RESUMO
Harmonization of variant pathogenicity classification across laboratories is important for advancing clinical genomics. The two CLIA-accredited Electronic Medical Record and Genomics Network sequencing centers and the six CLIA-accredited laboratories and one research laboratory performing genome or exome sequencing in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium collaborated to explore current sources of discordance in classification. Eight laboratories each submitted 20 classified variants in the ACMG secondary finding v.2.0 genes. After removing duplicates, each of the 158 variants was annotated and independently classified by two additional laboratories using the ACMG-AMP guidelines. Overall concordance across three laboratories was assessed and discordant variants were reviewed via teleconference and email. The submitted variant set included 28 P/LP variants, 96 VUS, and 34 LB/B variants, mostly in cancer (40%) and cardiac (27%) risk genes. Eighty-six (54%) variants reached complete five-category (i.e., P, LP, VUS, LB, B) concordance, and 17 (11%) had a discordance that could affect clinical recommendations (P/LP versus VUS/LB/B). 21% and 63% of variants submitted as P and LP, respectively, were discordant with VUS. Of the 54 originally discordant variants that underwent further review, 32 reached agreement, for a post-review concordance rate of 84% (118/140 variants). This project provides an updated estimate of variant concordance, identifies considerations for LP classified variants, and highlights ongoing sources of discordance. Continued and increased sharing of variant classifications and evidence across laboratories, and the ongoing work of ClinGen to provide general as well as gene- and disease-specific guidance, will lead to continued increases in concordance.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/genética , Variação Genética , Genômica/normas , Laboratórios/normas , Neoplasias/genética , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Testes Genéticos , Genética Médica/métodos , Genoma Humano , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Software , Terminologia como AssuntoRESUMO
Evaluating the pathogenicity of a variant is challenging given the plethora of types of genetic evidence that laboratories consider. Deciding how to weigh each type of evidence is difficult, and standards have been needed. In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published guidelines for the assessment of variants in genes associated with Mendelian diseases. Nine molecular diagnostic laboratories involved in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium piloted these guidelines on 99 variants spanning all categories (pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign). Nine variants were distributed to all laboratories, and the remaining 90 were evaluated by three laboratories. The laboratories classified each variant by using both the laboratory's own method and the ACMG-AMP criteria. The agreement between the two methods used within laboratories was high (K-alpha = 0.91) with 79% concordance. However, there was only 34% concordance for either classification system across laboratories. After consensus discussions and detailed review of the ACMG-AMP criteria, concordance increased to 71%. Causes of initial discordance in ACMG-AMP classifications were identified, and recommendations on clarification and increased specification of the ACMG-AMP criteria were made. In summary, although an initial pilot of the ACMG-AMP guidelines did not lead to increased concordance in variant interpretation, comparing variant interpretations to identify differences and having a common framework to facilitate resolution of those differences were beneficial for improving agreement, allowing iterative movement toward increased reporting consistency for variants in genes associated with monogenic disease.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Testes Genéticos/normas , Variação Genética/genética , Genômica/métodos , Laboratórios/normas , Mutação/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA/normas , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Exoma/genética , Genoma Humano , Guias como Assunto , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Software , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The originally published version of this Article contained errors in Fig. 2. The numbers below the black arrowheads were incorrect; please see incorrect Figure in associated Correction. These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Clinical sequencing emerging in health care may result in secondary findings (SFs). METHODS: Seventy-four of 6240 (1.2%) participants who underwent genome or exome sequencing through the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium received one or more SFs from the original American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommended 56 gene-condition pair list; we assessed clinical and psychosocial actions. RESULTS: The overall adjusted prevalence of SFs in the ACMG 56 genes across the CSER consortium was 1.7%. Initially 32% of the family histories were positive, and post disclosure, this increased to 48%. The average cost of follow-up medical actions per finding up to a 1-year period was $128 (observed, range: $0-$678) and $421 (recommended, range: $141-$1114). Case reports revealed variability in the frequency of and follow-up on medical recommendations patients received associated with each SF gene-condition pair. Participants did not report adverse psychosocial impact associated with receiving SFs; this was corroborated by 18 participant (or parent) interviews. All interviewed participants shared findings with relatives and reported that relatives did not pursue additional testing or care. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that disclosure of SFs shows little to no adverse impact on participants and adds only modestly to near-term health-care costs; additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/economia , Achados Incidentais , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/ética , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Revelação , Exoma , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/ética , Testes Genéticos/normas , Genômica/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/ética , Humanos , Intenção , Masculino , Pacientes , Prevalência , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/economiaRESUMO
Recommendations for laboratories to report incidental findings from genomic tests have stimulated interest in such results. In order to investigate the criteria and processes for assigning the pathogenicity of specific variants and to estimate the frequency of such incidental findings in patients of European and African ancestry, we classified potentially actionable pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in all 4300 European- and 2203 African-ancestry participants sequenced by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP). We considered 112 gene-disease pairs selected by an expert panel as associated with medically actionable genetic disorders that may be undiagnosed in adults. The resulting classifications were compared to classifications from other clinical and research genetic testing laboratories, as well as with in silico pathogenicity scores. Among European-ancestry participants, 30 of 4300 (0.7%) had a pathogenic SNV and six (0.1%) had a disruptive variant that was expected to be pathogenic, whereas 52 (1.2%) had likely pathogenic SNVs. For African-ancestry participants, six of 2203 (0.3%) had a pathogenic SNV and six (0.3%) had an expected pathogenic disruptive variant, whereas 13 (0.6%) had likely pathogenic SNVs. Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling mammalian conservation score and the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion summary score of conservation, substitution, regulation, and other evidence were compared across pathogenicity assignments and appear to have utility in variant classification. This work provides a refined estimate of the burden of adult onset, medically actionable incidental findings expected from exome sequencing, highlights challenges in variant classification, and demonstrates the need for a better curated variant interpretation knowledge base.
Assuntos
Exoma , Genômica , Achados Incidentais , Adulto , População Negra/genética , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Genes Dominantes , Estudos de Associação Genética , Testes Genéticos , Genoma Humano , Genômica/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Masculino , Fenótipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , População Branca/genéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Eliciting and understanding patient and research participant preferences regarding return of secondary test results are key aspects of genomic medicine. A valid instrument should be easily understood without extensive pretest counseling while still faithfully eliciting patients' preferences. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with 110 adults to understand patient perspectives on secondary genomic findings and the role that preferences should play. We then developed and refined a draft instrument and used it to elicit preferences from parents participating in a genomic sequencing study in children with intellectual disabilities. RESULTS: Patients preferred filtering of secondary genomic results to avoid information overload and to avoid learning what the future holds, among other reasons. Patients preferred to make autonomous choices about which categories of results to receive and to have their choices applied automatically before results are returned to them and their clinicians. The Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results (PIGSR) is designed to be completed by patients or research participants without assistance and to guide bioinformatic analysis of genomic raw data. Most participants wanted to receive all secondary results, but a significant minority indicated other preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel instrument-PIGSR-should be useful in a wide variety of clinical and research settings.Genet Med 19 3, 337-344.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Comportamento de Escolha , Compreensão , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Testes Genéticos/ética , Testes Genéticos/instrumentação , Genoma/ética , Genoma/genética , Genômica/ética , Genômica/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Deficiência Intelectual/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pais/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) has been used to reconstruct mandibular defects. An elegant addition to this reconstruction method would be incorporation of a nerve graft wrapped in a BMP-2 carrier to reconstitute the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and restore sensation to the lower face. We developed a rabbit model to determine the effect BMP-2 has on nerve regeneration following neurorrhaphy. METHODS: An inferior border mandibulectomy was created in 16 adult New Zealand white rabbits. The IAN was protected, divided, and repaired with either primary neurorrhaphy or reverse autografts. Bone defects were treated with no treatment controls (n = 2), absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) (vehicle controls) (n = 7), and ACS soaked in BMP-2 (treatment group) (n = 7). Animals underwent computed tomography (CT) 2 days and 6 weeks postoperatively. The percent bone defect healing was calculated using Amira 3D imaging software. At 6 weeks, IANs were harvested mesial to the reconstruction and were evaluated with toluidine blue histology to identify myelinated axons. Reconstructed mandible segments were evaluated with micro-CT and hematoxylin-eosin histology. RESULTS: Bone morphogenetic protein 2-treated animals demonstrated significantly more bone healing than did the ACS and empty defect groups (82%, 38%, 44%, respectively; P < 0.01). One hundred percent of ACS-treated nerves (n = 4) demonstrated axon regrowth, whereas only 25% of BMP-2-treated nerves (n = 4) did. Micro-CT and histology showed BMP-2 caused bone growth around the IAN, but regenerated bone infiltrated the repair site and created a physical barrier to axon growth. CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 can successfully heal bone defects in the rabbit mandible, but ectopic bone growth can inhibit IAN recovery after repair. Level of Evidence: Not gradable.
Assuntos
Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/uso terapêutico , Regeneração Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Mandibulares/cirurgia , Nervo Mandibular/efeitos dos fármacos , Regeneração Nervosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Animais , Axônios/efeitos dos fármacos , Colágeno , Corantes , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Mandíbula/efeitos dos fármacos , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Nervo Mandibular/cirurgia , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Coelhos , Alicerces Teciduais , Cloreto de Tolônio , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Traumatismos do Nervo Trigêmeo/cirurgia , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Microtomografia por Raio-X/métodosRESUMO
Translational research has tended to ignore the question of whether receiving a genomic diagnosis provides utility in community care contexts outside of doctors' offices and hospitals. However, empirical research with parents has highlighted numerous ways that a genomic diagnosis might be of practical value in the care provided by teachers, physical or occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, behavior analysts, and nonphysician mental health providers. In this essay, we propose a new conceptual model of genomic utility that offers the opportunity to better capture a broad range of potential implications of genomic technologies for families in various social and organizational systems. We explore crucial research directions to better understand how redefined utility might affect families and nonphysician professionals.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Comunicação , Saúde Mental , Humanos , Pais , GenômicaRESUMO
Background: The desire of parents to obtain a genetic diagnosis for their child with intellectual disability and associated symptoms has long been framed as a diagnostic odyssey, an arduous and sometimes perilous journey focused on the goal of identifying a cause for the child's condition.Methods: Semi-structured interviews (N = 60) were conducted with parents of children (N = 59, aged 2-24 years) with intellectual disability and/or developmental delay (IDD) who underwent genome sequencing at a single pediatric multispecialty clinic. Interviews were conducted after parents received their child's sequencing result (positive findings, negative findings, or variants of unknown significance). Thematic analysis was performed on all interviews.Results: Parents reported that obtaining a genetic diagnosis was one important step in their overall goal of helping their child live their best life possible life. They intended to use the result as a tool to help their child by seeking the correct school placement and obtaining benefits and therapeutic services.Conclusions: For the parents of children with IDD, the search for a genetic diagnosis is best conceptualized as a part of parents' ongoing efforts to leverage various diagnoses to obtain educational and therapeutic services for their children. Cleaving parents' search for a genetic diagnosis from these broader efforts obscures the value that some parents place on a sequencing result in finding and tailoring therapies and services beyond the clinic. Interviews with parents reveal, therefore, that genomic sequencing is best understood as one important stage of an ongoing therapeutic odyssey that largely takes place outside the clinic. Findings suggest the need to expand translational research efforts to contextualize a genetic diagnosis within parents' broader efforts to obtain educational and therapeutic services outside clinical contexts.
Assuntos
Motivação , Pais , Sequência de Bases , Criança , Família , Genômica , HumanosRESUMO
Schizophrenia is a devastating neurodevelopmental disorder whose genetic influences remain elusive. We hypothesize that individually rare structural variants contribute to the illness. Microdeletions and microduplications >100 kilobases were identified by microarray comparative genomic hybridization of genomic DNA from 150 individuals with schizophrenia and 268 ancestry-matched controls. All variants were validated by high-resolution platforms. Novel deletions and duplications of genes were present in 5% of controls versus 15% of cases and 20% of young-onset cases, both highly significant differences. The association was independently replicated in patients with childhood-onset schizophrenia as compared with their parents. Mutations in cases disrupted genes disproportionately from signaling networks controlling neurodevelopment, including neuregulin and glutamate pathways. These results suggest that multiple, individually rare mutations altering genes in neurodevelopmental pathways contribute to schizophrenia.