Social factors associated with self-reported changes in mental health symptoms among youth in the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Children and youth experienced marked impacts on day-to-day life in the COVID-19 pandemic that were associated with poorer familial and friend relationships, and greater mental health challenges. Few studies provide self-report data on mental health symptoms from children and youth themselves. We sought to examine the associations between social factors and child and youth self-reported symptoms of worsened mood, anxiety, and irritability during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey was administered online to collect self-report data across 10 Canadian provinces among children (11-14 years) and youth (15-18 years), April-May 2022. Age-appropriate questions were based on The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health and the World Health Organization of the United Nations H6 + Technical Working Group on Adolescent Health and Well-Being consensus framework and the Coronavirus Health and Impact Survey. Associations between a priori defined social factors (e.g., relationship quality) and respondent self-reported mental health were evaluated using ordinal logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and geographic location. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 483 (51.7%) children (11-14 years; 227, 47.0% girls) and 450 (48.3%) youth (15-18 years; 204, 45.3% girls). The parents of most children and youth had resided in Canada for over 20 years (678, 72.7%). Over one-quarter of children and youth self-identified as Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Color (134, 27.7%; 134, 29.8%, respectively). Over one-third of children and youth self-reported symptoms of worsened mood (149, 30.9%; 125, 27.8%, respectively), anxiety (181, 37.5%; 167, 37.1%, respectively), or irritability (160, 33.1%; 160, 35.6%, respectively) during, compared to pre-pandemic. In descending order of odds ratios (OR), for children and youth, worsened familial relationships (during compared to pre-pandemic) was associated with the self-reported symptoms of worsened mood (child: OR 4.22, 95%CI 2.51-6.88; youth: OR 6.65 95%CI 3.98-11.23), anxiety (child: OR 4.24, 95%CI2.69-6.75; youth: OR 5.28, 95%CI 3.17-8.86), and irritability (child: OR 2.83, 95%CI 1.76-4.56; youth: OR 6.46, 95%CI 3.88-10.90). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported data from a nationally representative sample of children and youth suggest strong associations between social factors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions targeting child and youth familial relationships may positively impact child and youth mental health.

Well-being approaches targeted to improve child and youth health post-COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Our previous work synthesized published studies on well-being interventions during COVID-19. As we move into a post-COVID-19 pandemic period there is a need to comprehensively review published strategies, approaches, and interventions to improve child and youth well-being beyond deleterious impacts experienced during COVID-19. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from inception to January 2023. Studies were included if they: (1) presented original data on an approach (i.e., approach applied) or (2) provided recommendations to inform development of a future approach (i.e., approach suggested), (3) targeted to mitigate negative impacts of COVID-19 on child and youth (≤18 year) well-being, and (4) published on or after December 2019. RESULTS: 39 studies (n = 4/39, 10.3% randomized controlled trials) from 2021 to 2023 were included. Twenty-two studies applied an approach (n = 22/39, 56.4%) whereas seventeen studies (n = 17/39, 43.6%) suggested an approach; youth aged 13-18 year (n = 27/39, 69.2%) were most frequently studied. Approach applied records most frequently adopted an experimental design (n = 11/22, 50.0%), whereas approach suggested records most frequently adopted a cross-sectional design (n = 13/22, 59.1%). The most frequently reported outcomes related to good health and optimum nutrition (n = 28/39, 71.8%), followed by connectedness (n = 22/39, 56.4%), learning, competence, education, skills, and employability (n = 18/39, 46.1%), and agency and resilience (n = 16/39, 41.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid onset and unpredictability of COVID-19 precluded meaningful engagement of children and youth in strategy development despite widespread recognition that early engagement can enhance usefulness and acceptability of interventions. Published or recommended strategies were most frequently targeted to improve connectedness, belonging, and socialization among children and youth.

Evaluating the use of the AMBIANCE-Brief measure in clinical settings: Assessing acceptability, feasibility, and utility of the AMBIANCE-Brief.

Community agencies and practitioners around the globe seek opportunities to learn various assessment tools and interventions rooted in attachment theory. However, information regarding the feasibility of implementation and sustainability of these tools once participants have been trained to use them, is limited. This study investigated the perceived acceptability, feasibility, utility, relevance, fidelity, and sustainability of the Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification-Brief (AMBIANCE-Brief) among practitioners who had taken a training. Practitioners (N = 59) who attended a virtual AMBIANCE-Brief training originating from Canada between June 2020 and November 2021 completed an online follow-up survey. Practitioners reported that they primarily used the AMBIANCE-Brief for case conceptualization (68%). Additionally, 95% agreed that the AMBIANCE-Brief was relevant to their clinical practice, 98% agreed it was useful for their clinical work, 76% agreed that it was feasible to implement into their clinical work, and 59% found it easy to incorporate into their treatment planning with clients. Findings suggest that the AMBIANCE-Brief may be acceptable, feasible, and useful for practitioners. Avenues for continuing to evaluate the AMBIANCE-Brief include cross-cultural validity, coder drift, and booster sessions. Additional work clarifying how practitioners integrate the measure into practice would be valuable.

Agencias comunitarias y profesionales de la práctica alrededor del mundo buscan oportunidades para aprender sobre varias herramientas de evaluación e intervenciones basadas en la teoría de la afectividad. Sin embargo, la información acerca de la posibilidad de implementación y sostenibilidad de estas herramientas, una vez que los participantes han sido entrenados para usarlas, es limitada. Este estudio investigó la percepción sobre la aceptabilidad, posibilidad, utilidad, relevancia, fidelidad y sostenibilidad del Instrumento de Comportamiento Materno Atípico para la Evaluación y Clasificación, versión abreviada (AMBIANCE­Abreviado) entre los profesionales de la práctica que habían recibido un entrenamiento. Los profesionales de la práctica (N = 59) que asistieron a un entrenamiento virtual de AMBIANCE­Abreviado que se originó en Canadá entre junio de 2020 y noviembre 2021, completaron en línea una encuesta de seguimiento. Los profesionales de la práctica reportaron que ellos primariamente usaban el AMBIANCE­Abreviado para el caso de conceptualización (68%). Adicionalmente, el 95% estuvo de acuerdo en que el AMBIANCE­Abreviado era relevante para su práctica clínica, 98% estuvo de acuerdo con que era útil para su trabajo clínico, 76% estuvo de acuerdo que era posible implementarlo en su trabajo clínico, y 59% lo encontraba fácil de incorporar en su plan de tratamiento con clientes. Los resultados sugieren que el AMBIANCE­Abreviado pudiera ser aceptable, posible y útil para los profesionales de la práctica. Entre las maneras para continuar evaluando el AMBIANCE­Abreviado se incluyen la validez intercultural, la variación del codificador y las sesiones de refuerzo. El trabajo adicional que clarifique cómo los profesionales integran la medida dentro de su práctica sería valioso.

Maternal postnatal depressive symptoms and early achievement of developmental milestones in infants and young children: A meta-analysis.

Screening for social determinants of health, including maternal depression, is a recommended pediatric practice. However, the magnitude of association between maternal and child screening tools remains to be determined. The current study evaluated the association between maternal postnatal depressive symptoms and child developmental milestones, as well as moderators of these associations. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from database inception to September 2022. Studies that examine postnatal depressive symptoms and associations with infant and early child (<6 years) achievement of developmental milestones were included. Data were extracted by two independent coders and a random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled effect sizes and test for moderators. A total of 38 non-overlapping studies (95,897 participants), all focused on maternal postnatal depression, met inclusion criteria. The pooled effect size for the association between postnatal depressive symptoms and early achievement of infant and child developmental milestones (N = 38; r = -.12; 95% CI = -.18, -.06) was small in magnitude. Child age at maternal depression measurement was a moderator, whereby effect sizes became greater for older children. Despite small effects, maternal postnatal depressive symptoms should be included in screening during routine well-child visits to enhance child development outcomes.

El examinar los determinantes sociales de la salud, incluyendo la depresión materna, es una práctica pediátrica recomendada. Sin embargo, la magnitud de la asociación entre las herramientas de examinación materna y del niño está por ser determinada. El presente estudio evaluó la asociación entre los síntomas depresivos postnatales maternos y los momentos cruciales en el desarrollo del niño, así como su papel de moderadores de estas asociaciones. Una estrategia de investigación comprensiva se llevó a cabo en cuatro bancos de datos (MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, y el Registro Central Cochrane para Ensayos Controlados) desde el inicio del banco de datos hasta septiembre de 2022. Se incluyeron los estudios que examinan los síntomas depresivos postnatales y sus asociaciones con el alcance de logros de momentos cruciales del infante y del niño en su temprana niñez (<6 años). Se extrajeron los datos por medio de dos independientes codificadores y se usó un metaanálisis de efectos al azar para estimar los tamaños de efectos agrupados y examinarlos como moderadores. Un total de 38 estudios que no compartían la misma información (95,897 participantes), todos enfocados en la depresión materna postnatal, reunieron los criterios para ser incluidos. El tamaño de los efectos agrupados para la asociación entre los síntomas depresivos postnatales y el logro temprano de los momentos cruciales del infante y el niño (N = 38; r = -.12; 95% CI = -.18, -.06) fue pequeño en magnitud. La edad del niño en la medida de la depresión materna fue un moderador, por lo cual los tamaños de los efectos se hicieron mayores para los niños de mayor edad. A pesar de los pequeños efectos, los síntomas depresivos postnatales maternos deben ser incluidos en la examinación durante las visitas rutinarias de chequeos del bienestar del niño para mejorar los resultados del desarrollo del niño.

Le dépistage de déterminants sociaux de la santé, y compris la dépression maternelle, est une pratique pédiatrique recommandée. Cependant la magnitude du lien entre les outils de dépistage maternelle et de l'enfant reste indéterminée. Cette étude a évalué le lien entre les symptômes dépressifs postnatals maternels et les jalons du développement de l'enfant, ainsi que les modérateurs de ces liens. Une stratégie de recherche exhaustive a été adoptée pour quatre bases de données (MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, et Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) des débuts de la base de données jusqu'à septembre 2022. Les études examinant les symptômes dépressifs postnatals et les liens avec l'atteinte des jalons de développement du nourrisson et du petit enfant (<6 ans) ont été inclues. Les données ont été extraites par deux codeurs et une méta-analyse à effets aléatoires a été utilisée afin d'estimer les tailles et tests d'effet regroupées pour les modérateurs. Un total de 38 études ne se recoupant pas (95897 participantes), toutes focalisées sur la dépression maternelle postnatale, ont rempli les critères d'inclusion. La taille d'effet regroupé pour le lien entre les symptômes dépressifs postnatales et l'atteinte précoce des jalons de développement du nourrisson et de l'enfant (N = 38; r = -,12; 95% CI = -,18, -,06) était petite en magnitude. L'âge de l'enfant à la mesure de la dépression maternelle était un modérateur, où l'ampleur de l'effet était plus grande pour les enfants plus âgés. En dépit du peu d'ampleur les symptômes dépressifs postnatals maternels devraient être inclus dans le dépistage durant les visites de routine de santé de l'enfant afin d'améliorer les résultats sur le développement de l'enfant.

Interventions to improve well-being among children and youth aged 6-17 years during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is an example of a global infectious disease outbreak that poses a threat to the well-being of children and youth (e.g., physical infection, psychological impacts). The consequences of challenges faced during COVID-19 may be longstanding and newly developed interventions are being deployed. We present a narrative synthesis of available evidence from the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic on the feasibility, accessibility, and effects of interventions to improve well-being among children and youth to inform the development and refinement of interventions relevant to post-pandemic recovery. METHODS: Six databases were searched from inception to August 2022. A total of 5484 records were screened, 39 were reviewed in full text, and 19 studies were included. The definition of well-being and the five domains of well-being as defined by the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health and the World Health Organization in collaboration with the United Nations H6 + Technical Working Group on Adolescent Health and Well-Being were used. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (74% randomized controlled trials) from 10 countries were identified, involving a total of 7492 children and youth (age range: 8.2-17.2 years; 27.8-75.2% males) and 954 parents that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 to March 2021). Nearly all interventions (n = 18, 95%) targeted health and nutrition, followed by connectedness (n = 6, 32%), while fewer studies targeted agency and resilience (n = 5, 23%), learning and competence (n = 2, 11%), or safety and support (n = 1, 3%). Five interventions (26%) were self-guided while 13 interventions (68%) were guided synchronous by a trained professional, all of which targeted physical and mental health subdomains within health and nutrition; one intervention (5%) was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Studies deploying synchronous interventions most often reported improved well-being among children and youth largely in the domain of health and nutrition, specifically physical and mental health. Targeted approaches will be crucial to reach sub-groups of children and youth who are most at risk of negative well-being outcomes. Further research is needed to determine how interventions that best supported children and youth early in the pandemic are different from interventions that are required now as we enter into the post-pandemic phase.

Developing non-response weights to account for attrition-related bias in a longitudinal pregnancy cohort.

BACKGROUND: Prospective cohorts may be vulnerable to bias due to attrition. Inverse probability weights have been proposed as a method to help mitigate this bias. The current study used the "All Our Families" longitudinal pregnancy cohort of 3351 maternal-infant pairs and aimed to develop inverse probability weights using logistic regression models to predict study continuation versus drop-out from baseline to the three-year data collection wave. METHODS: Two methods of variable selection took place. One method was a knowledge-based a priori variable selection approach, while the second used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). The ability of each model to predict continuing participation through discrimination and calibration for both approaches were evaluated by examining area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and calibration plots, respectively. Stabilized inverse probability weights were generated using predicted probabilities. Weight performance was assessed using standardized differences of baseline characteristics for those who continue in study and those that do not, with and without weights (unadjusted estimates). RESULTS: The a priori and LASSO variable selection method prediction models had good and fair discrimination with AUROC of 0.69 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.67-0.71) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75), respectively. Calibration plots and non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit Tests indicated that both the a priori (p = 0.329) and LASSO model (p = 0.242) were well-calibrated. Unweighted results indicated large (> 10%) standardized differences in 15 demographic variables (range: 11 - 29%), when comparing those who continued in the study with those that did not. Weights derived from the a priori and LASSO models reduced standardized differences relative to unadjusted estimates, with the largest differences of 13% and 5%, respectively. Additionally, when applying the same LASSO variable selection method to develop weights in future data collection waves, standardized differences remained below 10% for each demographic variable. CONCLUSION: The LASSO variable selection approach produced robust weights that addressed non-response bias more than the knowledge-driven approach. These weights can be applied to analyses across multiple longitudinal waves of data collection to reduce bias.

Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of the long-term implications of unrelieved pain during infancy, it is evident that infant pain is still under-managed and unmanaged. Inadequately managed pain in infancy, a period of exponential development, can have implications across the lifespan. Therefore, a comprehensive and systematic review of pain management strategies is integral to appropriate infant pain management. This is an update of a previously published review update in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2015, Issue 12) of the same title. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and adverse events of non-pharmacological interventions for infant and child (aged up to three years) acute pain, excluding kangaroo care, sucrose, breastfeeding/breast milk, and music. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE-Ovid platform, EMBASE-OVID platform, PsycINFO-OVID platform, CINAHL-EBSCO platform and trial registration websites (ClinicalTrials.gov; International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) (March 2015 to October 2020). An update search was completed in July 2022, but studies identified at this point were added to 'Awaiting classification' for a future update.  We also searched reference lists and contacted researchers via electronic list-serves.  We incorporated 76 new studies into the review.  SELECTION CRITERIA: Participants included infants from birth to three years in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cross-over RCTs that had a no-treatment control comparison. Studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis if they compared a non-pharmacological pain management strategy to a no-treatment control group (15 different strategies). In addition, we also analysed studies when the unique effect of adding a non-pharmacological pain management strategy onto another pain management strategy could be assessed (i.e. additive effects on a sweet solution, non-nutritive sucking, or swaddling) (three strategies). The eligible control groups for these additive studies were sweet solution only, non-nutritive sucking only, or swaddling only, respectively. Finally, we qualitatively described six interventions that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review, but not in the analysis.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The outcomes assessed in the review were pain response (reactivity and regulation) and adverse events. The level of certainty in the evidence and risk of bias were based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE approach. We analysed the standardised mean difference (SMD) using the generic inverse variance method to determine effect sizes.  MAIN RESULTS: We included total of 138 studies (11,058 participants), which includes an additional 76 new studies for this update. Of these 138 studies, we analysed 115 (9048 participants) and described 23 (2010 participants) qualitatively. We described qualitatively studies that could not be meta-analysed due to being the only studies in their category or statistical reporting issues. We report the results of the 138 included studies here. An SMD effect size of 0.2 represents a small effect, 0.5 a moderate effect, and 0.8 a large effect. The thresholds for the I2 interpretation were established as follows: not important (0% to 40%); moderate heterogeneity (30% to 60%); substantial heterogeneity (50% to 90%); considerable heterogeneity (75% to 100%). The most commonly studied acute procedures were heel sticks (63 studies) and needlestick procedures for the purposes of vaccines/vitamins (35 studies). We judged most studies to have high risk of bias (103 out of 138), with the most common methodological concerns relating to blinding of personnel and outcome assessors. Pain responses were examined during two separate pain phases: pain reactivity (within the first 30 seconds after the acutely painful stimulus) and immediate pain regulation (after the first 30 seconds following the acutely painful stimulus). We report below the strategies with the strongest evidence base for each age group. In preterm born neonates, non-nutritive sucking may reduce pain reactivity (SMD -0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.03 to -0.11, moderate effect; I2 = 93%, considerable heterogeneity) and improve immediate pain regulation (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.27, moderate effect; I2 = 81%, considerable heterogeneity), based on very low-certainty evidence. Facilitated tucking may also reduce pain reactivity (SMD -1.01, 95% CI -1.44 to -0.58, large effect; I2 = 93%, considerable heterogeneity) and improve immediate pain regulation (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.26, moderate effect; I2 = 87%, considerable heterogeneity); however, this is also based on very low-certainty evidence. While swaddling likely does not reduce pain reactivity in preterm neonates (SMD -0.60, 95% CI -1.23 to 0.04, no effect; I2 = 91%, considerable heterogeneity), it has been shown to possibly improve immediate pain regulation (SMD -1.21, 95% CI -2.05 to -0.38, large effect; I2 = 89%, considerable heterogeneity), based on very low-certainty evidence. In full-term born neonates, non-nutritive sucking may reduce pain reactivity (SMD -1.13, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.68, large effect; I2 = 82%, considerable heterogeneity) and improve immediate pain regulation (SMD -1.49, 95% CI -2.20 to -0.78, large effect; I2 = 92%, considerable heterogeneity), based on very low-certainty evidence.  In full-term born older infants, structured parent involvement was the intervention most studied. Results showed that this intervention has little to no effect in reducing pain reactivity (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.03, no effect; I2 = 46%, moderate heterogeneity) or improving immediate pain regulation (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.21, no effect; I2 = 74%, substantial heterogeneity), based on low- to moderate-certainty evidence. Of these five interventions most studied, only two studies observed adverse events, specifically vomiting (one preterm neonate) and desaturation (one full-term neonate hospitalised in the NICU) following the non-nutritive sucking intervention. The presence of considerable heterogeneity limited our confidence in the findings for certain analyses, as did the preponderance of evidence of very low to low certainty based on GRADE judgements. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, non-nutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and swaddling may reduce pain behaviours in preterm born neonates. Non-nutritive sucking may also reduce pain behaviours in full-term neonates. No interventions based on a substantial body of evidence showed promise in reducing pain behaviours in older infants. Most analyses were based on very low- or low-certainty grades of evidence and none were based on high-certainty evidence. Therefore, the lack of confidence in the evidence would require further research before we could draw a definitive conclusion.

Women's Mental Health up to Eight Years after Childbirth and Associated Risk Factors: Longitudinal Findings from the All Our Families Cohort in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence of elevated maternal anxiety and/or depression symptoms up to eight years after childbirth and the association between role and relationship strains during parenting and mental health challenges from three to eight years after childbirth. METHODS: This study used data from the All Our Families longitudinal pregnancy cohort. Role and relationship strain factors and anxiety and depression symptoms were measured at repeated time points from four months to eight years after childbirth. The proportion of women with elevated anxiety and/or depression was calculated at each available time point. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the association between role and relationship strain factors and anxiety and/or depression from three to eight years after childbirth. Predicted probability of having anxiety and/or depression was estimated across those with and without challenges with roles and relationships. The models were adjusted for known risk factors such as maternal income and perinatal anxiety and/or depression. RESULTS: The prevalence of elevated anxiety and/or depression ranged from 18.8% (at four months) to 26.2% (at eight years). The adjusted odds ratio of anxiety and/or depression was 3.5 (95% CI = 2.9, 4.3) for those juggling family responsibilities and 2.4 (95% CI = 2.0, 3.0) for those with stressful partner relationship compared to their counterparts. Similarly, experiencing financial crunch and poor partner relationship were associated with increased mental health difficulties. Women without challenges in roles or relationships had a 23% lower predicted probability of anxiety and/or depression than those with the challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring mothers for anxiety and depression beyond the postpartum period and strategies that address role and relationship challenges may be valuable to women at risk of anxiety and depression.

Changes and predictors of maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Longitudinal changes in maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms and predictors of symptom variation among a group of middle-to-upper income Canadian women (n = 2152) were examined prior to the pandemic (2017-2019) and at three pandemic timepoints (May-July 2020, March-April 2021, November-December 2021). Mean maternal depression and anxiety scores were elevated throughout the pandemic. Pre-pandemic depressive symptoms were associated with greater increases in depressive symptoms. Coping and relationship quality were protective factors. Supporting the development of coping strategies may mitigate mental health concerns among mothers.

Child and family factors associated with child mental health and well-being during COVID-19.

Understanding the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the current generation of youth is critical for post-pandemic recovery planning. This study aimed to identify the most salient child (i.e., connectedness to caregivers, screen time, sleep, physical activity, peer relationships, and recreational activities) and family (i.e., COVID-19 financial impact, maternal depression and anxiety) factors associated with children's mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic, after controlling for pre-pandemic mental health. This study included 846 mother-child dyads (child age 9-11) from the All Our Families cohort. Mothers reported on the child's pre-pandemic mental health at age 8 (2017-2019) and during COVID-19 (May-July 2020), the family's financial impact due to COVID-19, and maternal depression and anxiety. During COVID-19 (July-August 2020), children reported on their screen time, sleep, physical activity, peer and family relationships, and recreational activities, as well as their happiness, anxiety and depression. After controlling for pre-pandemic anxiety, connectedness to caregivers (B - 0.16; 95% CI - 0.22 to - 0.09), child sleep (B - 0.11; 95% CI - 0.19 to - 0.04), and child screen time (B 0.11; 95% CI 0.04-0.17) predicted child COVID-19 anxiety symptoms. After controlling for pre-pandemic depression, connectedness to caregivers (B - 0.26; 95% CI - 0.32 to - 0.21) and screen time (B 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.16) predicted child COVID-19 depressive symptoms. After controlling for covariates, connectedness to caregivers (B 0.36; 95% CI 0.28-0.39) predicted child COVID-19 happiness. Fostering parent-child connections and promoting healthy device and sleep habits are critical modifiable factors that warrant attention in post-pandemic mental health recovery planning.

iCOPE With COVID-19: A Brief Telemental Health Intervention for Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted extensive disruptions to the daily lives of children and adolescents worldwide, which has been associated with an increase in anxiety and depressive symptoms in youth. However, due to public health measures, in-person psychosocial care was initially reduced, causing barriers to mental health care access. This study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of iCOPE with COVID-19, a brief telemental health intervention for children and adolescents to address anxiety symptoms. Sessions were provided exclusively using videoconferencing technology. Feasibility and acceptability were measured with client satisfaction data. The main outcome measure for effectiveness was anxiety symptom severity measured using the Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED). Results indicated that the treatment was well accepted by participants. Significant reductions in anxiety were noted for social anxiety, and were observed to be trending towards a mean decrease for total anxiety. The findings suggest that this brief telemental health intervention focused on reducing anxiety related to COVID-19 is acceptable and feasible to children and adolescents. Future research using a large sample and with a longer follow-up period could inform whether symptom decreases are sustained over time.

Asking About Childhood Adversity in the Prenatal Care Setting: Cross-Sectional Associations with Maternal Health and Mental Health Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with poor physical and mental health outcomes in pregnancy, prompting many care agencies to ask about ACEs as part of routine care. However, limited research has been conducted in the clinical setting to demonstrate associations between ACEs and maternal health (i.e., pregnancy complications and birth outcomes) and mental health in pregnancy (i.e., depression, anxiety, and substance use). The aims of the current study were to: (1) examine the prevalence of ACEs reported by patients attending a maternity clinic for medically low-risk patients, and (2) evaluate whether these reports were associated with prenatal health and mental health. METHODS: Participants included pregnant women (n = 338) receiving prenatal care at a low-risk outpatient medical clinical from June 2017 to December 2018. Total ACE scores, pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational hypertension, preeclampsia), birth outcomes (e.g., Apgar scores, preterm birth), and mental health outcomes (i.e., anxiety, depression, and substance use) were extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: The majority of women (67.8%) reported experiencing no ACEs, 16.0% reported one ACE, 10.1% reported two ACEs, and 6.2% reported three or more ACEs. ACEs were associated with increased odds of prenatal depression, anxiety, and substance use in a dose-response fashion, but not pregnancy health or birth outcomes. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Prevalence rates of maternal ACEs obtained in the prenatal care setting were low compared to the general population. While ACEs were positively associated with maternal mental health and substance use in pregnancy, they were not associated with pregnancy complications.

When the Bough Breaks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health symptoms in mothers of young children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Parents have experienced considerable challenges and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may impact their well-being. This meta-analysis sought to identify: (1) the prevalence of depression and anxiety in parents of young children (

Los padres han experimentado retos considerables y estrés durante la pandemia del COVID-19, lo cual puede tener un impacto en su bienestar. Este metaanálisis busca identificar: 1) la prevalencia de la depresión y ansiedad en los padres de niños pequeños (

Les parents ont fait l'expérience de défis considérables et d'un stress considérable durant la pandémie du COVID-19, ce qui peut impacter leur bien-être. Cette méta-analyse s'est donné pour but d'identifier: 1) la prévalence de la dépression et de l'anxiété chez les parents de jeunes enfants (<âge 5) durant la pandémie du COVID-18, et 2) les facteurs de modération sociodémographique (par exemple, l'âge du parent, le fait d'être d'une minorité raciale) et méthodologique (par exemple, la qualité de l'étude) qui expliquent l'hétérogénéité dans les étudies. Une recherche systématique a été faite au travers de quatre banques de données du premier janvier 2020 au 3 mars 2021. Un total de 18 études ne se recoupant pas (8981 participants), toutes focalisées sur la santé mentale maternelle, ont rempli les critères d'inclusion. Des méta-analyses à effet aléatoire approprié ont été faites. Les estimations de prévalences regroupées pour une dépression cliniquement importante et des symptômes d'anxiété pour les mères de jeunes enfants durant la pandémie de COVID-19 étaient respectivement de 26,9% (95% CI: 21,3-33,4) et de 41,9% (95% CI: 26,7-58,8). La prévalence d'une dépression cliniquement élevée et de symptômes d'anxiété était plus élevée en Europe et en Amérique du Nord et chez les mères plus âgées. Les symptômes dépressifs cliniquement élevés étaient plus bas dans les études avec un pourcentage plus élevé d'individus de minorités raciales. Par comparaison les symptômes d'anxiété cliniquement élevés étaient plus haut dans les études de moindre qualité d'étude et dans les échantillons avec des mères très éduquées. Les politiques et les ressources visant des améliorations dans la santé mentale maternelle sont essentielles.

Pain in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A systematic review of the current state of knowledge and a call to action from the Children's Oncology Group.

Survivors of childhood cancer may be at risk of experiencing pain, and a systematic review would advance our understanding of pain in this population. The objective of this study was to describe: 1) the prevalence of pain in survivors of childhood cancer, 2) methods of pain measurement, 3) associations between pain and biopsychosocial factors, and 4) recommendations for future research. Data sources for the study were articles published from January 1990 to August 2019 identified in the PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science data bases. Eligible studies included: 1) original research, 2) quantitative assessments of pain, 3) articles published in English, 4) cancers diagnosed between birth and age 21 years, 5) survivors at 5 years from diagnosis and/or at 2 years after therapy completion, and 6) a sample size >20. Seventy-three articles were included in the final review. Risk of bias was considered using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Common measures of pain were items created by the authors for the purpose of the study (45.2%) or health-related quality-of-life/health status questionnaires (42.5%). Pain was present in from 4.3% to 75% of survivors across studies. Three studies investigated chronic pain according the definition in the International Classification of Diseases. The findings indicated that survivors of childhood cancer are at higher risk of experiencing pain compared with controls. Fatigue was consistently associated with pain, females reported more pain than males, and other factors related to pain will require stronger evidence. Theoretically grounded, multidimensional measurements of pain are absent from the literature.

Adverse childhood experiences and maternal anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can put women at risk for mental illness in the pregnancy and postpartum periods. While some studies have found strong support for this proposition, others have found weak or no support. This study is a meta-analysis of the association between ACEs and maternal mental health to resolve between-study discrepancies, and to examine potential moderators of associations. METHODS: Three electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO) were searched up to November 2018 by a health sciences librarian. A hand search was conducted in January 2020 and relevant studies were added. Included studies reported on associations between ACEs and maternal depression and/or anxiety in the perinatal period (pregnancy to 1-year postpartum). Pregnancy and postpartum outcomes were examined separately for both depression and anxiety. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted. Moderator analyses were conducted using meta-regression. Study quality was evaluated using a 15-point scale. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 4646 non-duplicate records and full text review occurred for 196 articles. A total of 15 studies (N = 7788) were included in the meta-analyses, of which 2 were also described narratively. Publication year ranged from 1998 to 2019. Mothers were approximately 28.93 years of age when they retrospectively reported on their ACEs. All studies had maternal self-report questionnaires for the mental health outcomes. Study quality ranged from 7 to 12. The pooled effect sizes between ACEs and prenatal (N = 12; r = .19; 95% CI= .13, .24) and postpartum (N = 7; r = .23; 95% CI = .06 to .39) depressive symptoms were significant. The pooled effect size between ACEs and prenatal anxiety was also significant (N = 5; r = .14; 95% CI= .07, .21). Moderator analyses indicated that timing of depressive and anxiety symptoms may be important for understanding associations. CONCLUSIONS: ACEs confer risk to maternal mental health, albeit effect sizes are small to moderate in magnitude. Trauma-informed approaches, as well as increased mental health support during and after pregnancy, may help to offset the relative risk of ACEs on maternal mental health.

Disentangling adversity timing and type: Contrasting theories in the context of maternal prenatal physical and mental health using latent formative models.

Research on the effects of adversity has led to mounting interest in examining the differential impact of adversity as a function of its timing and type. The current study examines whether the effects of different types (i.e., physical, sexual, and emotional abuse) and timing (i.e., early, middle childhood, adolescence, or adulthood) of adversity on maternal mental and physical health outcomes in pregnancy, are best accounted for by a cumulative model or independent effects model. Women from a prospective pregnancy cohort (N =3,362) reported retrospectively on their experiences of adversity (i.e., physical, sexual, and emotional abuse) in early childhood (0-5 years], middle childhood (6-12 years], adolescence (13-18 years], and adulthood (19+ years]. Measures of overall health, stress, anxiety, and depression were gathered in pregnancy. Results showed that a cumulative formative latent model was selected as more parsimonious than a direct effects model. Results also supported a model where the strength of the effect of adversity did not vary across abuse timing or type. Thus, cumulative adversity resulted in greater physical and mental health difficulties. In conclusion, cumulative adversity is a more parsimonious predictor of maternal physical and mental health outcomes than adversity at any one specific adversity timing or subtype.

Feasibility of training service providers on the AMBIANCE-Brief measure for use in community settings.

The Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification-Brief (AMBIANCE-Brief) was developed to provide a clinically useful and psychometrically sound assessment of disrupted parenting behavior for community practitioners. With prior evidence of this tool's reliability and validity in laboratory settings, this study aimed to determine whether providers from family service agencies could become reliable in the use of the level of disrupted communication following a brief training. Providers (N = 46) from three agency sites participated in a 2-day AMBIANCE-Brief training and, at the end of the training, coded eight videotaped mother-child interactions. Novice participant coding was compared to expert consensus ratings using intraclass correlations. On average, participants' interrater agreement was good (ICCmean  = .84, SD = 0.10), with 89% meeting the reliability standards of ICC ≥ .70. In response to queries, 100% of participants indicated that they would recommend the AMBIANCE-Brief training to their colleagues, 85% reported that the AMBIANCE-Brief measure would be useful or very useful for their clinical practice, and 56% of participant clinicians believed that parents would find the measure acceptable or very acceptable for integration into intervention or support planning. Altogether, these findings speak to the feasibility of using the AMBIANCE-Brief in community settings. Future studies are needed in diverse clinical and community contexts to evaluate whether use of this assessment tool can inform more targeted interventions tailored to the specific needs of families.

El Instrumento Abreviado para Evaluación y Clasificación de la Conducta Materna Atípica (AMBIANCE-Abreviado; Madigan, Bronfman, Haltigan y Lyons-Ruth, 2018) se desarrolló para ofrecer a quienes practican en la comunidad una evaluación clínicamente útil y sicométricamente acertada de la conducta de crianza trastornada. Con la anterior evidencia de la confiabilidad y validez de esta herramienta en el marco de los laboratorios (Cooke, Eirich, Racine, Lyons-Ruth y Madigan, 2020), este estudio se propuso determinar si se podría confiar en quienes proveen el servicio como parte de las agencias de servicio a las familias después de un breve entrenamiento. Los proveedores (N = 46) de tres lugares de agencias participaron en un entrenamiento de dos días sobre AMBAIANCE-Abreviado y, al final del entrenamiento, codificaron ocho interacciones madre-niño grabadas en video. Se comparó la forma de codificar de los novatos con el puntaje consenso de los expertos usando correlaciones dentro de clases. El acuerdo entre los evaluadores fue bueno (ICC media = .84, SD = 0.10), con un 89% de los participantes que lograron el estándar de confiabilidad de ICC > .70. En respuesta a preguntas, el 100% de los participantes indicó que ellos recomendarían el entrenamiento de AMBIANCE-Abreviado a sus colegas, 85% reportó que la medida AMBIANCE-Abreviado sería útil o muy útil en su práctica clínica, y 56% creían que los progenitores encontrarían la medida aceptable o muy aceptable para ser integrada en la intervención o el planeamiento de apoyo. En conjunto, estos resultados hablan de la factibilidad de usar AMBIANCE-Abreviado en el marco comunitario.

L'Instrument d'Evaluation et de Classification-Brève du Comportement Maternel Atypique (AMBIANCE-Bref; Madigan, Bronfman, Haltigan, & Lyons-Ruth, 2018) a été développé afin d'offrir une évaluation du comportement de parentage perturbé, cliniquement utile et saine du point de vue psychométrique, pour les acteurs communautaires. Avec des preuves préalables de la fiabilité et de la validité de cet outil en laboratoire (Cooke, Eirich, Racine, Lyons-Ruth, & Madigan, 2020), cette étude s'est donné pour but de déterminer si les prestataires des agences de service à la famille pouvaient devenir fiables pour son utilisation après une formation courte. Des prestataires (N = 46) de trois sites d'agence ont participé à une formation AMBIANCE-Bref de deux jours et à la fin de la formation ont codé huit interactions mère-enfant filmées. Le codage du participant débutant a été comparé aux évaluations par consensus d'expertes en utilisant des corrélations intraclasses. Le coefficient d'objectivité était bon (moyenne des coefficient de corrélation intraclasse [ICC] = 84, SD = 0,10), avec 89% des participants remplissant les standards de fiabilité d'ICC ICC ³,70. En répondant aux questions, 100% des participants ont indiqué qu'ils ou elles recommanderaient la formation AMBIANCE-bref à leurs collègues, 85% ont indiqué que la mesure AMBIANCE-bref serait utile ou très utile pour leur pratique clinique, et 56% ont déclaré qu'ils ou elles croyaient que les parents trouveraient cette mesure acceptable ou très acceptable pour une intégration à une intervention ou le plan de soutien. Au total, ces résultats parlent de la viabilité de l'utilisation de l'AMBIANCE-bref dans des contextes communautaires.

Maternal substance use in pregnancy: Differential prediction by childhood adversity subtypes.

Substance use in pregnancy, including alcohol use, drug use, or smoking, is associated with poor health outcomes for both the mother and her unborn child. Building on previous research that has examined the cumulative impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) on maternal binge drinking and alcohol use in pregnancy, the current study sought to examine the association between maternal ACEs and substance use in pregnancy more broadly, including alcohol use, binge drinking, smoking, and drug use. Furthermore, we also examined how different adversity subtypes, including sexual abuse, family violence (physical abuse, emotional abuse), and household dysfunction, differentially predict maternal substance use behavior. A sample of 1994 women were recruited between 2008 and 2011 from a community-based pregnancy cohort in Calgary, Canada. Self-reported information on exposure to ACEs prior to the age of 18 years and maternal substance usewere collected. Examining ACE subtypes, medium effects were observed for the role of household-dysfunction on binge drinking, drug use, and smoking in pregnancy, while only small effects were observed for family violence on binge drinking, drug use, and smoking. There were no significant effects for sexual abuse after controlling for covariates. A dose-response association between the number of ACEs and substance use in pregnancy was also demonstrated. Increased support prior to, and in pregnancy, particularly for women with a history of childhood adversity, is needed to reduce substance use behaviors in pregnancy.

Validation of the AMBIANCE-brief: An observational screening instrument for disrupted caregiving.

Resulting from a community-identified need for a well-validated indicator of caregiving difficulties for use in practice settings, a brief form of the Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification System (AMBIANCE) was developed for use as a screening instrument. Prior to its dissemination, this study aimed to assess the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the AMBIANCE-Brief. Adolescent mother-infant dyads (N = 69) participated in the Strange Situation Procedure, as well as play sessions with and without toys. Maternal disrupted caregiving was coded from the play sessions using the AMBIANCE and AMBIANCE-Brief. The AMBIANCE-Brief demonstrated convergent validity with the AMBIANCE in the play session with toys (r = .65, p < .001) and without toys (r = .61, p < .001). Concurrent validity of the AMBIANCE-Brief was also demonstrated in relation to infant attachment disorganization in the play session with toys (r = .36, p < .05) and without toys (r = .32, p < .01). These findings suggest a shorter protocol for assessing disrupted caregiving may be feasible and valid for use in community settings. Future studies are in progress to train community practitioners in the use of the AMBIANCE-Brief and to evaluate their reliability.

Como resultado de una necesidad identificada por la comunidad para un indicador bien validado de dificultades en la prestación de cuidado para uso en escenarios prácticos, se desarrolló una forma breve del Sistema del Instrumento de Conducta Materna Atípica para la Evaluación y Clasificación (AMBIANCE) para ser usado como instrumento de detección. Antes de ser diseminado, la meta de este estudio fue de evaluar la posibilidad, confiabilidad y validez de AMBIANCE-Abreviado. Las díadas de madres adolescentes e infantes (N = 69) participaron en el Procedimiento de la Situación Extraña, así como en sesiones de juego con y sin juguetes. La interrumpida prestación de cuidado materna fue codificada a partir de las sesiones de juego usando AMBIANCE y AMBIANCE-Abreviado. El AMBIANCE-Abreviado demostró una validez convergente con AMBIANCE en la sesión de juego con juguetes (r = .65, p < .001) y sin juguetes (r = .61, p < .001). También se demostró la validez concurrente de AMBIANCE-Abreviado en relación con la desorganización de la afectividad del infante en la sesión de juegos con juguetes (r = .36, p < .05) y sin juguetes (r = .32, p <.01). Estos resultados sugieren que un protocolo más corto para evaluar la interrumpida prestación de cuidado pudiera ser posible y válido para uso en escenarios comunitarios. Hay estudios futuros en progreso para entrenar al personal de la práctica comunitaria en el uso de AMBIANCE-Abreviado y para evaluar su confiabilidad.

Résultat d'un besoin identifié au niveau communautaire d'un indicateur bien validé de difficultés dans les soins pour une utilisation dans des contextes de pratique, une forme écourtée ("brève", ci-dessous) de l'Instrument d'Evaluation et du Système de Classification du Comportement Maternel Atypique (abrégé AMBIANCE en anglais, nous gardons ici l'abréviation anglaise) a été développée pour une utilisation à des fins d'outil de dépistage. Avant sa dissémination, cette étude s'était donnée pour but d'évaluer la faisabilité, la fiabilité et la validité de l'AMBIANCE-Brève. Des dyades adolescentes mères-nourrissons (N = 69) ont participé à la Procédure de Situation Etrange, ainsi qu'à des séances de jeu avec et sans jouets. Les soins maternels perturbés ont été codés à partir des séances de jeu en utilisant l'AMBIANCE et l'AMBIANCE-Brève. L'AMBIENCE-Brève a fait preuve de validité de convergence avec l'AMBIENCE dans les séances de jeu avec des jouets (r = ,65, p <,001) et sans jouets (r = ,61, p <,001). La validité concurrente de l'AMBIENCE-Brève a aussi été démontrée pour ce qui concerne la désorganisation de l'attachement du bébé dans la séance avec les jouets (r = ,36, p <,05) et sans jouets (r = ,32, p <,01). Ces résultats suggèrent qu'un protocole écourté pour l'évaluation de soin perturbé peut s'avérer plus fiable et valide pour l'utilisation en contexte communautaire. Des études supplémentaires sont en cours afin de former les praticiens communautaires à l'utilisation de l'AMBIENCE-Brève et afin d'évaluer leur fiabilité.

Maternal adverse childhood experiences and antepartum risks: the moderating role of social support.

The aims of the current study were to examine the association between maternal adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and antepartum health risks, and to investigate whether social support moderated this association. It was hypothesized that ACEs would be associated with antepartum health risks; however, social support in the prenatal period would buffer mothers from the deleterious consequences of ACEs. Data from 1994 women (mean age = 31 years) and their infants were collected from a longitudinal cohort recruited in health care offices in Alberta, Canada. Pregnant women completed questionnaires related to ACEs prior to the age of 18 and prenatal social support, and a health care professional assessed the mother's antepartum health risk. ACEs included physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence, as well as exposure to household dysfunction such as parental substance use, mental illness, or incarceration. Regression analyses demonstrated a positive association between ACEs and antepartum health risks. However, a significant interaction between maternal ACEs and social support was also observed. Specifically, women exposed to high ACEs and low social support in pregnancy had high antepartum health risks. However, among mothers who had high ACEs but also high levels of social support, there was no association between ACEs and antepartum health risk. A history of ACEs can place mothers at risk of antepartum health complications. However, a resiliency effect was observed: women with a history of ACEs were buffered from experiencing antepartum health risks if they reported high levels of social support in pregnancy.