Can state-supported interprofessional coalitions cure preceptor shortages?

The shortage of clinical preceptors compromises the current and future supply of healthcare providers and patient access to primary care. This article describes how an interprofessional coalition in South Carolina formed and sought government support to address the preceptor shortage. Some states have legislated preceptor tax credits and/or deductions to support the clinical education of future primary care healthcare providers. As a result of the coalition's work, a bill to establish similar incentives is pending in the South Carolina legislature.

Interprofessional service-learning in a community setting: findings from a pilot study.

Interprofessional education is becoming more popular in higher education and service-learning has been a successful method to facilitate experiences that foster teamwork between professions. This report shares the results from an interprofessional service-learning project (ISLP) targeting students across eight disciplines (physician assistant, medicine, pharmacy, dietetic internship, physical therapy, master in health administration, nursing and biomedical science). The project used an existing resource, the South Carolina Area Health Education Consortium (SC-AHEC), to coordinate student learning across multiple regions and an established health promotion program curriculum for student outreach content. Participating students (n = 149) were evaluated to determine how the activity affected student appreciation and knowledge of their own and other professions, their interaction with other professional students, and student teamwork skills. Students found the most value in learning with students from other professions as part of the activity with lesser value placed on students increasing their knowledge about their profession's role in interprofessional work.

Simulation-based teaching to improve cardiovascular exam skills performance among third-year medical students.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports the need for improvement in cardiac physical examination skills training. PURPOSE: This study evaluates whether the addition of simulation offers added benefit over training utilizing standardized patients only. METHODS: All 124 third-year students who completed the required clerkship in one academic year received cardiac examination skills training utilizing a standardized patient and a cardiac simulator. The control group, comprising 281 students from 2 previous academic years, received training utilizing a standardized patient only. All students' physical exam skills were assessed in an objective structured clinical examination. RESULTS: Students trained with cardiac simulation performed significantly better than the control group in all 5 cardiac skills. The number of students who correctly performed all 5 cardiac exam skills increased significantly (p=.004). Pulmonary exam skills were unchanged. CONCLUSION: The use of simulation in addition to standardized patient teaching can improve students' performance of cardiac examination skills.

Text Messaging as a Teaching Tool in a Family Medicine Clerkship Rotation.

INTRODUCTION: Today's learners use multiple forms of social communication, such as text messaging, that offer a promising teaching tool for medical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a diabetes care curriculum delivered through text messages for third-year medical students on a rural family medicine clerkship. METHODS: A pilot study of 119 participants were compared in a parallel group randomized controlled trial evaluating medical student learning and satisfaction with text messages throughout rotation compared to an email with the same content in their first week of rotation. Participants completed a 10-question multiple-choice test and six survey questions upon completing the rotation. The primary outcome was a difference between test scores among the two groups, and student satisfaction with the educational intervention was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 85 participants successfully completed the study protocol (34 text messages and 51 email) and were included in a per protocol analysis. The average number of correct responses per test was 3.32 (SD 1.29) in the texting group and 3.69 (SD 1.53) in the email group (P=0.259). Student satisfaction with text messages was 3.68 (SD 0.87) compared to email at 2.02 (SD 0.95) when rating the educational intervention on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1=poor, 3=average, and 5=excellent). CONCLUSIONS: Participant knowledge on a challenging posttest was not improved with text messages compared to an email in this pilot study. Satisfaction with text messages was primarily positive. Further study is needed to determine the effectiveness of this content delivery method.

Virtual Interprofessional Learning.

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional education is a challenge given the current constraints of clinical education, which is bound by space, location, off-campus clinical rotations, and conflicting academic schedules. New approaches need to be developed if academic settings are to provide high-impact interprofessional education. METHOD: Virtual Interprofessional (VIP) Learning was developed as an innovative, online, asynchronous learning platform utilizing avatars that engages learners in interprofessional clinical learning opportunities across disciplines and settings. Teams of interprofessional students worked together to complete a real-life case scenario focused on patient quality and safety using root cause analysis and interprofessional communication. RESULTS: Evaluation via focus groups, self-assessment survey, and a platform usability assessment found an increase in students' interprofessional knowledge, attitudes, and preference for virtual interprofessional experiences. CONCLUSION: VIP Learning is an innovative approach to advance interprofessional education from siloed, limited experiences to accessible and interactive opportunities that are not bound by time or place. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(11):668-674.].

Evaluation of Interprofessional Team Disclosure of a Medical Error to a Simulated Patient.

Objective. To evaluate the impact of an Interprofessional Communication Skills Workshop on pharmacy student confidence and proficiency in disclosing medical errors to patients. Pharmacy student behavior was also compared to that of other health professions' students on the team. Design. Students from up to four different health professions participated in a simulation as part of an interprofessional team. Teams were evaluated with a validated rubric postsimulation on how well they handled the disclosure of an error to the patient. Individually, each student provided anonymous feedback and self-reflected on their abilities via a Likert-scale evaluation tool. A comparison of pharmacy students who completed the workshop (active group) vs all others who did not (control group) was completed and analyzed. Assessment. The majority of students felt they had adequate training related to communication issues that cause medication errors. However, fewer students believed that they knew how to report such an error to a patient or within a health system. Pharmacy students who completed the workshop were significantly more comfortable explicitly stating the error disclosure to a patient and/or caregiver and were more likely to apologize and respond to questions forthrightly (p<0.05). Conclusions. This data affirms the need to devote more time to training students on communicating with patients about the occurrence of medical errors and how to report these errors. Educators should be encouraged to incorporate such training within interprofessional education curricula.

The relationship between continuity of care and trust with stage of cancer at diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While continuity of care has been associated with an increased rate of cancer screening, it is unclear if continuity leads to earlier detection of cancer. This study examined the relationship between continuity of care and trust in one's physician with stage of cancer among newly diagnosed colorectal and breast cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 119 newly diagnosed cancer patients (97 breast, 22 colorectal) were surveyed in face-to-face interviews. The relationship between continuity of care and trust with the patient's primary care physicians prior to diagnosis were examined in relationship to the patient's stage at diagnosis via Spearman correlations and chi-square analyses. A stepwise logistic regression model was computed to examine the best predictors of stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Half of the patients reported that their cancer was found through screening. Continuity of care prior to diagnosis was related to receiving mammography. Continuity of care was not, however, significantly related to earlier detection. Trust in one's primary care physician was related to earlier detection among both the entire sample of patients with colon and breast cancer and among a subsample of women with breast cancer. In a multivariate model, only detection through screening and trust predicted stage of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of care is not related to earlier detection of cancer, while trust with a regular physician was associated with earlier detection of cancer.

Medical students' perceptions of rural practice following a rural clerkship.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that rural experiences can positively influence students' preferences for rural practice. This study examined changes in students' perceptions toward rural primary care following a required rural clerkship. METHODS: Third-year students completed pre- and post-clerkship questionnaire items assessing their beliefs about primary care physicians who practice in rural communities in comparison with their urban/suburban counterparts. A factor analysis was performed, and pre- and post-clerkship scale means were calculated to determine differences. RESULTS: A total of 428 (88%) students completed these questionnaires. There was a significant increase in students' perceptions of rural primary care physicians' primary care service features and medical expertise. Students perceived the physicians' work demands more positively, and there was no change in students' perceptions of the physicians' income potential. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the rural primary care clerkship positively influenced students' perceptions toward rural primary care.

Simulation curriculum can improve medical student assessment and management of acute coronary syndrome during a clinical practice exam.

BACKGROUND: It has been noted that increased focus on learning acute care skills is needed in undergraduate medical curricula. This study investigated whether a simulation-based curriculum improved a senior medical student's ability to manage acute coronary syndrome as measured during a clinical performance examination (CPX). The authors hypothesized that simulation training would improve overall performance when compared with targeted didactics or historical controls. METHODS: All 4th-year medical students (n = 291) over 2 years at the authors' institution were included in this study. In the 3rd year of medical school, the "control" group received no intervention, the "didactic" group received a targeted didactic curriculum, and the "simulation" group participated in small group simulation training and the didactic curriculum. For intergroup comparison on the CPX, the authors calculated the percentage of correct actions completed by the student. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation with significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in overall performance with simulation versus both didactics and control (P < 0.001). Performance on the physical examination component was significantly better in simulation versus both didactics and control, as was for diagnosis: simulation versus both didactics and control (P < 0.02 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training had a modest impact on overall CPX performance in the management of a simulated acute coronary syndrome. Additional studies are needed to evaluate how to further improve curricula regarding unstable patients.

Are fourth-year medical students as prepared to manage unstable patients as they are to manage stable patients?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the fourth-year medical student's assessment and management of an unstable patient. METHOD: The authors compared the performance of fourth-year medical students in a clinical performance examination (CPX) across a spectrum of simulated stable conditions as compared with a case of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). All fourth-year medical students at the Medical University of South Carolina participated in an eight-station CPX. Student performance was graded as the percentage of correct steps performed according to checklists developed through a modified Delphi technique. Repeated analysis of variance was performed to compare performance on different stations. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation), and P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 143 fourth-year medical students participated in the study. The percentage of correct actions performed in the STEMI station was 47.8 (9.5), which was significantly lower than all other stations (P < .001). There was no difference in overall performance between any of the other stable encounters. Students performed significantly worse in the physical and management/treatment components of the STEMI station, as compared with history, differential diagnosis, labs/tests, and diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-year medical students were less prepared to manage a simulated STEMI case compared with a range of nonacute conditions. Given the prevalence of coronary artery disease and the necessity of interns to be equipped to handle emergent situations, this deficiency should be addressed in undergraduate medical curricula.

Interprofessional teamwork skills as predictors of clinical outcomes in a simulated healthcare setting.

PURPOSE: Teaching interprofessional (IP) teamwork skills is a goal of interprofessional education. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IP teamwork skills, attitudes and clinical outcomes in a simulated clinical setting. METHODS: One hundred-twenty health professions students (medicine, pharmacy, physician assistant) worked in interprofessional teams to manage a "patient" in a health care simulation setting. Students completed the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) attitudinal survey instrument. Students' responses were averaged by team to create an IEPS attitudes score. Teamwork skills for each team were rated by trained observers using a checklist to calculate a teamwork score (TWS). Clinical outcome scores (COS) were determined by summation of completed clinical tasks performed by the team based on an expert developed checklist. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the relationship of IEPS and TWS with COS. RESULTS: IEPS score was not a significant predictor of COS (p=0.054), but TWS was a significant predictor (p<0.001) of COS. Results suggest that in a simulated clinical setting, students' interprofessional teamwork skills are significant predictors of positive clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Interprofessional curricular models that produce effective teamwork skills can improve student performance in clinical environments and likely improve teamwork practice to positively affect patient care outcomes.

A simulated interprofessional rounding experience in a clinical assessment course.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a simulated interprofessional rounding experience using human patient simulators as a required activity for third-year pharmacy students in a clinical assessment course. DESIGN: Interprofessional student teams consisting of pharmacy, medical, and physician assistant students participated in a simulated interprofessional rounding experience in which they provided comprehensive medical care for a simulated patient in an inpatient setting. ASSESSMENT: Students completed a survey instrument to assess interprofessional attitudes and satisfaction before and after participation in the simulated interprofessional rounding experience. Overall student attitudes regarding interprofessional teamwork and communication significantly improved; student satisfaction with the experience was high and students' self-perceived clinical confidence improved after participation. The mean team clinical performance scores were 65% and 75% for each simulated interprofessional rounding experience. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a simulated interprofessional rounding experience into a required clinical assessment course improved student attitudes regarding interprofessional teamwork and was associated with high student satisfaction.

Applying Theory to Assess Cultural Competency.

Using a theoretical cultural competency model, the effectiveness of a cultural competency learning assignment was examined to determine: 1) students' cultural competency levels as reflected through the assignment, and 2) the effectiveness of the assignment as a cultural competency learning activity. Third-year family medicine clerkship students completed a required project to research and reflect upon a patient's "cultural belief." Applying a model of cultural competence development, a content analysis of written project reports determined what level of cultural competence was expressed by students' reflections. Results indicated16% of students were at "no insight", 18% at "minimal emphasis" and 66% at "acceptance." While many students expressed an "acceptance" competence level, not all students expressed the desired level of acceptance about the role of cultural beliefs in medical care. Application of a cultural competency theory to assess learners permits educators to frame performance changes within the context of competency achievement and determine if desired levels of competency have been achieved.

To what degree do problem-based learning issues change with clinical experience?

BACKGROUND: Problem-based learning has been advocated for preclinical and clinical instruction because the learning issues are adaptable to students with varying previous knowledge and ranges of experience. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the distribution in the types of learning issues generated to standardized problem-based learning cases changes with increasing clinical experience during the 3rd year of medical school. METHODS: Learning issues collected for students performing their 3rd year family medicine clerkship were categorized into broad areas by three reviewers with agreement achieved through consensus and compared over time. RESULTS: The distribution of learning issues remained relatively constant over the academic year with the exception of topics in the basic sciences and medical decision making. Basic science issues were more slightly common earlier in the 3rd year and decreased over time whereas the opposite trend was observed for medical decision-making questions. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that students do generate different types of learning issues with more clinical experience. Students may show a very slight shift in interest from basic science concerns to higher-order medical decision-making issues over time, but the shift in this interest is very small.