Internal dosimetry study of [82Rb]Cl using a long axial field-of-view PET/CT.

PURPOSE: Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) positron emission tomography (PET) systems allow to image all major organs with one bed position, which is particularly useful for acquiring whole-body dynamic data using short-lived radioisotopes like 82Rb. METHODS: We determined the absorbed dose in target organs of three subjects (29, 40, and 57 years old) using two different methods, i.e., MIRD and voxel dosimetry. The subjects were injected with 407.0 to 419.61 MBq of [82Rb]Cl and were scanned dynamically for 7 min with a LAFOV PET/CT scanner. RESULTS: Using the MIRD formalism and voxel dosimetry, the absorbed dose ranged from 1.84 to 2.78 µGy/MBq (1.57 to 3.92 µGy/MBq for voxel dosimetry) for the heart wall, 2.76 to 5.73 µGy/MBq (3.22 to 5.37 µGy/MBq for voxel dosimetry) for the kidneys, and 0.94 to 1.88 µGy/MBq (0.98 to 1.92 µGy/MBq for voxel dosimetry) for the lungs. The total body effective dose lied between 0.50 and 0.76 µSv/MBq. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the radiation dose associated with [82Rb]Cl PET/CT can be assessed by means of dynamic LAFOV PET and that it is lower compared to literature values.

Role of serial 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in determining the therapeutic efficacy of immunosuppression and clinical outcome in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial inflammation and perfusion defects detected by 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) and Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET) may be associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). The role of serial quantitative PET in determining the effect of treatment on myocardial inflammation and clinical outcomes is yet to be defined. METHODS: Newly diagnosed CS patients with active myocardial inflammation (maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 2.5) were treated with immunosuppression, then underwent repeat FDG-PET, Rubidium-82, and echocardiographic imaging 6-12 months later. Serial changes in SUVmax, SUVmean, inflammatory extent, perfusion defect (PD) extent, metabolism/perfusion mismatch extent, global cardiac metabolic activity, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, serious VA and heart-failure (HF) hospitalisation. Event data were recorded from the date of the second FDG-PET. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 113 patients (66% male, age: 55 ± 11 years, LVEF: 54 ± 13%). SUVmax reduced from 4.5 (interquartile range: 3.3-7.1) to 2.7 (2.2-3.6). Overall, 94 (83%) patients saw serial reduction in SUVmax, with 42 (37%) demonstrating complete response (SUVmax <2.5). Following a median of 46 (25-57) months, 28 (25%) patients reached the endpoint (8 deaths, 17 VAs, and 3 HF hospitalisations). PD extent (Hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.05; p = 0.035) was a significant predictor of outcome following treatment, even after accounting for LVEF and change in SUVmean. The risk of adverse events was the greatest in those with a pre-treatment or post-treatment PD extent of >10%. CONCLUSION: In our cohort with active CS, following a treatment-induced reduction in myocardial inflammation, PD extent was the main predictor of adverse events.

Machine and deep learning models for accurate detection of ischemia and scar with myocardial blood flow positron emission tomography imaging.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) is used for the noninvasive diagnosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study compared traditional statistics, machine learning, and deep learning techniques in their ability to diagnose disease using only the rest and stress MBF values. METHODS: This study included 3245 rest and stress rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET) studies and matching diagnostic labels from perfusion reports. Standard logistic regression, lasso logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, multilayer perceptron, and dense U-Net were compared for per-patient detection and per-vessel localization of scars and ischemia. RESULTS: Receiver-operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of machine learning models was significantly higher than those of traditional statistics models for per-patient detection of disease (0.92-0.95 vs. 0.87) but not for per-vessel localization of ischemia or scar. Random forest showed the highest AUC = 0.95 among the different models compared. On the final hold-out set for generalizability, random forest showed an AUC of 0.92 for detection and 0.89 for localization of perfusion abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: For per-vessel localization, simple models trained on segmental data performed similarly to a convolutional neural network trained on polar-map data, highlighting the need to justify the use of complex predictive algorithms through comparison with simpler methods.

Myocardial creep and cardiorespiratory motion correction improves diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography.

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of retrospectively detecting and correcting periodical (cardiac and respiratory motion) and non-periodical shifts of the myocardial position (myocardial creep) using only the acquired Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography raw (listmode) data. METHODS: This study comprised 25 healthy participants (median age = 23 years) who underwent repeat rest/adenosine stress Rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and 53 patients (median age = 64 years) considered for revascularization who underwent a single MPI session. All subjects were evaluated for myocardial creep during MPI by assessing the myocardial position every 200 ms. A proposed motion correction protocol, including corrections for cardiorespiratory and creep motion (3xMC), was compared to a guideline-recommended protocol (StandardRecon). For the volunteers, we report test-retest repeatability using standard error of measurements (SEM). For the patient cohort, we evaluated the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for both stress and ischemic total perfusion deficits (sTPD and iTPD, respectively) using myocardial ischemia defined as fractional flow reserve values < 0.8 in the relevant coronary segment as the gold standard. RESULTS: Test-retest repeatability was significantly improved following corrections for myocardial creep (SEM; sTPD: StandardRecon = 2.2, 3xMC = 1.8; iTPD: StandardRecon = 1.6, 3xMC = 1.2). AUC analysis of the ROC curves revealed significant improvements for iTPD measurements following 3xMC [sTPD: StandardRecon = 0.88, 3xMC = 0.92 (P = .21); iTPD: StandardRecon = 0.88, 3xMC = 0.95 (P = .039)]. CONCLUSION: 3xMC has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial MPI obtained from positron emission tomography. Therefore, its use should be considered both in clinical routine and large-scale multicenter studies.

Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose Rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: The most reliable quantitative variable on Rubidium-82 (82Rb) cardiac PET/CT for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) has not been characterized with low-dose silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) technology, which allows halving injected activity and radiation dose delivering less than 1.0 mSv in a 70-kg individual. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 234 consecutive participants with suspected myocardial ischemia. Participants underwent 82Rb cardiac SiPM PET/CT (5 MBq/kg) and were followed up for MACE over 652 days (interquartile range 559-751 days). For each participant, global stress myocardial blood flow (stress MBF), global myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and regional severely reduced myocardial flow capacity (MFCsevere) were measured. The Youden index was used to select optimal thresholds. In multivariate analysis after adjustments for clinical risk factors, reduced global stress MBF < 1.94 ml/min/g, reduced global MFR < 1.98, and regional MFCsevere > 3.2% of left ventricle emerged all as independent predictors of MACE (HR 4.5, 3.1, and 3.67, respectively, p < 0.001). However, only reduced global stress MBF remained an independent prognostic factor for MACE after adjusting for clinical risk factors and the combined use of global stress MBF, global MFR, and regional MFCsevere impairments (HR 2.81, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Using the latest SiPM PET technology with low-dose 82Rb halving the standard activity to deliver < 1 mSv for a 70-kg patient, impaired global stress MBF, global MFR, and regional MFC were powerful predictors of cardiovascular events, outperforming traditional cardiovascular risk factors. However, only reduced global stress MBF independently predicted MACE, being superior to global MFR and regional MFC impairments.

Impact of rubidium imaging availability on management of patients with acute chest pain.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of 82-Rubidium positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) availability on patient management presenting at the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of clinical databases. Patients presenting with CP with a non-definitive suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at the ED between April 2016 and February 2020 were divided into 2 groups based on PET availability. The proportion of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) without significant coronary artery disease (CAD), length of stay (LoS), and additional downstream testing were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 21,242 ED visits for CP without definitive ACS: 5,492 when PET is not available and 15,750 when PET is available. When PET is available, proportion of patients undergoing a MPI study was greater (20.7% vs 17.6%, P<0.0001), proportion of ICA without significant CAD was similar (18.5% vs 21.4%, P=0.24), and median ED LoS was shorter (16.6 vs 18.1 hours, P=0.03). Patients undergoing SPECT MPI had significantly more downstream testing (8.9% vs 6.4%, P=0.003) and a higher rate of coronary angiogram without significant CAD (21.2% vs 14.2%, P=0.09) compared to those who underwent PET MPI. CONCLUSION: Availability of PET MPI was associated with an increased number of MPI referral from the ED, similar rates of ICA without significant CAD, decreased LoS, and fewer downstream testing.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de la tomografía por emisión de positrones (PET) con 82-Rubidio y la disponibilidad de imágenes de perfusión miocárdica (MPI) en el manejo de los pacientes que se presentan en el servicio de urgencias (ED) con dolor torácico (CP). MéTODOS: Este es un estudio retrospectivo de bases de datos clínicas de un solo centro. Pacientes que presentaron CP con sospecha no definitiva de síndrome coronario agudo (ACS) en el ED entre abril de 2016 y febrero de 2020, se dividieron en 2 grupos según la disponibilidad de PET. Se evaluó la proporción de angiografía coronaria invasiva (ICA) sin enfermedad arterial coronaria (CAD) significativa, la duración de la estancia (LoS) y las pruebas posteriores adicionales. RESULTADOS: Hubo 21,242 visitas al ED por CP sin ACS definitivo: 5,492 cuando no se dispone de PET y 15.750 cuando se dispone de PET. Cuando se dispone de PET, la proporción de pacientes sometidos a estudio de MPI fue mayor (20.7% vs 17.6%, p=0.03). Los pacientes que se sometieron a SPECT MPI tuvieron significativamente más pruebas posteriores (8.9 % frente a 6.4 %, p = 0.003) y una tasa más alta de angiografía coronaria sin CAD significativa (21.2 % frente a 14.2 %, p = 0.09) en comparación con los que se sometieron a PET MPI. CONCLUSIóN: La disponibilidad de PET MPI se asoció con un mayor número de referencias de MPI desde el ED, tasas similares de ICA sin CAD significativa, disminución de LoS y menos pruebas posteriores.

Added value of coronary artery calcium score in the reporting of SPECT versus PET myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) influences the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT; however, the impact on PET interpretation remains unclear. We compared the added value of CACS to reporting MPI using SPECT vs PET. METHODS: We retrospectively included 412 patients. 206 patients who underwent Rb-82 PET were propensity-based matched to a cohort of 4018 patients who underwent cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT MPI to obtain a comparable group of 206 SPECT patients. Next, we created four image sets: SPECT MPI-only, PET-only, SPECT + CACS, and PET + CACS. Two physicians interpreted the 824 images as normal, equivocal, or abnormal for ischemia or irreversible defects. Additionally, event rates were compared between PET and SPECT groups during 30-month follow-up. RESULTS: PET yielded more scans interpreted as normal than SPECT (88% vs 80%, respectively, P = 0.015). Adding CACS to SPECT increased the percentage of normal scans to 86% (P = 0.014), whereas this effect was absent for PET (90%, P = 0.77). Annualized event rates for images interpreted as normal did not differ and varied between 0.7 and 2.0% (P > 0.084). CONCLUSION: Adding CACS correctly increased the percentage of normal scans for SPECT MPI but not for PET, possibly limiting the effect of adding CACS to reporting PET.

Quantitative myocardial perfusion 82Rb-PET assessed by hybrid PET/coronary-CT: Normal values and diagnostic performance.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess normal values for quantified myocardial blood flow (MBF) on a hybrid PET/coronary-CT scanner and to test their diagnostic performance in patients with suspected CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients underwent 82Rb-PET/CT and integrated CT-based coronary angiography (CCTA) and were classified as normal (no stenosis), with non-obstructive stenosis (< 50%) and with CAD (≥ 50%). Global and regional stress MBF (sMBF), rest MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were calculated. Ischemia was defined as SDS ≥ 2, severe ischemia as SDS ≥ 7. RESULTS: 357 consecutive patients were included. Global sMBF and MFR were higher in normal patients than in patients with CAD (3.61 ± 0.71 vs 3.04 ± 0.77, P < 0.0001; 3.08 ± 0.84 vs 2.68 ± 0.79, P = 0.0001), but not different compared to patients with non-obstructive stenosis (3.61 ± 0.71 vs 3.43 ± 0.69, P = 0.052; 3.08 ± 0.84 vs 2.99 ± 0.82, P = 0.45). sMBF yielded superior accuracy over MFR in identifying both ischemia (AUC 0.74 vs 0.62, P = 0.003) and severe ischemia (AUC 0.88 vs 0.78, P = 0.012). Optimal threshold for global sMBF to rule out myocardial ischemia was 3.5 mL g-1 min-1. CONCLUSIONS: Normal quantitative values are provided. Global sMBF provided higher diagnostic accuracy than MFR. Using sMBF-threshold of 3.5 mL·g-1·min-1 on 82Rb-PET/CT yielded similar NPV (96%) as CCTA to rule out CAD. Hence, resting scan could be omitted in patients with sMBF values above reference.

Reliability of rubidium-82 PET/CT for renal perfusion determination in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Changes in renal perfusion may play a pathophysiological role in hypertension and kidney disease, however to date, no method for renal blood flow (RBF) determination in humans has been implemented in clinical practice. In a previous study, we demonstrated that estimation of renal perfusion based on a single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with Rubidium-82 (82Rb) is feasible and found an approximate 5% intra-assay coefficient of variation for both kidneys, indicative of a precise method.This study's aim was to determine the day-to day variation of 82Rb PET/CT and to test the method's ability to detect increased RBF induced by infusion of amino acids. METHODS: Seventeen healthy subjects underwent three dynamic 82Rb PET/CT scans over two examination days comprising: Day A, a single 8-minute dynamic scan and Day B, two scans performed before (baseline) and after RBF stimulation by a 2-hour amino acid-infusion. The order of examination days was determined by randomization. Time activity curves for arterial and renal activity with a 1-tissue compartment model were used for flow estimation; the K1 kinetic parameter representing renal 82Rb clearance. Day-to-day variation was calculated based on the difference between the unstimulated K1 values on Day A and Day B and paired t-testing was performed to compare K1 values at baseline and after RBF stimulation on Day B. RESULTS: Day-to-day variation was observed to be 5.5% for the right kidney and 6.0% for the left kidney (n = 15 quality accepted scans). K1 values determined after amino acid-infusion were significantly higher than pre-infusion values (n = 17, p = 0.001). The mean percentage change in K1 from baseline was 13.2 ± 12.9% (range - 10.4 to 35.5) for the right kidney; 12.9 ± 13.2% (range - 15.7 to 35.3) for the left kidney. CONCLUSION: Day-to-day variation is acceptably low. A significant K1 increase from baseline is detected after application of a known RBF stimulus, indicating that 82Rb PET/CT scanning can provide a precise method for evaluation of RBF and it is able to determine changes herein. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register, 2017-005008-88. Registered 18/01/2018.

Tumour blood flow for prediction of human prostate cancer aggressiveness: a study with Rubidium-82 PET, MRI and Na+/K+-ATPase-density.

PURPOSE: Tumour blood flow (TBF) is a crucial determinant of cancer growth. Recently, we validated Rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) for TBF measurement in prostate cancer (PCa) and found TBF and cancer aggressiveness positively correlated. The aims of the present study were to determine the ability of TBF for separating significant from insignificant PCa and to examine the relation to underlying Na+/K+-ATPase density, which is relevant as 82Rb is transported intracellularly via the Na+/K+-ATPase. METHODS: One hundred and two patients were included for pelvic 82Rb PET scan prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy. Findings constituted 100 PCa lesions (86 patients) and 25 benign lesions (16 patients). Tumours were defined on MRI and transferred to 82Rb PET for TBF measurement. Immunohistochemical Na+/K+-ATPase staining was subsequently performed on biopsies. RESULTS: TBF was the superior predictor (rho = 0.68, p < 0.0001, inflammatory lesions excluded) of MRI-guided biopsy grade group (GG) over lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (rho = -0.23, p = 0.01), independent of ADC value and tumour volume (p < 0.0001). PET could separate GG-2-5 from GG-1 and benign lesions with an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.79, 96%, and 59%, respectively. For separating GG-3-5 from GG-1-2 and benign lesions the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 95%, and 63%, respectively. Na+/K+-ATPase density per PCa cell profile was 38% lower compared with that of the benign prostate cell profiles. Neither cell density nor Na+/K+-ATPase density determined tumour 82Rb uptake. CONCLUSION: TBF is an independent predictor of PCa aggressiveness and deserves more attention, as it may be valuable in separating clinically significant from insignificant PCa.

Body weight-dependent Rubidium-82 activity results in constant image quality in myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice shows degrading image quality in heavier patients who undergo myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET when using a fixed tracer activity. Our aim was to derive and validate a patient-specific activity protocol resulting in a constant image quality in PET MPI. METHODS: We included 251 patients who underwent rest MPI with Rb-82 PET (Discovery 670, GE Healthcare). 132 patients were included retrospectively and were scanned using a fixed activity of 740 MBq. The total number of measured prompts was normalized to activity and correlated to body weight, mass per body length and body mass index to find the best predicting parameter. Next, a patient-specific activity was derived and subsequently validated in 119 additional patients. Image quality was scored by three experts on a four-point scale. RESULTS: Both image quality and prompts decreased in heavier patients when using a fixed activity (p < .005). Body weight was used to derive a new activity formula: Activity = 8.3 MBq/kg. When applying this formula, both measured prompts and scored image quality became independent of body weight (p > .60). CONCLUSION: Administrating a Rb-82 activity that linearly depends on body weight resulted in a constant image quality across all patients and is recommended.

Rubidium-82 generator yield and efficiency for PET perfusion imaging: Comparison of two clinical systems.

INTRODUCTION: Strontium-82/Rubidium-82 (82Sr/82Rb) generators are used widely for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of myocardial perfusion. In this study, the 82Rb isotope yield and production efficiency of two FDA-approved 82Sr/82Rb generators were compared. METHODS: N = 515 sequential daily quality assurance (QA) reports from 9 CardioGen-82® and 9 RUBY-FILL® generators were reviewed over a period of 2 years. A series of test elutions was performed at different flow-rates on the RUBY-FILL® system to determine an empirical correction-factor used to convert CardioGen-82® daily QA values of 82Rb activity (dose-calibrator 'maximum' of 50 mL elution at 50 mL·min-1) to RUBY-FILL® equivalent values (integrated 'total' of 35 mL elution at 20 mL·min-1). The generator yield (82Rb) and production efficiency (82Rb yield/82Sr parent activity) were measured and compared after this conversion to a common scale. RESULTS: At the start of clinical use, the system reported 82Rb activity from daily QA was lower for CardioGen-82® vs RUBY-FILL® (2.3 ± 0.2 vs 3.0 ± 0.2 GBq, P < 0.001) despite having similar 82Sr activity. Dose-calibrator 'maximum' (CardioGen-82®) values were found to under-estimate the integrated 'total' (RUBY-FILL®) activity by ~ 24% at 50 mL·min-1. When these data were used to convert the CardioGen-82 values to a common measurement scale (integrated total activity) the CardioGen-82® efficiency remained slightly lower than the RUBY-FILL® system on average (88 ± 4% vs 95 ± 4%, P < 0.001). The efficiency of 82Rb production improved for both systems over the respective periods of clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: 82Rb generator yield was significantly under-estimated using the CardioGen-82® vs RUBY-FILL® daily QA procedure. When generator yield was expressed as the integrated total activity for both systems, the estimated 82Rb production efficiency of the CardioGen-82® system was ~ 7% lower than RUBY-FILL® over the full period of clinical use.

Saline-push improves rubidium-82 PET image quality.

INTRODUCTION: Rubidium-82 (82Rb) PET is used widely for myocardial perfusion imaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate if an additional saline-push following the 82Rb elution improves PET image quality. METHODS: 82Rb PET scans were acquired with and without 26 mL saline-push in six patients as part of a clinical quality improvement program. Dynamic images were analyzed to measure the total activity delivered to the superior vena cava (SVC) and retained in the left ventricle (LV) myocardium. Tracer uptake images were used to measure blood background coefficient-of-variation (COV), myocardium-to-blood signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) to assess image quality. RESULTS: Similar eluted activity was measured with/without the saline-push (830 vs 795 MBq; P = 0.24). The activity delivered to the heart and retained in the myocardium was consistently increased more than twofold (SVC: + 114% and LV: + 104%; P < 0.001) with the saline-push. Image quality was improved in all patients, with lower background noise (COV: - 19%), higher SNR (+ 24%) and CNR (+ 27%) (all P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The saline-push used to flush 82Rb activity out of the infuser tubing, patient injection and intravenous access lines consistently increased the activity delivered to the heart by twofold. This technique is recommended to maximize image quality with 82Rb PET.

The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET.

BACKGROUND: 82Rb kinetics may distinguish scar from viable but dysfunctional (hibernating) myocardium. We sought to define the relationship between 82Rb kinetics and myocardial viability compared with conventional 82Rb and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) perfusion-metabolism PET imaging. METHODS: Consecutive patients (N = 120) referred for evaluation of myocardial viability prior to revascularization and normal volunteers (N = 37) were reviewed. Dynamic 82Rb 3D PET data were acquired at rest. 18F-FDG 3D PET data were acquired after metabolic preparation using a standardized hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. 82Rb kinetic parameters K1, k2, and partition coefficient (KP) were estimated by compartmental modeling RESULTS: Segmental 82Rb k2 and KP differed significantly between scarred and hibernating segments identified by Rb-FDG perfusion-metabolism (k2, 0.42 ± 0.25 vs. 0.22 ± 0.09 min-1; P < .0001; KP, 1.33 ± 0.62 vs. 2.25 ± 0.98 ml/g; P < .0001). As compared to Rb-FDG analysis, segmental Rb KP had a c-index, sensitivity and specificity of 0.809, 76% and 84%, respectively, for distinguishing hibernating and scarred segments. Segmental k2 performed similarly, but with lower specificity (75%, P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, 82Rb kinetic parameters k2 and KP, which are readily estimated using a compartmental model commonly used for myocardial blood flow, reliably differentiated hibernating myocardium and scar. Further study is necessary to evaluate their clinical utility for predicting benefit after revascularization.

Rubidium-82 PET imaging is feasible in a rat myocardial infarction model.

BACKGROUND: Small-animal myocardial infarct models are frequently used in the assessment of new cardioprotective strategies. A validated quantification of perfusion using a non-cyclotron-dependent PET tracer would be of importance in monitoring response to therapy. We tested whether myocardial PET perfusion imaging is feasible with Rubidium-82 (82Rb) in a small-animal scanner using a rat myocardial infarct model. METHODS: 18 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent permanent coronary artery ligation (infarct group), and 11 rats underwent ischemia-reperfusion (reperfusion group) procedure. 82Rb-PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted before and after the intervention. Perfusion was compared to both left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size assessed by MRI. RESULTS: Follow-up global 82Rb-uptake correlated significantly with infarct size (infarct group: r = -0.81, P < 0.001 and reperfusion group: r = -0.61, P = 0.04). Only 82Rb-uptake in the infarct group correlated with LVEF. At follow-up, a higher segmental 82Rb-uptake in the infarct group was associated with better wall motion (ß = 0.034, CI [0.028;0.039], P < 0.001, R2 = 0.30), and inversely associated with scar transmurality (ß = -2.4 [-2.6; -2.2], P < 0.001, R2 = 0.59). The associations were similar for the reperfusion group. CONCLUSION: 82Rb-PET is feasible in small animal scanners despite the long positron range and enables fast and time-efficient myocardial perfusion imaging in rat models.

Comparison of maximal Rubidium-82 activities for myocardial blood flow quantification between digital and conventional PET systems.

BACKGROUND: PET-based myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification can be inaccurate when using high tracer activities. Our aim was to derive the maximal Rubidium-82 activity for MBF assessment using a new digital PET system and compare the results with conventional analog systems. METHODS: 1.8 GBq Rubidium-82 was injected into the cardiac insert of an anthropomorphic torso phantom. Data were acquired for 10 min using an Ingenuity TF (Philips Healthcare), Discovery 690 (D690, GE Healthcare), and digital PET prototype system (Philips Healthcare). The dynamic ranges, defined as the maximal measured activity in the reconstructed images deviating < 10% from the true present activity, were determined in all scans. RESULTS: The dynamic ranges were 312 MBq for Ingenuity TF, 650 MBq for D690, and 654 MBq for digital PET prototype. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal Rb-82 activity for MBF assessment using digital PET prototype is higher than that for its analog counterpart (Ingenuity TF), but seems comparable to the D690.

Early risk stratification using Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in STEMI patients.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of infarct size after myocardial infarction is predictive of subsequent morphological changes and clinical outcome. This study aimed to assess subacute post-intervention Rubidium-82 (82Rb)-PET imaging in predicting left ventricle ejection fraction, regional wall motion, and final infarct size by CMR at 3-months after STEMI. METHODS: STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were included prospectively. Rest-only 82Rb-PET perfusion imaging was performed at median 36 hours [IQR: 22 to 50] after the treatment. The extent of hypoperfusion and absolute blood flow (mL·min·g) were estimated on a global and a 17-segment model with dedicated software. At 3-months follow-up patients completed the CMR functional and late gadolinium enhancement imaging. RESULTS: 42 patients were included, but only 35 had follow-up CMR and constituted the study population. Absolute blood flow was significantly lower in the infarct-related territory compared to remote myocardium, P < .005. Extent of hypoperfusion correlated with final infarct size, r = 0.58, P < .001, while blood flow correlated with ejection fraction, r = 0.41, P < .05. In linear mixed models, higher subacute absolute blood flow (ß = 4.6, confidence interval [3.5; 5.2], P < .001, R2 = 0.67) was associated with greater wall motion. Segmental extent of subacute hypoperfusion (ß = 0.43 [0.38; 0.49], P < .001, R2 = 0.58) was associated with the degree of late gadolinium enhancement at 3-months. CONCLUSIONS: Subacute rest-only 82Rb-PET is feasible following STEMI and seems predictive of myocardial function and infarct size at 3-months.

Impact of pharmacological stress agent on patient motion during rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: Patient motion has been demonstrated to have a significant impact on the quality and accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT. This study aimed to investigate the effect on patient motion of two pharmacological stressing agents, adenosine and regadenoson. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dynamic data were retrospectively analyzed in 90 patients undergoing adenosine (n = 30), incremental adenosine (n = 30), or regadenoson (n = 30) rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT. Severity of motion was scored qualitatively using a four-point (0-3) scale and quantitatively using frame-to-frame pixel shifts. The type of motion, returning or non-returning, and the frame in which it occurred were also recorded. There were significant differences in both the qualitative and quantitative scores comparing regadenoson to adenosine (P = .025 and P < .001) and incremental adenosine (P = .014, P = .015), respectively. The difference in scores between adenosine and incremental adenosine was not significant. Where motion was present, significantly more adenosine patients were classed as non-returning (P = .018). The median frames for motion occurring were 12 for regadenoson and 14 for both adenosine cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of stressing protocol impacts significantly on patient motion. Patients stressed with regadenoson have significantly lower motion scores than those stressed with adenosine, using local protocols. This motion is more likely to be associated with a drift of the heart away from a baseline position, coinciding with the termination of infusion.

Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and stress/rest flow reserve is used increasingly to diagnose multi-vessel coronary artery disease and micro-vascular disease with PET imaging. However, variability in the measurements may limit physician confidence to direct revascularization therapies based on specific threshold values. This study evaluated the effects of rubidium-82 (82Rb) tracer injection profile using a constant-activity-rate (CA) vs a constant-flow-rate (CF) infusion to improve test-retest repeatability of MBF measurements. METHOD: 22 participants underwent single-session 82Rb dynamic PET imaging during rest and dipyridamole stress using one of 2 test-retest infusion protocols: CA-CA (n = 12) or CA-CF (n = 10). MBF was quantified using a single-tissue-compartment model (1TCM) and a simplified retention model (SRM). Non-parametric test-retest repeatability coefficients (RPCnp) were compared between groups. Myocardium-to-blood contrast and signal-to-noise ratios of the late uptake images (2 to 6 minutes) were also compared to evaluate standard myocardial perfusion image (MPI) quality. RESULTS: MBF values in the CA-CA group were more repeatable (smaller RPCnp) than the CA-CF group using the 1TCM at rest alone, rest and stress combined, and stress/rest reserve (21% vs 36%, 16% vs 19%, and 20% vs 27%, P < 0.05, respectively), and using the SRM at Rest and Stress alone, Rest and Stress combined, and stress/rest reserve (21% vs 38%, 15% vs 25%, 22% vs 38%, and 23% vs 49%, P < 0.05, respectively). In terms of image quality, myocardium-to-blood contrast and signal-to-noise ratios were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Constant-activity-rate 'square-wave' infusion of 82Rb produces more repeatable tracer injection profiles and decreases the test-retest variability of MBF measurements, when compared to a constant-flow-rate 'bolus' administration of 82Rb, especially with SRM, and without compromising standard MPI quality.

Subacute cardiac rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (82Rb-PET) to assess myocardial area at risk, final infarct size, and myocardial salvage after STEMI.

BACKGROUND: Determining infarct size and myocardial salvage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is important when assessing the efficacy of new reperfusion strategies. We investigated whether rest 82Rb-PET myocardial perfusion imaging can estimate area at risk, final infarct size, and myocardial salvage index when compared to cardiac SPECT and magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: Twelve STEMI patients were injected with 99mTc-Sestamibi intravenously immediate prior to reperfusion. SPECT, 82Rb-PET, and CMR imaging were performed post-reperfusion and at a 3-month follow-up. An automated algorithm determined area at risk, final infarct size, and hence myocardial salvage index. RESULTS: SPECT, CMR, and PET were performed 2.2 ± 0.5, 34 ± 8.5, and 32 ± 24.4 h after reperfusion, respectively. Mean (± SD) area at risk were 35.2 ± 16.6%, 34.7 ± 11.3%, and 28.1 ± 16.1% of the left ventricle (LV) in SPECT, CMR, and PET, respectively, P = 0.04 for difference. Mean final infarct size estimates were 12.3 ± 15.4%, 13.7 ± 10.4%, and 11.9 ± 14.6% of the LV in SPECT, CMR, and PET imaging, respectively, P = .72. Myocardial salvage indices were 0.64 ± 0.33 (SPECT), 0.65 ± 0.20 (CMR), and 0.63 ± 0.28 (PET), (P = .78). CONCLUSIONS: 82Rb-PET underestimates area at risk in patients with STEMI when compared to SPECT and CMR. However, our findings suggest that PET imaging seems feasible when assessing the clinical important parameters of final infarct size and myocardial salvage index, although with great variability, in a selected STEMI population with large infarcts. These findings should be confirmed in a larger population.