RESUMO
We report on a 33-year-old female patient with a relatively mild clinical case of TNF-receptor associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) and her 58-year-old father in whom end-stage renal disease due to TRAPS-related AA-amyloidosis has already developed. TRAPS was caused by a I170N mutation that has previously not been associated with amyloidosis. It remains unclear if an only mildly affected patient such as ours would benefit from treatment considering her father's severe course of disease. The relevant literature on this problem is reviewed.
Assuntos
Doenças Hereditárias Autoinflamatórias/genética , Receptores Tipo I de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/genética , Adulto , Amiloidose/genética , Amiloidose/imunologia , Feminino , Doenças Hereditárias Autoinflamatórias/imunologia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/genética , Falência Renal Crônica/imunologia , Mutação , Receptores Tipo I de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/imunologiaAssuntos
Azatioprina/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/fisiopatologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Large vessel vasculitis can be visualized by 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET). However, the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET is yet to be determined. We therefore performed a study to evaluate this technique for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TA). Patients with GCA or TA, who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and also had a pathologic PET scan in clinical routine, were selected. These PET scans, as well as PET scans obtained from age- and sex-matched control patients, were independently re-evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine experts. PET scans of 20 patients (17 GCA, 3 TA) and 20 controls were evaluated. In 85% of the examinations, both observers agreed on the diagnosis or exclusion of vasculitis. Specificity was calculated with 80% and sensitivity with 65%, yielding an overall diagnostic accuracy of 72%. The mean maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the subclavian region was significantly higher in vasculitis than in control patients (2.77 ± 1.02 vs 2.09 ± 0.64; difference 0.69; CI(95%): 0.14-1.24, p = 0.0161). SUVmax of the iliacal regions did not differ significantly. Receiver- operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed the highest sensitivity of 90% (CI(95%): 68-99%) and specificity of 45% (CI(95%): 23-69%) for a SUVmax cut-off point of 1.78 (AUC 0.72, (CI(95%): 0.56-0.86). PET findings are reproducible and independent of the observer. The low sensitivity and specificity indicate that enhanced vascular uptake might be overrated if clinical details are suggestive for vasculitis. Therefore, the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis should not be based on PET findings only.