[Pilot survey on continuing education for pharmacists in Germany]. / Piloterhebung zur Fortbildungssituation der Apotheker*innen in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: Continuing education (CE) for pharmacists is mandatory in Germany. However, the findings on CE activities of pharmacists are limited. The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot survey on the CE situation of pharmacists in Germany, including licensed and future pharmacists, to determine the commitment to CE, the attitude towards CE and an obligation to provide evidence, the extent of CE considered necessary and the application of CE content in professional practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the form of an online survey using SoSci survey, which was addressed to licensed pharmacists, pre-registration pharmacists, and pharmacy students. The online survey was promoted by pharmaceutical professional societies, trade media and interest groups. RESULTS: In total, 880 participants were included in the study: 695 pharmacists, 136 pharmacy students and 49 pre-registration pharmacists. Only 50.0% of the participants were aware of their CE obligations. Among the pharmacists, 44.9% reported that they held the voluntary advanced training certificate issued by the Chambers of Pharmacists. 551 participants reported the CE points of the past twelve month. On average, 56.2 ±â€¯50.2 CE points were collected (x̅ = 210.8 CE minutes per month). Pharmacists not holding the voluntary advanced training certificate of the Chamber of Pharmacists collected significantly fewer (p < 0.001) CE points (39.5 ±â€¯32.0 points; x̅ = 148.1 CE minutes per month). On average, the study population considered a minimum number of 33.9 ±â€¯20.9 CE points per year (x̅ = 127.1 CE minutes per month) to be adequate to meet the CE requirements. DISCUSSION: Although the majority participated in CE, the introduction of nationwide CE commitment monitoring was rejected. On the one hand, this may be linked to a lack of willingness to engage in lifelong learning. On the other hand, it should be borne in mind that, despite the same common nationwide legal basis, the different Chambers of Pharmacists districts have set up different rules concerning the minimum yearly CE commitment, the proof of compliance with CE requirements and fines for non-compliance. Therefore, the introduction of nationwide standard regulations may result in a greater acceptance of CE commitment checks. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' willingness to CE participation has so far been dependent on intrinsic motivation. Although many licensed pharmacists were in possession of the advanced training certificate issued by the Chambers of Pharmacists, the majority of participants did not support the introduction of a nationwide CE commitment monitoring. 127.1 CE minutes per month were considered appropriate to fulfill the CE obligations, which is significantly less than the 187.5 CE minutes per month which are required to obtain the advanced training certificate of the Chambers of Pharmacists.

A Systematic Review of Models Used and Preferences for Continuing Education and Continuing Professional Development of Pharmacists.

Continuing Education (CE) or Continuing Professional Development (CPD) are used by pharmacists globally to maintain up-to-date knowledge and skills throughout their careers. The primary aim of this study was to identify the formats or models used by pharmacists for CE and CPD globally. The secondary aim was to identify preferences of pharmacists, in relation to the variety of formats or models used to fulfil mandatory requirements, in order to support future planning of lifelong learning events. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science covering a time period from 1995 until March 2018. Searches were conducted in English, with studies on undergraduate studies being excluded. Eighteen papers from an initial search of 4561 were included from 2004 to 2014. All studies focused on pharmacists. Three studies identified face-to-face learning as a preference, with six studies identifying a positive impact of interactive learning. All four identified studies focusing on online provision were linked to CE. One study highlighted the benefits of blended learning. Two studies identified concluded that no one size fits all. A clear structure of event was highlighted in three studies. Three studies highlighted the relevance of topics to practice, and two studies showed the need for opportunities to apply knowledge. Due to the variety of formats and no consistent model, no perfect model or activity has been identified. However, CPD showed increased practice outcomes versus CE. Although an increasing amount of technology is being utilized, face-to-face learning is still preferred. Interactive, multiple-format learning should be used where possible, to reflect preferences of different learners. There is a need for a structured approach to the planning and learning event itself to support CE and CPD.