RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: Data of patients with clinical stage T3-4aN0-3M0 (IIb-III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein-Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit.
Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer type. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis. A non-invasive assay for the detection of early-stage gastric cancer is highly desirable for reducing associated mortality. METHODS: We collected a prospective study cohort of 110 stage I-II gastric cancer patients and 139 non-cancer individuals. We performed whole-genome sequencing with plasma samples and profiled four types of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) characteristics, fragment size pattern, copy number variation, nucleosome coverage pattern, and single nucleotide substitution. With these differential profiles, we developed an ensemble model to detect gastric cancer signals. Further, we validated the assay in an in-house first validation cohort of 73 gastric cancer patients and 94 non-cancer individuals and an independent second validation cohort of 47 gastric cancer patients and 49 non-cancer individuals. Additionally, we evaluated the assay in a hypothetical 100,000 screening population by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Our cfDNA-based assay could distinguish early-stage gastric cancer from non-cancer at an AUROC of 0.962 (95% CI: 0.942-0.982) in the study cohort, 0.972 (95% CI: 0.953-0.992) in the first validation cohort and 0.937 (95% CI: 0.890-0.983) in the second validation cohort. The model reached a specificity of 92.1% (128/139) and a sensitivity of 88.2% (97/110) in the study cohort. In the first validation cohort, 91.5% (86/94) of non-cancer individuals and 91.8% (67/73) of gastric cancer patients were correctly identified. In the second validation cohort, 89.8% (44/49) of non-cancer individuals and 87.2% (41/47) of gastric cancer patients were accurately classified. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced a liquid biopsy assay using multiple dimensions of cfDNA characteristics that could accurately identify early-stage gastric cancer from non-cancerous conditions. As a cost-effective non-invasive approach, it may provide population-wide benefits for the early detection of gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05269056 on March 7, 2022.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/sangue , Biópsia Líquida/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Adulto , DNA Tumoral Circulante/sangue , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) exhibit poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy offers promising clinical benefits; however, its efficacy and predictive biomarkers in a conversion therapy setting remain unclear. The authors aimed to retrospectively evaluate chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in a conversion therapy setting for GC patients with PM and establish a prediction model for assessing clinical benefits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes encompassed 55 GC patients with PM who underwent chemoimmunotherapy in a conversion therapy setting. Baseline PM specimens were collected for genomic and transcriptomic profiling. Clinicopathological factors, gene signatures, and tumor immune microenvironment were evaluated to identify predictive markers and develop a prediction model. RESULTS: Chemoimmunotherapy achieved a 41.8% objective response rate and 72.4% R0 resection rate in GC patients with PM. Patients with conversion surgery showed better overall survival (OS) than those without the surgery (median OS: not reached vs 7.82 m, P <0.0001). Responders to chemoimmunotherapy showed higher ERBB2 and ERBB3 mutation frequencies, CTLA4 and HLA-DQB1 expression, and CD8+ T cell infiltration, but lower CDH1 mutation and naïve CD4+ T cell infiltration, compared to nonresponders. A prediction model was established integrating CDH1 and ERBB3 mutations, HLA-DQB1 expression, and naïve CD4+ T cell infiltration (AUC=0.918), which were further tested using an independent external cohort (AUC=0.785). CONCLUSION: This exploratory study comprehensively evaluated clinicopathological, genomic, and immune features and developed a novel prediction model, providing a rational basis for the selection of GC patients with PM for chemoimmunotherapy-involved conversion therapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Peritoneais , Neoplasias Gástricas , Microambiente Tumoral , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/imunologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Neoplasias Peritoneais/imunologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/genética , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , GenômicaRESUMO
Ovarian metastasis is one of the major causes of treatment failure in patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, the genomic characteristics of ovarian metastasis in GC remain poorly understood. In this study, we enroll 74 GC patients with ovarian metastasis, with 64 having matched primary and metastatic samples. Here, we show a characterization of the mutation landscape of this disease, alongside an investigation into the molecular heterogeneity and pathway mutation enrichments between synchronous and metachronous metastasis. We classify patients into distinct clonal evolution patterns based on the distribution of mutations in paired samples. Notably, the parallel evolution group exhibits the most favorable prognosis. Additionally, by analyzing the differential response to chemotherapy, we identify potential biomarkers, including SALL4, CCDC105, and CLDN18, for predicting the efficacy of paclitaxel treatment. Furthermore, we validate that CLDN18 fusion mutations improve tumor response to paclitaxel treatment in GC with ovarian metastasis in vitro and vivo.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Mutação , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Paclitaxel , Neoplasias Gástricas , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Feminino , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Claudinas/genética , Claudinas/metabolismo , Evolução Molecular , Animais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Camundongos , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Exfoliated tumor cells are integral to malignant tumors diagnosis. The process of clinical cytology of exfoliation involves several complex steps that require at least two days of preparation. Here, we develop a balanced-etching visual kit based on concentration differences of Glutathione/Glucose (GSH/Glu) to distinguish normal from exfoliated tumor cells rapidly and accurately. The balanced-etching visualization kit can be used to obtain color cards and screen exfoliated tumor cells initially (within 10 min). Furthermore, by utilizing logic gates and machine learning algorithms for RGB extraction of the color card obtained from the kit, accurate screening of exfoliated tumor cells is achieved. Finally, a series of clinical tumor samples, such as urine, pleural fluids, ascites, and gastric fluids, have been validated. With effective experimental methods, accurate disease information, and appropriate therapeutic programs, the novel diagnostic strategy is expected to promote precision medicine.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of an effective strategy for the prevention of peritoneal metastasis (PM) from locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This randomized-controlled study aimed to evaluate the outcome of D2 radical resection with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plus systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone in locally AGC patients. METHODS: All enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy (HIPEC group) or systemic chemotherapy alone (non-HIPEC group) after radical gastrectomy. HIPEC was performed intraperitoneally with cisplatin (40 mg/m2) within 72 h after surgery, while systemic chemotherapy based on the SOX regimen (S-1 combined with oxaliplatin) was administered 4-6 weeks after radical surgery. Patterns of recurrence, adverse events, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were enrolled in the present study. The 3-year DFS rate was 73.8% in the HIPEC group, which was significantly higher than that in the non-HIPEC group (61.2%, P = 0.031). The 3-year OS rate was 73.9% in the HIPEC group and 77.6% in the non-HIPEC group, with no significant difference (P = 0.737). PM was the most common distant metastasis in both groups. The occurrence rate of PM in the HIPEC group was statistically lower than that in the non-HIPEC group (20.9% vs. 40.3%, P = 0.015). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 19 (14.2%) patients, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Radical surgery followed by HIPEC combined with systemic chemotherapy is a safe and feasible strategy for locally AGC patients and could effectively improve DFS and reduce the occurrence of PM. However, more prospective randomized studies with a large sample size are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with www.medresman.org.cn as ChiCTR2200055966 on 10/12/2016.
Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Terapia CombinadaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer (GC) is characterized by aggressive biological behavior and poor outcome. Currently, there is no standard treatment mode for such patients. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy of conversion therapy in patients with synchronous ovarian metastasis from GC in this study. METHODS: About 219 GC patients with ovarian metastasis in 2011-2020 were enrolled. Two groups were established based on the different treatment: the conversion therapy group (chemotherapy combined with surgical resection, CS group) and the non-conversion therapy group (NCS group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to analyze the efficacy of different treatment modes on the prognosis of these patients. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included according to PSM results, with 46 patients each in CS and NCS groups. The median overall survival (OS) in the CS group was notably better than that in the NCS group (p < 0.001). Twenty-six patients (56.52%) in the CS group achieved R0 resection, and they had a better prognosis (p = 0.003). Compared with patients who underwent simultaneous gastrectomy and ovarian metastasectomy (CSb group), those who underwent ovarian metastasectomy before systemic chemotherapy (CSa group) had a higher R0 resection rate (p = 0.016) and longer survival time (p = 0.002). A total of 38 patients (41.30%) across both groups received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and these patients had a better survival (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The conversion therapy is safe and effective for patients with synchronous ovarian metastasis from GC and can improve their prognosis. However, our results need to be confirmed by more randomized controlled clinical studies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Prognóstico , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia Combinada , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and genotypic characteristics of Cronobacter isolated from powdered infant formula (PIF) manufacturing facilities and to identify a potential source of contamination. A total of 42 Cronobacter isolates (5%) were detected in 835 environmental samples collected during the surveillance study. These isolates included C. sakazakii (n = 37), C. malonaticus (n = 3), and C. turicensis (n = 2). The isolates were divided into 14 sequence types (STs) by multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and 21 pulsotypes (PTs) using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The dominant C. sakazakii sequence types were ST3 (n = 12) and ST21 (n = 10), followed by ST136 (n = 6). The major PTs were PT22 (n = 12) and PT17 (n = 4) based on 100% similarity. Strains isolated from samples collected at the same production facility showed closer phylogenetic relation than those collected from distinct facilities. The result of extensive traceback sampling showed that PIF residues (PIF dust in production areas), fluid beds, drying areas, floors, and soil samples collected adjacent to the production facilities were the primary positive areas for Cronobacter. The present study outlines an effective approach to determine prevalence and genetic diversity of Cronobacter isolates associated with contamination of PIF.