Prenatal diagnosis of a trisomy 7 mosaic case: CMA, CNV-seq, karyotyping, interphase FISH, and MS-MLPA, which technique to choose?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform a prenatal genetic diagnosis of a high-risk fetus with trisomy 7 identified by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the efficacy of different genetic testing techniques for prenatal diagnosis of trisomy mosaicism. METHODS: For prenatal diagnosis of a pregnant woman with a high risk of trisomy 7 suggested by NIPT, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed on an amniotic fluid sample. Low-depth whole-genome copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to clarify the results further. In addition, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) was performed to analyze the possibility of uniparental disomy(UPD). RESULTS: Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis revealed a 46, XX result. Approximately 20% mosaic trisomy 7 was detected according to the CMA result. About 16% and 4% of mosaicism was detected by CNV-seq and FISH, respectively. MS-MLPA showed no methylation abnormalities. The fetal ultrasound did not show any detectable abnormalities except for mild intrauterine growth retardation seen at 39 weeks of gestation. After receiving genetic counseling, the expectant mother decided to continue the pregnancy, and follow-up within three months of delivery was normal. CONCLUSION: In high-risk NIPT diagnosis, a combination of cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques proves fruitful in detecting low-level mosaicism. Furthermore, the exclusion of UPD on chromosome 7 remains crucial when NIPT indicates a positive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 7.

Pathogenic recurrent copy number variants in 7,078 pregnancies via chromosomal microarray analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of pathogenic recurrent CNVs in fetuses with different referral indications and review the intrauterine phenotypic features of each CNV. METHODS: A total of 7,078 amniotic fluid samples were collected for chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and cases carrying pathogenic recurrent CNVs were further studied. RESULTS: The highest incidence of pathogenic recurrent CNVs was 2.25 % in fetal ultrasound anomalies (FUA) group. Moreover, regardless of other indications, pregnant women with advanced maternal age have a lower incidence compared with whom less than 35 years old (p<0.05). In total 1.17 % (83/7,078) samples carried pathogenic recurrent CNVs: 20 cases with 22q11.2 recurrent region (12 microdeletion and eight microduplication), 11 with 1q21.1 (five microdeletion and six microduplication) and 16p13.11 (four microdeletion and seven microduplication), 10 with 15q11.2 recurrent microdeletion, seven with Xp22.31 recurrent microdeletion and 16p11.2 (three microdeletion and four microduplication), four with 7q11.23 (two microdeletion and two microduplication), three with 17p11.2 (three microdeletion), 17p12 (two microdeletion and one microduplication) and 17q12 (two microdeletion and one microduplication). The rest ones were rare in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Pathogenic recurrent CNVs are more likely to be identified in FUA group. Pregnant women with advanced maternal age have a lower incidence of pathogenic recurrent CNVs. The profile of pathogenic recurrent CNVs between prenatal and postnatal is different, especially in 22q11.2, 1q21.1, 15q13.3 recurrent region and 15q11.2 deletion.

SOX3 duplication in a boy with 46,XX ovotesticular disorder of sex development and his 46,XX sister with atypical genitalia: Probable germline mosaicism.

Ovotesticular disorders of sex development (OT-DSD) are characterized by ovarian follicles and seminiferous tubules in the same individual, with a wide range of atypical genitalia. We report on two sibs with atypical genitalia and SRY-negative 46,XX DSD, OT-DSD was confirmed only in the boy, while the girl had bilateral ovaries. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) showed a 737-kb duplication at Xq27.1 including the entire SOX3 gene in both sibs, which was confirmed by quantitative real time PCR. Also, X chromosome inactivation assay showed random inactivation in both sibs. Whole exome sequencing revealed no pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. CMA of the parents showed normal results for both, suggesting that germline mosaicism could be the reason of recurrence of this duplication in the siblings. Our results support a pathogenic role of SOX3 overexpression in 46,XX subjects leading to variable DSD phenotypes.

Ultrasonographic characteristics, genetic features, and maternal and fetal outcomes in fetuses with omphalocele in China: a single tertiary center study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with omphalocele, a midline abdominal wall defect at the umbilical cord base, have a low survival rate. However, the long-term outcomes of fetuses with prenatally diagnosed omphalocele have scarcely been studied. Therefore, we investigated the ultrasonographic features, genetic characteristics, and maternal and fetal outcomes of fetuses with omphalocele and provided a reference for the perinatal management of such cases. METHODS: A total of 120 pregnant females with fetal omphalocele were diagnosed using prenatal ultrasonography at the Fujian Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 2015 to March 2022. Amniotic fluid or cord blood samples were drawn at different gestational weeks for routine karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) detection, and whole exome sequencing (WES). The maternal and fetal outcomes were followed up. RESULTS: Among the 120 fetuses, 27 were diagnosed with isolated omphalocele and 93 with nonisolated omphalocele using prenatal ultrasonography. Cardiac anomalies were the most observed cause in 17 fetuses. Routine karyotyping and CMA were performed on 35 patients, and chromosomal abnormalities were observed in five patients, trisomy 18 in three, trisomy 13 in one, and chromosome 8-11 translocation in one patient; all were non-isolated omphalocele cases. Six nonisolated cases had normal CMA results and conventional karyotype tests, and further WES examination revealed one pathogenic variant and two suspected pathogenic variants. Of the 120 fetuses, 112 were successfully followed up. Eighty of the 112 patients requested pregnancy termination. Seven of the cases died in utero. A 72% 1-year survival rate was observed from the successful 25 live births. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of fetuses with nonisolated omphalocele varies greatly, and individualized analysis should be performed to determine fetal retention carefully. Routine karyotyping with CMA testing should be provided for fetuses with omphalocele. WES is an option if karyotype and CMA tests are normal. If the fetal karyotype is normal and no associated abnormalities are observed, fetuses with omphalocele could have a high survival rate, and most will have a good prognosis.

Prenatally detected six duplications at Xp22.33-p11.22: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between the results of cytogenetics and the results of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) has often led to confusion over genetic counselling for prenatal diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: The prenatal ultrasound results of a congenital heart defect (CHD) foetus displayed an apartial endocardial pad defect and permanently dilated coronary sinus and left superior vena cava at 21 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis, CMA, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) with foetal cord blood samples were used to detect the genetic aetiology. Routine G-binding cytogenetic analysis showed normal karyotypes in both the foetus' and parents' blood samples. CMA results demonstrated that there were 53.973-Mb recurrent CNVs at Xp22.33-p11.22, as confirmed by MLPA assay. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we described the CNV of six duplications at Xp22.33-p11.22 and the 53.973 Mb duplication CNV that was not found in foetal cord blood samples by conventional cytogenetic methods, and it was confirmed by CMA and MLPA. Our novel findings will provide helpful information for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counselling for foetal CHDs.

Phenotypic and mutational spectrum of ROR2-related Robinow syndrome.

Robinow syndrome is characterized by a triad of craniofacial dysmorphisms, disproportionate-limb short stature, and genital hypoplasia. A significant degree of phenotypic variability seems to correlate with different genes/loci. Disturbances of the noncanonical WNT-pathway have been identified as the main cause of the syndrome. Biallelic variants in ROR2 cause an autosomal recessive form of the syndrome with distinctive skeletal findings. Twenty-two patients with a clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome were screened for variants in ROR2 using multiple molecular approaches. We identified 25 putatively pathogenic ROR2 variants, 16 novel, including single nucleotide variants and exonic deletions. Detailed phenotypic analyses revealed that all subjects presented with a prominent forehead, hypertelorism, short nose, abnormality of the nasal tip, brachydactyly, mesomelic limb shortening, short stature, and genital hypoplasia in male patients. A total of 19 clinical features were present in more than 75% of the subjects, thus pointing to an overall uniformity of the phenotype. Disease-causing variants in ROR2, contribute to a clinically recognizable autosomal recessive trait phenotype with multiple skeletal defects. A comprehensive quantitative clinical evaluation of this cohort delineated the phenotypic spectrum of ROR2-related Robinow syndrome. The identification of exonic deletion variant alleles further supports the contention of a loss-of-function mechanism in the etiology of the syndrome.

Application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in diagnostic assessment of abnormal Down syndrome screening results.

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS) is the most common congenital cause of intellectual disability and also leads to numerous metabolic and structural problems. This study aims to explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis for pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results. METHODS: The study recruited 1452 pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results including 493 with an enlarged nuchal translucency thickness (NT ≥ 2.5 mm) and 959 with an abnormal second-trimester maternal serum biomarker screening results. They underwent amniocentesis to obtain amniotic fluid for CMA and karyotyping. RESULTS: CMA identified 74/1452 abnormal results, which was more efficient than karyotyping (51/1452, P < 0.05.) CMA is equivalent to traditional karyotyping for identifying aneuploidies. Compared to karyotyping CMA identified 1.90% more copy number variants (CNVs) ranging from 159Kb to 6496Kb. However, 34.4% of them were recurrent pathogenic CNVs associated with risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. CMA identified 13 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) results and 1 maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 7. Karyotyping identified 3 mosaic sex chromosome aneuploidy and 4 balanced translocation which could not be identified by CMA. In enlarged NT group, karyotyping identified 80.9% abnormal results while in serum screening group karyotyping identified 35.7%. However, the incidence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs was nearly the same in both groups. That was because aneuploidies and gross duplication/deletion were previously screened out by NT scan. CONCLUSIONS: CMA and karyotyping have both advantages and disadvantages in prenatal diagnosis of pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results. However, there was not enough evidence to support routine CMA in pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results.

Progress in Methods for Copy Number Variation Profiling.

Copy number variations (CNVs) are the predominant class of structural genomic variations involved in the processes of evolutionary adaptation, genomic disorders, and disease progression. Compared with single-nucleotide variants, there have been challenges associated with the detection of CNVs owing to their diverse sizes. However, the field has seen significant progress in the past 20-30 years. This has been made possible due to the rapid development of molecular diagnostic methods which ensure a more detailed view of the genome structure, further complemented by recent advances in computational methods. Here, we review the major approaches that have been used to routinely detect CNVs, ranging from cytogenetics to the latest sequencing technologies, and then cover their specific features.

A Novel Look at Dosage-Sensitive Sex Locus Xp21.2 in a Case of 46,XY Partial Gonadal Dysgenesis without NR0B1 Duplication.

A region of 160 kb at Xp21.2 has been defined as dosage-sensitive sex reversal (DSS) and includes the NR0B1 gene, considered to be the candidate gene involved in XY gonadal dysgenesis if overexpressed. We describe a girl with 46,XY partial gonadal dysgenesis carrying a 297 kb duplication at Xp21.2 upstream of NR0B1 initially detected by chromosomal microarray analysis. Fine mapping of the breakpoints by whole-genome sequencing showed a tandem duplication of TASL (CXorf21), GK and partially TAB3, upstream of NR0B1. This is the first description of an Xp21.2 duplication upstream of NR0B1 associated with 46,XY partial gonadal dysgenesis.

[Application of Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Diagnostic Assessment of Abnormal Prenatal Serological Screening Results of Down's Syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) technology in the prenatal diagnostic assessment of abnormal serological prenatal screening results of Down's syndrome (DS). METHODS: A total of 3 578 amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis solely due to abnormal serological prenatal screening results were selected. The samples were categorized into 3 groups, 2 624 in the high-risk group, 662 in the borderline-risk group, and 292 in the abnormal multiple of median (MoM) group. a-CGH was performed on the Agilent CGX ™ (8×60K) platform and the data were analyzed by the Genoglyphix ® software. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.38% (121/3 578). Among the chromosomal abnormalities, 49.59% (60/121) was aneuploidies, 42.15% (51/121) was pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs), and 8.26% (10/121) was likely pathogenic CNVs (lpCNVs). The detection rate of copy number variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was 1.03% (37/3 578). In the high-risk, the borderline-risk and the abnormal MoM groups, the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.54% (93/2 624), 2.87% (19/662) and 3.08% (9/292), respectively; the detection rate of p/lp CNVs was 1.64% (43/2 624), 1.81% (12/662) and 2.05% (6/292), respectively; the detection rate of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 was 1.37% (36/2 624), 0.76% (5/662) and 0.34% (1/292) in the three groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in all the detection rate among these groups ( P>0.05). One sample with X(51)/XYY(49) confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was misdiagnosed by a-CGH. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis with a-CGH is of great significance for reducing birth defects in pregnancies with abnormal serological prenatal screening results of DS. It can also be used to detect CNVs of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes.

[Application of Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Chromosomal Aberration in Gravidas with Advanced Age].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aberrations in gravidas with advanced maternal age (AMA). METHODS: A total of 3 677 amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis solely due to AMA were selected. Array-CGH was performed on the Agilent CGX TM (8X60K) platform and the data were analyzed by the Genoglyphix software. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of chromosomal aberration was 2.04% (75/3677), with 53.33% (40/75) being aneuploidies, including 22 cases of trisomy-21, 5 cases of trisomy-18, 8 cases with XXY, 3 cases of XYY and 2 cases of mosaic monosomy X, 32.00% (24/75) being pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs), including 19 cases of microdeletion and 5 cases of microduplication, with the fragment size ranging from 323 kb to 26 780 kb, and 14.67% (11/75) being likely pathogenic CNVs (lpCNVs), including 7 cases of microdeletion and 7 cases of microduplication, with the fragment size ranging from 358 kb to 16 873 kb. Besides, the detection rate of CNVs of unknown clinical significance (VUS) was 0.84% (31/3 677). The detection rate of aneuploidies increased significantly with increased maternal age ( P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the detection rate of p/lpCNVs among different maternal age groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that, compared with traditional karyotype analysis, a-CGH not only detects aneuploidies, but also detect pathogenic CNVs, including microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. The detection rate of fetal aneuploidies was closely correlated to maternal age. However, no correlation was found between the detection rate of p/lpCNVs and maternal age.

The prevalence of genetic diagnoses in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects.

PURPOSE: Congenital heart defects (CHD) are associated with genetic syndromes. Rapid aneuploidy testing and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are standard care in fetal CHD. Many genetic syndromes remain undetected with these tests. This cohort study aims to estimate the frequency of causal genetic variants, in particular structural chromosome abnormalities and sequence variants, in fetuses with severe CHD at mid-gestation, to aid prenatal counselling. METHODS: Fetuses with severe CHD were extracted from the PRECOR registry (2012-2016). We evaluated pre- and postnatal genetic testing results retrospectively to estimate the frequency of genetic diagnoses in general, as well as for specific CHDs. RESULTS: 919 fetuses with severe CHD were identified. After exclusion of 211 cases with aneuploidy, a genetic diagnosis was found in 15.7% (111/708). These comprised copy number variants in 9.9% (70/708). In 4.5% (41/708) sequence variants were found that would have remained undetected with CMA. Interrupted aortic arch, pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and atrioventricular septal defect were most commonly associated with a genetic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In case of normal CMA results, parents should be offered exome sequencing sequentially, if time allows for it, especially if the CHD is accompanied by other structural malformations due to the large variety in genetic syndromes.

Application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: To explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: The results of chromosome karyotype analysis and CMA of 477 cases undergoing amniocentesis were analyzed. The results of the no ultrasound abnormality group and the ultrasound abnormality group were compared separately. Within the ultrasound abnormality group, the results of the ultrasound structural malformation group, the ultrasound soft index abnormality group, and other ultrasound abnormality (including abnormal amniotic fluid volume and fetal growth restriction) groups were compared. RESULTS: Abnormal chromosome and CMA results were found in a total of 71 cases (15.88%, 71/447), which can be broken down into a total of 23 karyotype abnormalities (5.15%, 23/447), consisting of 18 cases of aneuploidy (4.03%, 18/447), 2 cases of unbalanced chromosome rearrangements (0.44%, 2/447), and 3 cases of chimerism (0.67%, 3/447); 17 cases with detection of pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) (3.80%, 17/447); and 31 cases of detection of clinical variants of unknown significance (VOUS) (6.93%, 31/447). CMA detected 3.8% more genetic abnormalities than karyotype analysis (in addition to the abnormalities detected simultaneously by karyotype analysis). Between the no ultrasound abnormality group and the ultrasound abnormality group, there was an extremely significant difference in the detection rate of an abnormal chromosomal karyotype (P < 0.01) and of VOUS (P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate of pCNV (P > 0.05). Comparing the ultrasound structural malformation group, the ultrasound soft index abnormality group, and the other ultrasound abnormality group, there were no significant differences in the detection rate of abnormal chromosomal karyotypes (P > 0.05), pCNV (P > 0.05) or VOUS (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of chromosomal karyotype abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis in cases with no ultrasound abnormalities was higher. For cases with fetal ultrasound structural abnormalities, when compared with traditional karyotype analysis, CMA can improve the detection rate of fetal genetic abnormalities. However, the no ultrasound abnormality group also had a high VOUS abnormality detection rate, so it is necessary to strictly define the CMA indications.

UPD16 itself is not a cause of intrauterine growth restriction.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of uniparental disomy (UPD16) for chromosome 16 is currently unclear. METHODS AND RESULT: We performed chromosome microarray analysis on two fetus and their placentas, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to exclude the hidden chr16 trisomy mosaicism in the fetuses, and clinical whole-exome sequencing to assess for homozygosity mutations of autosomal-recessive diseases. RESULTS: Microarray analysis of two fetuses had UPD16. The membranous placenta of the case 1 had confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 16. Clinical whole-exome sequencing on chromosome 16 revealed three potentially pathogenic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Gap-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and MLPA for a-thal deletions demonstrated that case 2 was homozygous for the -SEA deletion. CONCLUSIONS: The poor outcome in these fetuses may be attributed to other factors, the membranous placenta and the -SEA deletion, respectively. Fetal UPD16 itself might be not correlated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and thus is not the basic cause of IUGR.

Uniparental Disomy of Chromosome 15 in Two Cases by Chromosome Microarray: A Lesson Worth Thinking.

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are neurogenetic disorders caused by loss of function of the imprinted genes at 15q11q13. A 5-7 Mb paternal/maternal deletion of chromosomal region 15q11.2q13 is the major genetic cause of PWS/AS, but in a small group of patients, the PWS/AS phenotype can result from maternal/paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 15. Various mechanisms leading to UPD include gametic complementation, trisomy rescue, and compensatory UPD, which can be inferred from the pattern of uniparental heterodisomy (heteroUPD) or uniparental isodisomy (isoUPD). However, heteroUPD and isoUPD, especially mixed heteroUPD and isoUPD, are very rare in patients with PWS/AS. Here, we report 2 children with PWS/AS caused by mixed segmental heteroUPD 15 and isoUPD 15 which failed to be identified by chromosome microarray (CMA) but could be detected by other molecular genetic methods. The present report unravels the mechanism of mixed iso/heteroUPD 15 in PWS/AS and phenotype-genotype correlations. Moreover, our study suggests that CMA is prone to misdiagnosis for imprinting disorders such as PWS/AS, though it is considered a highly useful tool for copy number variations. As a result, other molecular detection methods, such as methylation analysis and STR marker analysis for UPD, should be supplementary used in this situation.

Chromosome microarray analysis in the investigation of children with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Our study was aimed to explore the clinical implication of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in genetically etiological diagnosis of children with congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: A total of 104 children with CHD with or without multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) or intellectual disabilities/developmental delay (ID/DD) but normal karyotype were investigated using Affymetrix CytoScan HD array. RESULT: Pathogenic copy number variations (PCNVs) were identified in 29 children (27.9%). The detection rates in children with simple CHD and complex CHD were 31.1% (19/61) and 23.2% (10/43), respectively. The detection rates of PCNVs were 17.9% (7/39), 20% (5/25), 63.2% (12/19) and 23.8% (5/21) in isolated CHD, CHD plus MCA, CHD plus ID/DD, CHD plus MCA and ID/DD, respectively. The PCNVs rate of CHD plus ID/DD was significantly higher than that of isolated CHD. Two genomic loci including 15q11.2 deletion and 1q43-q44 deletion were considered as CHD locus. The DVL1, SKI, STIM1, CTNNA3 and PLN were identified as candidate genes associated with CHD phenotypes. CONCLUSION: CMA can increase the diagnostic rate and improve the etiological diagnosis in children with CHD. We suggest CMA as a first-tier test in children with CHD, especially in children with CHD plus ID/DD.

De Novo 1.77-Mb Microdeletion of 10q22.2q22.3 in a Girl With Developmental Delay, Speech Delay, Congenital Cleft Palate, and Bilateral Hearing Impairment.

Interstitial deletions of chromosome band 10q22.1q22.3 are rare. We here report a 2.5-year-old female patient with developmental delay, speech delay, congenital cleft palate, and bilateral hearing impairment. The girl's karyotype was normal. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) revealed a 1.77-Mb de novo interstitial deletion in 10q22.2q22.3. The deletion harbors 9 genes, including KAT6B, DUPD1, DUSP13, SAMD8, VDAC2, COMTD1, ZNF503, NCRNA00245, and C10orf11. This is the first patient with a deletion of the smallest size in 10q22.2q22.3 as detected using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. Comparisons with patients with overlapping deletions and in neighboring regions demonstrate the clinical impact of each deletion and in the context of other deletions within the 10q22q23 region. Additionally, KAT6B and C10orf11 could represent disease-associated genes that contribute to developmental delay, speech and language delay, and congenital cleft palate.

Recurrent copy number variations as risk factors for autism spectrum disorders: analysis of the clinical implications.

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is currently considered a first-tier diagnostic assay for the investigation of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), developmental delay and intellectual disability of unknown etiology. High-resolution arrays were utilized for the identification of copy number variations (CNVs) in 195 ASD patients of Greek origin (126 males, 69 females). CMA resulted in the detection of 65 CNVs, excluding the known polymorphic copy number polymorphisms also found in the Database of Genomic Variants, for 51/195 patients (26.1%). Parental DNA testing in 20/51 patients revealed that 17 CNVs were de novo, 6 paternal and 3 of maternal origin. The majority of the 65 CNVs were deletions (66.1%), of which 5 on the X-chromosome while the duplications, of which 7 on the X-chromosome, were rarer (22/65, 33.8%). Fifty-one CNVs from a total of 65, reported for our cohort of ASD patients, were of diagnostic significance and well described in the literature while 14 CNVs (8 losses, 6 gains) were characterized as variants of unknown significance and need further investigation. Among the 51 patients, 39 carried one CNV, 10 carried two CNVs and 2 carried three CNVs. The use of CMA, its clinical validity and utility was assessed.

Dysmorphology services: a snapshot of current practices and a vision for the future.

Dysmorphology concerns the recognition and management of rare, multiple anomaly syndromes. Genomic technologies and software for gestalt recognition will re-shape dysmorphology services. In order to reflect on a model of the service in the post-genomic era, we compared the utility of dysmorphology consultations in two Mediterranean cities, Athens, Greece and Afula, Israel (MDS), the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, a UK service with dysmorphology expertise (UKDS) and the DYSCERNE, digital service (DDS). We show that it is more likely that chromosome microarray analysis will be performed if suggested in the UKDS rather than in the MDS; this, most probably reflects the difference of access to genetic testing following funding limitations in the MDS. We also show that in terms of achieved diagnosis, the first visit to a dysmorphology clinic is more significant than a follow-up. We show that a confirmed syndrome diagnosis significantly decreases the requests for other, non-genetic, laboratory investigations. Conversely, it increases the requests for reviews by other specialists and, most significantly (t-test: 8.244), it increases further requests for screening for possible associated complications. This is the first demonstration of the demands, on a health service, following the diagnosis of a dysmorphic condition.

Clinical value of screening prenatal ultrasound combined with chromosomal microarrays in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound findings in the screening of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and the analysis of risk factors for chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) abnormalities. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the datasets of 15,899 pregnant women who underwent prenatal evaluations at Affiliated Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong University between August 2018 and December 2022. Everyone underwent ultrasound screening, and those with abnormal findings underwent CMA to identify chromosomal abnormalities. RESULTS: The detection rates for isolated ultrasound anomalies and combined ultrasound and CMA anomalies were 11.81% (1877/15,899) and 2.40% (381/15,899), respectively. Among all ultrasound abnormalities, detection rates for isolated ultrasound soft marker anomalies, isolated structural abnormalities, and both ultrasound soft marker anomalies with structural abnormalities were 82.91% (1872/2258), 15.99% (361/2258), and 1.11% (25/2258), respectively. The detection rate of abnormal chromosomes in pregnant women with abnormal ultrasound results was 16.87% (381/2258). The detection rates were 13.33% in cases with two or more ultrasound soft markers anomalies, 47.37% for two or more structural anomalies, and 48.00% for concomitant ultrasound soft marker and structural anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced detection rates of chromosomal anomalies in fetal malformations are achieved with specific ultrasound findings (NT thickening, cardiovascular abnormalities, and multiple soft markers) or when combined with high-risk factors (advanced maternal age, familial history, parental chromosomal anomalies, etc.). When the maternal age is over 35 and with ≥2 ultrasound soft marker anomalies accompanied with any high-risk factors, CMA testing can aid in the diagnosis of prenatal chromosomal abnormalities.