ROM, and the mean AOM improved (P < 0.001). Achievement of successful ROM was comparable between LE (72%) and CRev (62%) cohorts (P = 0.29). The mean gain in AOM was similar between LE (24.9°) and CRev (25.4°) cohorts (P = 0.45). Preoperative extension deficit was associated with poorer outcomes (P = 0.006). The 10-year re-revision-free survival was similar between the LE (86.2%) and CRev (81.1%) cohorts (P = 0.55). Survival from re-revision for stiffness at 10-years was also similar (P = 0.6). The CRev group had increased surgical times (P < 0.0001), blood loss (P < 0.0001), and length of stay (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LE resulted in similar achievement of a successful ROM and re-revision-free survival compared with CRev. In properly selected patients, LE is a reasonable option for the treatment of stiffness after TKA.

Patients Consistently Report Worse Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between primary TKA (pTKA) and revision TKA (rTKA) have not been well-studied. Therefore, we compared pTKA and rTKA patients by the rates of achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W). METHODS: A total of 2,448 patients (2,239 pTKAs/209 rTKAs) were retrospectively studied. Patients who completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patient-reported outcome measures and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models measured relationships between surgery type and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Patients who underwent rTKA (all causes) had lower rates of improvement and higher rates of worsening compared to pTKA patients for KOOS-PS (MCID-I: 54 versus 68%, P < .001; MCID-W: 18 versus 8.6%, P < .001), PF10a (MCID-I: 44 versus 65%, P < .001; MCID-W: 22 versus 11%, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 34 versus 45%, P = .005), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 51 versus 60%, P = .014; MCID-W: 29 versus 14%, P < .001). Undergoing revision was predictive of worsening postoperatively for KOOS-PS, PF10a, and PROMIS Global-Physical compared to pTKA. Postoperative scores were significantly higher for all 4 PROMs following pTKA. CONCLUSION: Patients reported significantly less improvement and higher rates of worsening following rTKA, particularly for PROMs that assessed physical function. Although pTKA patients did better overall, the improvement rates may be considered relatively low and should prompt discussions on improving outcomes following pTKA and rTKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Isolated Liner Exchange Versus All-Component Revision for Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Instability is a common cause for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risks and benefits of polyethylene liner exchange (LE) as compared to full metal component revision continue to be debated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the success rate and complication profiles of revision TKA for instability based on surgical procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing revision TKA for instability from 2015 to 2019. Patients with prior revisions were excluded. 42 patients undergoing isolated polyethylene LE without an increase in constraint were compared with 48 patients undergoing full component revision revision (FCR) of both tibial and femoral components. The primary outcome was differences in rerevision for instability. Noninstability reoperations, 90-day readmissions, and lengths-of-stay were also compared. RESULTS: LEs had a 10.1% higher rerevision for instability rate that approached statistical significance (LE 14.3% versus FCR 4.2%, P = .092). Additionally, FCR had a 4.2% rate of aseptic loosening and a 4.2% rate of periprosthetic-joint-infection, whereas LE had none (P = .181). FCR also had a longer length-of-stay (FCR 3.0 ± 1.3 versus LE: 1.8 ± 0.9 days, P < .001). No differences were found in 90-day readmissions (LE 7.1% versus FCR 4.2%, P = .661). CONCLUSION: All component revision may have a higher success rate than isolated LE in addressing instability but is associated with higher rates of surgical complications. With appropriate patient selection and risk-benefit discussion, isolated LE may be a reasonable surgical option for TKA instability with a lower complication profile and length-of-stay.

Inpatient Hospital Costs, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmissions for Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tremendously burden hospital resources. This study evaluated factors influencing perioperative costs, including emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and total costs-of-care within 90 days following revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 772 revision TKAs and THAs performed on 630 subjects at a single center between January 2007 and December 2019 was conducted. Cost data were available from January 2015 to December 2019 for 277 patients. Factors examined included comorbidities, demographic information, preoperative Anesthesia Society of Anesthesiologists score, implant selection, and operative indication using mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS: Among 772 revisions (425 THAs and 347 TKAs), 213 patients required an ED visit, and 90 required hospital readmission within 90 days. There were 22.6% of patients who underwent a second procedure after their initial revision. Liver disease was a significant predictor of ED readmission for THA patients (multivariable odds ratio [OR]: 3.473, P = .001), while aseptic loosening, osteolysis, or instability significantly reduced the odds of readmission for TKA patients (OR: 0.368, P = .014). In terms of ED visits, liver disease increased the odds for THA patients (OR: 1.845, P = .100), and aseptic loosening, osteolysis, or instability decreased the odds for TKA patients (OR: 0.223, P < .001). Increased age was associated with increased costs in both THA and TKA patients, with significant cost factors including congestive heart failure for TKA patients (OR: $7,308.17, P = .004) and kidney disease for THA patients. Revision surgeries took longer than primary ones, with TKA averaging 3.0 hours (1.6 times longer) and THA 2.8 hours (1.5 times longer). CONCLUSIONS: Liver disease increases ED readmission risk in revision THA, while aseptic loosening, osteolysis, or instability decreases it in revision TKA. Increased age and congestive heart failure are associated with increased costs. These findings inform postoperative care and resource allocation in revision arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis, Level IV.

Commercial Synovial Antigen Testing is Inferior to Traditional Culture for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite its limitations, a culture remains the "gold standard" for pathogen identification in patients who have periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, a synovial fluid antigen test has been introduced by a commercial entity. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the accuracy of the antigen test in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: This retrospective study identified 613 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty who had undergone preoperative synovial fluid analysis. A PJI was defined using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Patients who had an extended period (> 180 days) from aspiration to revision procedure (n = 62), those presenting within 90 days of their index arthroplasty procedure (n = 17), and patients who had an inconclusive ICM score (n = 8) were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, we examined the utility of the microbial identification (MID) antigen test and any positive culture (either preoperative or intraoperative) in the diagnosis of PJI. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were included. Of these, 125 (23.8%) were ICM positive and 401 (76.2%) were ICM negative. Culture demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864, sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 97.5%. On the other hand, the MID test exhibited an AUC of 0.802, sensitivity of 61.6%, and specificity of 98.8%. The AUC of culture was significantly higher than that of the MID test (P = .037). The MID test was positive in 41.9% of culture-negative PJI cases. We also observed a high rate of discordance (29.7%) when both culture and the MID test were positive in the ICM-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial fluid antigen testing does not provide additional clinical benefit when compared to traditional cultures for the diagnosis of PJI. The antigen test had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI and a relatively high rate of discordance with culture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

High Rates of Early Septic Failure, but Low Rates of Aseptic Loosening After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship and functional outcomes for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with contemporary rotating-hinge knee implants. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 115 rTKAs using contemporary rotating-hinge implants from 2014 to 2018 for the treatment of instability (34, 30%), reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (33, 29%), aseptic loosening (25, 22%), arthrofibrosis (14, 12%), periprosthetic fracture (4, 3%), osteolysis (4, 3%), and femoral component fracture (1, 1%). There were 70 women (61%), and the mean age was 67 years (range, 27 to 94). The mean follow-up was 3 years (range, 2 to 6). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models estimated survivorship. RESULTS: The re-revision rate was 20% (23 of 115) at an average of 18 months postoperatively. Re-revision indications included PJI (n = 14), aseptic loosening (n = 4), arthrofibrosis (n = 2), instability/malalignment (n = 1), femoral stem fracture (n = 1), and hinge mechanism disruption (n = 1). At 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause re-revision was 86 and 64%, and survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening was 100 and 87%, respectively. Use of a rotating-hinge implant in reimplantation after PJI was a risk factor for subsequent re-revision (hazard ratio = 2.4, P = 0.046). On a radiographic review of unrevised rotating-hinges, there were major radiolucent lines around 2 femoral and 5 tibial components. The mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement increased from 43 preoperatively to 60 at 1 year (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with a rotating-hinge implant for rTKA, there were relatively poor 2-year (86%) and 5-year (64%) survivorship free from all-cause re-revision, most commonly due to PJI. Midterm survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening was modest (87%). There should be a goal to mitigate complications in complex rTKAs with rotating-hinge implants, namely PJI.

Age-Adjusted Modified Frailty Index Predicts 30-Day Complications and Mortality in Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The age-adjusted modified frailty index (aamFI) has been demonstrated to effectively predict postoperative complications and healthcare resource utilization in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of aamFI in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip (rTHA) and knee arthroplasty (rTKA). METHODS: A national database was queried for patients undergoing aseptic rTHA and rTKA from 2015 to 2020. A total of 13,307 rTHA and 18,762 rTKA cases were identified. The aamFI was calculated by adding 1 additional point for age ≥73 years to the previously described 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5). The area under the curve was calculated and compared to compare predictive accuracy between mFI-5 and aamFI. Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between aamFI and 30-day complications. RESULTS: The incidence of incurring any (≥1) complication increased from 15% for aamFI 0 to 45% for aamFI ≥5 after rTHA and from 5 to 55% after rTKA. Patients who had an aamFI ≥3 (reference aamFI = 0) had increased odds (rTHA: odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9 to 4.1, P < .001; rTKA: OR 4.2, 95% CI 4.4 to 5.1, P < .001) of incurring at least 1 complication. The aamFI, compared to mFI-5, was a more accurate predictor of any complication (rTHA P < .001; rTKA P < .001) and 30-day mortality (rTHA P < .001; rTKA P < .003). CONCLUSION: The aamFI is an excellent predictor of complications in patients undergoing rTHA and rTKA. The addition of chronological age to the previously described mFI-5 improves the predictive value of this simple metric.

Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: Tibial bone defects are commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and can be managed with metaphyseal cones or sleeves. Few studies have directly compared tibial cones and sleeves in rTKA, and none have limited this comparison to the most severe tibial defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of metaphyseal cones and sleeves for tibial reconstruction in rTKA regarding implant fixation and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing rTKA in which metaphyseal cones or sleeves were utilized for addressing metaphyseal bone loss (34 cones and 18 sleeves). Tibial bone loss was classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, with types 2B and 3 being included. Patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications were collected, and a radiographic evaluation of osseointegration or loosening was performed. RESULTS: There were 52 knees included (34 cones, 18 sleeves), with a median follow-up of 41.0 months. All-cause implant survival was 100% at 2 years and 96% (95% confidence interval: 76 to 99%) at 4 years, with 98% of tibial components demonstrating osseointegration at the final follow-up. During follow-up, there were a total 11 revisions, of which 1 sleeve was revised secondary to implant loosening. Tibial sleeves had a higher risk of revision compared to tibial cones (P < .01), and sleeves fixed with a hybrid technique were more likely to need revision than cones fixed by the same method (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Porous metaphyseal tibial cones and tibial metaphyseal sleeves both performed well at a 41-month median follow-up with no difference in aseptic survivorship between the 2 constructs. Both demonstrate high rates of osseointegration, low rates of aseptic failure, and significant improvement in Knee Society Scores in patients with severe tibial defects in rTKA.

Unplanned Emergency Department Visits Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: Incidences, Risk Factors, and Mortalities.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of unplanned emergency department (ED) visits following revision total joint arthroplasty is an indicator of the quality of postoperative care. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidences, timings, and characteristics of ED visits within 90 days after revision total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of 457 consecutive cases, including 254 revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and 203 revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) cases, was conducted. Data regarding patient demographics, timings of the ED encounter, chief complaints, readmissions, and diagnoses indicating reoperation were analyzed. RESULTS: The results showed that 41 patients who had rTHA (16.1%) and 14 patients who had rTKA (6.9%) returned to the ED within 90 days postoperatively. The incidence of ED visits was significantly higher in the rTHA group than in the rTKA group (P = .003). The most common surgery-related complications were dislocation among rTHA patients and wound conditions among rTKA patients. Apart from elevated calculated comorbidity scores, peptic ulcer in rTHA patients and cerebral vascular events and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in rTKA patients might increase chances of unplanned ED visits. Patients who had ED visits showed significantly higher mortality rates than the others in both rTHA and rTKA cohorts (P = .050 and P = .008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ED visits within 90 days are more common after rTHA than after rTKA. Patients in both ED visit groups after rTHA and rTKA demonstrated worse survival. Efforts should be made to improve quality of care to prevent ED visits.

Risk Factors for Peripheral Nerve Injury Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in 132,960 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a potentially devastating injury for patients. This study assessed the frequency of and risk factors for postoperative PNI following rTKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent rTKA from 2003 to 2015 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Demographics, medical histories, surgical details, and complications were compared between patients who sustained a PNI and those who did not to identify risk factors for the development of PNI after rTKA. RESULTS: Overall, 132,960 patients who underwent rTKA were identified, and 737 (0.56%) sustained a postoperative PNI. After adjusting for confounders, patients with a history of a spine condition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.7, 95%-confidence interval 1.2 to 2.4, P = .003) and postoperative anemia (aOR: 1.3, 95%-CI: 1.1 to 1.5, P = .004) had higher risk of PNI following rTKA. Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (aOR: 1.3, 0.78 to 2.2, P = .308), rheumatoid arthritis (aOR: 1.0, 95%-CI: 0.68 to 1.6, P = .865), and history of knee dislocation (aOR: 1.1, 95%-CI: 0.85 to 1.5, P = .412), were not significantly associated with higher risk for PNI. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a 0.56% incidence of PNI following rTKA, and patients who had preexisting spine conditions or postoperative anemia were at an increased risk for this complication. Orthopedic surgeons may use the results of this study to appropriately counsel patients on the potential for a PNI following rTKA.

Are Proud Tibial Cone Constructs an Effective Alternative to Those That are Fully Seated in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between patients treated with the traditional fully seated tibial cone construct and those with the novel proud tibial cone construct in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 56 adult patients who had a minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent rTKA with either the fully seated (n = 18 knees) or proud (n = 42 knees) tibial cone construct between 2010 and 2020. The electronic medical record was reviewed for demographic, clinical, and radiographic data. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected. RESULTS: All patients had improved mechanical alignment postoperatively regardless of surgical technique. All patients showed good evidence of osseointegration without loss of fixation at the latest follow-up. There were no significant differences in the complication rate or re-revision rate between the groups. KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) scores were significantly higher for patients treated with the fully seated construct (mean 57 [range, 20 to 95] versus 38 [range, 0 to 75], P = .04); however, no significant differences were present for the other KOOS subscales or KOOS Jr. CONCLUSION: The proud tibial cone construct may be an effective alternative to the fully seated construct in the setting of severe bone loss in rTKA. The proud construct avoids a proximal tibial cut, and thus is a bone-preserving technique that provides good fixation, reduces operative time, prevents potential iatrogenic injuries, decreases the need for tibial augments, saves costs, and improves the ease of restoring joint height.

Early Discharge for Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: Predictors of Success.

BACKGROUND: The rate of revision total joint arthroplasties is expected to increase drastically in the near future. Given the recent pandemic, there has been a general push toward early discharge. This study aimed to assess for predictors of early postoperative discharge after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). METHODS: There were 77 rTKA and 129 rTHA collected between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021. Demographic data, comorbidities, a comorbidity index, the modified frailty index (mFI-5), and surgical history were collected. The Common Procedural Terminology codes for each case were assessed. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts, early discharge (length of stay [LOS] <24 hours) and late discharge (LOS >24 hours). RESULTS: In the rTHA cohort, age >65 years, a history of cardiac or liver disease, an mFI-5 of >1, a comorbidity index of >2.7, a surgical time >122 minutes, and the need for a transfusion were predictors of prolonged LOS. Only the presence of a surgical time of >63 minutes or an mFI-5 >1 increased patient LOS in the rTKA cohort. In both rTHA and rTKA patients, periprosthetic joint infection resulted in a late discharge for all patients, mean 4.8 and 7.1 days, respectively. Dual component revision was performed in 70.5% of rTHA. Only 27.6% of rTKA were 2-component revisions or placements of an antibiotic spacer. CONCLUSIONS: Several patient and surgical factors preclude early discharge candidacy. For rTHA, an mFI-5 of >2/5, comorbidity index of >4, or a surgical time of >122 minutes is predictive of prolonged LOS. For rTKA, an mFI-5 of >2/5, Charlson Comorbidity Index of >5, or a surgical time of >63 minutes predicts prolonged LOS.

Unsuspected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management and outcomes of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (arTKA) with unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) compared to those with sterile cultures. METHODS: The institutional database at a single tertiary center was retrospectively reviewed for arTKA from January 2013 to October 2023. Patients who met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on available preoperative infectious workup, received antibiotic spacers, or did not have at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Patients were stratified based on intraoperative cultures into 4 cohorts: sterile cultures, 1 UPC, ≥ 2 UPCs with different organisms, and ≥ 2 UPCs with the same organism. Univariable analyses were used to compare these groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis assessed infection-free survival at 5 years, and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate factors that influence infection-free survival. A total of 691 arTKAs at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years were included in the study. Of these, 49 (7.1%) had 1 UPC with a new organism, 10 (1.4%) had ≥2 UPCs of the same organism, and 2 (0.2%) had ≥2 UPCs with different organisms. RESULTS: Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed to 114 (16.5%) patients-13 (26.5%) with 1 UPC, 6 (60.0%) with ≥2 UPCs of the same organism, and 0 (0.0%) of patients who had ≥2 UPCs of different organisms. There were no differences in infection-free survival at 5 years between patients who had sterile cultures and 1 UPC (96 versus 89%; P = .39) nor between sterile cultures and ≥2 UPCs of different organisms (96 versus 100%; P < .72). However, patients who had ≥2 UPCs of the same organism had significantly worse infection-free survival at 5 years compared to patients who had sterile cultures (58 versus 96%; P < .001). Cox proportional hazards regression suggested that when adjusting for covariates, an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of ≥3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1; P = .007), ≥2 UPCs of the same organism (HR = 11.0; P < .001), 1 UPC (HR = 4.2; P = .018), and arTKA with hinge constructs (HR = 4.1; P = .008) were associated with increased risk of rerevision for PJI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had 1 UPC or ≥2 UPCs with different organisms had similar infection-free survival at 5 years as patients who had sterile cultures. However, patients who had ≥2 UPCs of the same organism had significantly worse infection-free survival at 5 years. Overall, 1 UPC or ≥2 UPCs of the same organism at the time of arTKA may suggest the patient is at higher risk of rerevision for PJI. More studies are needed to determine what interventions can be implemented to mitigate this risk.