Insertable cardiac monitoring results in higher rates of atrial fibrillation diagnosis and oral anticoagulation prescription after ischaemic stroke.

AIMS: After an ischaemic stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF) detection allows for improved secondary prevention strategies. This study aimed to compare AF detection and oral anticoagulant (OAC) initiation in patients with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) vs. external cardiac monitor (ECM) after ischaemic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) insurance claims and Abbott Labs device registration data were used to identify patients hospitalized with an ischaemic stroke in 2017-2019 who received an ICM or ECM within 3 months. Patients with continuous Medicare FFS insurance and prescription drug enrolment in the prior year were included. Patients with prior AF, atrial flutter, cardiac devices, or OAC were excluded. Insertable cardiac monitor and ECM patients were propensity score matched 1:4 on demographics, comorbidities, and stroke hospitalization characteristics. The outcomes of interest were AF detection and OAC initiation evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. A total of 5702 Medicare beneficiaries (ICM, n = 444; ECM, n = 5258) met inclusion criteria. The matched cohort consisted of 2210 Medicare beneficiaries (ICM, n = 442; ECM, n = 1768) with 53% female, mean age 75 years, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.6 (1.6). Insertable cardiac monitor use was associated with a higher probability of AF detection [(hazard ratio (HR) 2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.31, 3.59)] and OAC initiation [HR 2.91, CI (2.28, 3.72)] compared to patients monitored only with ECM. CONCLUSION: Patients with an ischaemic stroke monitored with an ICM were almost three times more likely to be diagnosed with AF and to be prescribed OAC compared to patients who received ECM only.

New insertable cardiac monitors show high diagnostic yield and good safety profile in real-world clinical practice: results from the international prospective observational SMART Registry.

AIMS: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are indicated for long-term monitoring of unexplained syncope or palpitations, and for detection of bradycardia, ventricular tachycardia, and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and clinical value associated with a new generation ICM (Confirm Rx™, Abbott, Illinois, USA), featuring a new remote monitoring system based on smartphone patient applications. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SMART Registry is an international prospective observational study. The main endpoints were ICM safety (incidence of serious adverse device and procedure-related events (SADEs) at 1 month), ICM clinical value (incidence of device-detected true arrhythmias and of clinical diagnoses and interventions), and patient-reported experience measurements (PREMs). A total of 1400 subjects were enrolled. ICM indications included syncope (49.1%), AF (18.8%), unexplained palpitations (13.6%), risk of ventricular arrhythmia (6.6%), and cryptogenic stroke (6.0%). Freedom from SADEs at 1 month was 99.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 98.8-99.7%). In the 6-month monitoring period, the ICM detected true cardiac arrhythmias in 45.7% of patients and led to clinical interventions in a relevant proportion of patients; in particular, a pacemaker implant was performed after bradycardia detection in 8.9% of subjects who received an ICM for syncope and oral anticoagulation therapy was indicated after AF detection in 15.7% of subjects with cryptogenic stroke. PREMs showed that 78.2% of subjects were satisfied with the remote monitoring patient app. CONCLUSION: The evaluated ICM is associated with an excellent safety profile and high diagnostic yield. Patients reported positive experiences associated with the use of their smartphone for the device remote monitoring.

Avoiding unnecessary ventricular pacing is associated with reduced incidence of heart failure hospitalizations and persistent atrial fibrillation in pacemaker patients.

AIMS: In bradycardia patients treated with dual-chamber pacing, we aimed to evaluate whether pacing with atrioventricular (AV) delay management [AV hysteresis (AVH)], compared with standard pacing with fixed AV delays, reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing percentage (VPP) and is associated with better clinical outcomes. Main study endpoints were the incidence of heart failure hospitalizations (HFH), persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), and cardiac death. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from two identical prospective observational studies, BRADYCARE I in the USA and BRADYCARE II in Europe, Africa, and Asia, were pooled. Overall, 2592 patients (75 ± 10 years, 45.1% female, 50% with AVH) had complete clinical and device data at 1-year follow-up and were analysed. Primary pacing indication was sinus node disease (SND) in 1177 (45.4%), AV block (AVB) in 974 (37.6%), and other indications in 441 (17.0%) patients. Pacing with AVH, compared with standard pacing, was associated with a lower 1-year incidence of HFH [1.3% vs. 3.1%, relative risk reduction (RRR) 57.5%, P = 0.002] and of persistent AF (5.3% vs. 7.7%, RRR = 31.1%, P = 0.028). Cardiac mortality was not different between groups (1.0% vs. 1.4%, RRR = 27.8%, P = 0.366). Pacing with AVH, compared with standard pacing, was associated with a lower (P < 0.001) median VPP in all patients (7% vs. 75%), in SND (3% vs. 44%), in AVB (25% vs. 98%), and in patients with other pacing indications (3% vs. 47%). CONCLUSION: Cardiac pacing with AV delay management via AVH is associated with reduced 1-year incidence of HFH and persistent AF, most likely due to a reduction in VPP compared to standard pacing.

Artificial intelligence cloud platform improves arrhythmia detection from insertable cardiac monitors to 25 cardiac rhythm patterns through multi-label classification.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias and other heart diseases. Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) have been developed to continuously monitor cardiac activity over long periods of time and to detect 4 cardiac patterns (atrial tachyarrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, bradycardia, and pause). However, interpretation of ECG or ICM subcutaneous ECG (sECG) is time-consuming for clinicians. Artificial intelligence (AI) classifies ECG and sECG with high accuracy in short times. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate whether an AI algorithm can expand ICM arrhythmia recognition from 4 to many cardiac patterns. METHODS: We performed an exploratory retrospective study with sECG raw data coming from 20 patients wearing a Confirm Rx™ (Abbott, Sylmar, USA) ICM. The sECG data were recorded in standard conditions and then analyzed by AI (Willem™, IDOVEN, Madrid, Spain) and cardiologists, in parallel. RESULTS: In nineteen patients, ICMs recorded 2261 sECGs in an average follow-up of 23 months. Within these 2261 sECG episodes, AI identified 7882 events and classified them according to 25 different cardiac rhythm patterns with a pondered global accuracy of 88%. Global positive predictive value, sensitivity, and F1-score were 86.77%, 83.89%, and 85.52% respectively. AI was especially sensitive for bradycardias, pauses, rS complexes, premature atrial contractions, and inverted T waves, reducing the median time spent to classify each sECG compared to cardiologists. CONCLUSION: AI can process sECG raw data coming from ICMs without previous training, extending the performance of these devices and saving cardiologists' time in reviewing cardiac rhythm patterns detection.

Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.

AIMS: Per standard of care, dual-chamber pacemakers are programmed in DDDR mode with fixed atrioventricular (AV) delay or with long AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing. We aimed to evaluate whether the PR interval may be a specific criterion of choice between standard DDDR, to preserve AV synchrony in long PR patients, and managed ventricular pacing (MVP), to avoid ventricular desynchronization imposed by right ventricle apical pacing, in short PR patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the MINERVA trial, 1166 patients were randomized to Control DDDR, MVP, or atrial anti-tachycardia pacing plus MVP (DDDRP + MVP). We evaluated the interaction of PR interval with pacing mode by comparing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) longer than 7 consecutive days as a function of PR interval. Out of 906 patients with available data, the median PR interval was 180 ms. The PR interval was found to significantly (P = 0.012) interact with pacing mode for AF incidence: the risk of AF > 7 days was lower [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.34-0.99; P = 0.047] in patients with short PR (shorter than median PR) if programmed in MVP mode compared with DDDR mode and it was lower (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99; P = 0.049) in patients with long PR (equal to or longer than median PR) if programmed in DDDR mode compared with MVP. CONCLUSION: Our data show that PR interval may be used as a selection criterion to identify the optimal physiological pacing mode. Persistent AF incidence was lower in short PR patients treated by right ventricular pacing minimization and in long PR patients treated by standard dual-chamber pacing.

Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in bradycardia patients. Advanced pacemakers feature atrial preventive pacing and atrial antitachycardia pacing (DDDRP) and managed ventricular pacing (MVP), which minimizes unnecessary right ventricular pacing. We evaluated whether DDDRP and MVP might reduce mortality, morbidity, or progression to permanent AF when compared with standard dual-chamber pacing (Control DDDR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized, parallel, single-blind, multi-centre trial we enrolled 1300 patients with bradycardia and previous atrial tachyarrhythmias, in whom a DDDRP pacemaker had recently been implanted. History of permanent AF and third-degree atrioventricular block were exclusion criteria. After a 1-month run-in period, 1166 eligible patients, aged 74 ± 9 years, 50% females, were randomized to Control DDDR, DDDRP + MVP, or MVP. Analysis was intention-to-treat. The primary outcome, i.e. the 2-year incidence of a combined endpoint composed of death, cardiovascular hospitalizations, or permanent AF, occurred in 102/385 (26.5%) Control DDDR patients, in 76/383 (19.8%) DDDRP + MVP patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.99, P = 0.04 vs. Control DDDR] and in 85/398 (21.4%) MVP patients (HR = 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.03, P = 0.125 vs. Control DDDR). When compared with Control DDDR, DDDRP + MVP reduced the risk for AF longer than 1 day (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.85, P < 0.001), AF longer than 7 days (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.73, P < 0.001), and permanent AF (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.75, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In patients with bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias, DDDRP + MVP is superior to standard dual-chamber pacing. The primary endpoint was significantly lowered through the reduction of the progression of atrial tachyarrhythmias to permanent AF. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00262119.

Improving atrial fibrillation detection in patients with implantable cardiac devices by means of a remote monitoring and management application.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and has been associated with an increased stroke risk. The aim of our project was to assess the clinical value of a web-based application, Discovery Link AFinder, in improving AF detection in CIED patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven Italian hospitals performed an observational study consisting of four phases. During phase 1, expert nurses and cardiologists prospectively followed-up CIED patients via in-hospital examinations and remote monitoring, and classified clinically relevant events, particularly AF occurrence. During phase 2, Discovery Link AFinder was exploited to identify patients who had suffered AF in the previous 12 months through the systematic scanning of device data remote transmissions. Phases 3 and 4 were repetitions of phases 1 and 2, respectively, and were implemented 6 months after the previous phases. A total of 472 consecutive patients were included in phase 1; AF occurred in 170 patients, 61 of whom were identified as new AF patients. Evidence of AF during this phase prompted prescription of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in 30 patients. In phase 2, AFinder uncovered new AF, unidentified in phase 1, in 54 patients and prompted implementation of OAC therapy in 11 patients. During phase 3, 30 new AF patients were identified by means of remote monitoring, while during phase 4, a further three AF patients were identified by AFinder only. CONCLUSIONS: The AFinder web-based software, applied on top of standard in-hospital and remote monitoring, improved AF detection and enabled OAC treatment to be undertaken.

Heart Size Difference Drives Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MORE-MPP CRT Trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported that female sex predicts superior cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. One theory is that this association is related to smaller female heart size, thus increased relative dyssynchrony at a given QRS duration (QRSd). Our objective was to investigate the mechanisms of sex-specific CRT response relating to heart size, relative dyssynchrony, cardiomyopathy type, QRS morphology, and other patient characteristics. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a post hoc analysis of the MORE-CRT MPP (More Response on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Multipoint Pacing)  trial (n=3739, 28% women), with a subgroup analysis of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block (n=1308, 41% women) to control for confounding characteristics. A multivariable analysis examined predictors of response to 6 months of conventional CRT, including sex and relative dyssynchrony, measured by QRSd/left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Women had a higher CRT response rate than men (70.1% versus 56.8%, P<0.0001). In subgroup analysis, regression analysis of the nonischemic cardiomyopathy left bundle-branch block subgroup identified QRSd/LVEDV, but not sex, as a modifier of CRT response (P<0.0039). QRSd/LVEDV was significantly higher in women (0.919) versus men (0.708, P<0.001). CRT response was 78% for female patients with QRSd/LVEDV greater than the median value, compared with 68% with QRSd/LVEDV less than the median value (P=0.012). The association between CRT response and QRSd/LVEDV was strongest at QRSd <150 ms. CONCLUSIONS: In the nonischemic cardiomyopathy left bundle-branch block population, increased relative dyssynchrony in women, who have smaller heart sizes than their male counterparts, is a driver of sex-specific CRT response, particularly at QRSd <150 ms. Women may benefit from CRT at a QRSd <130 ms, opening the debate on whether sex-specific QRSd cutoffs or QRS/LVEDV measurement should be incorporated into clinical guidelines.

Result of the Physiologic Pacing Registry, an international multicenter prospective observational study of conduction system pacing.

BACKGROUND: Conduction system pacing (CSP), including both left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been proposed as an alternative therapy option for patients with indication for cardiac pacing to treat bradycardia or heart failure. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate implant success, safety, and electrical performances of HBP and LBBAP in the multinational Physiological Pacing Registry. METHODS: The international prospective observational registry included 44 sites from 16 countries globally between November 2018 and May 2021. RESULTS: Of 870 subjects enrolled, CSP lead implantation was attempted in 849 patients. Subjects with successful CSP lead implantation were followed for 6 months (5 ± 2 months). CSP lead implantation was successful in 768 patients (90.4%). Implant success was 95.2% (239/251) for LBBAP and 88.5% (529/598) for HBP (P = .002). Procedural duration and fluoroscopy duration were comparable between LBBAP and HBP (P = .537). Capture threshold at implant was 0.69 ± 0.39 V at 0.46 ± 0.15 ms in LBBAP and 1.44 ± 1.03 V at 0.71 ± 0.33 ms in HBP (P <.001). Capture threshold at 6 months was 0.79 ± 0.33 V at 0.44 ± 0.13 ms in LBBAP and 1.59 ± 0.97 V at 0.67 ± 0.31 ms in HBP (P <.001). Pacing threshold rise ≥1 V was observed at 6 months in 3 of 208 (1.4%) of LBBAP and 55 of 418 (13.2%) of HBP (P <.001). Serious adverse events related to implant procedure or CSP lead occurred in 5 of 251 (2.0%) with LBBAP and 25 of 598 (4.2%) with HBP (P = .115). CONCLUSION: This large prospective multicenter study demonstrates that CSP is technically feasible in most patients with relatively higher implant success and suggests that, with current technology, LBBAP may have better pacing parameters than HBP.

Heart size disparity drives sex-specific response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the MORE-MPP CRT trial.

Background: Studies have reported that female sex predicts superior cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. One theory is that this association is related to smaller female heart size, thus increased "relative dyssynchrony" at given QRS durations (QRSd). Objective: To investigate the mechanisms of sex-specific CRT response relating to heart size, relative dyssynchrony, cardiomyopathy type, QRS morphology, and other patient characteristics. Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the MORE-CRT MPP trial (n=3739, 28% female), with a sub-group analysis of patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=1308, 41% female) to control for confounding characteristics. A multivariable analysis examined predictors of response to 6 months of conventional CRT, including sex and relative dyssynchrony, measured by QRSd/LVEDV (left ventricular end-diastolic volume). Results: Females had a higher CRT response rate than males (70.1% vs. 56.8%, p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis: Regression analysis of the NICM LBBB subgroup identified QRSd/LVEDV, but not sex, as a modifier of CRT response (p<0.0039). QRSd/LVEDV was significantly higher in females (0.919) versus males (0.708, p<0.001). CRT response was 78% for female patients with QRSd/LVEDV>median value, compared to 68% < median value (p=0.012). Association between CRT response and QRSd/LVEDV was strongest at QRSd<150ms. Conclusions: In the NICM LBBB population, increased relative dyssynchrony in females, who have smaller heart sizes than their male counterparts, is a driver of sex-specific CRT response, particularly at QRSd <150ms. Females may benefit from CRT at a QRSd <130ms, opening the debate on whether sex-specific QRSd cut-offs or QRS/LVEDV measurement should be incorporated into clinical guidelines.

Artificial intelligence augments detection accuracy of cardiac insertable cardiac monitors: Results from a pilot prospective observational study.

Background: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are indicated for long-term monitoring of patients with unexplained syncope or who are at risk for cardiac arrhythmias. The volume of ICM-transmitted information may result in long data review times to identify true and clinically relevant arrhythmias. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) may improve ICM detection accuracy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients implanted with the Confirm RxTM ICM (Abbott) and followed in a prospective observational study. This device continuously monitors subcutaneous electrocardiograms (SECGs) and transmits to clinicians information about detected arrhythmias and patient-activated symptomatic episodes. All SECGs were classified by expert electrophysiologists and by the WillemTM AI algorithm (IDOVEN). Results: During mean follow-up of 23 months, of 20 ICM patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years; 50% women), 19 had 2261 SECGs recordings associated with cardiac arrhythmia detections or patient symptoms. True arrhythmias occurred in 11 patients: asystoles in 2, bradycardias in 3, ventricular tachycardias in 4, and atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation [AT/AF]) in 10; with 6 patients having >1 arrhythmia type. AI algorithm overall accuracy for arrhythmia classification was 95.4%, with 97.19% sensitivity, 94.52% specificity, 89.74% positive predictive value, and 98.55% negative predictive value. Application of AI would have reduced the number of false-positive results by 98.0% overall: 94.0% for AT/AF, 87.5% for ventricular tachycardia, 99.5% for bradycardia, and 98.8% for asystole. Conclusion: Application of AI to ICM-detected episodes is associated with high classification accuracy and may significantly reduce health care staff workload by triaging ICM data.

Determinants of worse prognosis in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Are ventricular arrhythmias an adjunctive risk factor?

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated in patients with systolic heart failure (HF), severe left ventricle (LV) dysfunction and interventricular dyssynchrony.In prospective observational research, we aimed to evaluate whether CRT-induced LV reverse remodelling and occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF) independently contribute to prognosis in patients with CRT defibrillators (CRT-D). METHODS: In 95 Italian cardiological centres, after a screening period of 6 months, patients were categorized according to VT/VF occurrence and CRT response, defined as LV end-systolic volume relative reduction >15% or LV ejection fraction absolute increase >5%. The main endpoint was death or HF hospitalizations. RESULTS: Among 1308 CRT-D patients (80% male, mean age 66 years), at 6 months, follow-up 71% were identified as CRT responders and 12% experienced appropriate VT/VF detections. The main endpoint was significantly and independently associated with previous myocardial infarction, New York Heart Association Class, VT/VF occurrence and with CRT response. CRT nonresponder patients who suffered VT/VF in the screening period had a risk of death or HF hospitalizations [HR = 7.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.95-15.48] significantly (P < 0.001) higher than CRT responders without VT/VF occurrence. This risk is mitigated without VT/VF occurrence (HR = 3.47, 95% CI = 2.03-5.91, P < 0.001) or in case of CRT response (HR = 3.11, 95% CI = 1.44-6.72, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our data show that both CRT response and occurrence of VT/VF independently contribute to the risk of death or HF-related hospitalizations in CRT-D patients. Early VT/VF occurrence may be identified as a marker of disease severity than can be mitigated by CRT response both in terms of all-cause mortality and long-term VT/VF onset. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00147290 and NCT00617175.

The Interplay of PR Interval and AV Pacing Delays Used for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients: Association with Clinical Response in a Retrospective Analysis of a Large Observational Study.

Background. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with prolonged QRS and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We aim to evaluate how the baseline PR interval is associated with outcomes (all-cause death or HF hospitalizations) and LV reverse remodeling (>15% relative reduction in LV end-systolic volume). Methods. Among 2224 patients with CRT defibrillators, 1718 (77.2%) had a device programmed at out-of-the-box settings (sensed AV delay: 100 ms and paced AV delay: 130 ms). Results. In this cohort of 1718 patients (78.7% men, mean age 66 years, 71.6% in NYHA class III/IV, LVEF = 27 ± 6%), echocardiographic assessment at 6-month follow-up showed that LV reverse remodeling was not constant as a function of the PR interval; in detail, it occurred in 56.4% of all patients but was more frequent (76.6%) in patients with a PR interval of 160 ms. In a median follow-up of 20 months, the endpoint of death or HF hospitalizations occurred in 304/1718 (17.7%) patients; in the multivariable regression analysis it was significantly less frequent when the PR interval was between 150 and 170 ms (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63−0.99, p = 0.046). The same PR range was associated with higher probability of CRT response (odds ratio = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.41−4.47, p = 0.002). Conclusions. In a large population of CRT patients, with fixed AV pacing delays, specific PR intervals are associated with significant benefits in terms of LV reverse remodeling and lower morbidity. These observational data suggest the importance of optimizing pacing programming as a function of the PR interval to maximize CRT response and patient outcome.

Temporal patterns of premature atrial complexes predict atrial fibrillation occurrence in bradycardia patients continuously monitored through pacemaker diagnostics.

The frequency of premature atrial complexes (PACs) has been related with atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence and adverse prognosis. Research objective was to evaluate whether temporal patterns of PACs are directly associated with AF onset in pacemaker patients with continuous monitoring of the atrial rhythm. Overall, 193 pacemaker patients (49% female, 72 ± 9 years old), enrolled in a national registry, were analyzed. Frequency of daily PACs was measured in a 14-day initial observation period, during which patients were in sinus rhythm. In the following period, temporal occurrence and frequency of daily PACs and eventual onset of AF were derived by pacemaker diagnostics. In the run-in period, median PACs frequency was 614 PACs/day (interquartile range 70-3056). Subsequently, in a median follow-up of 6 months, AF occurred in 109 patients, in particular in 37/96 (38.5%) patients with a PAC rate < 614 PACs/day and in 72/97 (74.2%) patients with PAC rate ≥ 614 PACs/day (p < 0.001). In patients with AF occurrence, the number of daily PACs, normalized by dividing for the average of PACs in ten preceding days, progressively increased in the 5 days preceding AF. Cox model predictive analysis showed that the risk of AF was significantly higher in patients with a relative increase of the daily PACs higher than 30% compared with PACs average number in ten preceding days [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.67 (2.40-5.59), p < 0.001]. PACs frequency increases in the 5 days preceding AF onset. A relative increase of the daily PACs is significantly associated with the risk of AF occurrence.

Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators reduce clinical adverse events related to atrial fibrillation when compared with single-chamber defibrillators: a subanalysis of the DATAS trial.

AIMS: The aim of the present analysis of the DATAS study was to compare the impact of dual- vs. single-chamber defibrillators on atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence and AF-related clinical events in patients with Class I indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and no indication for dual-chamber pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-four patients were randomized, through a centralized assignment, to single-chamber ICDs, dual-chamber ICDs programmed as single-chamber ICDs, and dual ICDs with full diagnostics and AF prevention and therapy capabilities. The latter two groups in the first 8 months of the study, when the study design was that of a randomized parallel trial, were compared in the present analysis. The primary endpoint was composed by the following AF-related clinical events: permanent AF, AF-related hospitalizations, cardiac-embolic events, and inappropriate ICD shocks due to AF misclassification. Two hundred and twenty-three patients were available for this analysis, of whom 111 in the single-chamber-simulated group and 112 in the dual-chamber true group. Atrial fibrillation-related composite endpoint raw incidence was 9 of 111 (8.1%) in the single-chamber group vs. 1 of 112 (0.9%) in the dual-chamber group (P = 0.0098 by Fisher's exact test). Single-chamber ICDs were associated with a significantly higher risk to develop the AF-related composite endpoint by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 8.25, 95% CI 1.03-65.96, P = 0.047) and by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank test, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Dual-chamber ICDs compared with single-chamber ICDs reduced the incidence of an endpoint composed by permanent AF, AF-related hospitalizations, and ICD shocks deemed inappropriate due to AF misclassification.

Primary prevention implantation of cardioverter defibrillator without defibrillation threshold testing: 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Even though the intraoperative threshold testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) may cause hemodynamic impairment or be unfeasible, it is still considered required standard practice at the time of implantation. We compared the outcome of ICD recipients who underwent defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) with that of patients in whom no testing was performed. METHODS: A total of 291 subjects with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy received transvenous ICDs between January 2000 and December 2004 in five Italian cardiology centers. In two centers, DFT was routinely performed in 137 patients (81% men; mean age 69+/-9 years; mean ejection fraction 26+/-4%) (DFT group), while three centers never performed DFT in 154 patients (90% men; mean age 69+/-9 years; mean ejection fraction 27+/-5%) (no-DFT group). RESULTS: We compared total mortality, total cardiovascular mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and spontaneous episodes of ventricular arrhythmia (sustained ventricular tachycardia, VT, and ventricular fibrillation, VF) between these groups 2 years after implantation (median 23 months, 25th-75th percentile, 12-44 months). On comparing the DFT and no-DFT groups, we found an overall mortality rate of 20% versus 16%, cardiovascular mortality of 13% versus 10%, SCD of 3% versus 0.6%, VT incidence of 8% versus 10%, and VF incidence of 6% versus 4% (no significant difference in any comparison). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the incidence of clinical outcomes considered emerged between no-DFT and DFT groups. These results should be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

Electrical storm in patients with biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and related outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) who experienced electrical storm (ES). Electrical storm was defined as the occurrence of >or=3 episodes in 24 hours of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: A total of 631 patients with HF (90% male, mean 66+/-9 years) consecutively received a CRT-D device. At baseline, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 26%+/-7%, the QRS duration was 164+/-33 milliseconds, and the mean New York Heart Association class was 3.3+/-0.3. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 19+/-11 months, 2,419 ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes were appropriately detected in 141 (22%) patients. Electrical storm occurred in 45 (7%) of 631 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression showed that ES is more frequent in secondary prevention (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3, P=.015) and in nonischemic patients (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.8, P=.028). In patients who presented ES, CRT was associated with only marginal nonsignificant improvements of New York Heart Association class and left ventricular ejection fraction. Hospitalizations and death due to HF were more frequent in patients with ES compared with those without ES, amounting to 16.8 (4.3) versus 8.6 (0.9) per 100 patient-years (P = .018) and 7.7 versus 2.7 per 100 patient-years (P=.014), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical storm affect only 7% of CRT-D recipients and occurred more frequently in nonischemic patients with HF with biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillators implanted for secondary prevention. Electrical storm was associated with worse HF morbidity and mortality.

The MINERVA study design and rationale: a controlled randomized trial to assess the clinical benefit of minimizing ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Dual-chamber (DDD) pacing has generally been regarded as "physiologic pacing" and therefore expected to be superior to ventricular pacing. Major randomized trials have so far failed to demonstrate significant reductions in the incidences of mortality, stroke, and heart failure. It has been shown that unnecessary ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction or only intermittent atrioventricular block is associated with ventricular desynchronization and increased risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA). METHODS: The MINimizE Right Ventricular pacing to prevent Atrial fibrillation and heart failure (MINERVA) study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, international, single-blind, controlled trial designed to determine whether physiologic pacing through the managed ventricular pacing (MVP) algorithm combined with preventive atrial pacing (PAP) and atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is superior to standard DDD pacing in terms of 2-year reduction in death, permanent ATA, and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Patients with standard class I or II indications for permanent DDD pacing and history of ATA will receive a Medtronic EnRhythm implantable pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). After a 1-month run-in period, patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 manner to the DDD (control group, all OFF), the DDDRP (MVP + PAP + ATP ON), and the MVP group (only MVP ON). Up to 1,300 patients will be included in approximately 70 centers in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. CONCLUSIONS: The MINERVA study will make an important contribution to the management of patients with paroxysmal ATA and accepted indications for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation by determining whether physiologic pacing combined with PAP and ATP is superior to standard DDD pacing in terms of reduction of mortality, incidence of permanent ATA, and cardiovascular hospitalizations.

A randomized comparison of amiodarone and class IC antiarrhythmic drugs to treat atrial fibrillation in patients paced for sinus node disease: the Prevention Investigation and Treatment: A Group for Observation and Research on Atrial arrhythmias (PITAGORA) trial.

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control is an important goal in the treatment of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT). The PITAGORA study was a randomized trial in patients paced for sinus node disease (SND), designed to test the noninferiority of class IC antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) to amiodarone in terms of a primary end point composed of death, permanent AT, cardiovascular hospitalization, atrial cardioversion, or AAD change. METHODS: Randomization was stratified to assign 2 patients to amiodarone and 2 patients to class IC AADs: propafenone or flecainide. One hundred seventy-six patients (46% men, 72 +/- 8 years) were enrolled. Device diagnostics continuously monitored AT recurrences and duration. RESULTS: In a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 9 months, the primary end point occurred in 23 (30.7%) of 75 class IC patients and in 28 (40.0%) of 70 amiodarone patients. The absolute difference in the end point incidence (-9.3%; 95% CI between 3.7% and -22.3%) confirmed the noninferiority of class IC to amiodarone (P = .007). Kaplan-Meier 1-year freedom from AT episodes >10 minutes, 1 day, and 7 days was 40%, 73%, and 91% for amiodarone and 28%, 78%, and 86% for class IC AADs (P = nonsignificant). CONCLUSIONS: In patients paced for SND and suffering from AT, class IC AADs proved not to be inferior to amiodarone in terms of the primary composite end point described or end points which were differently composed of mortality, efficacy, or AAD side effects. The AADs studied also showed similar results in terms of symptoms, quality of life, and freedom from AT recurrences.

Persistent atrial fibrillation worsens heart rate variability, activity and heart rate, as shown by a continuous monitoring by implantable biventricular pacemakers in heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) induces loss of atrial contribution, heart rate irregularity, and fast ventricular rate. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to accurately measure AF incidence and to investigate the mutual temporal patterns of AF and heart failure (HF) in patients indicated to cardiac resynchronization therapy. METHODS: Four hundred ten consecutive patients (70% male, age 69 +/- 11) with advanced HF (NYHA = 3.0 +/- 0.6), low ejection fraction (EF = 27 +/- 9%), and ventricular conduction delay (QRS = 165 +/- 29 ms) received a biventricular pacemaker. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups: G1 = 249 patients with no AF history, G2 = 161 patients with history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. RESULTS: In a median follow-up of 13 months, AF episodes longer than 5 minutes occurred in 105 of 249 (42.2%) G1 patients and 76 of 161 (47.2%) G2 patients, while AF episodes longer than one day occurred in 14 of 249 (5.6%) G1 patients and in 36 of 161 (22.4%) G2 patients. Device diagnostics monitored daily values of patient activity, night heart rate (NHR), and heart rate variability (HRV). Comparing 30-day periods before AF onset and during persistent AF, significant (P < 0.0001) changes were observed in patient activity, which decreased from 221 +/- 13 to 162 +/- 12 minutes, and in NHR, which increased from 68 +/- 3 to 94 +/- 7 bpm. HRV significantly decreased (from 75 +/- 5 ms before AF onset to 60 +/- 6 ms after AF termination). NHR during AF was significantly (P < 0.01) and inversely correlated (R(2)= 0.73) with activity, with a significant lower activity associated with NHR >or= 88 bpm. CONCLUSION: AF is frequent in HF patients. Persistent AF is associated with statistically significant decrease in patient activity and HRV and NHR increase.