Dried Blood Spot Method Development and Clinical Validation for the Analysis of Elexacaftor, Elexacaftor-M23, Tezacaftor, Tezacaftor-M1, Ivacaftor, Ivacaftor Carboxylate, and Hydroxymethyl Ivacaftor Using LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: The highly effective Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulator, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, is now widely being used by people with cystic fibrosis. However, few independent studies have detailed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CFTR modulators. Blood collection by venipuncture is the gold standard for PK measurements, but it is invasive. The aim of this study was to develop and clinically validate a quantification method for elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor, and their main metabolites in dried blood spots (DBSs) using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. METHODS: Linearity, accuracy, precision, stability, hematocrit (Hct), spot-to-spot carryover, spot volume, and extraction efficiency were validated in DBS for all analytes. The clinical validation of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in patients was performed by comparing 21 DBS samples with matched plasma samples. RESULTS: The preset requirements for linearity, within-run and between-run accuracy, precision, Hct, spot volume, and extraction efficiency were met. Puncher carryover was observed and resolved by punching 3 blanks after each sample. The samples remained stable and showed no notable degradation across the tested temperatures and time intervals. Corrected DBS values with the Passing-Bablok regression equation showed good agreement in Bland-Altman plots, and acceptance values were within 20% of the mean for a minimum of 67% of the repeats, according to the EMA guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: A quantification method for the analysis of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor, and their main metabolites was developed and clinically validated in DBS. This method could be valuable in both clinical care and research to address unanswered PK questions regarding CFTR modulators.

Quantitative Method for the Analysis of Ivacaftor, Hydroxymethyl Ivacaftor, Ivacaftor Carboxylate, Lumacaftor, and Tezacaftor in Plasma and Sputum Using Liquid Chromatography With Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Its Clinical Applicability.

BACKGROUND: The novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, ivacaftor, lumacaftor, and tezacaftor, are the first drugs directly targeting the underlying pathophysiological mechanism in cystic fibrosis (CF); however, independent studies describing their pharmacokinetics are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a quantification method for ivacaftor and its 2 main metabolites, lumacaftor and tezacaftor, in plasma and sputum using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. METHODS: The developed method used a small sample volume (20 µL) and simple pretreatment method; protein precipitation solution and internal standard were added in one step to each sample. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was performed for a total run time of 6 minutes. The method was validated by assessing selectivity, carryover, linearity, accuracy and precision, dilution, matrix effects, and stability. RESULTS: The selectivity was good as no interference from matrices was observed. In the concentration range from 0.01 to 10.0 mg/L, calibration curves were linear with a correlation coefficient >0.9997 for all compounds. The within-run and between-run accuracy were between 99.7% and 116% at the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and between 95.8% and 112.9% for all concentrations above LLOQ for all analytes in plasma and sputum. Within-run and between-run precisions were <12.7% for LLOQ and <6.7% for the higher limit of quantitation. Samples were stable, with no significant degradation at examined temperatures and time points. Clinical applicability was revealed by analyzing samples from 2 patients with CF. CONCLUSIONS: The presented method enables simultaneous quantification of ivacaftor, lumacaftor, and tezacaftor in plasma and sputum and is an improvement over previous methods because it uses smaller sample volumes, a simple pretreatment protocol, and includes tezacaftor. In future studies, it can be applied for examining pharmacokinetics characteristics of new CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators.

Correlation between trough concentration and AUC for elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) could be a useful tool to increase efficacy and decrease the risk of adverse effects in people with Cystic Fibrosis (pwCF). It is however unclear whether drug exposure should be monitored by assessment of trough (Cmin) levels or determination of the area under the curve (AUC). Hence, in this study the correlation between measured Cmin concentration and AUC was evaluated. Serial plasma samples, including Cmin, were drawn after administration of ETI in order to calculate the AUC and assess the correlation between the two parameters. A linear correlation between Cmin and AUC0-24h was found, with Pearson's r correlation coefficients of 0.963, 0.908 and 0.860 for elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor, respectively. Exposure of ETI may be monitored by assessment of Cmin levels.

Stepwise Introduction of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Liver Cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B Using Clinical and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenetic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein and affecting multiple organs, including the lungs and liver. Almost 90% of people affected carry at least 1 Phe508del CFTR mutation. Medical treatment with the CFTR-modulating drug elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) has been proven to be efficacious in carriers of at least 1 Phe508del CFTR mutation. Use of ETI in patients with CF (pwCF) and liver cirrhosis is still controversial. Therefore, stepwise introduction of ETI in pwCF and liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B was evaluated using clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: Seven consecutive pwCF received ETI. Four dosing steps were defined, at each of which the patients underwent clinical examination, routine blood tests, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Exposure of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor was assessed by means of determination of AUC. FINDINGS: ETI was successfully introduced and maintained in all pwCF. In those with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (n = 2), diminishment of the dose as recommended by the label resulted in AUC values that were lower than the mean AUC values in pwCF without hepatic impairment, as reported previously. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the limitations of this small case series, stepwise elevation of ETI dose did not induce clinical adverse effects or increases in serum liver test results under strict clinical follow-up and therapeutic drug monitoring, and may allow tolerable introduction of this therapy in pwCF and cirrhosis Child-Pugh A and possibly B.

Real-life efficacy and safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on severe cystic fibrosis lung disease patients.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is a cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator modulator, which has shown efficacy in CF patients (≥6 years) with ≥1 Phe508del mutation and a minimal function mutation. In October 2019, ETI became available on compassionate use basis for Dutch CF patients with severe lung disease. Our objective was to investigate safety and efficacy of ETI in this patient group in a real-life setting. A multicenter longitudinal observational study was conducted to examine changes in FEV1 , BMI, and adverse events at initiation and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after starting ETI. The number of exacerbations was recorded in the 12 months before and the 12 months after ETI treatment. Patients eligible for compassionate use had a FEV1 <40% predicted. Wilcoxon signed-rank test analyzed changes over time. Twenty subjects were included and followed up for up to 12 months after starting ETI. Treatment was well tolerated with mild side effects reported, namely, rash (15%) and stomach ache (20%) with 80% resolving within 1 month. Mean absolute increase of FEV1 was 11.8/13.7% (p ≤ .001) and BMI was 0.49/1.87 kg/m2 (p < .001-0.02) after 1/12 months, respectively. In comparison to the number of exacerbations pretrial, there was a marked reduction in exacerbations after initiation. Our findings show long-term effects of treatment with ETI in patients with severe CF lung disease in a real-life setting. Treatment with ETI is associated with increased lung function and BMI, less exacerbations, and only mild side effects.