Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of BPI-9016M in c-MET overexpression or MET exon 14 skipping mutation patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase Ib study.

BACKGROUND: As a potential target receptor tyrosine kinase, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) exhibits high aberrant expression across various tumors. This study aimed to evaluated the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BPI-9016M, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting c-MET, in c-MET overexpression or MET exon 14 skipping mutation patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS/DESIGN: In this two-part multicenter phase Ib study, eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring c-MET overexpression or MET exon 14 skipping mutation were enrolled into Part A (tested positive for c-MET overexpression [immunohistochemical staining score ≥ 2+]; 300 mg quaque die [QD], 450 mg QD and 600 mg QD cohorts) or Part B (tested positive for MET exon 14 skipping mutation; 400 mg bis in die [BID] cohort), respectively. The primary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), the second endpoints were PK parameters, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between March 15, 2017 and September 18, 2021, 38 patients were enrolled (Part A, n = 34; Part B, n = 4). Of 38 patients, 32 (84.2%) patients completed the treatment protocol. As of the data cut-off date on January 27, 2022, all patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Ninety-two point one percent (35/38) of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed in 11 (28.9%) patients. The most common TRAEs were elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 14/38, 36.8%) and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST, 11/38, 28.9%). Only one (2.6%) patient had treatment-related serious adverse event (SAE) in 600 mg QD cohort due to thrombocytopenia. PK analysis showed BPI-9016M and its main metabolites (M1 and M2-2) reached steady state after seven days of continuous administration. At the dose of 300 mg QD and 450 mg QD, the exposure of BPI-9016M increased with increasing dose. Exposure of BPI-9016M was similar at 450 mg QD and 600 mg QD, which may exhibit a saturation trend. In all patients, ORR and DCR were 2.6% (1/38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-13.8%) and 42.1% (16/38, 95% CI 26.3-59.2%), respectively. Only one partial response (PR) patient was observed at a dose of 600 mg QD in Part A. In Part B, DCR was 75.0% (3/4, 95% CI 19.4-99.4%). The median PFS and OS in all 38 patients were 1.9 months (95% CI 1.9-3.7) and 10.3 months (95% CI 7.3-not evaluable [NE]), respectively. CONCLUSION: BPI-9016M showed manageable safety profile in c-MET overexpression or MET exon 14 skipping mutation patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, but showed limited efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02929290 (11/10/2016).

Radiomic-signature changes after early treatment improve the prediction of progression-free survival in patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of lung cancer varies widely, even in cases wherein the tumor stage, genetic mutation, and treatment regimens are the same. Thus, an effective means for risk stratification of patients with lung cancer is needed. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a combined model for predicting progression-free survival and risk stratification in patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ensartinib. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 203 tumor lesions in 114 patients and evaluated average radiomic feature measures from all lesions at baseline and changes in these features after early treatment (Δradiomic features). Combined models were developed by integrating clinical with radiomic features. The prediction performance and clinical value of the proposed models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Both the baseline and delta combined models achieved predictive efficacy with a high area under the curve. The calibration curve and DCA indicated the high accuracy and clinical usefulness of the combined models for tumor progression prediction. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the delta and baseline combined models, Δradiomic signature, and two selected clinical features could distinguish patients with a higher progression risk within 42 weeks. The delta combined model had the best performance. CONCLUSION: The combination of clinical and radiomic features provided a prognostic value for survival and progression in patients with NSCLC receiving ensartinib. Radiomic-signature changes after early treatment could be more valuable than those at baseline alone.

Development of HPLC-MS/MS assay for quantitation of ensartinib in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetics study in Chinese patients.

Ensartinib is a novel anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor with potent activity against a broad range of known crizotinib-resistant ALK mutations and is developed to treat patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. This study was the first to develop and validate a rapid and sensitive HPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ensartinib in human plasma. The plasma samples were extracted using liquid extraction, and chromatographic separation was performed using a Phenomenex, Luna phenyl-hexyl column (50 × 2.0 mm, 5 µm). Electrospray ionization in positive-ion mode and multiple reaction monitoring were used to monitor ion transitions at m/z 561.3 → 257.1 (ensartinib) and 565.2 → 261.2 (internal standard: X-396-d4), respectively. The method yielded excellent linearity in the range of 0.5-500 ng/ml with the lowest quantification of 0.5 ng/ml. Both intra- and inter-run precisions (relative standard deviation %) were less than 15%, with accuracy (relative error %) between ±15%. Extraction recovery, matrix effect, selectivity, and stability were also validated and found to be satisfactory. Finally, the validated method was successfully applied in a phase I clinical study of ensartinib in Chinese subjects with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Phase I Trial of a Third Generation EGFR Mutant-Selective Inhibitor (D-0316) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: D-0316 is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR T790M mutation that progressed after prior treatment with the first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. METHODS: This phase I, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluated daily oral D-0316 administration in dose-escalation (25 to 150 mg; 17 patients) and dose-expansion (50, 100 mg; 67 patients) cohorts for safety, tolerability, anti-tumor activity, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: D-0316 was well tolerated at daily doses of 25 to 150 mg and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were platelet count decreased, electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged, anemia, rash, low white blood cell count, hypertriglyceridemia, high cholesterol, headache, pruritus, cough, and aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) increased. Most of AEs were grade 1 or 2. In the 50 and 100 mg group, the overall response rate (ORR) was 33.3% and 45.5%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 86.7% and 93.9%, and the median PFS was 8.3 and 9.6 months, respectively. D-0316 exposure increased in proportion to dose from 25 to 150 mg. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 100 mg. CONCLUSION: D-0316 is safe, tolerable, and effective for patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with the EGFR T790M mutation who previously received EGFR-TKI. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03452150.

Efficacy of Icotinib, an EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Exon 19 Deletion and Exon 21 L858R: A Retrospective Analysis in China.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of icotinib on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions (19-Del) or L858R point mutation in exon 21 (21-L858R) remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of icotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring these 2 EGFR mutations. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the clinical effects of first-line icotinib on advanced NSCLC patients with 2 classic EGFR mutations. Kinase activity assays were used to reaffirm the preclinical efficacy. RESULTS: Among 2,757 patients, 2,365 (86%) harbored 19-Del (1,346/2,757, 49%) or 21-L858R (1,019/2,757, 37%) mutation. Patients with 19-Del had a higher response rate (ORR; 67.8 vs. 62.1%; p = 0.0039) and disease control rate (98.5 vs. 97.2%; p = 0.0223) than those with 21-L858R mutation. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the 19-Del group (22.3 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3-23.4) was significantly longer than that in the 21-L858R group (20.4 months, 95% CI: 19.5-21.7) (p = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, mutation types, clinical stage, and smoking history were significant factors for PFS. Additionally, an in vitro study indicated the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of icotinib was lower for EGFR 19-Del than 21-L858R. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that EGFR 19-Del confers superior PFS and response to the icotinib treatment compared to 21-L858R.

Vorolanib, an oral VEGFR/PDGFR dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors: An open-label, phase I dose escalation and dose expansion trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of vorolanib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: During dose escalation, patients received increasing doses of oral vorolanib (50-250 mg once daily) in cycles of four weeks for up to one year. During dose expansion, patients received recommended doses (100 and 200 mg) in 4-week cycles. The primary endpoint was to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose and/or the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The severity and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The second endpoint was preliminary efficacy in terms of objective response and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity occurred during dose escalation (50-250 mg). Five (26.3%) patients in the escalation cohort (n=19) and 12 (48.0%) in the expansion cohort (n=25) experienced grade 3 ADRs. The most common ADRs were hair color changes, fatigue, portal hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and proteinuria. During dose expansion, the patients treated with 200 mg and 100 mg (once daily) showed an objective response rate of 22.2% and 5.9%, respectively; the disease control rate was 88.9% and 73.3%, respectively; the median PFS was 9.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 7.4-not reached] months and 3.8 (95% CI: 1.9-not reached) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral vorolanib at a dose of 200 mg (once daily) exhibited an acceptable safety profile and favorable clinical benefit for patients with advanced solid tumors. The RP2D for vorolanib was determined to be 200 mg as a daily regimen.

BPI-3016, a novel long-acting hGLP-1 analogue for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues have been commonly used as add-on medications for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Currently, the development of long-acting GLP-1 analogues which allow the freedom and flexibility of once-weekly injections while maintaining their potency for a relatively long period has become the mainstream. Here, we successfully developed a long-acting human GLP-1(7-37) analogue (BPI-3016) with significantly extended half-life and increased resistance to dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) cleavage by structural modifications of human GLP-1. In vitro activity of BPI-3016 including GLP-1 receptor affinity and stimulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production was measured. In vivo activity of BPI-3016 such as its effects on glycemic control, ß-cell mass and body weight was evaluated in ob/ob mice, db/db mice, and spontaneous diabetic cynomolgus monkeys. The results indicated that BPI-3016 preserved receptor affinity to GLP receptors, and was capable of stimulating cAMP production. In in vivo pharmacokinetic study, the half-life of BPI-3016 was more than 95h after single dosing in diabetic cynomolgus monkeys. Also, BPI-3016 reduced fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose levels for up to a week after a single dose; It reduced body mass index (BMI), body fat, improved glucose tolerance and showed insulinotropic effects after once-weekly injection for 7 weeks. In conclusion, BPI-3016 retains the effects of GLP-1 with significantly prolonged half-life, making it a promising therapy for type 2 diabetes with once-weekly treatment in the clinic.

A Phase I Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Higher-Dose Icotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: This phase I study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of icotinib with a starting dose of 250 mg in pretreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. We observed a maximum tolerated dose of 500 mg with a favorable pharmacokinetics profile and antitumor activity.These findings provide clinicians with evidence for application of higher-dose icotinib. BACKGROUND: Icotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown favorable tolerability and antitumor activity at 100-200 mg in previous studies without reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In July 2011, icotinib was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration at a dose of 125 mg three times daily for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. This study investigated the MTD, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of higher-dose icotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced NSCLC were treated at doses of 250-625 mg three times daily The EGFR mutation test was not mandatory in this study. RESULTS: Twenty-four (92.3%) of 26 patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE); rash (61.5%), diarrhea (23.1%), and oral ulceration (11.5%) were most frequent AEs. Dose-limiting toxicities were seen in 2 of 6 patients in the 625-mg group, and the MTD was established at 500 mg. Icotinib was rapidly absorbed and eliminated. The amount of time that the drug was present at the maximum concentration in serum (Tmax) ranged from 1 to 3 hours (1.5-4 hours) after multiple doses. The t1/2 was similar after single- and multiple-dose administration (7.11 and 6.39 hours, respectively). A nonlinear relationship was observed between dose and drug exposure. Responses were seen in 6 (23.1%) patients, and 8 (30.8%) patients had stable disease. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that higher-dose icotinib was well-tolerated, with a MTD of 500 mg. Favorable antitumor activity and pharmacokinetic profile were observed in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced NSCLC.

Icotinib, a selective EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main cause for cancer-related mortality. Treatments for advanced NSCLC are largely palliative and a benefit plateau appears to have reached with the platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib came up with prolonged progression-free survival and improved quality of life, especially in EGFR-mutated patients. Icotinib is an oral selective EGFR tyrosine kinase, which was approved by China Food and Drug administration in June 2011 for treating advanced NSCLC. Its approval was based on the registered Phase III trial (ICOGEN), which showed icotinib is noninferior to gefitinib. This review will discuss the role of icotinib in NSCLC, and its potential application and ongoing investigations.

Icotinib versus gefitinib in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ICOGEN): a randomised, double-blind phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Icotinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had shown antitumour activity and favourable toxicity in early-phase clinical trials. We aimed to investigate whether icotinib is non-inferior to gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial we enrolled patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from 27 sites in China. Eligible patients were those aged 18-75 years who had not responded to one or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using minimisation methods, to receive icotinib (125 mg, three times per day) or gefitinib (250 mg, once per day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed in the full analysis set. We analysed EGFR status if tissue samples were available. All investigators, clinicians, and participants were masked to patient distribution. The non-inferiority margin was 1·14; non-inferiority would be established if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the hazard ratio (HR) of gefitinib versus icotinib was less than this margin. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01040780, and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR-TRC-09000506. FINDINGS: 400 eligible patients were enrolled between Feb 26, 2009, and Nov 13, 2009; one patient was enrolled by mistake and removed from the study, 200 were assigned to icotinib and 199 to gefitinib. 395 patients were included in the full analysis set (icotinib, n=199; gefitinib, n=196). Icotinib was non-inferior to gefitinib in terms of progression-free survival (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·67-1·05; median progression-free survival 4·6 months [95% CI 3·5-6·3] vs 3·4 months [2·3-3·8]; p=0·13). The most common adverse events were rash (81 [41%] of 200 patients in the icotinib group vs 98 [49%] of 199 patients in the gefitinib group) and diarrhoea (43 [22%] vs 58 [29%]). Patients given icotinib had less drug-related adverse events than did those given gefitinib (121 [61%] vs 140 [70%]; p=0·046), especially drug-related diarrhoea (37 [19%] vs 55 [28%]; p=0·033). INTERPRETATION: Icotinib could be a new treatment option for pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Application of the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale to assess the clinical benefit of antibody drug conjugates in solid cancer: a systematic descriptive analysis of phase III and pivotal phase II trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical benefit value of approved antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for solid tumours using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) V.1.1. DESIGN: Systematic descriptive analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched for publications from 1 January 2000 to 18 October 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included the phase III randomised controlled trials or phase II pivotal trials leading to approval of ADCs in solid tumours. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and discrepancies were resolved by consensus in the presence of a third investigator. RESULTS: ESMO-MCBS Scores were calculated for 16 positive clinical trials of eight ADCs, which were first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the China National Medical Products Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency for solid cancers. Among 16 trials, 4 (25%) met the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade, while 12 (75%) of the regimens did not meet the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade. 5 (31%) of the 16 trials had no published scorecard on the ESMO website due to the approval by other jurisdictions but not by the FDA or EMA. Discrepancies between our results and the ESMO scorecard were observed in 4 (36%) of 11 trials, mostly owing to integration of more recent data. CONCLUSIONS: ESMO-MCBS is an important tool for assessing the clinical benefit of cancer drugs, but not all drugs met the meaningful benefit threshold.

Ensartinib in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive locally advanced or metastatic patients with lung squamous or adenosquamous carcinoma: A real-world, retrospective study.

AIM: To report the efficacy and safety of ensartinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in treating patients with ALK-positive advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) or lung adenosquamous carcinoma (LASC) in China. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data for 36 advanced-stage patients with ALK-positive LUSC (cohort A) and 13 patients with ALK-positive LASC (cohort B) between December 16, 2020 and December 16, 2021. All patients received once-daily ensartinib 225 mg. Outcome analysis included the demographic characteristics, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). RESULTS: Among the 49 patients, the majority were under 65 years old (73.5%), non-smokers (85.7%), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-1 (77.6%), and were at stage IV (71.4%). All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. Seven PFS events were reported in cohort A while no patients experienced PFS events in cohort B. The median PFS was not estimable for both cohorts. In cohort A, the objective response rate (ORR) was 63.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%. In the cohort B, the ORR was 76.9% and the DCR was 100.0%. Rash was the only TRAE reported in the cohort A (8.3%) and cohort B (23.1%). No patients had grade 3 or higher TRAE. CONCLUSION: Ensartinib has been tentatively proven favorable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive advanced LUSC or LASC in the real-world. However, confirmatory studies are still needed in larger sample sizes.

Updated overall survival and circulating tumor DNA analysis of ensartinib for crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC from a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The initial phase II stuty (NCT03215693) demonstrated that ensartinib has shown clinical activity in patients with advanced crizotinib-refractory, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we reported the updated data on overall survival (OS) and molecular profiling from the initial phase II study. METHODS: In this study, 180 patients received 225 mg of ensartinib orally once daily until disease progression, death or withdrawal. OS was estimated by Kaplan‒Meier methods with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Next-generation sequencing was employed to explore prognostic biomarkers based on plasma samples collected at baseline and after initiating ensartinib. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was detected to dynamically monitor the genomic alternations during treatment and indicate the existence of molecular residual disease, facilitating improvement of clinical management. RESULTS: At the data cut-off date (August 31, 2022), with a median follow-up time of 53.2 months, 97 of 180 (53.9%) patients had died. The median OS was 42.8 months (95% CI: 29.3-53.2 months). A total of 333 plasma samples from 168 patients were included for ctDNA analysis. An inferior OS correlated significantly with baseline ALK or tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. In addition, patients with concurrent TP53 mutations had shorter OS than those without concurrent TP53 mutations. High ctDNA levels evaluated by variant allele frequency (VAF) and haploid genome equivalents per milliliter of plasma (hGE/mL) at baseline were associated with poor OS. Additionally, patients with ctDNA clearance at 6 weeks and slow ascent growth had dramatically longer OS than those with ctDNA residual and fast ascent growth, respectively. Furthermore, patients who had a lower tumor burden, as evaluated by the diameter of target lesions, had a longer OS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis further uncovered the independent prognostic values of bone metastases, higher hGE, and elevated ALK mutation abundance at 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Ensartinib led to a favorable OS in patients with advanced, crizotinib-resistant, and ALK-positive NSCLC. Quantification of ctDNA levels also provided valuable prognostic information for risk stratification.

Simultaneous quantitation of befotertinib (D-0316) and its metabolite D-0865 in human plasma by LC-MS/MS method.

A sensitive and reliable method was developed to determine befotertinib (D-0316) and its metabolite D-0865 from human plasma by LC-MS/MS. The samples were prepared by simple protein precipitation and 2 µL of the supernatant were chromatographed on a C18 analytical column (ACE Excel 2 Super C18, 50 × 2.1 mm). Elution was performed with mobile phase A (10 mM ammonium acetate in water containing 1 % formic acid) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile containing 1 % formic acid) under a gradient program in a total run time of 4 min. Triple Quadruple 5500 equipped with Turbo Ion Spray source and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) were used for the analysis detection. The transitions were m/z 568.3 â†’ 72.1 m/z (befotertinib), m/z 554.2 â†’ 497.2 (D-0865), and m/z 455.2 â†’ 164.9 (verapamil, internal standard). According to the Chinese Pharmacopeia Commission and ICH Harmonised Guideline for Bioanalytical Method Validation, this method was validated within the spectrum of its accuracy, precision, selectivity, linearity, recovery, matrix effect, and stability. This LC-MS/MS method was successfully applied for the quantitation of befotertinib and its metabolite D-0865 in human plasma during the pharmacokinetics study of befotertinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

A retrospective study of ensartinib-treated ALK-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients in China.

Aim: This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ensartinib in Chinese patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC in real-world clinical practice. Methods: Clinical data from ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with ensartinib in China were collected and analyzed. Efficacy end points included objective response rate and progression-free survival. Safety profiles were also evaluated. Results: A total of 682 patients were included in this study. The study demonstrated promising efficacy with an objective response rate of 54.0%, and the median progression-free survival was not estimable. Ensartinib exhibited a manageable safety profile with treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) consistent with prior clinical trials. The most common TRAE was rash (21.1%) and no TRAE led to death. Conclusion: Ensartinib is active and well tolerated for ALK-positive NSCLC patients in real-world clinical settings.

Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Ensartinib, a drug which blocks an enzyme in the body called ALK tyrosine kinase, has shown to be efficient and well tolerated in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence is crucial to confirm its effectiveness and safety in diverse patient populations. We analyzed the real-world outcomes of ensartinib treatment in 682 ALK-positive NSCLC patients in China, by looking at past records. The results showed that ensartinib demonstrated positive effects in most patients, meaning it helped in controlling their cancer progression. Side effects affected approximately one quarter of patients and most reported side effects were mild. Rash was the most reported side effect, accounting for about 21%. This study provides valuable insights into the real-world clinical performance of ensartinib, confirming its effectiveness and safety as a treatment option for ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

Adjuvant icotinib versus observation in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC (GASTO1003, CORIN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Background: This phase 2 trial aimed to compare adjuvant icotinib with observation in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We performed a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial from May 1, 2015 to December 29, 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in China. Patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutant, stage IB (the 7th edition of TNM staging) NSCLC without adjuvant chemotherapy were randomised (1:1) to receive adjuvant therapy with icotinib (125 mg, three times daily) for 12 months or to undergo observation until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). CORIN (GASTO1003) was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, with the number NCT02264210. Findings: A total of 128 patients were randomised, with 63 patients in the icotinib group and 65 patients in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months. The three-year DFS was significantly higher in the icotinib group (96.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3-99.9) than in the observation group (84.0%, 95% CI, 75.1-92.9; P = 0.041). The DFS was significantly longer in the icotinib group than in the observation group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.81; P = 0.013). The OS data were immature, with three deaths in the observation arm. In the icotinib group, adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 49 patients (77.8%), and grade 3 or greater AEs occurred in four patients (6.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that adjuvant icotinib improved the 3-year DFS in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC with a manageable safety profile. Funding: This study was sponsored by Betta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Safety and tolerability of oral vorolanib for neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration: a phase I, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral vorolanib for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: In the dose escalation, participants received ascending doses of oral vorolanib (25-100 mg daily). In the dose expansion, participants received recommended doses (25 and 50 mg daily). RESULTS: Between March 15, 2015, and January 23, 2019, 41 participants were enrolled in 6 centres in China. At the data cut-off (November 14, 2019), two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during dose escalation (one in the 75 mg cohort and one in the 100 mg cohort). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 33 (80.5%) participants, and grade 3 or higher TRAEs occurred in 12 (29.3%) participants. No fatal TRAEs were observed. Increases in the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to Day 360 of +7.7 letters (range, -5-29; n = 41) were observed in participants who were administered vorolanib. Corresponding reductions in mean central subfield thickness (CST) and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) area at Day 360 were observed in these three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of vorolanib improved visual outcomes in participants with nAMD with manageable systemic safety profiles.

Efficacy and safety of vorolanib plus everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A three-arm, randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase III study (CONCEPT).

BACKGROUND: Vorolanib is a highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. This three-arm, randomised, registered study aimed to assess the combination of vorolanib and everolimus or vorolanib alone versus a control arm of everolimus as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who had received one prior VEGFR-TKI were randomised (1:1:1) to receive the combination of vorolanib and everolimus or either monotherapy. Patients with brain metastases were excluded. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by the independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. RESULTS: Between 10th March 2017 and 30th May 2019, 399 patients (133 in each group) were enrolled. By the cutoff date (30th April 2020), a significant improvement in PFS was detected in the combination group compared with the everolimus group (10.0 versus 6.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.70; P = 0.0171). PFS was similar between the vorolanib group and the everolimus group (median: 6.4 versus 6.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.94; P = 0.6856). A significantly higher objective response rate was observed in the combination group than in the everolimus group (24.8% versus 8.3%; P = 0.0003), whereas there was no significant difference between the vorolanib group and the everolimus group (10.5% versus 8.3%; P = 0.5278). The overall survival data were immature. A total of 96 (72.2%), 52 (39.1%) and 71 (53.4%) grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in the combination group, vorolanib group and everolimus group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of vorolanib to everolimus as 2nd-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who have experienced cancer progression after VEGFR-TKI therapy provided a better objective response rate and PFS than everolimus alone with a manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03095040; Chinadrugtrials, CTR20160987.

Befotertinib (D-0316) versus icotinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, selective oral third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of befotertinib with icotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study at 39 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC, and had confirmed exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system to receive either oral befotertinib (75-100 mg once daily) or oral icotinib (125 mg three times per day) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by type of EGFR mutation, CNS metastasis status, and gender, and participants, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomly assigned patients. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in safety analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04206072, and the overall survival follow-up is still in progress. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2019, and Dec 18, 2020, 568 patients were screened, of whom 362 were randomly assigned to the befotertinib (n=182) or icotinib (n=180) group; all 362 patients were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 10·2-23·5) in the befotertinib group and 19·4 months (10·3-23·5) in the icotinib group. Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 17·9-not estimable) in the befotertinib group and 13·8 months (12·4-15·2) in the icotinib group (hazard ratio 0·49 [95% CI 0·36-0·68], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55 (30%) of 182 patients in the befotertinib group and in 14 (8%) of 180 patients in the icotinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 37 (20%) patients in the befotertinib group and in five (3%) patients in the icotinib group. Two (1%) patients in the befotertinib group and one (1%) patient in the icotinib group died due to treatment-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Befotertinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared with icotinib in first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Although serious adverse events were more common in the befotertinib than the icotinib arm, the safety profile of befotertinib was manageable overall. FUNDING: Betta Pharmaceuticals (China). TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of crown ether fused quinazoline analogues as potent EGFR inhibitors.

Crown ether fused anilinoquinazoline analogues were synthesized as novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Representative compounds showed potent and selective EGFR inhibitory activities in an in vitro EGFR kinase assay and an EGFR-mediated intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation assay. The synthesis and preliminary biological, physical, and pharmacokinetic evaluation of these fused quinazoline compounds is reported.