The effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus treatment: A single-center experience in Saudi Arabia.

Background: The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) to treat the hepatitis C virus (HCV) overcame many drawbacks of interferon-based therapy. DAA achieved sustained viral response (SVR) rates above 90% and overcame many drawbacks of pegylated interferon regimens.The HCV genotype (GT) distribution varies by geographical area, with GT-4 being most prevalent in the Middle East region, including Saudi Arabia. Yet, the real-world evidence about using DAAs in the Saudi population is limited.Thus, the aim of this study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of DAAs in Saudi patients with HCV infection. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included patients treated with DAAs from 2015 to 2017 at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All patients with HCV treated with either ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir (LDS/SOF) ± ribavarin (RBV) or ombitasvir-paritaprevir-ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± RBV were included. Using a per-protocol analysis, the effectiveness outcome was the end-of-treatment response (EOTr) and Sustained virologic reponce12 weeks after competing the regimen (SVR12). The secondary safety outcome was the adverse event related to the therapy reported by the patients. Results: A total of 97 patients were included; with the majority infected with GT-4 (64 %), followed by GT-1 (18 %), in addition to 8 % having a mixed GT (1 + 4). The EOTr and SVR12 rates were 98 % and 96 %, respectively. SVR12 was 94.4 % within the LDS/SOF ± RBV group and 97.7 % within the OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV group. Only 4 % had a response failure due to relapse or breakthrough, and all were infected with mixed GT1 + 4. Medications were well tolerated with minimal side effects, including vomiting, nausea, and weakness. Conclusion: DAAs regimens are associated with high rates of SVR12 and are well tolerated with a good safety profile in Saudi HCV-infected patients.

Characteristics of hepatitis C virus resistance in an international cohort after a decade of direct-acting antivirals.

Background & Aims: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens provide a cure in >95% of patients with chronic HCV infection. However, in some patients in whom therapy fails, resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) can develop, limiting retreatment options and risking onward resistant virus transmission. In this study, we evaluated RAS prevalence and distribution, including novel NS5A RASs and clinical factors associated with RAS selection, among patients who experienced DAA treatment failure. Methods: SHARED is an international consortium of clinicians and scientists studying HCV drug resistance. HCV sequence linked metadata from 3,355 patients were collected from 22 countries. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs in virologic failures, including novel NS5A substitutions, were examined. Associations of clinical and demographic characteristics with RAS selection were investigated. Results: The frequency of RASs increased from its natural prevalence following DAA exposure: 37% to 60% in NS3, 29% to 80% in NS5A, 15% to 22% in NS5B for sofosbuvir, and 24% to 37% in NS5B for dasabuvir. Among 730 virologic failures, most were treated with first-generation DAAs, 94% had drug resistance in ≥1 DAA class: 31% single-class resistance, 42% dual-class resistance (predominantly against protease and NS5A inhibitors), and 21% triple-class resistance. Distinct patterns containing ≥2 highly resistant RASs were common. New potential NS5A RASs and adaptive changes were identified in genotypes 1a, 3, and 4. Following DAA failure, RAS selection was more frequent in older people with cirrhosis and those infected with genotypes 1b and 4. Conclusions: Drug resistance in HCV is frequent after DAA treatment failure. Previously unrecognized substitutions continue to emerge and remain uncharacterized. Lay summary: Although direct-acting antiviral medications effectively cure hepatitis C in most patients, sometimes treatment selects for resistant viruses, causing antiviral drugs to be either ineffective or only partially effective. Multidrug resistance is common in patients for whom DAA treatment fails. Older patients and patients with advanced liver diseases are more likely to select drug-resistant viruses. Collective efforts from international communities and governments are needed to develop an optimal approach to managing drug resistance and preventing the transmission of resistant viruses.

Changes in Serum Interferon Gamma and Interleukin-10 in Relation to Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: This study analyzes the changing levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin (IL)-10 (as the main cytokines of T-helper-1 and T-helper-2 immune responses) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection undergoing therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and to correlate them with laboratory markers. Methods: This Pilot study included 50 HCV monoinfected patients who received DAAs for 12 or 24 weeks. They were followed up monthly during therapy and 3 months after the end of the treatment. Liver disease was determined by transient elastography, in addition to FIB-4 indices. Analysis of IFN-gamma and IL-10 was carried out using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: All patients carried HCV genotype 4. The Sustained virological response was 100% and 92% in cirrhotics and noncirrhotics, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in baseline IL-10 or IFN-gamma. In noncirrhotics, IL-10 showed a significant reduction at Week 4 after treatment start. In cirrhotics, IL-10 showed a significant reduction at Week 4 after treatment starts and a significant reduction at Week 12 after the end of the treatment. At Week 12 after the end of the treatment, serum IL-10 levels were significantly lower in cirrhotics. IFN-γ showed nonsignificant changes in noncirrhotics. A significant increase of IFN-γ occurred in cirrhotics from Week 4 after treatment starts to 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. IFN-γ was significantly higher in cirrhotics at Week 12 after the end of the treatment. IFN-γ and IL-10 showed different correlations with laboratory markers. Conclusion: Viral eradication induced by DAAs caused a significant change in IL-10 and IFN-gamma.

Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 3 With Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LED) is recommended for treatment of genotypes 1, 4, 5 and 6. Despite some preliminary data from the ELECTRON-2 trial regarding use of SOF/LED combination in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3, there are no guidelines recommending this combination in such patients. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of the overall sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR 12) and safety of SOF/LED in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infection in our population. METHODS: It was a prospective, hospital-based observational study. All patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 treated with SOF/LED were divided into two groups: patients with cirrhosis and without cirrhosis. Patients without cirrhosis received SOF/LED (90/400 mg) for 12 weeks; however, patients with cirrhosis received treatment for 24 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 104 patients with chronic hepatitis C over a period of 24 months. Of the total, 66 were women (63.5%) and 38 were men (36.5%). The average age was 40 years (range: 18-76 years). Of 104 patients, 86 (82.7%) were of genotype 3, 15 (14.9%) were of genotype 1 and 3 (2.9%) were of genotype 4. Ninety-two (88%) were noncirrhotic and 12 (11.5%) were cirrhotic. Ninety-five (95.2%) were treatment naïve. Among genotype 1 and 4, all patients achieved rapid virologic response and SVR 12. Of 86 genotype 3 patients, 78 (90.6%) were noncirrhotic and 8 (9.3%) were cirrhotic. Among genotype 3 patients without cirrhosis, 75 (96%) achieved SVR 12 while 6 (75%) with cirrhosis achieved SVR 12. All patients tolerated the combination well; however, some patients experienced nausea (26%), headache (25%) and fatigue (21%). No patient had to discontinue therapy due to adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Single tablet LED and SOF combination is safe and effective in genotype 3 patients without cirrhosis even without ribavirin. Being effective in genotype 3, the combination can be used as a pangenotypic drug in patients without cirrhosis.

Can remdesivir and its parent nucleoside GS-441524 be potential oral drugs? An in vitro and in vivo DMPK assessment.

Remdesivir (RDV) is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for treating COVID-19. However, RDV can only be given by intravenous route, and there is a pressing medical need for oral antivirals. Significant evidence suggests that the role of the parent nucleoside GS-441524 in the clinical outcomes of RDV could be largely underestimated. We performed an in vitro and in vivo drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) assessment to examine the potential of RDV, and particularly GS-441524, as oral drugs. In our in vitro assessments, RDV exhibited prohibitively low stability in human liver microsomes (HLMs, t 1/2 = âˆ¼1 min), with the primary CYP-mediated metabolism being the mono-oxidation likely on the phosphoramidate moiety. This observation is poorly aligned with any potential oral use of RDV, though in the presence of cobicistat, the microsomal stability was drastically boosted to the level observed without enzyme cofactor NADPH. Conversely, GS-441524 showed excellent metabolic stability in human plasma and HLMs. In further in vivo studies in CD-1 mice, GS-441524 displayed a favorable oral bioavailability of 57%. Importantly, GS-441524 produced adequate drug exposure in the mice plasma and lung, and was effectively converted to the active triphosphate, suggesting that it could be a promising oral antiviral drug for treating COVID-19.

Intrahepatic De Novo Tumors in Liver Recipients are Highly Associated With Recurrent Viral Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term survival of liver transplant recipients is endangered by tumorigenesis at different sites. Little is known about primary de novo tumors developing in the graft. METHODS: We analyzed the follow-up data of 2731 liver recipients that were transplanted between 1988 and 2019 at our institution (Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Surgery). All cases with new intrahepatic tumors during follow-up were identified. RESULTS: A total of nine patients were diagnosed at a median of 16 years (range, 2-24 years) after surgery. Eight patients presented with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and one patient presented with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE). All eight HCC patients had a recurrence of the initial disease that had caused liver failure before transplantation. This was associated with viral reinfection with either HCV or HBV in seven cases. Of the nine patients, three underwent surgical resection and only one patient was alive at data abstraction. CONCLUSION: Intrahepatic de novo neoplasms in the liver graft need to be considered in the long-term follow-up of liver recipients and were strongly associated with recurrent viral hepatitis in our study. Although prognosis of this rare complication is generally poor, patients may benefit from surgical resection of localized disease.

Outcomes of Real-World Integrated HCV Microelimination for People Who Inject Drugs: An expansion of the Punjab Model.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in People Who Inject Drugs (PWID) is 8-10% as compared to 3·6% in the general population in Punjab, India. We assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of free-of-charge generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), sofosbuvir with an NS5A inhibitor (ledipasvir, daclatasvir or velpatasvir)±ribavirin in the microelimination of CHC in PWID in a public health setting. METHODS: An integrated care team at 25 sites provided algorithm based DAAs treatment to PWID supervised by telemedicine clinics between 18th June 2016 and 31st July 2019. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR-12); the secondary endpoints were treatment completion, adherence, safety, and adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01110447. FINDINGS: We enrolled 3477 PWID (87·2% men; mean age 33·6±12·5 years; 83·8% rural; 6·8% compensated cirrhosis). While 2280 (65·5%) patients completed treatment, 1978 patients completed 12 weeks of follow up for SVR-12. SVR-12 was achieved in 91·1% of patients per protocol, 49.5% as per intention to treat (ITT) and 90·1% in a modified ITT analysis. Of 546 (15·7%) patients with treatment interruptions, 99 (19·7%) could be traced to test for SVR-12 with a cure rate of 77·8%. There were no major adverse events or consequent treatment discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: Integrated care of PWID with CHC with DAAs is safe and effective. Measures for reducing treatment interruptions will further improve outcomes. FUNDING: The Government of the state of Punjab, India under the Mukh Mantri Punjab Hepatitis C Relief Fund (MMPHCRF) project, funds the project.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a risk factor for occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C patients: A prospective four-years follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) decreases significantly in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with sustained virologic response (SVR) after pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (PR) or direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) therapy. We follow-up a single cohort of CHC patients to identify risk factors associated with HCC development post-SVR. METHOD: CHC patients with SVR in Beijing/Hong Kong were followed up at 12-24 weekly intervals with surveillance for HCC by ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to explore factors associated with HCC occurrence. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and May 2017, SVR was observed in 519 and 817 CHC patients after DAAs and PR therapy respectively. After a median post -SVR follow-up of 48 months, HCC developed in 54 (4.4%) SVR subjects. By adjusted Cox analysis, older age (≥55 years) [HR 2.4, 95% CI (1.3-4.3)], non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases [HR 2.4, 95%CI (1.3-4.2), higher AFP level (≥20 ng/ml) [HR 3.4, 95%CI (2.0-5.8)], higher liver stiffness measurement (≥14.6 kPa) [HR 4.2, 95%CI (2.3-7.6)], diabetes mellitus [HR 4.2, 95%CI (2.4-7.4)] at pre-treatment were associated with HCC occurrence. HCC patients in the DAAs induced SVR group had a higher prevalence of NAFLD as compared with those in the PR induced SVR group, 62% (18/29) vs 28% (7/25), p = 0.026. A nomogram formulated with the above six independent variables had a Concordance-Index of 0.835 (95% CI 0.783-0.866). CONCLUSION: Underlying NAFLD is associated with increased incidence of HCC in chronic HCV patients post-SVR, particularly in those treated with DAA.

Where are the children in national hepatitis C policies? A global review of national strategic plans and guidelines.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is estimated that 3.26 million children and adolescents worldwide have chronic HCV infection. To date, the global response has focused on the adult population, but direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens are now approved for children aged ≥3 years. This global review describes the current status of policies on HCV testing and treatment in children, adolescents, and pregnant women in WHO Member States. METHODS: We identified national strategic plans and/or clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for HCV infection from a World Health Organization (WHO) database of national policies from Member States as of August 2019. A standardised proforma was used to abstract data on polices or recommendations on testing and treatment in children, adolescents and pregnant women. Analysis was stratified according to the country-income status and results were validated through WHO regional focal points through August 2020. RESULTS: National HCV policies were available for 122 of the 194 WHO Member States. Of these, the majority (n = 71/122, 58%) contained no policy recommendations for either testing or treatment in children or adolescents. Of the 51 countries with policies, 24 had specific policies for both testing and treatment, and were mainly from the European region; 18 countries for HCV testing only (12 from high- or upper-middle income); and 9 countries for treatment only (7 high- or upper-middle income). Twenty-one countries provided specific treatment recommendations: 13 recommended DAA-based regimens for adolescents ≥12 years and 6 still recommended interferon/ribavirin-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant gaps in policies for HCV-infected children and adolescents. Updated guidance on testing and treatment with newly approved DAA regimens for younger age groups is needed, especially in most affected countries. LAY SUMMARY: To date, the predominant focus of the global response towards elimination of hepatitis C has been on the testing and treatment of adults. Much less attention has been paid to testing and treatment among children and adolescents, although in 2018 an estimated 3.26 million were infected with HCV. Our review shows that many countries have no national guidance on HCV testing and treatment in children and adolescents. It highlights the urgent need for advocacy and updated policies and guidelines specific for children and adolescents.

Genotype 1 and 3 Response to Velpatasvir and Sofosbuvir in Chronic Hepatitis C in the Kashmiri Population: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Our data is one of the earliest study from the Indian subcontinent on Velpatasvir/Sofosbuvir (VEL/SOF) combination in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The primary end point was to evaluate sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 in CHC-infected patients and to determine its effect in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. The secondary end point was to observe any adverse events related to treatment. METHODS: All patients with CHC were randomized into two groups: noncirrhotic and cirrhotic. The combination of VEL/SOF was given as recommended. RESULTS: One hundred patients with CHC infection treated with the VEL/SOF regimen were evaluated. A total of 79 (79%) of 100 patients were noncirrhotic, and 21 (21%) were cirrhotic. We achieved SVR12 in 99 (99%) of 100 patients. Among cirrhotics, the mean serum bilirubin (mg/dl), albumin (g/dl), and platelet count (×10³/µL) improved from baseline 1.82 ± 0.87, 3.22 ± 0.69, and 80.19 ± 46.03 to 1.74 ± 0.87, 3.48 ± 0.72, and 85.05 ± 42.50, respectively, at SVR12 (P-value > 0.05). Mean serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) improved from baseline 71.28 ± 59.17 to 35.38 ± 17.39 at SVR12 (P-value < 0.024). Baseline mean liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in cirrhotic patients was 28.24 ± 10.87 kPa, which decreased to 24.04 ± 9.33 kPa at SVR12 (P-value, 0.02). The baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 13.47 ± 3.66, which decreased to 12.33 ± 5.46 at SVR12 (P-value, 0.28). The Child-Turcotte-Pugh score improved by 1 point in 33.33% (7/21) patients and 2 points in 9.52% (2/21) patients, and in the majority, that is, 38.09% (8/21), the score remained as it is. CONCLUSION: A single daily dose of the tablet SOF/VEL combination is safe and effective in all types of CHC. There was a significant improvement in the mean transaminase level and LSM at SVR12. And the MELD score improved by 1 point at SVR12 among cirrhotics.

Correlation between IL28B/TLR4 genetic variants and HCC development with/without DAAs treatment in chronic HCV patients.

In Egypt, Sofosbuvir (SOF) in combination with Dataclasvir (DCV) is the broadly used DAAs with excellent therapeutic profile. This study is designed to explore the relation between IL28B/TLR4 genetic variants and each of the followings; HCC development post SOF/DCV treatment, progression to HCC in naïve patients and SOF/DCV therapy outcome. A total of 493 blood samples were collected (controls (n = 70); HCV patients treated with SOF/DCV (n = 252) of whom 65 patients developed HCC, 187 patients didn't develop HCC (125 responders, 62 relapsers); naïve HCV patients (n = 171) had early (n = 48), late liver fibrosis (n = 21) and HCC (n = 102)). Both SNPs were genotyped using a TaqMan 5' allelic discrimination assay. At IL28B rs12979860 SNP, the C allele was significantly correlating with the response rate more than T allele (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.29-2.9, p = 0.004), while at TLR4 rs4986791 SNP, no association was found (OR 6.5, 95% 0.57-75.28, p = 0.09). Both SNPs couldn't detect the probability for HCC emergence after treatment. In naïve patients, the protective alleles were detected in their lowest frequency in HCC patients (p = 0.1, for rs12979860 and, p = 0.001 for rs4986791). SOF/DCV combination improved SVR rates in HCV genotype 4a infected patients regardless of IL28B genotype, with the best rates in those lacking the T allele.

Features of resistance-associated substitutions after failure of multiple direct-acting antiviral regimens for hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to clarify the features of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after failure of multiple interferon (IFN)-free regimens in HCV genotype 1b infections. METHODS: A total of 1,193 patients with HCV for whom direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment had failed were enrolled from 67 institutions in Japan. The RASs in non-structural protein (NS)3, NS5A, and NS5B were determined by population sequencing. RESULTS: Failure of 1, 2, and 3 regimens was observed in 1,101; 80; and 12 patients, respectively. Among patients with failure of 1 regimen, Y56H and D168V in NS3 were more frequently detected after failure of paritaprevir, whereas D168E was more frequently detected after failure of regimens including asunaprevir. R30H and L31-RAS in NS5A were frequently detected after failure of regimens including daclatasvir. The prevalence of Y93-RAS was high irrespective of the regimen. S282T RAS in NS5B was detected in 3.9% of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir failures. The prevalence of D168-RAS increased significantly according to the number of failed regimens (p <0.01), which was similar to that seen with L31-RAS and Y93-RAS. The prevalence of patients with RASs in either NS3 or NS5A, or in both, increased significantly with increasing numbers of failed regimens. The P32del, which is unique to patients for whom DAA had failed, was linked to the absence of Y93H, the presence of L31F, and previous exposure to IFN plus protease inhibitor regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of multiple DAA regimens can lead to the generation of multiple RASs in the NS3 and NS5A regions of the HCV 1b genome. These mutations contribute to viral resistance to multiple treatment regimens and, therefore, should be considered during decision making for treatment of chronic HCV. LAY SUMMARY: Resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in the genome of the hepatitis C virus are 1 of the major causes for failed treatment. We investigated RASs after failure of various treatments for chronic hepatitis C, and found that more complicated RASs accumulated in the viral genome with successive failed treatments. The highly resistant P32del RAS at NS5A region was uniquely found in patients for whom DAA treatments had failed, and was linked to the presence and absence of specific RASs.

Results of Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin in Patients With Hepatitis C Related Decompensated Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Sofosbuvir (SOF), a direct acting antiviral, has revolutionized the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection. However, data is scarce about efficacy of SOF plus Ribavarin (RBV) in Indian patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We evaluated the efficacy of SOF plus RBV in decompensated cirrhosis, and compared the outcome with compensated cirrhosis and non-cirrhotics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive decompensated cirrhotic patients of chronic HCV with detectable HCV RNA were treated with 24-week course of SOF (400 mg) plus weight based RBV. Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP) and Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were assessed at 36 weeks (i.e. 12 weeks after completion of therapy). Non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C patients and patients with compensated cirrhosis treated with SOF plus RBV during the same period were used as controls. During the period of this study ledipasvir and daclatasvir were not available in India. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients [median age 50 (29-82) years, 64% males] with decompensated cirrhosis were included as 'cases' in the study; while, 27 patients with compensated cirrhosis and 29 patients with chronic hepatitis were included as 'controls'. Age, gender, HCV RNA levels, and genotype distribution were similar in cases and controls. The median CTP and MELD scores of cases were 8 (7-12) and 13 (6-25), respectively. Among cases 39 (83%) could complete the therapy, while 1 (2%) was intolerant and 7 (15%) died before completion of therapy. End of Treatment Response (ETR) was achieved in 37/39 (95%) cases. Of these, another 3 died before SVR, and 7 failed to achieve SVR, thus 27/34 (79%) could achieve SVR. Thus according to intention-to-treat analysis, only 27/47 (57%) cases could achieve SVR. In comparison, 24/28 (86%) compensated cirrhotics and 27/28 (96%) of chronic hepatitis achieved SVR. There was a significant improvement in mean CTP score in cases who achieved SVR (P < 0.01) compared to those who did not achieve SVR/ETR. On multivariate analysis the only independent factor influencing successful outcome patients was a serum albumin >3.5 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-week course of SOF plus ribavirin in decompensated HCV cirrhosis could lead to SVR in only 57% of patients. The failure of therapy in 43% patients was either due to non-response, intolerance, or death. A serum albumin of more than 3.5 is associated with success of antiviral therapy. Thus an early initiation of antiviral therapy is recommended before decompensation sets in as it precludes successful outcome.

Advances in HCV and Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis in the Era of DAAs: Are We at the End of the Road?

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-related Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (MC) is a unique condition with complex pathogenesis that involves HCV antigen-driven B-lymphocyte clonal proliferation and mutagenesis. Clinical spectrum of MC ranges from asymptomatic state to clinically-apparent vasculitis involving multiple organs. In the era of Direct-Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapy, patients with HCV-related MC achieve high rates of viral clearance that is commonly accompanied by an improvement in clinical symptoms as well as immunological profiles. Rituximab, either alone or in combination with DAA, has also been shown to be effective. Nevertheless, there have been limited and somewhat conflicting data, particularly over the long-term, regarding the rate and degree of clinical response of MC following DAA therapy. It appears that we have come quite a long way in the last decade with this condition. As with non-MC related HCV, undoubtedly long term outcome data will be forthcoming over the next few years. As we move forward successful therapy of HCV is not likely to be a challenge in contrast to access to therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients with ß-Thalassemia Major.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ß-thalassemia major patients are susceptible to Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection owing to life-long dependency for blood-transfusion. Moreover, this patient population is at risk of progression of liver fibrosis or development of cirrhosis as a consequence of both iron overload and HCV infection. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination regimen of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for HCV infection in ß-thalassemia major patients. METHODS: The present study was a prospective observational study which enrolled multi-transfused ß-thalassemia major patients treated with a combination regimen of sofosbuvir (400 mg) and daclatasvir (60 mg) daily for 12 weeks for HCV infection during May 2016 and November 2016 depending upon inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. Sustained virological response at post-treatment week-12 (SVR-12) was defined as negative HCV-RNA at week-12 after completion of antiviral treatment. RESULTS: A total of 10 multi-transfused patients with ß-thalassemia major were included in the study. Average age of the patient was 13.60 ± 4.38 years. All the included patients were treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic and infected with HCV genotype-3. All the patients achieved SVR-12. There was significant reduction in aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.005) and alanine aminotransferase level (p = 0.005) and serum ferritin level (p = 0.028) after completion of the antiviral treatment. The reported adverse events include nausea, vomiting and anorexia which were managed conservatively. None of the patient required dose reduction or termination of antiviral treatment. CONCLUSION: The study reports safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based treatment in non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive ß-thalassemia major patients infected with HCV genotype-3. However, further studies with larger patient populations are needed to build up stronger evidence of safety and efficacy of this treatment approach for HCV infection in thalassemic patients.

Impact of Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy for Treatment of Hepatitis C Genotypes 1, 3 and 4: A Real Life Experience from India.

OBJECTIVE: To assess impact of Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapies for treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotypes 1, 3 and 4 in a real-world cohort from India. METHODS: Adults with chronic HCV infection treated with Sofosbuvir (SOF) and Ledipasvir (LDV) (genotypes 1 and 4) or SOF and Daclatasvir (DCV) (genotype 3), with or without Ribavirin (RBV) between December 2015 and December 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was Sustained Virological Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS: Of the 648 patients, 181 received SOF/LDV (65 with RBV) and 467 received SOF/DCV (135 with RBV). Most patients were males (65.4%), aged 41-60 years (49.4%) and treatment-naïve (92.6%). Genotype 3 (72.1%) was most common, followed by genotypes 1 (22.4%) and 4 (5.6%). Forty two percent patients (n = 271) had cirrhosis (112 patients were decompensated). SVR12 (modified intention-to-treat) was achieved by 98.1% of patients (512/522) (100% in genotypes 1 and 4, and 97.3% (362/372) in genotype 3). On intention to treat analysis, SVR12 was 88.1% (512/581) [genotype 1-96.8% (121/125), genotype 3-85.2%, genotype 4-93.5% (29/31)]. Seventy patients had treatment failure (non response in 6, virological breakthrough in 2, 10 patients relapsed, 2 died and 50 were lost to follow up). High SVR was observed regardless of HCV genotype, presence of cirrhosis or past history of treatment. No major adverse events warranting discontinuation of treatment were noted. CONCLUSIONS: DAA therapy for HCV genotypes 1, 3 and 4 achieves high SVR rates in all patients, including those with cirrhosis and previous non-responders.

Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin for 24 Weeks Is An Effective Treatment Option for Recurrent Hepatitis C Infection After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been a serious problem after liver transplantation (LT). We report our experience of 24-week therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV) in post-LT recurrent HCV in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) setting in South Asia. METHODS: Data from all patients treated for post-transplantation HCV recurrence in a single center were analyzed. Treatment regimen was 24 weeks of SOF 400 mg daily and RBV (starting at 800 mg daily, increased as tolerated). Sustained virological response (SVR) was assessed 12 weeks and 24 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: 63 patients (median age 52 [range 30-69] years; 80% males) were treated. Most (76.2%) were treatment experienced and predominant HCV genotype was 3 (77.7%) followed by 1 (20.6%). Median transient elastography (Fibroscan) score was 7 (range 3-11) kPa and none of the patients had cirrhosis. SVR12 was achieved in 60 of 63 patients (95.2%) while SVR24 was noted in 59 (93.7%). SVR12 rates were as good in genotype-3 as in genotype-1. Older age, longer period after transplantation, higher Fibroscan value and higher need for erythropoietin were likely to be associated with relapse. Adverse effects were noted in 34 patients and weakness and fatigue were the commonest side effects. Significant drop in hemoglobin (<8 g/dL) was seen in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: SOF + RBV combination therapy for 24 weeks was safe and effective in treatment of for post-LT recurrent HCV in a single LT center and remains relevant due to its low cost and lack of drug interactions.

Chronic Hepatitis C: Do Generics Work as Well as Branded Drugs?

India has a large share of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) burden of the world. Unsafe medical practices and blood transfusions are the leading modes of transmission of HCV in India. The commonest HCV genotype in India is genotype 3 followed by genotype 1. While directly acting antivirals (DAAs) agents have become available at reasonable rates in India, cost of therapy remains a major barrier for control of HCV in India. Generic DAAs have been proven to be cost-saving in prior studies. We examined data from various studies in India and elsewhere using generic DAAs, and evaluated whether they are equally efficacious as the branded drugs. Since the availability of generic DAAs in the Indian market, there is a lot of real life data as well as prospective studies in special patient populations such as hematological disorders (thalassemia and hemophilia), chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis patients, post liver and renal transplant patients on immunosuppression, intravenous drug users, confections and other high risk groups. Control of HCV infection in India requires multi pronged approach. There is a need to formulate a health educational curriculum targeting not only the high-risk population but also the general population regarding the transmission of HCV. Adopting the dual approach of treating the old cases (decreasing the reservoir pool of HCV) and decreasing the incidence of new ones would help curtail the disease and decrease liver related mortality. In this scenario, the role of efficacious low cost generic medications is essential.

Potential Liver Transplant Recipients with Hepatitis C: Should They Be Treated Before or After Transplantation?

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with newer directly acting antivirals (DAAs) and lead to sustained viral response (SVR) in majority of patients and SVR has been documented to be associated with reversal of liver cirrhosis. The improved SVR rates and safety profiles of DAAs have led to the treatment of patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Several clinical trials of DAAs in decompensated HCV patients have recently demonstrated SVR rates above 80%, which have been associated with significant improvements, in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte scores/or model for end-stage liver disease scores in a proportion of patients. Moreover, it has been shown that HCV RNA becomes negative after 2-4 weeks of treatment, and those who are transplanted after becoming HCV RNA negative will be have very low the risk of HCV recurrence after transplantation. Some of the patients may have reached the "point of no return" and may proceed to worsening of decomposition over time. To avoid the risk of worsening, there is an additional option of treating these patients after LT should they develop recurrent HCV infection. Currently there are no guidelines as to select patients who would benefit from treatment prior to LT as opposed to those who will be better off being treated after the transplant surgery. The article discusses a possible approach for such selection.

Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance for Antiviral Therapy Against HCV Infection: Update 2016.

India contributes significantly to the global burden of HCV. While the nucleoside NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir became available in the Indian market in March 2015, the other directly acting agents (DAAs), Ledipasvir and Daclatasvir, have only recently become available in the India. The introduction of these DAA in India at a relatively affordable price has led to great optimism about prospects of cure for these patients as not only will they provide higher efficacy, but combination DAAs as all-oral regimen will result in lower side effects than were seen with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin therapy. Availability of these newer DAAs has necessitated revision of INASL guidelines for the treatment of HCV published in 2015. Current considerations for the treatment of HCV in India include the poorer response of genotype 3, nonavailability of many of the DAAs recommended by other guidelines and the cost of therapy. The availability of combination DAA therapy has simplified therapy of HCV with decreased reliance of evaluation for monitoring viral kinetics or drug related side effects.