Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on anterior knee pain: Patellofemoral pain and patellar tendinopathy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a multidisciplinary guideline for patellofemoral pain (PFP) and patellar tendinopathy (PT) to facilitate clinical decision-making in primary and secondary care. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel identified questions in clinical decision-making. Based on a systematic literature search, the strength of the scientific evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method and the weight assigned to the considerations by the expert panel together determined the strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: After confirming PFP or PT as a clinical diagnosis, patients should start with exercise therapy. Additional conservative treatments are indicated only when exercise therapy does not result in clinically relevant changes after six (PFP) or 12 (PT) weeks. Pain medications should be reserved for cases of severe pain. The additional value of imaging assessments for PT is limited. Open surgery is reserved for very specific cases of nonresponders to exercise therapy and those requiring additional conservative treatments. Although the certainty of evidence regarding exercise therapy for PFP and PT had to be downgraded ('very low GRADE' and 'low GRADE'), the expert panel advocates its use as the primary treatment strategy. The panel further formulated weaker recommendations regarding additional conservative treatments, pain medications, imaging assessments and open surgery ('very low GRADE' to 'low GRADE' assessment or absence of scientific evidence). CONCLUSION: This guideline recommends starting with exercise therapy for PFP and PT. The recommendations facilitate clinical decision-making, and thereby optimizing treatment and preventing unnecessary burdens, risks and costs to patients and society. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, clinical practice guideline.

[Exercise capacity after mechanical ventilation because of COVID-19: Cardiopulmonary exercise tests in clinical rehabilitation]. / Inspanningscapaciteit na beademing vanwege covid-19.

OBJECTIVE: To safely and effectively train the exercise capacity of post-COVID-19 patients it is important to test for cardiopulmonary risk factors and to assess exercise limitations. The goal of this study was to describe the exercise capacity and underlying exercise limitations of mechanically ventilated post-COVID-19 patients in clinical rehabilitation. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. METHOD: Twenty-four post-COVID-19patients that were mechanically ventilated at ICU and thereafter admitted for clinical rehabilitation performed a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with breath-by-breath gas-exchange monitoring, ECG-registration, blood pressure- and saturation monitoring. In absence of a primary cardiac or ventilatory exercise limitation patients were considered to be limited primarily by decreased peripheral muscle mass. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients could perform a maximal exercise test and no adverse events occurred. Cardiorespiratory fitness was very poor with a median peak oxygen uptake of 15.0 [10.1-21.4] mlO2/kg/min (57% of predicted values). However, we observed large differences within the group in both exercise capacity and exercise limitations. While 7/23 patients were primarily limited by ventilatory function, the majority (70%) was limited primarily by the decreased peripheral muscle mass. CONCLUSION: Cardiorespiratory fitness of post-COVID-19 patients in clinical rehabilitation is strongly deteriorated. The majority of patients seemed primarily limited for exercise by the decreased peripheral muscle mass.