Identifying the Variables for Oncoplastic Reconstruction: Preoperative Assessment Tool for Breast Conserving Treatment.

BACKGROUND: A wide range of surgical techniques has been described for breast conservation treatment (Oncoplasty) based on breast size and shape, as well as tumor size and location. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding the indications for oncoplastic reconstruction. This study aims to identify the presurgical parameters associated with poor cosmetic outcomes post-breast conserving treatment. We hope this preoperative model can assist in evaluating whether there is a need for oncoplastic intervention. METHODS: The study group involved 136-adult females (age 35-77) who previously undergone breast conserving surgery and radiation, without oncoplastic intervention between 2007 and 2017. Patient demographics, medical and physical parameters were collected, and each patient filled Breast-QTM-questionnaire and six angles' photographs were taken. Patients' photographs were evaluated by 15 board-certified plastic surgeons. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders for poor outcome in each of the experts' and patients' average-grades. RESULTS: Our analysis identified several variables correlated with poor surgical outcome: high BMI, high chest-wall-circumference, high breast-width and larger volume-removed. The general-aesthetic-result as evaluated by our experts was favorably influenced by an upper lateral quadrant tumor while the breast shape was negatively influenced by a lower medial quadrant tumor. Interestingly, no correlation was found between the patients' and panel's evaluations, nor did we find any clinically significant parameter related to the patients' reported well-being. CONCLUSION: Patients with high BMI, high chest-wall-circumference, large breast-width and larger inferomedial tumors could benefit from early plastic surgery evaluation and intervention. Patient's psychosocial well-being as well as sexual well-being are independent from positive surgical outcome evaluated by plastic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Repeat breast-conserving treatment of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a nationwide survey amongst breast surgeons and radiation oncologists in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In line with the paradigm to minimize surgical morbidity in patients with primary breast cancer, there is increasing evidence for the safety of a repeat breast-conserving treatment (BCT) of an ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) in selected patients. The conditions for the feasibility of a repeat BCT vary widely in literature. In clinical practice, many physicians have ongoing concerns about the oncological safety and possible toxicity of repeat BCT. AIM: To investigate the attitude of Dutch breast surgeons and radiation oncologists towards repeat BCT and to report on their experiences with, objections against and perceived requirements to consider a repeat BCT in case of IBTR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An online survey consisting of a maximum of 26 open and multiple-choice questions about repeat BCT for IBTR was distributed amongst Dutch breast surgeons and radiation oncologists. RESULTS: Forty-nine surgeons representing 49% of Dutch hospitals and 20 radiation oncologists representing 70% of Dutch radiation oncology centres responded. A repeat BCT was considered feasible in selected cases by 28.7% of breast surgeons and 55% of radiation oncologists. The most important factors to consider a repeat BCT for both groups were the patient's preference to preserve the breast and surgical feasibility of a second lumpectomy. Arguments against a repeat BCT were based on the perceived unacceptable toxicity and cosmesis of a second course of radiotherapy. The technique of preference for re-irradiation would be partial breast irradiation (PBI) according to all radiation oncologists. Differentiating between new primary tumours (NPT) and true recurrences (TR) was reported to be done by 57.1% of breast surgeons and 60% of radiation oncologists. The most important reason to differentiate between NPT and TR was to establish prognosis and to consider whether a repeat BCT would be feasible. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of Dutch breast cancer specialists is considering a repeat BCT feasible in selected cases, at the patient's preference and with partial breast re-irradiation.

Assessment of the Grisotti oncoplastic procedure for the management of central breast tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The Grisotti technique consists to excise central breast tumor with nipple areolar and mobilize a dermo-glandular flap which is de-epithelized in order to reshape the breast and recreate an areola. The objective was to assess oncological results, postoperative side-effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction rates resulting from this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2016 to December 2019, 38 patients have been treated with a central breast tumor using the Grisotti technique. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.6 ± 11. The median body mass index was 27 kg/m² [20-42]. Thirty one patients benefited from a sentinel lymph node dissection. Preoperative histology found a majority of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) (71%). There were no intraoperative complications, and the average operating time was 90 min [60-200]. Postoperative histology found IDC associated with ductal carcinoma in situ in 28 patients. The surgical margins were invaded in two patients (reoperated by mastectomy after adjuvant treatment) and invasion of a margin of less than 1 mm in another six patients (supplemented by re-excision). The main postoperative complications were an abscess of the operating site and a partial necrosis of the neo-areola. The appearance of the breasts after radiotherapy gives a high satisfaction rate, both for patients and for surgeons. CONCLUSION: The Grisotti technique is an easily reproducible procedure without major complications. It makes it possible to perform a carcinological satisfactory central lumpectomy, correction of the central glandular defect, and reconstruction of a new areola.

Effectiveness of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in older patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In the Netherlands, radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is omitted in up to 30% of patients aged ≥ 75 years. Although omission of radiotherapy is considered an option for older women treated with endocrine treatment, the majority of these patients do not receive systemic treatment following Dutch treatment guidelines. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of omission of radiotherapy on locoregional recurrence risk in this patient population. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 75 years undergone BCS for T1-2N0 breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2009 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. To minimize confounding by indication, hospital variation was used to assess the impact of radiotherapy-use on locoregional recurrence risk using cox proportional hazards regression. Hazards ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 2390 patients were included. Of the patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, 39.3% received endocrine treatment. Five-year incidences of locoregional recurrence were 1.9%, 2.8%, and 3.0% in patients treated at hospitals with higher (average radiotherapy-use 96.0%), moderate (88.0%), and lower radiotherapy-use (72.2%) respectively, and nine-year incidences were 2.2%, 3.1%, and 3.2% respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.46 (95% CI 0.77-2.78) and 1.50 (95% CI 0.79-2.85) for patients treated at hospitals with moderate and lower radiotherapy-use, compared to patient treated at hospitals with higher radiotherapy-use. CONCLUSIONS: Despite endocrine treatment in only 39.3%, locoregional recurrence risk was low, even in patients treated at hospitals with lower radiotherapy-use. This provides reasonable grounds to consider omission of radiotherapy in patients aged ≥ 75 years with T1-2N0 breast cancer.

pTis and pT1a Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Is Associated with Good Prognosis after Salvage Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery have a poor prognosis. There is little information regarding the prognostic impact of the tumor size in patients with IBTR. METHODS: A total of 143 patients who had histologically confirmed IBTR without distant metastases and who underwent salvage surgery between 1989 and 2013 in our hospital were included. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was calculated according to the invasive tumor size of IBTR. The median follow-up period was 4.6 years. RESULTS: Patients with pT1b or more advanced IBTR have a high (≥20%) 5-year distant recurrence risk. There were significant differences in DDFS between patients with pTis or pT1a and those with pT1b or a more advanced stage (5-year DDFS: 94.4 vs. 70.1%, respectively, p value = 0.006). This significance remained after adjusting for other clinicopathological factors (p value = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with pTis or pT1a IBTR have a good prognosis after salvage surgery for IBTR, and the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy could be considered. Further research and validation studies are needed.

Contribution of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for therapeutic de-escalation in early breast cancer: Report of a single institution's experience.

The spread of systematic screening and the emergence of oncoplastic techniques allow more breast conservative treatment associating lumpectomy and external beam radiation therapy. In order to furthermore facilitate the patient's treatment, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been developed. The oncological safety of this technique has been studied, and is considered acceptable. Many questions remain unsolved in regard of the toxicity of this procedure as well as the patient's selection criteria. In this study, we present the first results and complications rate of patients treated by IORT in a single French institution. Between 2012 and 2015, all patients with breast cancer treated in a one-step procedure associating lumpectomy and IORT were retrospectively included in a monocentric cohort. Acute and long-term toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE v4.0 classification. 280 breast cancers were treated using IORT procedure. Additional external beam radiation therapy was requested for 45.7% patients. The acute complications rate was 14.6%, with 5 surgical revisions needed (1.78%). With a median follow up of 911 days, the long-term grade-3 toxicity rate was 1.1%. The only risk factor for local fibrosis was external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (OR = 1.99; IC95 [1.05-3.81], P = 0.036). Three patients (1.07%) were diagnosed with local recurrence. The results from this cohort confirm the low complication and recurrence rate of IORT procedure. A good selection of patients is necessary in order to lower the EBRT rate and allow therapeutic de-escalation. The classification of tumors into IHC subsets seems a good selection gate. Intraoperative radiation therapy appears to have a low toxicity rate with an acceptable local recurrence risk, and should therefore be considered as an option in the treatment of early breast cancer.

[Oncoplastic breast surgery]. / Chirurgie oncoplastique du sein.

Oncoplastic surgery is to treat breast tumors with the help of plastic surgery. Efficiency of breast-conserving treatments (BCT) compared to mastectomies is equivalent. BCT is better accepted but can cause breast deformity, thus further operations. Oncoplastic surgery aims at conserving an acceptable shape to the breast. It ranges from simple remodeling to more complex techniques modifying the width of the breast. According to the quadrant to treat (inner upper, outer upper, inner lower, outer lower, union of quadrants, tumors of the nipple-areola complex, tumors of the inframammary fold), according to the proximity of the tumor to the nipple, and to the size of the breast and tumor, various techniques are displayed. Few touch ups are necessary. Symmetry is managed during the initial operation or after.

Mucinous breast cancer - clinical characteristics and treatment results in patients treated at the Oncology Centre in Kraków between 1952 and 2002.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To present the characteristics and clinical outcomes in 94 patients with mucinous breast cancer treated at the Oncology Centre in Krakow between 1952 and 2002. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stage I or II carcinomas were found in 66 patients (69.4%) of the presented group and in the remaining 28 patients (29.8%) stage III disease was diagnosed. In 27 cases regional lymph nodes were involved. All patients had been treated with surgery: mastectomy (90 patients) or breast-conserving treatment (4 patients). Radiotherapy was administered in 14 patients, adjuvant chemo-therapy in 14 patients, and endocrine therapy in 39 patients. RESULTS: The maximum follow-up was 257 months. Ten-year survival was as follows: 75.7% (overall survival), 82.5% (disease-free survival). During the follow-up, 4 patients developed local recurrence, 5 patients developed metastases. Second primary cancer was found in 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The presented results confirm the good prognosis in patients treated for mucinous breast cancer. The diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer based on mammography can allow breast-conserving treatment.

Survival and toxicity after breast-conserving surgery and external beam reirradiation for localized ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence: A population-based study.

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse may increase the radiation dose delivered to the heart and result in a greater risk of cardiac adverse events. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiac mortality in patients treated for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse, either with breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation or with total mastectomy between 2000 and 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated for a primary non-metastatic breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database, and those who subsequently experienced a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse treated with breast-conserving surgery and reirradiation ("BCS+ReRT" group, n=239) or with total mastectomy ("TM" group, n=3127) were included. The primary objective was to compare the cardiac mortality rate between the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation and total mastectomy. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and cancer specific survival. RESULTS: Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.40, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.19-4.86, P=0.006) in univariate analysis; non-statistically significant differences were observed after adjusting for age, laterality and chemotherapy on multivariate analysis (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.96-3.94, P=0.067), age being the only confounding factor. A non-statistically significant difference towards lower overall survival was observed in patients who had breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation compared with those who underwent total mastectomy (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.98-1.90, P=0.066), and no differences were observed in terms of cancer specific survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.56-1.82, P=0.965). CONCLUSION: In this study, the incidence of cardiac mortality was low, and breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation did not independently increased the risk of cardiac mortality for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse.

A prospective analysis of two studies that used the 5-mm interval slices and 5-mm margin-free method for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is one of standard treatments for early breast cancer. However, it is regarded as an option to treat elderly patients with small hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy. We conducted two sequential prospective studies to examine the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy since 2002 and present the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary female breast cancer patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled in two sequential studies named WORTH 1 and 2. The surgical materials were sliced in 5-mm intervals and all slices were examined microscopically. Postoperative radiotherapy was not allowed, but tamoxifen or anastrozole was administered for 5 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The data of the two studies were combined (N = 321). The median follow-up period for IBTR was 94 months (4-192 months). Only three patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5- and 10-year IBTR-free rates were 97.0% and 90.5%, respectively. The age at operation and PR status affected IBTR rates independently. When we calculated IBTR-free rates of patients who were 65 years of age or older at the time of surgery and had PR-positive tumors, the 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were both 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS:  Our "5-mm-thick slice and 5-mm free-margin" method may be effective to select patients who can be treated by breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy.

The diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography for recurrent breast cancer after breast conserving treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of mammography and breast ultrasonography to diagnose tumor recurrence in patients after breast conserving therapy. Material and Methods: Imaging findings of 130 breast cancer patients treated by breast conserving therapy (BCT) who have followed up with mammography and ultrasonography at our center between 1 st January 2010 and 1st January 2016 were interpreted by two radiologists. The information of recurrent tumor and baseline data were blinded. Imaging interpretation followed the ACR Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 5th edition guideline. Findings of mammography, breast ultrasonography, demographic data and histological data were recorded and analyzed. Results: The presence of mass in mammography (P-value=0.025) and internal vascularity in mass in ultrasonography (P-value<0.001) were associated with recurrent tumor at the surgical bed. All the recurrent tumors were interpreted as BI-RADS 4 (71 patients) with sensitivity= 100%, specificity= 89.5%. BIRADS4 is significant in the diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer in BCT patients (AUC of the ROC curve = 0.742 and 95% CI=(0.7-0.79)). Conclusion: The presence of mass in mammography and internal vascularity in the mass in ultrasonography are the imaging findings which were significantly related to recurrent tumor at surgical bed in patient with breast conserving treatment.

Modern Approaches to Oncoplastic Surgical Treatment.

Partial breast reconstruction using oncoplastic techniques is performed at the time of lumpectomy and includes volume replacement techniques such as flaps and volume displacement techniques such as reduction and mastopexy. These techniques are used to preserve breast shape, contour, size, symmetry, inframammary fold position, and position of the nipple-areolar complex. Newer techniques such as auto-augmentation flaps and perforator flaps continue to broaden options and newer radiation therapy protocols will hopefully reduce side effects. Options for the oncoplastic approach now include higher risk patients as there is a larger repository of data on the safety and efficacy of this technique.

Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in situ: A Register-Based Study of Norwegian Women Diagnosed between 1995 and 2018.

Introduction: The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased after implementation of mammographic screening. The lesion represents management challenges due to its undetermined growth pattern. We aimed to explore treatment of women aged 48-71 years diagnosed with DCIS between 1995 and 2018, by detection mode and histopathological characteristics. Material and Methods: Data on surgical treatment and radiation therapy (RT) of 4,995 women diagnosed with DCIS were retrieved from the Cancer Registry of Norway. We described the percentage and frequency of breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for participants in BreastScreen Norway (screen-detected) and nonparticipants. We estimated the relative risk (RR) of BCT, using log-binomial regression models. Results: Use of BCT increased from about 40% in 1995 to 85% in 2018. Use of BCT was more common among older than younger women and more commonly used for screen-detected versus tumors detected outside the screening program. Nine out of ten women with tumors ≤10 mm were treated with BCT and two out of ten with tumors >50 mm. RT was given to 89.3% of the women with tumors ≤10 mm, 34.1% of those with tumors classified as van Nuys' grade 1 and <10 mm and 96.0% of the tumors >50 mm. Use of BCT was less common for tumors >50 mm compared to <10 mm (RR adjusted for age, detection mode, van Nuys' grade, and localization: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.19-0.36). Conclusion: BCT was increasingly used among women diagnosed with DCIS in Norway during the period from 1995 to 2018, particularly for screen-detected, small lesions with low van Nuys' grade.

Characteristics, prognosis, risk factors, and management of recently diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) represents ~1% of all breast cancer cases and is arguably a more aggressive subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Lacking studies with a large population, the survival outcomes of DCISM are still poorly understood and the treatment recommendations remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the long-term outcome of patients with DCISM, potential risk factors for their prognosis, and the difference of survival between patients treated with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCT + RT) and mastectomy only. METHODS: In total, 1299 patients from 2008 to 2019 with DCISM were retrospectively retrieved. Clinicopathological features were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was conducted between patients who underwent BCT + RT and mastectomy only. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. Differences of survival between two groups were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Totally, 1286 patients had follow-up information, the median follow-up is 54.57 months, the 5-year local-regional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were 98.6%, 97.1%, and 99.4%, respectively, two deaths were due to breast cancer. Multivariate analysis identified age <40 (p = 0.028) and close margin (≤2 mm) as independent negative prognostic factors for LRFS. No prognostic factors were identified for DMFS and OS. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS of patients who had DCIS component ≥5 cm and underwent mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy were 100%, 98.4%, and 98.4%, respectively. After propensity score matching (PSM), no survival difference was observed between patients treated with BCT + RT or mastectomy only. CONCLUSIONS: DCISM patients had a good survival, even those with DCIS component ≥5 cm. Patients aged <40 or with close margin (≤2 mm) had a poorer LRFS, but not DMFS or OS. BCT + RT is a feasible choice for DCISM patients.

Reliability of the BCCT.core software in evaluation of breast cosmesis - A systematic review.

Breast cancer conservative treatment software (BCCT.core) has the potential to provide objective results using digital photographs, thus increasing the reliability, limiting the subjective interpretation and standardising the evaluation of breast cosmesis in patients. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the empirical evidence regarding the agreement between the BCCT.core and other methods used by health professionals and patients to assess breast cosmesis. The Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies comparing the agreement between BCCT.core and other methods used to assess breast cosmesis. A total of 14 studies involving 2703 patients were included in the review. In studies where patients undertook self-assessment, the percentage agreement ranged from 69.2% to 74.8% and the kappa values ranged from slight (k = 0.12) to fair agreement. There was a low correlation between the BCCT.core and the Harvard scale when patients assessed cosmetic outcomes using photographs of their breasts (r = 0.165). A 75% and 42.8% agreement was reported in studies where clinicians assessed breast cosmesis by directly visualising the patients' breasts and photographs, respectively. Assessment of breast cosmesis by the expert panel using patient photographs reported a percentage agreement ranging from 25% to 83%. The results of this systematic review demonstrated an overall agreement of fair to moderate between the BCCT.core and the subjective scales used to assess breast cosmesis. However, clinician experience and patient values should be considered in clinical decision-making.

Hypoxia-Overcoming Breast-Conserving Treatment by Magnetothermodynamic Implant for a Localized Free-Radical Burst Combined with Hyperthermia.

For the purpose of improving the quality of life and minimizing the psychological morbidity of a mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment (BCT) has become the more preferable choice in breast cancer patients. Meanwhile, tumor hypoxia has been increasingly recognized as a major deleterious factor in cancer therapies. In the current study, a novel, effective, and noninvasive magnetothermodynamic strategy based on an oxygen-independent free-radical burst for hypoxia-overcoming BCT is proposed. Radical precursor (AIPH) and iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are coincorporated within the alginate (ALG) hydrogel, which is formed in situ within the tumor tissue by leveraging the cross-linking effect induced by the local physiological Ca2+ with ALG solution. Inductive heating is mediated by IONPs under AMF exposure, and consequently, regardless of the tumor hypoxia condition, a local free-radical burst is achieved by thermal decomposition of AIPH via AMF responsivity. The combination of magnetic hyperthermia and oxygen-irrelevant free-radical production effectively enhances the in vitro cytotoxic effect and also remarkably inhibits tumor proliferation. This study provides a valuable protocol for an hypoxia-overcoming strategy and also an alternative formulation candidate for noninvasive BCT.

Impact of clinical and pathological factors on local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment: CT-based localization for a tumor bed boost yielded better local control when compared with a surgical scar.

Background: We investigated the effects of risk factors on the incidence of local recurrence (LR) in patients who underwent breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for primary breast cancer at a single institution in China from 1999 to 2011. Methods: Patient outcomes were compared with respect to LR, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, the risk factors for relapse after BCT were studied. Results: The 2028 patients with invasive breast cancer included in this study were followed for a median of 95 months, during which the 8-year LR, IBTR, DDFS, and DFS rates were 2.6%, 3.0%, 93.7%, and 91.3%, respectively. Lymph node involvement, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and the use of computed tomography (CT) information during boost field planning were identified as significant predictors of LR and IBTR. Notably, use of the surgical scar for tumor bed identification during boost field planning was associated with a higher adjusted risk of LR, compared with the use of CT. By contrast, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was not an independent predictor of LR (hazard ratio of no NAC vs. NAC, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.19; P = 0.157). In a multivariate analysis, the age at diagnosis, tumor diameter, lymph node involvement, HER2-positive status, and use of CT information during boost field planning were identified as significant factors affecting DFS. Conclusions: The use of CT information during boost field planning could reduce the risk of LR among patients undergoing BCT. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments for breast cancer did not show the significant difference in respect to the outcome of LR.

Noninferior Outcome After Breast-Conserving Treatment Compared to Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients With Four or More Positive Lymph Nodes.

Introduction: We conducted a non-inferiority analysis using real-world data to compare the survival outcomes of stage T1-2N2-3 (tumor size ≤5 cm and four or more node metastases) breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MAST). Methods: The study included patients with stage T1-2N2-3 invasive breast carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, who underwent BCS or MAST between 2004 and 2012, along with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The statistical analyses used included the chi-squared test, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score matching (PSM). Results: The study population comprised 13,263 patients, including 4,787 (36.1%) and 8,476 (63.9%) patients who were treated with BCS and MAST, respectively. Patients with younger age and advanced stage were more likely to have received MAST. The probability of receiving MAST increased over the years, while the probability of BCS decreased (p < 0.001). The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 86.1% in the BCS cohort compared to 83.1% in the MAST cohort (p < 0.001). Surgical procedure was an independent prognostic factor for BCSS. Patients who received MAST had worse BCSS than those treated with BCS (hazard ratio = 1.179, 95% confidence interval = 1.087-1.278, p < 0.001). These results remained significant after stratification by age, tumor grade, T stage, N stage as well as marital status. Similar results were obtained after PSM. Conclusions: BCS resulted in noninferior outcome than MAST in patients with T1-2/N2-3 invasive breast carcinoma. BCS may therefore be an optimal treatment option when both treatment options are feasible and appropriate.

Effect of 21-gene recurrence score in decision-making for surgery in early stage breast cancer.

AIM: We aimed to assess the role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in the decision-making for surgical treatment in early stage breast cancer and compared the outcomes between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MAST) among various 21-gene RS groups. METHODS: We included patients with stage T1-2M0M0 and estrogen receptor-positive breast invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent BCS + radiotherapy or MAST between 2004 and 2012 as part of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Data were analyzed using binomial logistic regression, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: We enrolled 34,447 patients including 22,681 (65.8%) and 11,766 (34.2%) who underwent BCS and MAST, respectively. Patients with high-risk RS were more likely to receive MAST. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with intermediate-risk (P<0.001) and high-risk (P<0.001) RS had poor breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), as compared to those with low-risk RS. Moreover, patients who underwent MAST also exhibited poor BCSS (P<0.001), as compared to those who underwent BCS. In low-risk (P<0.001) and intermediate-risk (P=0.020) RS groups, patients who underwent MAST had poor BCSS, as compared to those treated with BCS. However, BCSS was comparable between patients who underwent MAST and BCS (P=0.952); similar trends were also observed after PSM. CONCLUSION: The 21-gene RS may impact the decision-making for surgery in early stage breast cancer. Our study provides additional support for a shared decision-making process for BCS when both local management options are appropriate choices regardless of the 21-gene RS.

Two cases of radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAA) of the breast has been increasing, and its prognosis is reportedly poor. It is important to remove tumor tissues completely to prevent recurrence. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases of patients with RAA of the breast. Both patients had a nodule in their remaining breast a few years after undergoing breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for breast cancer. The nodules were diagnosed as angiosarcoma by skin biopsy and open biopsy, respectively. To determine the extent of lesion spread, mapping biopsy was performed before surgery. Both patients underwent mastectomy, extensive skin resection, and split skin grafting. Pathological findings showed that their tumors could be completely resected. After surgery, chemotherapy was performed. CONCLUSION: In our cases, no local or distant recurrence has been detected in either patient for over 4 years. We identified the range of tumor invasion by preoperative mapping biopsy and completely resected all tumor tissue.