RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Hospice and Palliative Care Act of 2015 aimed at developing and regulating the provision of palliative care (PC) services in Germany. As a result of the legal changes, people with incurable diseases should be enabled to experience their final stage of life including death according to their own wishes. However, it remains unknown whether the act has impacted end-of-life care (EoLC) in Germany. OBJECTIVE: The present study examined trends in EoLC indicators for patients who died between 2016 and 2020, in the context of Lower Saxony, Germany. METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from the statutory health insurance fund AOK Lower Saxony (AOK-LS), referring to the years 2016-2020. EoLC indicators were: (1) the number of patients receiving any form of outpatient PC, (2) the number of patients receiving generalist outpatient PC and (3) specialist outpatient PC in the last year of life, (4) the onset of generalist outpatient PC and (5) the onset of specialist outpatient PC before death, (6) the number of hospitalisations in the 6 months prior to death and (7) the number of days spent in hospital in the 6 months prior to death. Data for each year were analysed descriptively and a comparison between 2016 and 2020 was carried out using t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Data from 160,927 deceased AOK-LS members were analysed. The number of patients receiving outpatient PC remained almost consistent over time (2016 vs. 2020 p = .077). The number of patients receiving generalist outpatient PC decreased from 28.4% (2016) to 24.5% (2020; p < .001), whereas the number of patients receiving specialist outpatient PC increased from 8.5% (2016) to 11.2% (2020; p < .001). The onset of generalist outpatient PC moved from 106 (2016) to 93 days (2020; p < .001) before death, on average. The onset of specialist outpatient PC showed the reverse pattern (2016: 55 days before death; 2020: 59 days before death; p = .041). CONCLUSION: Despite growing needs for PC at the end of life, the number of patients receiving outpatient PC did not increase between 2016 and 2020. Furthermore, specialist outpatient PC is being increasingly prescribed over generalist outpatient PC. Although the early initiation of outpatient PC has been proven valuable for the majority of people at the end of life, generalist outpatient PC was not initiated earlier in the disease trajectory over the study period, as was found to be true for specialist outpatient PC. Future studies should seek to determine how existing PC needs can be optimally met within the outpatient sector and identify factors that can support the earlier initiation of especially generalist outpatient PC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study "Optimal Care at the End of Life" was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00015108; 22 January 2019).
Assuntos
Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Assistência Terminal , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Cuidados Paliativos , Alemanha , Morte , Seguro SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Practical and non-cognitive skills are essential to medical professions; yet, success in medical studies is primarily assessed with cognitive criteria. We show that practical exams can benefit students who have only average high school final grades, but working experience in medical professions. METHODS: With a cross-sectional study, we compare the performance of undergraduate medical students with working experience in adjacent health-care professions (and below-average school leaving-grades) with students who entered medical school directly based on their excellent school records in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). For a sample of more than 1,200 students, we use information on OSCE scores in medical and practical skills, doctor-patient communication/interaction, performance in MC-exams, and core sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Waiting list students outperformed their classmates in the demonstration of practical skills. Students admitted via their excellent school grades scored best overall. This difference vanishes once we control for school-leaving grade and age, the two main factors separating the analysed groups. Students from the waiting list have a significantly smaller overall chance to reach excellent grades in the first two years of study. CONCLUSIONS: Students who gathered experiences in health-care professions before enrolling at medical school can benefit from an expanded role of practical elements in medical studies. Student selection instruments should take these different starting positions and qualities of applicants into account, for example with a quota for the professionally experienced.
Assuntos
Sucesso Acadêmico , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Logro , Competência Clínica , Avaliação EducacionalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the provision of primary palliative care (PC). The identification of patients who might benefit from PC and the timely initiation of patient-centred PC measures at the end of life are essential, yet challenging. Although different tools exist to support these key tasks, a structured approach is often missing. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed at implementing the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE™) in general practices, following a structured and regional approach, in order to evaluate the effects of this tool on the identification of patients with potential PC needs and the initiation of patient-centred PC measures. METHODS: The intervention of this mixed-methods study comprised a standardised training of 52 GPs from 34 general practices in two counties in Lower Saxony, Germany, on the use of the SPICT-DE™. The SPICT-DE™ is a clinical tool which supports the identification of patients with potential PC needs. Subsequently, over a period of 12 months, GPs applied the SPICT-DE™ in daily practice with adult patients with chronic, progressive diseases, and completed a follow-up survey 6 months after the initial patient assessment. The outcome parameters were alterations in the patient's clinical situation, and the type and number of initiated patient-centred PC measures during the follow-up interval. Additionally, 12 months after the standardised training, GPs provided feedback on their application of the SPICT-DE™. RESULTS: A total of 43 GPs (n = 15 female, median age 53 years) out of an initial sample of 52 trained GPs assessed 580 patients (n = 345 female, median age 84 years) with mainly cardiovascular (47%) and cancer (33%) diseases. Follow-up of 412 patients revealed that 231 (56%) experienced at least one critical incident in their disease progression (e.g. acute crisis), 151 (37%) had at least one hospital admission, and 141 (34%) died. A review of current treatment/medication (76%) and a clarification of treatment goals (53%) were the most frequently initiated patient-centred PC measures. The majority of GPs deemed the SPICT-DE™ practical (85%) and stated an intention to continue applying the tool in daily practice (66%). CONCLUSIONS: The SPICT-DE™ is a practical tool that supports the identification of patients at risk of deterioration or dying and promotes the initiation of patient-centred PC measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (N° DRKS00015108; 22/01/2019).
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Enfermagem de Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Prospectivos , Seguimentos , MorteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Distress and burnout are common in physicians. Both may already arise during medical training and persist throughout residency. An analysis of needs is necessary in order to develop target group specific curricular concepts at medical faculties. Aim of this study was to assess the perceived stress of medical students, to explore study-related behavior and experience patterns, and to investigate associated factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of medical students at the Hannover Medical School. The web-based questionnaire consisted of 74 items and included two standardized instruments: the "Work-related Behavior and Experience Patterns" (Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster, AVEM) and the "Perceived Medical School Stress" scale (PMSS). Students were asked to state their self-perceived actual stress level on a scale from 0% (no stress at all) to 100% (maximum stress). We performed a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to identify factors that can discriminate between the four different AVEM patterns. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-one medical students (female 75.8%, response rate: 34.0%) participated in the survey. The mean sum score of the PMSS was 37.2 (SD 8.3; median score 37, min.-max. = 18-65). Overall, 68.5% of the students showed a risk pattern (risk pattern A "overexertion": 38.9%; risk pattern B "burnout": 29.6%). Pattern G "healthy" was shown in 8.3% and pattern S "protection" in 23.1% of the students. Multilevel analysis revealed that the self-perceived stress level and the PMSS sum score were the most important predictors for the AVEM pattern assignment. Furthermore, academic year, gender, and financial dependency were relevant influencing factors: students in higher academic years with no financial support had a higher probability to be in risk pattern B whereas male students in the first academic year tended to be in pattern G. CONCLUSIONS: The PMSS sum score could objectify medical students' high self-perceived stress level. The majority of participating students showed a risky study-related behavior and experience pattern. Medical faculties should be aware of the still existing and relevant problem of stress and burnout among medical students. Our results lay the groundwork for an evaluation and further development of medical curricula at the own faculty.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Estudantes de Medicina , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Psicológico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The provision and quality of end-of-life care (EoLC) in Germany is inconsistent. Therefore, an evaluation of current EoLC based on quality indicators is needed. This study aims to evaluate EoLC in Germany on the basis of quality indicators pertaining to curative overtreatment, palliative undertreatment and delayed palliative care (PC). Results were compared with previous findings. METHODS: Data from a statutory health insurance provider (AOK Lower Saxony) pertaining to deceased members in the years 2016 and 2017 were used to evaluate EoLC. The main indicators were: chemotherapy for cancer patients in the last month of life, first-time percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for patients with dementia in the last 3 months of life, number of hospitalisations and days spent in inpatient treatment in the last 6 months of life, and provision of generalist and specialist outpatient PC in the last year of life. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Data for 64,275 deceased members (54.3% female; 35.1% cancer patients) were analysed. With respect to curative overtreatment, 10.4% of the deceased with cancer underwent chemotherapy in the last month and 0.9% with dementia had a new PEG insertion in the last 3 months of life. The mean number of hospitalisations and inpatient treatment days per deceased member was 1.6 and 16.5, respectively, in the last 6 months of life. Concerning palliative undertreatment, generalist outpatient PC was provided for 28.0% and specialist outpatient PC was provided for 9.0% of the deceased. Regarding indicators for delayed PC, the median onset of generalist and specialist outpatient PC was 47.0 and 24.0 days before death, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to data from 2010 to 2014, the data analysed in the present study suggest an ongoing curative overtreatment in terms of chemotherapy and hospitalisation, a reduction in new PEG insertions and an increase in specialist PC. The number of patients receiving generalist PC remained low, with delayed onset. Greater awareness of generalist PC and the early integration of PC are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00015108 ; 22 January 2019).
Assuntos
Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Terminal/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Análise de Dados , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The structured diagnosis of chest radiographs is an important basic competence in radiology and will be required in the student teaching with the implementation of the National Competency-Based Learning Catalog Medicine (NKLM) in Germany. AIM: The aim was to evaluate the extent to which second-year students gain confidence in the diagnosis of chest radiographs through a new curricular training for the diagnosis of chest radiographs with subsequent objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and how confident they feel about meeting the expectations of the supervising medical colleagues during the clinical clerkship. METHODS: The training included four lectures and ten commented instructional films on the diagnosis of radiographs. Two years later, the students were asked how often and in what form they had contact with chest radiographs in their clinical clerkship. They were also asked how confident they felt in dealing in different areas. The students with training were also asked to what extent the lectures and the instructional films were helpful. The results of students in the last year without and the first year with training and OSCE were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples. RESULTS: The frequency of dealing with chest radiographs was comparably high among students with and without training. The students with training and OSCE felt more confident and better prepared in dealing with chest radiographs than the students without training (varying between pâ¯< 0.001 and pâ¯= 0.148). They rated the educational films as more helpful than the lectures (mean 2.85⯱ 0.76 vs. 3.41⯱ 0.68 on a four-point scale). DISCUSSION: With early training, students' confidence in dealing with chest radiographs can be sustainably increased.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional , Radiografia Torácica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The implementation of the cross-sectional subject of palliative care (Q13) at medical faculties in Germany is heterogeneous. In faculties without a chair for palliative medicine, other solutions are needed. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the development and implementation process of the new educational concept in Q13 at the Hannover Medical School and its evaluation by medical students and lecturers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new educational concept was developed in 2017/18 following the six-step approach of curriculum development by Kern, and was implemented and tested in the academic year 2018/19. Evaluation was assessed in two steps, both in qualitative and quantitative terms (mixed methods): an anonymous written evaluation by students with the option of free text answers and feedback discussions with lecturers. RESULTS: Students and lecturers welcomed the new educational concept in equal measures. Students thought that education in Q13 stimulates reflection on the individual attitude towards the issues of death and dying and prepares them for encounters with terminally ill and dying people. The case-based learning units in particular led to a consolidation of theoretical knowledge (i.e. pain management) with adequate patient orientation. Teachers positively highlighted the organization and the educational material. Content structuring was considered to be particularly helpful. CONCLUSIONS: With the new teaching concept, medical students feel well prepared for the treatment of terminally ill and dying patients. The combination of different learning formats with an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral focus promotes education with a practical orientation.
Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudantes de Medicina , Estudos Transversais , Currículo , Alemanha , Humanos , Faculdades de MedicinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: At the end of life, about 85-90% of patients can be treated within primary palliative care (PC) provided by general practitioners (GPs). In Germany, there is no structured approach for the provision of PC by GPs including a systematic as well as timely identification of patients who might benefit from PC, yet. The project "Optimal care at the end of life" (OPAL) focusses on an improvement of primary PC for patients with both oncological and non-oncological chronic progressive diseases in their last phase of life provided by GPs and health care services. METHODS: OPAL will take place in Hameln-Pyrmont, a rural region in Lower Saxony, Germany. Target groups are (a) GPs, (b) relatives of deceased patients and (c) health care providers. The study follows a three-phase approach in a mixed-methods and pre-post design. In phase I (baseline, t0) we explore the usual practice of providing PC for patients with chronic progressive diseases by GPs and the collaboration with other health care providers. In phase II (intervention) the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for the timely identification of patients who might benefit from PC will be implemented and tested in general practices. Furthermore, a public campaign will be started to inform stakeholders, to connect health care providers and to train change agents. In phase III (follow-up, t1) we investigate the potential effect of the intervention to evaluate differences in the provision of PC by GPs and to convey factors for the implementation of SPICT in general practices. DISCUSSION: The project OPAL is the first study to implement the SPICT-DE regionwide in general practices in Germany. The project OPAL may contribute to an overall optimisation of primary PC for patients in Germany by reducing GPs' uncertainty in initiating PC, by consolidating their skills and competencies in identifying patients who might benefit from PC, and by improving the cooperation between GPs and different health care stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; trial registration number: DRKS00015108 ; date of registration: 22th of January 2019).
Assuntos
Família/psicologia , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Participação dos Interessados/psicologia , Assistência Terminal/normas , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Alemanha , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice). METHODS: SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal ("usual practice") and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC. CONCLUSIONS: SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Psicometria/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Áustria , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria/instrumentação , Psicometria/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in general practice and usually treated with antibiotics. This contributes to increasing resistance rates of uropathogenic bacteria. A previous trial showed a reduction of antibiotic use in women with UTI by initial symptomatic treatment with ibuprofen. However, this treatment strategy is not suitable for all women equally. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (UU, bearberry extract arbutin) is a potential alternative treatment. This study aims at investigating whether an initial treatment with UU in women with UTI can reduce antibiotic use without significantly increasing the symptom burden or rate of complications. METHODS: This is a double-blind, randomized, and controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Women between 18 and 75 years with suspected UTI and at least two of the symptoms dysuria, urgency, frequency or lower abdominal pain will be assessed for eligibility in general practice and enrolled into the trial. Participants will receive either a defined daily dose of 3 × 2 arbutin 105 mg for 5 days (intervention) or fosfomycin 3 g once (control). Antibiotic therapy will be provided in the intervention group only if needed, i.e. for women with worsening or persistent symptoms. Two co-primary outcomes are the number of all antibiotic courses regardless of the medical indication from day 0-28, and the symptom burden, defined as a weighted sum of the daily total symptom scores from day 0-7. The trial result is considered positive if superiority of initial treatment with UU is demonstrated with reference to the co-primary outcome number of antibiotic courses and non-inferiority of initial treatment with UU with reference to the co-primary outcome symptom burden. DISCUSSION: The trial's aim is to investigate whether initial treatment with UU is a safe and effective alternative treatment strategy in women with UTI. In that case, the results might change the existing treatment strategy in general practice by promoting delayed prescription of antibiotics and a reduction of antibiotic use in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2016-000477-21 . Clinical trials.gov: NCT03151603 (registered: 10 May 2017).
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Arctostaphylos , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During a doctor-patient consultation patients usually seek information by disclosing their reasons for requesting the encounter. Geriatric assessment allows a proactive examination of patients' overall health and function and provides an opportunity to broach issues beyond the initial purposes of the consultation. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed at investigating older patients' information seeking behavior following a geriatric assessment and the kind of topics they wished to discuss, taking a variety of patient and health-related factors into account. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 317 patients (≥ 70 years) underwent a geriatric assessment in 40 general practices. Subsequently they obtained a list of the problems uncovered and rated the relevance and information needs for each problem. Analyses consisted of determining the prevalence of information need for each health topic and identifying predictors in a mixed model (multilevel regression analysis). RESULTS: The 317 patients presented with a median of 11 health problems (interquartile range, IQR 8-14) and 80 % of the patients had information needs concerning only a few of the problems. High information needs were present for physical complaints and for vaccination issues. Little information seeking behavior was evident for unhealthy lifestyles, falls, limitations in daily activities and psychosocial problems. In the mixed model the personal relevance and the type of health problem both had a significant and independent effect on information seeking behavior. CONCLUSION: A geriatric assessment generates a moderate need for information. It provides physicians with an opportunity to focus on those health problems that are important to older patients but not usually addressed in normal consultations. This particularly applies to limitations in daily activities and psychosocial problems.
Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento de Busca de Informação , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso à Informação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of liver insufficiency. While there is widespread acceptance of its importance, there is no consensus on how best to diagnose and monitor HE. OBJECTIVE: To compare the four most favoured methods for the diagnosis of HE. DESIGN: 170 patients who were on the waiting list for liver transplantation as well as 86 healthy controls were included in the study. All patients and controls underwent the portosystemic encephalopathy syndrome test yielding the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS), the inhibitory control test (ICT) and critical flicker frequency (CFF) measurement. RESULTS: PHES and ICT targets had the best sensitivity (85.7% vs 85.7%) and specificity (96.5% vs 97.6%) for the diagnosis of overt HE. CFF showed inferior sensitivity (40.9%) for the diagnosis of HE and dependency from previous alcohol abuse (p=0.015). Multiple regression analysis showed that all test results apart from PHES were influenced by secondary diagnoses such as diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In the German population of patients awaiting liver transplantation, PHES is the most robust method for the diagnosis and follow-up of HE.
Assuntos
Encefalopatia Hepática/diagnóstico , Transplante de Fígado , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Escolaridade , Feminino , Fusão Flicker , Encefalopatia Hepática/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Psicometria , Valores de Referência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Listas de Espera , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Established as health insurance benefit in 2007, Specialized Palliative Home Care (SPHC) has been continuously expanded. At the same time, health policy initiatives intended to promote general outpatient palliative care. In comparison to urban centers, the development of palliative care networks in rural areas appears to be more difficult. In addition, there is an increasing shortage of family doctors in primary care. Family members play a key role in the home care for seriously ill patients. This paper therefore investigated the experiences of relatives with the end-of-life (EoL) care for family members with life-limiting chronic diseases in more rural regions. The aim was to determine aspects that, from the relatives' point of view, are essential for optimizing EoL care. METHODS: Qualitative after-death interviews with relatives in two districts were conducted in the first six months of 2019, who were recruited by the deceased patients' family doctor. Relatives (age ≥18 years) of patients who died in 2018 were included. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: In the first half of 2019, 28 after-death interviews were conducted with 30 relatives (77% female, age: 32 to 83 years) from rural (n=8) and urban communities (n=22) in two Lower Saxonian counties. They were mostly in a partnership or parent-child relationship with the deceased person. The central categories and needs that emerged in the analysis were: (1) communication about dying and death, (2) information and enabling, (3) support of and relief for relatives, and (4) continuity and cooperation of the services involved in EoL care. The results underline the fact that family caregivers in particular find open communication, information to provide them with the confidence to act, recognizing and responding to support needs and continuity in the course helpful in coping with EoL care situations. Access problems to specialist medical care, deficiencies in care coordination and bureaucratic hurdles in the provision of medical aids proved to be an additional burden. DISCUSSION: The results underline the importance of open communication and the integration of relatives into the care process for optimal care at the end of life. Close cooperation between the services involved and proactive support for relatives are essential, too, especially in rural areas where the challenges of accessing and coordinating care services are a major concern. CONCLUSION: The identification and communication of complex problems, the needs of patients and their relatives and possible barriers to accessing care services are prerequisites for the timely initiation of palliative care measures and support for family caregivers. In addition to needs-based care structures, the optimization of EoL care in home settings requires cooperation and networking between professional stakeholders.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Extrapyramidal and cerebellar symptoms belong to the most prominent features of episodic hepatic encephalopathy, and usually decrease upon ammonia-lowering therapy. Rapidly progressing parkinsonian symptoms, which are unresponsive to treatment of hepatic encephalopathy, indicate cirrhosis-related Parkinsonism. This study aims at analyzing the prevalence of cirrhosis-related Parkinsonism in patients with liver cirrhosis, and to study the functional status of the striatal dopaminergic system in these patients. METHODS: 214 patients with liver cirrhosis who were consecutively seen at the out-patient clinic for liver transplant candidates and/or at the transplantation wards at Hannover Medical School, between August 1, 2008 and March 31, 2011, underwent a standardized neurological examination while on the waiting list or immediately after liver transplantation. Single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT) using (123)I-beta-CIT, for the evaluation of the striatal dopamine transporter function, and (123)I-IBZM for the evaluation of the striatal dopamine D2 receptor availability, was performed in 6 patients with cirrhosis-related Parkinsonism. RESULTS: Cirrhosis-related Parkinsonism was diagnosed in 9 of 214 patients (4.2%). SPECT revealed significantly decreased dopamine receptor availability in 5 of 6 patients studied, and significantly decreased dopamine transporter availability in 3. Levodopa improved motor dysfunction in two of four patients treated, although only temporarily. Incomplete recovery was observed in two patients after liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis-related Parkinsonism is more frequent than presumed. The presented data suggest pre- and postsynaptic alteration of striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission as a possible cause of cirrhosis-related Parkinsonism and reveal the limited effects of dopaminergic therapy.
Assuntos
Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/etiologia , Adulto , Corpo Estriado/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpo Estriado/fisiopatologia , Dopamina/fisiologia , Feminino , Encefalopatia Hepática/etiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/fisiopatologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/terapia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores de Dopamina D2/fisiologia , Transmissão Sináptica , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Up to 90% of people at the end of life are in need of palliative care. The majority can be cared for within general outpatient palliative care (AAPV) by general practitioners. Previous studies have described outpatient palliative care to fall short behind the estimated needs and to be initiated rather late in the health care process. Yet, little is known about the development of outpatient palliative care in recent years and about the parameters influencing its utilisation. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the number and time of initiation for AAPV and specialised outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in a rural and small-town region in Lower Saxony on the basis of routinely collected general practice data. Furthermore, this study sought to estimate the influence of various parameters related to patients, practices and physicians on the provision of AAPV and SAPV. METHODS: All general practitioners (n=190) in two counties in Lower Saxony were invited to take part in the project "Optimal care at the end of life - OPAL" (Innovation Fund, 01VSF17028) between autumn 2018 and spring 2019. In the participating practices, clinical data pertaining to patients with statutory health insurance, who had died in the second or third quarter of 2018, were collected in pseudonymised form and analysed using selected indicators for end-of-life care. The number of hospital stays and the provision of AAPV and SAPV were the subject of the descriptive analyses. In order to take the cluster effect of the practices into account, mixed-model analyses were carried out. RESULTS: The data of 279 deceased patients (48% female; median age 82 years) from 31 general practices were analysed. In the last year of life, AAPV was provided for 78 deceased patients (28.0%) with a median onset of 20 days before death. 52 deceased patients (18.6%) received SAPV with a median onset of 28 days before death, respectively. In the last six months of life, 207 deceased patients (74.2%) were hospitalised at least once. The mixed-model analyses showed a greater probability of receiving AAPV (odds ratio (OR)=3.3) or SAPV (OR=3.2) in the last year of life for patients with oncological diseases. It was also shown that GPs with a higher value on the subscale practice organisation billed more AAPV (OR=1.4). DISCUSSION: The number of patients with SAPV is at least equivalent to the estimated needs known from the literature in both selected regions. In contrast, AAPV seems to be provided relatively rarely and rather late in the health care process. Relevant reasons for this may be the lack of concrete criteria for AAPV (e. g., ambiguities and competing codes for billing) as well as prognostic uncertainties of health care providers especially for patients with non-oncological diseases. CONCLUSION: Strategies to further develop end-of-life care should especially strengthen the AAPV provided by general practitioners and focus on patients with non-oncological diseases.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Assistência Terminal , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Morte , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in the provision of end-of-life care (EoLC). The present study aimed at comparing the quality of GPs' EoLC before and after an intervention involving a clinical decision aid and a public campaign. METHODS: The study was part of the larger interventional study 'Optimal care at the end of life' (OPAL) (Innovation Fund, Grant No. 01VSF17028). The intervention lasted 12 months and comprised two components: (1) implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE™) in general practice and (2) a public campaign in two German counties to inform and connect regional health care providers and stakeholders in EoLC. Participating GPs completed the General Practice End of Life Care Index (GP-EoLC-I) pre- (t0) and post- (t1) intervention. The GP-EoLC-I (25 items, score range: 14-40) is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the quality of GPs' EoLC. It includes two subscales: practice organisation and clinical practice. Data were analysed descriptively, and a paired t-test was applied for the pre-post comparison. RESULTS: Forty-five GPs (female: 29%, median age: 57 years) from 33 general practices participated in the intervention and took part in the survey at both times of measurement (t0 and t1). The mean GP-EoLC-I score (t0 = 27.9; t1 = 29.8) increased significantly by 1.9 points between t0 and t1 (t(44) = - 3.0; p = 0.005). Scores on the practice organisation subscale (t0 = 6.9; t1 = 7.6) remained almost similar (t(44) = -2.0; p = 0.057), whereas those of the clinical practice subscale (t0 = 21.0; t1 = 22.2) changed significantly between t0 and t1 (t(44) = -2.6; p = 0.011). In particular, items regarding the record of care plans, patients' preferred place of care at the end of life and patients' preferred place of death, as well as the routine documentation of impending death, changed positively. CONCLUSIONS: GPs' self-assessed quality of EoLC seemed to improve after a regional intervention that involved both the implementation of the SPICT-DE™ in daily practice and a public campaign. In particular, improvement related to the domains of care planning and documentation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00015108 ; 22/01/2019).
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Clínicos Gerais , Assistência Terminal , Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We explored whether initial treatment with the herbal drug uva ursi (UU) reduces antibiotic use in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) without increasing symptom burden and complication frequency compared with antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 42 family practices in Germany. The participants were adult women with suspected uncomplicated UTIs receiving either UU 105 mg 3 × 2 tablets for 5 days (intervention) or fosfomycin a 3-g single dose (control), and their respective placebos. Participants and investigators were blinded. The primary outcome included (1) antibiotic courses day 0-28 as superiority, and (2) symptom burden (sum of daily symptom scores) day 0-7, as non-inferiority outcome (margin 125%). Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03151603. RESULTS: Overall, 398 patients were randomly allocated to groups receiving UU (n = 207) and fosfomycin (n = 191). The number of antibiotic courses was 63.6% lower (95% CI 53.6%-71.4%; p < 0.0001) in the UU group than in the fosfomycin group. The ratio of total symptom burden in the UU group compared with control was 136.5% (95% CI 122.7-151.9; p 0.95), failing non-inferiority. Eight women developed pyelonephritis in the UU group compared with two in the fosfomycin group (mean difference 2.8; 95% CI 0.2-5.9; p 0.067). Adverse events were similar between the groups. DISCUSSION: In women with uncomplicated UTIs, initial treatment with UU reduced antibiotic use but led to a higher symptom burden and more safety concerns than fosfomycin.
Assuntos
Arctostaphylos , Fosfomicina , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Arctostaphylos/química , Feminino , Fosfomicina/efeitos adversos , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Alemanha , Humanos , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Objective: In the spring of 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the question arose at Hannover Medical School as to how simulated patients (SP) could still be utilized in the communication course that is part of the module "Diagnostic methods" taught in the second year of the model medical curriculum known as HannibaL. Methods: This short report summarizes the process of implementing the utilization of SP in analog classroom teaching and describes the relevant results on the concluding Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in comparison to the previous year. Results: Overall, the analog SP deployments were practicable under local conditions and in compliance with precautionary measures to curb the risk of infection, whereby the OSCE scores did not deviate significantly from those in the prior year. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic and perhaps other epidemics as well, it will continue to be important in the future to make locally adapted, purpose-oriented, and preventively effective decisions regarding university didactics in undergraduate studies.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Simulação de Paciente , Ensino/organização & administração , Competência Clínica , Comunicação , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Humanos , Pandemias , Relações Médico-Paciente , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Objective: The systematic identification of patients who are at risk of deteriorating and dying is the prerequisite for the provision of palliative care (PC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and practicability of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) for the systematic identification of these patients in general practice. Methods: In the beginning of 2017, twelve general practitioners (GPs; female n=6) were invited to take part in the study. GPs were asked to apply the SPICT-DE in everyday practice over a period of two months in patients with chronic progressive diseases. Six months after initial assessment, a follow-up survey revealed how the clinical situation of the initially identified patients had changed and which PC actions had been initiated by GPs. In addition, GPs gave feedback on the practicability of SPICT-DE in daily routine. Results: 10 of the 12 GPs (female n=5, median age 46 years, range 38-68) participated in both the two-month assessment period and the follow-up survey. A total of 79 patients (female n=40, median age 79 years, range 44-94) was assessed with the SPICT-DE. Main diagnoses were predominately of cardio-vascular (n=28) or oncological (n=26) origin. Follow-up after six months showed that 38 patients (48%) went through at least one crisis during the course of disease and almost one third (n=26) had died. The majority of GPs (n=7) considered the SPICT-DE to be practical in daily routine and helpful in identifying patients who might benefit from PC. Seven GPs indicated that they would use the SPICT-DE as part of everyday practice. Conclusions: The SPICT-DE seems to be a practical tool supporting the systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in general practice.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Estado Terminal , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Cuidados Paliativos , Psicometria/métodos , Doente Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Doença Crônica/classificação , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Indicadores de Doenças Crônicas , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Estado Terminal/terapia , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Seleção de Pacientes , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In Germany, no instruments exist to evaluate the practice and organisation of palliative care in general practice. The aim of this project was the systematic development and adjustment of a German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index (GP-EoLC-I). METHODS: The translation and adaptation process followed the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pre-test, documentation. The process was completed by a back translation, a first pre-test and a feasibility study with general practitioners. RESULTS: Nine of the ten general practitioners invited took part in the pre-test (56 % female, median age 55 years, range 40-75). The pre-test showed a median processing time of 15minutes. 17 general practitioners (59 % female, median age 53 years, range 39-69) took part in the pilot study. Adaptation to the German context was necessary for two of the 25 items. In the pre-test and in the pilot study only single values were missing. With the exception of the two adapted items, the back translation showed a high level of consistency with the original version of the questionnaire. DISCUSSION: The systematic development and testing of the questionnaire "Hausärztliche Begleitung in der letzten Lebensphase" (HA-BeL) as well as its adaptation for the primary care setting in Germany was successfully completed in a multi-stage process using an interdisciplinary and participatory approach. The results of this empirical testing provide guidance for expenditure and reasonableness, objectivity of application and content-related consistency of the HA-BeL index. CONCLUSION: The HA-BeL index is the first self-assessment instrument to be used by general practitioners to evaluate practice and organisation of palliative care in general practice in Germany.