Anti-Hla Donor-Specific Antibodies Are Associated to Infection and Not to the Engraftment Rate in Outpatient Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Background: Recipients of a related haploidentical stem cell transplant (haplo-SCT) can have preformed antibodies to HLA donor's antigens. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the engraftment rate and major clinical associations of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at two mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) thresholds in recipients of an outpatient haplo-SCT. Methods: Seventy haplo-HCT recipients were analyzed. A virtual crossmatch was performed using the donor HLA typing and the recipient's anti-HLA DSA test results. Data for anti-HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DR were analyzed. Recipients with DSA ≥ 500 MFI were considered positive, and those with < 500 were considered negative; the same was adopted for MFI ≥ 1000. Results: Post-transplant infection was higher in recipients with DSA ≥ 500 MFI (84.6%, p = 0.041). First-year mortality was higher in DSA-positive patients ≥ 500 MFI, p = 0.004, and DSA ≥ 1000 MFI, p = 0.022, than in DSA-negative recipients. Graft failure in the first 100 days was not associated with DSA ≥ 500 or ≥ 1000 MFI. There was no difference in acute (a-GVHD) or chronic (c-GVHD) graft versus host disease between DSA-positive and negative patients. Conclusions: There was no association of anti-HLA DSA at MFI ≥ 500 and ≥ 1000 with graft failure, however, increased infection and 1st-year mortality were documented in related haplo-HCT at the MFI cutoffs studied.

A method comparison study of the high throughput automated HISCL® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay using nasopharyngeal swab samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects against conventional RT-PCR.

Our study aim was to evaluate the performance of the automated Sysmex HISCL® severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen assay against reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We tested 277 remnant frozen nasopharyngeal swab samples, stored in universal transport medium (UTM), yielding a sensitivity of 94.9% against historical RT-PCR results with cycle threshold (Ct ) < 30, and a sensitivity of 76.7% for Ct < 35, and specificity of 100% (all Ct values) confirming compatibility of UTM-diluted samples with the assay system. Thereafter, we prospectively collected 141 nasopharyngeal swab samples in UTM from healthcare workers and 1369 paired swabs (400 UTM; 969 dry) from individuals at a public health testing center, with the first swab (UTM) reserved for RT-PCR, yielding a positivity rate of 4.6%. HISCL assay performance using UTM swabs was superior to dry swabs, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.5%-100%) at Ct < 30 versus 92.3% (95%CI 81.5%-97.9%), and a specificity of 99.3% (95% CI 98.1-99.89) against 83.3% (95%CI 80.7%-85.6%). We conclude that this antigen assay is suitable for high throughput facilities where the primary indication for testing is to rule out infection with low RT-PCR Ct values (proxy for high viral loads) to curb viral spread.

Management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection based on a highly sensitive HB core-related antigen assay.

AIMS: To prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation-related hepatitis, we examined the clinical usefulness of a highly sensitive HB core-related antigen (iTACT-HBcrAg) assay in patients with resolved HBV infection after nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment for HBV reactivation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients with resolved HBV infection who experienced HBV reactivation (defined as HBV DNA levels of 1.3 log IU/ml or more), and who received systemic chemotherapies for hematological malignancies between 2008 and 2020. iTACT-HBcrAg, HBsAg-HQ, and antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) were measured using samples stored after HBV reactivation. The lower limit of quantification for iTACT-HBcrAg was 2.0 log U/ml. RESULTS: HBV reactivation was diagnosed at a median HBV DNA level of 1.8 log IU/ml, and then all patients received NA treatment. No patient had HBV-related hepatitis with a median maximum HBV DNA level of 2.0 log IU/ml. The positivities of iTACT-HBcrAg and HBsAg-HQ were 96% and 52% after HBV reactivation, respectively. Of 25 patients with detectable iTACT-HBcrAg at the initiation of NA treatment, 17 (68%) achieved iTACT-HBcrAg loss. Median durations from NA treatment to HBV DNA loss and iTACT-HBcrAg loss or the last follow-up were 35 and 175 days, respectively. Recurrence of HBV reactivation after NA cessation was not observed in seven of eight patients who achieved iTACT-HBcrAg loss or seropositive for anti-HBs during follow-up, except for one without anti-HBs after allogeneic transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: iTACT-HBcrAg could be a potential surrogate marker for diagnosing early-stage HBV reactivation as well as safe cessation of NA treatment in patients with resolved HBV infection after HBV reactivation.

Clinical efficacy of a novel, high-sensitivity HBcrAg assay in the management of chronic hepatitis B and HBV reactivation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A fully automated, novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) has been developed. We demonstrate the clinical utility of iTACT-HBcrAg for monitoring chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and for the early detection of HBV reactivation. METHODS: After fundamental assessments, the clinical performance of iTACT-HBcrAg was compared with other HBV markers. i) Serial sera, available from 161 HBeAg-negative patients with CHB and persistently undetectable HBV DNA, were measured by iTACT-HBcrAg and a conventional HBcrAg assay (G-HBcrAg). ii) Serial sera from 13 HBV-reactivated patients were measured by iTACT-HBcrAg and an ultra-high-sensitivity HBsAg immune complex transfer-chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (lower limit of detection; 0.0005 IU/ml, ICT-CLEIA) to compare HBV DNA detection. iii) To elucidate the various HBcrAg components detected by iTACT-HBcrAg, OptiPrep density gradient centrifugation analysis was performed on sera obtained before and after HBV reactivation. RESULTS: The analytical performance of iTACT-HBcrAg was satisfactory. The sensitivity of iTACT-HBcrAg (2.1 Log U/ml) was approximately 10-fold greater than that of G-HBcrAg (2.8 Log U/ml). i) HBcrAg was detectable in the sera of 97.5% (157/161) of patients with CHB by iTACT-HBcrAg, of whom 75.2% (121/161) had ≥2.8 Log U/ml HBcrAg and 22.4% (36/161) had 2.1-2.8 Log U/ml HBcrAg, which was undetectable by G-HBcrAg. ii) 9 and 2 of 13 HBV-reactivated patients were HBcrAg-positive by iTACT-HBcrAg before and at HBV DNA positivity, respectively; 7 and 4 were HBcrAg-positive by iTACT-HBcrAg before and at HBsAg-positivity by ICT-CLEIA, respectively. iii) The HBcrAg detected by iTACT-HBcrAg before HBV reactivation was contained in empty particles (22 KDa precore protein). CONCLUSIONS: iTACT-HBcrAg could be used to better monitor responses to anti-HBV treatments in HBeAg-negative patients and for the early detection of HBV reactivation. LAY SUMMARY: A fully automated, novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) has been developed. iTACT-HBcrAg can be used to monitor HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B, as well as for the early detection of HBV reactivation. iTACT-HBcrAg could be used as a general marker of disease progression and treatment response.

Evaluation of a rapid antigen detection test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for COVID-19 in a pediatric emergency department.

We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for COVID-19 in 357 patients at a pediatric emergency department. Thirty-four patients tested positive by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, of which 24 were positive by the antigen assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 70.5% and 100%, respectively.

Digestive enzymes of fungal origin as a relevant cause of false positive Aspergillus antigen testing in intensive care unit patients.

BACKGROUND: Galactomannan antigen (GM) testing is widely used in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Digestive enzymes play an important role in enzyme substitution therapy in exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. As digestive enzymes of fungal origin like Nortase contain enzymes from Aspergillus, a false-positive result of the test might be possible because of cross-reacting antigens of the cell wall of the producing fungi. We, therefore, asked whether the administration of fungal enzymes is a relevant cause of false-positive GM antigen test results. METHODS: Patients with a positive GM antigen test between January 2016 and April 2020 were included in the evaluation and divided into two groups: group 1-Nortase-therapy, group 2-no Nortase-therapy. In addition, dissolved Nortase samples were analyzed in vitro for GM and ß-1,3-D-glucan. For statistical analysis, the chi-squared and Mann‒Whitney U tests were used. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in this evaluation (30 patients receiving Nortase and 35 patients not receiving Nortase). The overall false positivity rate of GM testing was 43.1%. Notably, false-positive results were detected significantly more often in the Nortase group (73.3%) than in the control group (17.1%, p < 0.001). While the positive predictive value of GM testing was 0.83 in the control group, there was a dramatic decline to 0.27 in the Nortase group. In vitro analysis proved that the Nortase enzyme preparation was highly positive for the fungal antigens GM and ß-1,3-D-glucan. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the administration of digestive enzymes of fungal origin like Nortase leads to a significantly higher rate of false-positive GM test results compared to that in patients without digestive enzyme treatment.

Performance Assessment of the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay On Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is ongoing worldwide, causing prolonged pressure on molecular diagnostics. Viral antigen (Ag) assays have several advantages, ranging from lower cost to shorter turnaround time to detection. Given the rare occurrence of low-load viremia, antigen assays for SARSCoV-2 have focused on nasopharyngeal swab and saliva as biological matrices, but their effectiveness must be validated. We assayed here the performances of the novel quantitative Liaison® SARSCoV-2 Ag assay on 119 nasopharyngeal swabs and obtained results were compared with Hologic Panther and Abbott m2000 RT-qPCR. The Ag assay demonstrated a good correlation with viral load, shorter turnaround time, and favorable economics. The best performance was obtained in the acute phase of disease.

Association of prior sensitizing events with anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies: An analysis of renal transplant recipients in a tertiary care centre in South India.

Traditionally, sensitizing events such as previous pregnancies, previous transfusions and prior transplants result in the production of anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) antibodies. However, it has been observed that, anti-HLA antibodies have been detected in many patients with no prior history of sensitizing events. This retrospective study analysed the most recent 100 consecutive Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assay results performed on 100 patients. The SAB assay is used routinely to detect anti-HLA antibodies in transplant recipients. Results of the SAB assay were analyzed and subsequently studied to see if a correlation existed between sensitizing events, the type of events and presence of antibody. Analysis showed that 77% (77/100) had anti-HLA antibodies. 61 out of 100 patients had prior sensitizing events while the remaining 39 had none. Both these groups showed an almost equal percent of patients with anti-HLA antibodies 77% (47/61) and 76.9% (30/39) respectively. A single sensitizing event was seen in 54.1% (33/61) patients including previous transfusions in 29.5% (18/61), pregnancies in 11.4% (7/61) and prior transplant in 13.1% (8/61). Our study suggests that irrespective of whether patients have prior sensitizing events or not, patients run the risks of alloimmunization, and therefore appropriate screening tests should be included in the pre-transplant compatibility algorithm.

Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Amniotic Fluid May Cause Hyperemesis Gravidarum.

Objectives: Limited data are available from recent trials involving pregnant women to guide Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis. There are no data about the presence of H. pylori in the amniotic fluid as well. Furthermore, the relation between amniotic fluid H. pylori and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) has not been characterized yet. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study conducted after obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee. Pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis were enrolled in the study. The stool antigen test assessed the presence of H. pylori in amniotic fluid. A perinatologist independently performed an amniocentesis. The obtained amniotic liquid was sent to the laboratory to evaluate H. pylori infection by stool H. pylori antigen assay. We determined the rate of H. pylori in amniotic fluid and assessed relations between H. pylori infection and pregnancy outcome, including HG. Results: Between May and September 2017, we enrolled 48 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis to detect possible fetal malformations. Patients were divided into two groups regarding the HG status. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of H. pylori infection presence. Among them, 28 (58.3%) were found to have a positive H. pylori test in their amniotic fluid. The rate of HG was significantly higher (71.4%) in patients who tested positive for H. pylori in amniocentesis than the H. pylori-negative group (20%), (p<0.001). Conclusions: The study's main new finding is that presence of H. pylori in the amniotic fluid is possible. Our data suggest that H. pylori-infected amniotic fluid is associated with the experience of past HG. The current study may have important implications for HG detection and help identify patients who would benefit from future preventive strategies.

HCV core antigen comes of age: a new opportunity for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection.

The diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been traditionally based on the detection of the host antibody response. Although antibody assays are available in different formats and are fairly accurate, they cannot distinguish between an ongoing infection with HCV replicative activity and a past infection where HCV has been cleared, spontaneously or after a successful therapy. As a chronic infection is mostly asymptomatic until the late clinical stages, there is a compelling need to detect active HCV infection by simple and reproducible methods. On this purpose, the clinical guidelines have suggested to search for the HCV ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) after anti-HCV has been detected, but this second step carries several limitations especially for population screening. The availability of fast and automated serological assays for the hepatitis C core antigen (HCVAg) has prompted an update of the guidelines that now encompass the use of HCVAg as a practical alternative to HCV-RNA, both for screening and monitoring purposes. In this paper, we summarize the features, benefits and limitations of HCVAg testing and provide an updated compendium of the evidences on its clinical utility and on the indications for use.

Analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using high-sensitivity HBsAg assays in hepatitis B virus carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional assays.

AIM: We investigated the utility of high-sensitivity hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays compared with conventional HBsAg assays. METHODS: Using serum samples from 114 hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional HBsAg assays (cut-off value, 0.05 IU/mL), the amount of HBsAg was re-examined by high-sensitivity HBsAg assays (cut-off value, 0.005 IU/mL). Cases negative for HBsAg in both assays were defined as consistent cases, and cases positive for HBsAg in the high-sensitivity HBsAg assay only were defined as discrepant cases. RESULTS: There were 55 (48.2%) discrepant cases, and the range of HBsAg titers determined by high-sensitivity HBsAg assays was 0.005-0.056 IU/mL. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, liver cirrhosis, and negative anti-HBs contributed to the discrepancies between the two assays. Cumulative anti-HBs positivity rates among discrepant cases were 12.7%, 17.2%, 38.8%, and 43.9% at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates among consistent cases were 50.8%, 56.0%, 61.7%, and 68.0%, respectively. Hepatitis B virus DNA negativity rates were 56.4% and 81.4% at baseline, 51.3% and 83.3% at 1 year, and 36.8% and 95.7% at 3 years, among discrepant and consistent cases, respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen reversion was observed only in discrepant cases. CONCLUSIONS: Re-examination by high-sensitivity HBsAg assays revealed that HBsAg was positive in approximately 50% of cases. Cumulative anti-HBs seroconversion rates and HBV-DNA seroclearance rates were lower in these cases, suggesting a population at risk for HBsAg reversion.

The HP10 Taenia monoclonal antibody-based ELISA detects a similar protein in the vesicular fluid of Taenia hydatigena.

Diagnosis of Taenia solium cysticercosis in endemic rural communities depends on serological tests, as typically there is no access to imaging facilities. The HP10 antigen ELISA (HP10 Ag ELISA), which detects a high molecular weight secreted protein of viable metacestodes, has been employed for the diagnosis of both human and porcine cysticercosis in such communities. In this communication, we formally demonstrate that the HP10 Ag ELISA, already known to function for the detection of T. saginata and T. solium cysticercosis, also detects a similar high molecular weight antigen of T. hydatigena. Thus, the HP10 Ag assay, while specific for human cysticercosis, may not be recommended for the diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis where there is co-infection of pigs with T. solium and T. hydatigena.

Discovery of Specific Antigens That Can Predict Microfilarial Intensity in Loa loa Infection.

Antigen-based immunoassays are currently needed for point-of-care quantification of Loa loa microfilariae (mf). Coupling transcriptomic approaches with bioinformatic analysis, we have identified 11 specific putative proteins (coding mRNAs) with potential utility as biomarkers of patent (mf + ) L. loa infection. We successfully developed antigen capture immunoassays to quantify 2 (LOAG_14221 and LOAG_15846) of these proteins in individual plasma/serum samples. Of the 2 quantifiable circulating biomarkers, LOAG_14221 showed the highest degree of specificity, particularly with a monoclonal antibody-based immunoassay. Moreover, the levels of LOAG_14221 in L. loa mf + patients were positively correlated to the mf densities in the corresponding blood samples (r = 0.53 and P = 0.008 for polyclonal assay; r = 0.54 and P = 0.004 for monoclonal assay). Thus, LOAG_14221 is a very promising biomarker that will be exploited in a quantitative point-of-care immunoassay for determination of L. loa mf densities.

The differences in short- and long-term varicella-zoster virus (VZV) immunoglobulin G levels following varicella vaccination of healthcare workers measured by VZV fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen assay (FAMA), VZV time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay and a VZV purified glycoprotein enzyme immunoassay.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) reporting no history of varicella frequently receive varicella vaccination (vOka) if they test varicella-zoster virus (VZV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) negative. In this study, the utilities of VZV-IgG time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (VZV-TRFIA) and a commercial VZV-IgG purified glycoprotein enzyme immunoassay (gpEIA) currently used in England for confirming VZV immunity have been compared to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen assay (FAMA). A total of 110 HCWs received two doses of vOka vaccine spaced 6 weeks apart and sera collected pre-vaccination (n = 100), at 6 weeks post-completion of vaccination (n = 86) and at 12-18 months follow-up (n = 73) were analysed. Pre-vaccination, by FAMA, 61·0% sera were VZV IgG negative, and compared to FAMA the sensitivities of VZV-TRFIA and gpEIA were 74·4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 57·9-87·0] and 46·2% (95% CI 30·1-62·8), respectively. Post-completion of vaccination the seroconversion rate by FAMA was 93·7% compared to rates of 95·8% and 70·8% determined by VZV-TRFIA and gpEIA, respectively. At 12-18 months follow-up seropositivity rates by FAMA, VZV-TRFIA and gpEIA were 78·1%, 74·0% and 47·9%, respectively. Compared to FAMA the sensitivities of VZV-TRFIA and gpEIA for measuring VZV IgG following vaccination were 96·4% (95% CI 91·7-98·8) and 74·6% (95% CI 66·5-81·6), respectively. Using both FAMA and VZV-TRFIA to identify healthy adult VZV susceptibles and measure seroconversion showed that vOka vaccination of HCWs is highly immunogenic.

Clinical impact of the baseline donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody measured by Luminex single antigen assay in living donor kidney transplant recipients after desensitization therapy.

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical impact of donor-specific anti-HLA-antibody (HLA-DSA) baseline levels, measured using the Luminex single antigen assay (LSA), in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Total 129 cases of LDKT were divided into four groups according to baseline mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) HLA-DSA values: Strong (n = 6), >10,000; Moderate (n = 8), 5,000-10,000; Weak (n = 11), 1,000-5,000, Negative (n = 104), <1,000. Pretransplant desensitization (DSZ) was performed to decrease the MFI to weak or negative values before KT. Clinical outcomes in the four groups were compared. After DSZ, HLA-DSA decreased to weak or negative levels in all patients; Acute rejections developed more frequently in strong group [5/6 (83.3%)] compared with other three groups (P < 0.05), and especially acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) developed almost exclusively in strong group [4/6 (66.7%)]. Strong HLA-DSA levels at baseline were more predictive of AAMR than either type of XM (complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity or flow cytometry) in ROC analysis. Allograft function in this group showed significant deterioration during follow-up compared with the other groups. In conclusion, strong HLA-DSA levels at baseline are associated with worse allograft outcome even after successful desensitization; therefore, strict monitoring and strong maintenance immunosuppression may be required in such patients.

Interassay Variability and Clinical Implications of Five Different Prostate-specific Antigen Assays.

Background and objective: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains a critical marker for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and monitoring. Recognising historical variability in PSA assays and the evolution of assay technology and calibration, this study aims to reassess interassay variability using the latest generation of five assays in a contemporary cohort of men undergoing prostate biopsy. Methods: Five different commercially available PSA assays were tested in a blood sample of 76 men before undergoing a prostate biopsy. Total PSA (tPSA) and free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA) were compared across assays, using Roche (Basel, Switzerland) as the benchmark, and correlated with biopsy outcome to analyse the impact on PCa diagnosis. The statistical analysis included Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots, with a p value threshold of <0.05 for significance. Key findings and limitations: Among the 76 men, 28 (36.8%) were diagnosed with significant PCa (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥2). A high correlation was observed between tPSA and %fPSA values among the different PSA assays tested (r2 ≥ 0.9). The Passing-Bablok analysis showed that tPSA results varied substantially among the assays, with slopes ranging between 0.78 and 1.04. Compared with the tPSA of Roche, tPSA values were on average 20.7% lower by Beckman (Oststeinbeck, Germany), 15.2% lower by Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA), 6.1% lower by Diasorin (Saluggia, Italy), and 9.6% higher by Brahms (Hennigsdorf, Germany; p < 0.001 for all). The %fPSA values by Abbott and Brahms were higher at 15.7% and 10.6%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the Beckman and Diasorin values had minimal differences of -0.3% and 2.3%, respectively (p > 0.05). The variability across assays would have resulted in discrepancies in both the sensitivity and the specificity for tPSA and %fPSA by at least 14%, depending on the cut-offs applied. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the use of the latest PSA assays, relevant variability of tPSA and %fPSA results can be observed among different assays. There is an urgent need for standardised calibration methods and greater awareness among practitioners concerning interassay variability. Clinicians should acknowledge that clinically relevant thresholds may depend on the specific PSA assay and that ideally the same assay is applied over time for better clinical decision-making. Patient summary: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a critical marker for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and monitoring. However, significant variations were observed in the results of the latest PSA assays. Thus, standardised calibration methods and greater awareness among practitioners concerning interassay variability are needed.

Designing and expression of novel recombinant fusion protein for efficient antigen screening of SARS-CoV-2.

Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), claimed millions globally. After the report of the first incidence of the virus, variants emerged with each posing a unique threat than its predecessors. Though many advanced diagnostic assays like real-time PCR are available for screening of SARS-CoV-2, their applications are being hindered because of accessibility and cost. With the advent of rapid assays for antigenic screening of SARS-CoV-2 made diagnostics far easy as the assays are rapid, cost-effective and can be used at point-of-care settings. In the present study, a fusion construct was made utilising highly immunogenic B cell epitopes from the three important structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2. The protein was expressed; purified capture mAbs generated and rapid antigen assay was developed. Eight hundred and forty nasopharyngeal swab samples were screened for the evaluation of the developed assay which showed 37.14% positivity, 96.51% and 100% sensitivity and specificity respectively. The assay developed was supposed to identify SARS-CoV-2 wild-type as well as variants of concern and variants of importance in real-time conditions.

Development of a specific MPXV antigen detection immunodiagnostic assay.

Human monkeypox (mpox) has recently become a global public health emergency; however, assays that detect mpox infection are not widely available, largely due to cross-reactivity within the Orthopoxvirus genus. Immunoassay development was largely confined to researchers who focus on biothreats and endemic areas (Central and West Africa) until the 2022 outbreak. As was noted in the COVID-19 pandemic, antigen detection assays, integrated with molecular assays, are necessary to help curb the spread of disease. Antigen-detecting immunoassays offer the advantage of providing results ranging from within min to h and in lateral flow formats; they can be deployed for point-of-care, home, or field use. This study reports the development of an mpox-specific antigen detection immunoassay developed on a multiplexed, magnetic-bead-based platform utilizing reagents from all research sectors (commercial, academic, and governmental). Two semi-quantitative assays were developed in parallel and standardized with infectious mpox virus (MPXV) cell culture fluid and MPXV-positive non-human primate (NHP) sera samples. These assays could detect viral antigens in serum, were highly specific toward MPXV as compared to other infectious orthopoxviruses (vaccinia virus, cowpox virus, and camelpox virus), and exhibited a correlation with quantitative PCR results from an NHP study. Access to a toolbox of assays for mpox detection will be key for identifying cases and ensuring proper treatment, as MPXV is currently a global traveler.

Analytical and clinical performances of seven direct detection assays for SARS-CoV-2.

Background: Direct detection tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that bypass complicated nucleic acid/antigen purification steps are promising tools for the rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: To determine the analytical and clinical diagnostic performances of the direct detection assays, we compared 6 direct molecular detection assays, including two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays and one lateral flow antigen assay, against the reference extraction-based RT-PCR assay using 183 respiratory samples (87 nasopharyngeal swabs, 51 saliva samples, and 45 sputum samples). Results: Analytical sensitivity analysis showed that the direct RT-PCR assay of Toyobo exhibited the lowest LOD of 1,000 copies/mL. Compared with the 80 positive and 103 negative samples based on the reference assay, the Toyobo assay had the highest positive percent agreement (PPA) of 96.3%, followed by the two direct RT-PCR assays of Takara and Shimadzu and one LAMP assay of Eiken (86.3-87.5%). The Fujirebio antigen assay had the lowest PPA of 44.7% among the assays tested. The negative percent agreement of these direct detection assays was 100%, except for the Eiken assay (96.3%). Conclusions: Large differences in PPA existed among the direct detection tests. Laboratories need to take these characteristics into consideration before implementing these assays.