The role of point-of-care ultrasound to monitor response of fluid replacement therapy in pregnancy.

Fluid management in obstetrical care is crucial because of the complex physiological conditions of pregnancy, which complicate clinical manifestations and fluid balance management. This expert review examined the use of point-of-care ultrasound to evaluate and monitor the response to fluid therapy in pregnant patients. Pregnancy induces substantial physiological changes, including increased cardiac output and glomerular filtration rate, decreased systemic vascular resistance, and decreased plasma oncotic pressure. Conditions, such as preeclampsia, further complicate fluid management because of decreased intravascular volume and increased capillary permeability. Traditional methods for assessing fluid volume status, such as physical examination and invasive monitoring, are often unreliable or inappropriate. Point-of-care ultrasound provides a noninvasive, rapid, and reliable means to assess fluid responsiveness, which is essential for managing fluid therapy in pregnant patients. This review details the various point-of-care ultrasound modalities used to measure dynamic changes in fluid status, focusing on the evaluation of the inferior vena cava, lung ultrasound, and left ventricular outflow tract. Inferior vena cava ultrasound in spontaneously breathing patients determines diameter variability, predicts fluid responsiveness, and is feasible even late in pregnancy. Lung ultrasound is crucial for detecting early signs of pulmonary edema before clinical symptoms arise and is more accurate than traditional radiography. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral assesses stroke volume response to fluid challenges, providing a quantifiable measure of cardiac function, which is particularly beneficial in critical care settings where rapid and accurate fluid management is essential. This expert review synthesizes current evidence and practice guidelines, suggesting the integration of point-of-care ultrasound as a fundamental aspect of fluid management in obstetrics. It calls for ongoing research to enhance techniques and validate their use in broader clinical settings, aiming to improve outcomes for pregnant patients and their babies by preventing complications associated with both under- and overresuscitation.

The effect of passive leg raising test on intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation in brain injured patients: a physiological observational study.

BACKGROUND: The use of the passive leg raising (PLR) is limited in acute brain injury (ABI) patients with increased intracranial pressure (ICP) since the postural change of the head may impact on ICP and cerebral autoregulation. However, the PLR use may prevent a positive daily fluid balance, which had been recently associated to worse neurological outcomes. We therefore studied early and delayed effects of PLR on the cerebral autoregulation of patients recovering from ABI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a Prospective, observational, single-center study conducted in critically ill patients admitted with stable ABI and receiving invasive ICP monitoring, multimodal neuromonitoring and continuous hemodynamic monitoring. The fluid challenge consisted of 500 mL of crystalloid over 10 min; fluid responsiveness was defined as cardiac index increase ≥ 10%. Comparisons between different variables at baseline and after PLR were made by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The correlation coefficients between hemodynamic and neuromonitoring variables were assessed using Spearman's rank test. RESULTS: We studied 23 patients [12 patients (52.2%) were fluid responders]. The PLR significantly increased ICP [from 13.7 (8.3-16.4) to 15.4 (12.0-19.2) mmHg; p < 0.001], cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) [from 51.1 (47.4-55.6) to 56.4 (49.6-61.5) mmHg; p < 0.001] and the pressure reactivity index (PRx) [from 0.12 (0.01-0.24) to 0.43 (0.34-0.46) mmHg; p < 0.001]. Regarding Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived parameters, PLR significantly increased the arterial component of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (O2Hbi) [from 1.8 (0.8-3.7) to 4.3 (2.5-5.6) µM cm; p < 0.001], the deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHbi) [from 1.6 (0.2-2.9) to 2.7 (1.4-4.0) µM cm; p = 0.007] and total hemoglobin (cHbi) [from 3.6 (1.9-5.3) to 7.8 (5.2-10.3): p < 0.001]. In all the patients who had altered autoregulation after PLR, these changes persisted ten minutes afterwards. After the PLR, we observed a significant correlation between MAP and CPP and PRx. CONCLUSIONS: In ABI patient with stable ICP, PLR test increased ICP, but mostly within safety values and thresholds. Despite this, cerebral autoregulation was importantly impaired, and this persisted up to 10 min after the end of the maneuvre. Our results discourage the use of PLR test in ABI even when ICP is stable.

Blood pressure response to clonidine in children with short stature is correlated with postural characteristics: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Clonidine stimulation test has been widely used in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children with short stature with a high level of reliability. However, it may cause hypotension, which usually appears as headache, dizziness, bradycardia, and even syncope. It is well known that elevating the beds to make patients' feet above their cardiac level might relieve this discomfort. However, the real efficiency of this method remains to be proved while the best angle for the elevated bed is still unclear. METHODS: A total of 1200 children with short stature were enrolled in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Age, gender, weight, and basic systolic and diastolic blood pressure were collected. Blood pressure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after stimulation tests were recorded. The participants were divided into 3 groups based on the angles of the elevated foot of their beds named 0°, 20°, and 40° groups. RESULTS: At one hour after the commencement of the tests, participants lying on the elevated beds showed a higher mean increase on the change of pulse pressure. The difference in the angles of the elevated beds did not show statistical significance compared with those who did not elevate their beds (0.13 vs. 2.83, P = 0.001; 0.13 vs. 2.18, P = 0.005; 2.83 vs. 2.18, P = 0.369). When it came to 4 h after the tests began, participants whose beds were elevated at an angle around 20° had a significantly higher mean increase in the change of pulse pressure values compared with those whose beds were elevated at an angle around 40° (1.46 vs. -0.05, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Elevating the foot of the beds of the patients who are undergoing clonidine stimulation tests at an angle of 20°might be a good choice to alleviate the hypotension caused by the tests.

Comparison Between Changes in Systolic-Pressure Variation and Pulse-Pressure Variation After Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to evaluate the precision of changes in systolic-pressure variation after passive leg raising (PLR) as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in postoperative critically ill patients, and to compare the precision of changes in pulse-pressure variation after PLR (ΔPPVPLR) with changes in systolic-pressure variation after PLR (ΔSPVPLR). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four postoperative critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of 10% or more in stroke volume after PLR, dividing patients into 2 groups: responders and nonresponders. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamic data were recorded at baseline and after PLR, and the stroke volume was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Thirty-eight patients were responders, and 36 were nonresponders. ΔPPVPLR predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.917, and the optimal cutoff value was 2.3%, with a gray zone of 1.6% to 3.3%, including 19 (25.7%) patients. ΔSPVPLR predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUC of 0.908, and the optimal cutoff value was 1.9%, with a gray zone of 1.1% to 2.0%, including 18 (24.3%) patients. No notable distinction was observed between the AUC for ΔPPVPLR and ΔSPVPLR (p = 0.805) in predicting fluid responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: ΔSPVPLR and ΔPPVPLR could accurately predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative critically ill patients. There was no difference in the ability to predict fluid responsiveness between ΔSPVPLR and ΔPPVPLR.

Passive leg raising modulates low-frequency oscillation propagation in peripheral atherosclerosis: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Low-frequency oscillations (LFOs) observed in the periphery may reflect physiological processes. The aim of this study was to investigate these processes' effects on LFOs and the differences between healthy subjects and those with peripheral arteriosclerosis disease (PAD). METHODS: 14 PAD patients and 25 healthy controls were studied in resting (RS) and passive leg raising (PLR) states. We simultaneously measured LFOs at the peripheral left earlobes (LE), right earlobes (RE), left fingertips (LF), right fingertips (RF), left toes (LT), and right toes (RT), along with coherence and phase shift analysis processing. RESULTS: The coherence coefficients in the PAD group were lower than those in the healthy group (p < .01), and the phase shifts in the PAD group were higher than those in the healthy group (p < .01) in a resting state. Mild to moderate PAD patients had greater coherence coefficients and smaller phase shifts than severe PAD patients. 0.05 Hz PLR LFOs originating in the LT can be observed in other peripheral positions. The proportion of occurrence times for 0.05 Hz PLR LFOs peaks observed at different peripheral positions was different in healthy subjects, patients with bilateral multiple lower limb arteriosclerosis, and those with left or right lower limb arteriosclerosis. CONCLUSION: The coherence coefficient and phase shift characteristics of LFOs were different between healthy subjects and PAD patients. LFOs have the potential to provide valuable physiological process information associated with atherosclerosis in the periphery.

How I personalize fluid therapy in septic shock?

During septic shock, fluid therapy is aimed at increasing cardiac output and improving tissue oxygenation, but it poses two problems: it has inconsistent and transient efficacy, and it has many well-documented deleterious effects. We suggest that there is a place for its personalization according to the patient characteristics and the clinical situation, at all stages of circulatory failure. Regarding the choice of fluid for volume expansion, isotonic saline induces hyperchloremic acidosis, but only for very large volumes administered. We suggest that balanced solutions should be reserved for patients who have already received large volumes and in whom the chloremia is rising. The initial volume expansion, intended to compensate for the constant hypovolaemia in the initial phase of septic shock, cannot be adapted to the patient's weight only, as suggested by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, but should also consider potential absolute hypovolemia induced by fluid losses. After the initial fluid infusion, preload responsiveness may rapidly disappear, and it should be assessed. The choice between tests used for this purpose depends on the presence or absence of mechanical ventilation, the monitoring in place and the risk of fluid accumulation. In non-intubated patients, the passive leg raising test and the mini-fluid challenge are suitable. In patients without cardiac output monitoring, tests like the tidal volume challenge, the passive leg raising test and the mini-fluid challenge can be used as they can be performed by measuring changes in pulse pressure variation, assessed through an arterial line. The mini-fluid challenge should not be repeated in patients who already received large volumes of fluids. The variables to assess fluid accumulation depend on the clinical condition. In acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure, extravascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability index assess the risk of worsening alveolar oedema better than arterial oxygenation. In case of abdominal problems, the intra-abdominal pressure should be taken into account. Finally, fluid depletion in the de-escalation phase is considered in patients with significant fluid accumulation. Fluid removal can be guided by preload responsiveness testing, since haemodynamic deterioration is likely to occur in patients with a preload dependent state.

The increase in cardiac output induced by a decrease in positive end-expiratory pressure reliably detects volume responsiveness: the PEEP-test study.

BACKGROUND: In patients on mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can decrease cardiac output through a decrease in cardiac preload and/or an increase in right ventricular afterload. Increase in central blood volume by fluid administration or passive leg raising (PLR) may reverse these phenomena through an increase in cardiac preload and/or a reopening of closed lung microvessels. We hypothesized that a transient decrease in PEEP (PEEP-test) may be used as a test to detect volume responsiveness. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients with PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O ("high level") and without spontaneous breathing were prospectively included. Volume responsiveness was assessed by a positive PLR-test, defined as an increase in pulse-contour-derived cardiac index (CI) during PLR ≥ 10%. The PEEP-test consisted in reducing PEEP from the high level to 5 cmH2O for one minute. Pulse-contour-derived CI (PiCCO2) was monitored during PLR and the PEEP-test. RESULTS: We enrolled 64 patients among whom 31 were volume responsive. The median increase in CI during PLR was 14% (11-16%). The median PEEP at baseline was 12 (10-15) cmH2O and the PEEP-test resulted in a median decrease in PEEP of 7 (5-10) cmH2O, without difference between volume responsive and unresponsive patients. Among volume responsive patients, the PEEP-test induced a significant increase in CI of 16% (12-20%) (from 2.4 ± 0.7 to 2.9 ± 0.9 L/min/m2, p < 0.0001) in comparison with volume unresponsive patients. In volume unresponsive patients, PLR and the PEEP-test increased CI by 2% (1-5%) and 6% (3-8%), respectively. Volume responsiveness was predicted by an increase in CI > 8.6% during the PEEP-test with a sensitivity of 96.8% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 83.3-99.9%) and a specificity of 84.9% (95%CI 68.1-94.9%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PEEP-test for detecting volume responsiveness was 0.94 (95%CI 0.85-0.98) (p < 0.0001 vs. 0.5). Spearman's correlation coefficient between the changes in CI induced by PLR and the PEEP-test was 0.76 (95%CI 0.63-0.85, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A CI increase > 8.6% during a PEEP-test, which consists in reducing PEEP to 5 cmH2O, reliably detects volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with a PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT 04,023,786). Registered July 18, 2019. Ethics Committee approval CPP Est III (N° 2018-A01599-46).

Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acutely ill patients might be influenced by a number of clinical and technical factors. We aim to identify variables potentially modifying the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors commonly used in clinical practice. METHODS: A sensitive strategy was conducted in the Medline and Embase databases to search for prospective studies assessing the operative performance of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, passive leg raising (PLR), end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT), mini-fluid challenge, and tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill and acutely ill surgical patients published between January 1999 and February 2023. Adjusted diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated by subgroup analyses (inverse variance method) and meta-regression (test of moderators). Variables potentially modifying the operative performance of such predictor tests were classified as technical and clinical. RESULTS: A total of 149 studies were included in the analysis. The volume used during fluid loading, the method used to assess variations in macrovascular flow (cardiac output, stroke volume, aortic blood flow, volume‒time integral, etc.) in response to PLR/EEOT, and the apneic time selected during the EEOT were identified as technical variables modifying the operative performance of such fluid responsiveness predictor tests (p < 0.05 for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs). In addition, the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors was also influenced by clinical variables such as the positive end-expiratory pressure (in the case of EEOT) and the dose of norepinephrine used during the fluid responsiveness assessment for PLR and EEOT (for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs). CONCLUSION: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in critically and acutely ill patients is strongly influenced by a number of technical and clinical aspects. Such factors should be considered for individual intervention decisions.

Pre-anesthesia ultrasound monitoring of subclavian vein diameter changes induced by modified passive leg raising can predict the occurrence of hypotension after general anesthesia: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypotension increases postoperative complication rates and prolongs postoperative recovery time. Whether Passive Leg Raising test (PLR) and Subclavian Vein Diameter (DSCV) can effectively predict post-anesthesia hypotension remains to be tested. This study aimed to identify specific predictors of General Anesthesia (GA)induced hypotension by measuring DSCV in the supine versus PLR position. METHODS: A total of 110 patients who underwent elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this study. Before anesthesia, DSCV and theCollapsibility Index of DSCV(DSCV-CI) were measured by ultrasound, and the difference in maximal values of DSCV between supine and PLR positions was calculated, expressed as ΔDSCV. Hypotension was defined as Mean Blood Pressure (MBP) below 60mmhg or more than 30% below the baseline. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (Group H) or absence (Group N) of postanesthesia hypotension. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictability of DSCV and other parameters for predicting preincision hypotension. RESULTS: Three patients were excluded due to unclear ultrasound scans, resulting in a total of 107 patients studied. Twenty-seven (25.2%) patients experienced hypotension. Area under the ROC curve of ΔDSCV was 0.75 (P < 0.001) with 95% confidence interval (0.63-0.87), while DSCV and DSCV-CI were less than 0.7. The odds ratio (OR)of ΔDSCV was 1.18 (P < 0.001, 95%CI 1.09-1.27) for predicting the development of hypotension. ΔDSCV is predictive of hypotension following induction of general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: ΔDSCV has predictive value for hypotension after general anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 04/10/2021.

The Accuracy of Velocity-Time Integral Variation and Peak Velocity Variation of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Patients Mechanically Ventilated at Low Tidal Volumes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether velocity-time integral (VTI) variation and peak velocity (Vpeak) variation of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) accurately could predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes. DESIGN: A prospective, single-center, observational study. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty postoperative critically ill patients with deep sedation and mechanical ventilation (tidal volume <8 mL/kg) were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Passive leg raising (PLR). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Pulse pressure variation (PPV), VTI variation, and Vpeak variation were measured at baseline and after PLR by transthoracic echocardiography. The fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase (>10%) in stroke volume after PLR. Thirty-two (53.3%) patients were fluid responders. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for PPV were 0.797, and the gray zone was large and included 58.3% of patients. Both VTI variation and Vpeak variation predicted fluid responsiveness with the AUROC of 0.919 and 0.905; meanwhile, the best cutoff values were 12.51% (sensitivity of 71.9%; specificity of 75.0%) and 11.76% (sensitivity of 81.3%; specificity of 89.3%). The gray zones of VTI variation and Vpeak variation were from 7.41% to 11.88% (contained 23.3% patients) and from 9.96% to 13.10% (contained 28.3% patients). CONCLUSIONS: In postoperative critically ill patients mechanically ventilated with tidal volume <8 mL/kg, the VTI variation and Vpeak variation of LVOT accurately could predict fluid responsiveness, and VTI variation showed more accuracy than Vpeak variation in predicting fluid responsiveness.

Sacroiliac joint pain increases repositioning error during active straight leg-raising.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the repositioning error (RE) of patients with unilateral sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) to that of patients with low back pain (LBP) and a healthy control (HC) group. Differences between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides were also investigated. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with SIJP, LBP, and HC were included in this study. An active straight leg-raising repositioning test (ASLR-Rt) was performed. ASLR was performed three times each on the left and right sides, targeting a set base angle. RE was calculated as the difference between the base angle and the participant's attempt to adjust the target angle. RE was expressed as constant error (CE) and absolute error (AE). RESULTS: The CE of the SIJP group (median [interquartile range]) (6.9 [4.6‒10.4]) was significantly higher than that in the LBP group (3.2 [1.3‒7.1]) and the HC group (2.7 [0.3‒4.6]) (P = 0.009, d = 0.91, P < 0.001, d = 1.30). The AE of the SIJP group (7.3[5.0‒10.4]) was also significantly higher than that in the LBP (3.7[2.8‒7.1]) and HC groups (3.0[1.9‒4.2]) (P = 0.003, d = 1.04; P = 0.001, d = 1.57). Comparing the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides in the SIJP group, the symptomatic side (8.0[6.0‒10.6]) was significantly higher than the asymptomatic side (5.7[3.6‒8.1]) in terms of CE (P = 0.05, d = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Patients with SIJP increased RE during ASLR, which may be related to impaired proprioception and decreased motor control.

Does the L4 nerve root extend during femoral nerve stretch test? A cadaveric study of four cases analyzing the extension rates of the lumbar nerve root.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar radicular pain is a common symptom of lumbar disc herniation and spinal canal stenosis, and L4 nerve root impingement is difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to elucidate the extension rate of L4 nerve roots in Thiel-embalmed specimens using both classic and new femoral nerve stretch test (FNST), as well as straight leg raising test (SLRT). Additionally, the extension rate of the L2 and L3 nerve roots and L5 and S1 roots were determined using FNST (both classic and new) and SLRT, respectively. METHODS: Four Thiel-embalmed specimens were used. The extension rate data of the nerve root were obtained using a displacement sensor under the following conditions: knee joint flexed to 0°/45°/90°/135° with either the hip extension/flexion of 0° (classic FNST) or extension of 15° (new FNST); and hip joint flexed to 0°/30°/60°/90° with the knee flexion of 0° (SLRT). RESULTS: Case A had almost no L4 nerve root lengthening at 45° and 90° knee joint flexion; however, at 135° of knee flexion, the nerve root was lengthened. In Case B, the L4 nerve root was hardly extended by the classic FNST, but it was extended at 135° of knee flexion and 15° of hip extension. In Case C, the L4 nerve root showed little change by classic FNST and it was shortened by new FNST, whereas, it was extended by SLRT. Case D showed a shortened L4 nerve root at 135° of knee flexion in classic FNST and at 0°/45°/90°/135° of knee flexion and 15° of hip extension. Further, no root shortening was observed for L2 and L3 nerve roots according to both classic and new FNST. In contrast, the extension of L2 and L3 nerve root with the new FNST was high. In all cases, nerve roots were lengthened by the SLRT. Further, as the hip flexion angle increased, the rate of nerve elongation also increased. CONCLUSIONS: It was shown that in patients in whom L4 nerve root was extended by FNST, it was shortened by SLRT. The opposite pattern was also observed. Further, it is believed that FNST and SLRT are reliable tests for L2 and L3 radiculopathy and L5 and S1 radiculopathy, respectively, and that more tension on the femoral and sciatic nerves is better. Furthermore, we recommend that FNST should be performed with 15° hip extension and 135° knee flexion to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Referential values for lower limb flexibility in healthy children and adolescents in Japan: A five-year cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb flexibility (LLF) is an essential motor function. However, assessing LLF during adolescence is difficult because of the influence of marked physical changes. We, therefore, assessed LLF and investigated the relationship between LLF and sex and age in healthy children and adolescents. METHODS: We conducted a five-year cross-sectional study with students aged 8-14 years at a single school in Japan. We evaluated the heel-buttock distance (HBD), straight leg raising angle (SLRA), and dorsiflexion angle of the ankle joint (DFA) at the beginning of each year. We conducted a comparative analysis on the performance of the HBD, SLRA, and DFA techniques, stratified by both sex and age. The statistical significance of observed differences was assessed through the application of Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Furthermore, we analyzed the effects of sex, age, height, and weight on LLF using a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: Of the 4221 initial study participants, 3370 were analyzed. Mean HBD, SLRA, and DFA values were 1.6 cm, 77.0°, and 15.7°, respectively. Girls showed significantly higher HBD and lower SLRA and DFA values than boys and 14-year-olds (p < 0.01). Median HBD value for girls was 0 cm, whereas for boys, it exceeded 0 cm after age 13. The median SLRA value for girls was 80-85°, while for boys, it was 70-75°. The median DFA value for girls was 15-19°, and for boys, it was 12-15°. A multivariable linear regression model indicated that boys had significantly greater tightness than girls (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The reference values of HBD, SLRA, and DFA differed according to age and sex. Furthermore, we showed that sex differences were significantly associated with LLF. Data in this study provide the reference value for assessing LLF in children and adolescents.

Volumetric evaluation of fluid responsiveness using a modified passive leg raise maneuver during experimental induction and correction of hypovolemia in anesthetized dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate if modified passive leg raise (PLRM) maneuver can be used for volumetric evaluation of fluid responsiveness (FR) by inducing cardiac output (CO) changes during experimental induction and correction of hypovolemia in healthy anesthetized dogs. The effects of PLRM on plethysmographic variability index (PVI) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were also investigated. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, crossover study. ANIMALS: A total of six healthy anesthetized Beagle dogs. METHODS: Dogs were anesthetized with propofol and isoflurane. They were mechanically ventilated under neuromuscular blockade, and normothermia was maintained. After instrumentation, all dogs were subjected to four stages: 1, baseline; 2, removal of 27 mL kg-1 circulating blood volume; 3, after blood re-transfusion; and 4, after 20 mL kg-1 hetastarch infusion over 20 minutes. A 10 minute stabilization period was allowed after induction of each stage and before data collection. At each stage, CO via pulmonary artery thermodilution, PVI, PPV and cardiopulmonary variables were measured before, during and after the PLRM maneuver. Stages were sequential, not randomized. Statistical analysis included repeated measures anova and Tukey's post hoc test, considering p < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: During stage 2, PLRM at a 30° angle significantly increased CO (mean ± standard deviation, 1.0 ± 0.1 to 1.3 ± 0.1 L minute-1; p < 0.001), with a simultaneous significant reduction in PVI (38 ± 4% to 21 ± 4%; p < 0.001) and PPV (27 ± 2% to 18 ± 2%; p < 0.001). The PLRM did not affect CO, PPV and PVI during stages 1, 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In anesthetized dogs, PLRM at a 30° angle successfully detected FR during hypovolemia, and identified fluid nonresponsiveness during normovolemia and hypervolemia. Also, in hypovolemic dogs, significant decreases in PVI and PPV occurred in response to PLRM maneuver.

Fluid Bolus: How Much More?

Fluid bolus in critically ill children is always a matter of concern and has to be balanced between benefits and harms. While optimizing pre-load is important in the golden hour period, fluid overload is a concern in ICU stay. Various dynamic parameters both clinical and device-guided assessment can help in optimizing fluid therapy. How to cite this article: Venkatesan DK, Goel AK. Fluid Bolus: How Much More? Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(4):296.

Optimising fluid requirements after initial resuscitation: A pilot study evaluating mini-fluid challenge and passive leg raising test in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The goals and approaches to fluid therapy vary through different stages of resuscitation. This pilot study was designed to test the safety and feasibility of a fluid therapy protocol for the second or optimisation stage of resuscitation in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: Spontaneously breathing patients with predicted SAP were admitted after initial resuscitation and studied over a 24-h period in a tertiary hospital ward. Objective clinical assessment (OCA; heart rate, mean arterial pressure, urine output, and haematocrit) was done at 0, 4, 8, 12, 18-20, and 24 h. All patients had mini-fluid challenge (MFC; 250 ml intravenous normal saline within 10 min) at 0 h and repeated at 4 and 8 h if OCA score ≥2. Patients who were fluid responsive (>10% change in stroke volume after MFC) received 5-10 ml/kg/h, otherwise 1-3 ml/kg/h until the next time point. Passive leg raising test (PLRT) was done at each time point and compared with OCA for assessing volume status and predicting fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: This fluid therapy protocol based on OCA, MFC, and PLRT and designed for the second stage of resuscitation was safe and feasible in spontaneously breathing predicted SAP patients. The PLRT was superior to OCA (at 0 and 8 h) for predicting fluid responsiveness and guiding fluid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found that a protocol for intravenous fluid therapy specifically for the second stage of resuscitation in patients with predicted SAP was safe, feasible, and warrants further investigation.

Variation of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral at Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 10 cmH2O and PEEP 0 cmH2O can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: A tertiary hospital intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 79 critically ill patients who were on controlled mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at different PEEP levels and was also performed before and after passive leg raising (PLR). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients were classified as the fluid responders (n = 45) and the fluid nonresponders (n = 34) according to the LVOT VTI change after PLR (ΔVTIPLR). The difference of LVOT VTI between PEEP 10 cmH2O and PEEP 0 cmH2O (ΔVTIPEEP) was much higher in responders than in nonresponders (17.9% v 2.1%, p < 0.001). The ΔVTIPEEP and ΔVTIPLR were correlated among all patients (r = 0.582, p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the ΔVTIPEEP was a good predictor of fluid responsiveness, with an area under the curve of 0.935 (95% confidence interval: 0.885-0.986, p < 0.001), and the optimal cutoff value was 10.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Variation of LVOT VTI between PEEP 10 cmH2O and PEEP 0 cmH2O can be used to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients on controlled mechanical ventilation.

The Cardiac Caval Index: Improving Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Preload.

OBJECTIVES: Inferior vena cava (IVC) pulsatility quantified by the Caval Index (CI) is characterized by poor reliability, also due to the irregular magnitude of spontaneous respiratory activity generating the major pulsatile component. The aim of this study was to test whether the IVC cardiac oscillatory component could provide a more stable index (Cardiac CI-CCI) compared to CI or respiratory CI (RCI). METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent long-term monitoring in supine position of IVC, followed by 3 minutes passive leg raising (PLR). CI, RCI, and CCI were extracted from video recordings by automated edge-tracking and CCI was averaged over each respiratory cycle (aCCI). Cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were also recorded during baseline (1 minutes prior to PLR) and PLR (first minute). RESULTS: In response to PLR, all IVC indices decreased (P < .01), CO increased by 4 ± 4% (P = .055) while HR and MAP did not vary. The Coefficient of Variation (CoV) of aCCI (13 ± 5%) was lower than that of CI (17 ± 5%, P < .01), RCI (26 ± 7%, P < .001) and CCI (25 ± 7%, P < .001). The mutual correlations in time of the indices were 0.81 (CI-RCI), 0.49 (CI-aCCI) and 0.2 (RCI-aCCI). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term IVC monitoring by automated edge-tracking allowed us to evidence that 1) respiratory and averaged cardiac pulsatility components are uncorrelated and thus carry different information and 2) the new index aCCI, exhibiting the lowest CoV while maintaining good sensitivity to blood volume changes, may overcome the poor reliability of CI and RCI.

In Response to: Is the Carotid Artery a Window to the Left Ventricle?

We think correlation of Doppler ultrasound derived CA-VTI and echocardiography derived SV needs further exploration in a larger sample and in various models of hypovolemia and shock under ideal measurement conditions before concluding whether carotid artery can be considered a true window to the left ventricle. How to cite this article: Kundu R, Maitra S, Chowhan G, Baidya DK. In Response to: Is the Carotid Artery a Window to the Left Ventricle? Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(3):407.

Clinical outcomes and safety of passive leg raising in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are data suggesting that passive leg raising (PLR) improves hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This trial aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of PLR during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of the outcomes that assigned adults OHCA to be treated with PLR or in the flat position. The trial was conducted in the Camp de Tarragona region. The main end point was survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome defined as cerebral performance category (CPC 1-2). To study possible adverse effects, we assessed the presence of pulmonary complications on the first chest X-rays, brain edema on the computerized tomography (CT) in survivors and brain and lungs weights from autopsies in non-survivors. RESULTS: In total, 588 randomized cases were included, 301 were treated with PLR and 287 were controls. Overall, 67.8% were men and the median age was 72 (IQR 60-82) years. At hospital discharge, 3.3% in the PLR group and 3.5% in the control group were alive with CPC 1-2 (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4-2.3, p = 0.91). No significant differences in survival at hospital admission were found in all patients (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.7-1.6, p = 0.95) and among patients with an initial shockable rhythm (OR 1.7; 95% CI 0.8-3.4, p = 0.15). There were no differences in pulmonary complication rates in chest X-rays [7 (25.9%) vs 5 (17.9%), p = 0.47] and brain edema on CT [5 (29.4%) vs 10 (32.6%), p = 0.84]. There were no differences in lung weight [1223 mg (IQR 909-1500) vs 1239 mg (IQR 900-1507), p = 0.82] or brain weight [1352 mg (IQR 1227-1457) vs 1380 mg (IQR 1255-1470), p = 0.43] among the 106 autopsies performed. CONCLUSION: In this trial, PLR during CPR did not improve survival to hospital discharge with CPC 1-2. No evidence of adverse effects has been found. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01952197, registration date: September 27, 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01952197 .