Association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location. CONCLUSION: TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.

Poor prognosis of young male patients with stage III colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of young patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. However, sex-dependent differences in the prognosis of young CRC remain unknown. METHODS: We investigated patients aged <70 years with stage III CRC treated between January 2000 and December 2010 in 24 Japanese referral hospitals. Patients were divided into subgroups by age of 50 years (early-onset and late-onset groups) and sex, and clinical characteristics and survival outcomes were compared. Risk factors associated with poor survival outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among 4758 consecutive patients, 771 (16%) were <50 years. Regardless of sex, there were more patients with rectal cancer and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in the early-onset group. Among males, tumors in the early-onset group were poorly differentiated (p < 0.001), and patients were diagnosed at an advanced N stage (p = 0.010). Among females, there were more patients with left-sided cancer in the early-onset group (p < 0.001). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were worse in the early-onset group than in the late-onset group (5-year RFS rates: 58% and 63%, p = 0.024; 5-year OS rates: 76% and 81%, p = 0.041, respectively), while there were no age-dependent differences in the survival outcomes of female CRC patients. A multivariate analysis identified age <50 years as one of the independent risk factors associated with poor RFS in male stage III CRC patients (p = 0.032) CONCLUSIONS: Young male patients with stage III CRC showed poorer survival outcomes than their older counterparts. Therefore, age- and sex-related differences in the incidence of CRC recurrence need to be considered.

Sidedness is not a prognostic factor in an unselected cohort of patients with colon cancer but prognosis for caecal carcinoma is worse - A multivariate analysis of a large single institution database.

PURPOSE: Sidedness has emerged as a prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer treated with modern systemic therapies. This study investigates whether it is also relevant for an unselected patient cohort including all stages. METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted with colon cancer between 1995 and 2018 were retrieved from an institution-held database. Patients were divided into two cohorts. The first cohort included patients without distant metastases who were able to undergo curative resection. The second cohort presented with distant metastases (stage IV). Potentially prognostic factors were subjected to multivariate Cox Regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 1,606 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. An R0-resection was achieved in 1,222 patients without distant metastases. Five-year cause-specific survival rate was 89.3% for this group. There was no difference between right- and left-sided cancers (88.2% vs. 90.1%, p = 0.220). However, prognosis of caecal carcinoma was significantly worse than that of all other sites combined (83.5% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, pT-category, pN-category, grading, vascular invasion, emergency operation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and caecal carcinoma remained as independent prognostic factors. In the 384 patients with stage IV-disease, 3-year overall survival for right- vs. left-sided cancers differed only in univariate analysis (17.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In non-metastatic colon cancer, location in the caecum is an independent prognostic factor. In unselected patients with stage IV colon cancer, sidedness was not found to be a prognostic factor. Differentiation into right- and left-sided tumors may be simplistic, and further studies on the biological behavior of different colonic sites are warranted.

Should left- and right-sided unilateral cleft lip and palate patients be grouped together when reporting the outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: Investigate associations between cleft laterality in patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and oral-health, dental-arch, speech, audiological, psychological and nasolabial-aesthetic outcomes. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of the outcomes of 5-year-old children with non-syndromic complete UCLP identified from three studies: Cleft Collective (n = 155), Cleft Care UK (CCUK) (n = 266) and Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study (n = 238). Outcome measures included occlusal assessment using the 5-year-old's index score, speech intelligibility rating using the CAPS-A Audit tool, audiological assessment using pure tone audiometry, nasolabial aesthetic assessment using the Asher-McDade tool, oral-health assessment using decayed, missing, filled teeth scores and parent-reported outcomes. Logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex and index-of-multiple-deprivation scores were performed. RESULTS: No differences were found in patient-reported outcomes between the left and right clefts in the Cleft Collective study. From the CCUK study, right clefts had poorer speech (n = 236; 95% CI 1.09, 3.42; and P = .03) and hearing outcomes (n = 211; 95% CI 1.03, 3.43; P = .04). In the CSAG study, patients with left clefts were more likely to be teased (n = 213; 95% CI 0.26, 0.85; and P = .01). CONCLUSION: Weak associations between cleft laterality, speech, hearing and psychological outcomes were found, however the findings were inconsistent across the studies. This study contributes to evidence of associations between laterality and outcomes in children born with UCLP.

Right-sided versus left-sided colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a sub-analysis of a large multicenter case-control study in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients on the prognosis. METHODS: In a sub-analysis of a multicenter case-control study of CRC patients who underwent surgery at ≥ 80 years old conducted in Japan between 2003 and 2007, both short- and long-term outcomes were compared between right-sided colon cancers (RCCs) and left-sided colorectal cancers (LCCs). RCCs were defined as those located from the cecum to the transverse colon. RESULTS: Among the 1680 patients who underwent curative surgery, 812 and 868 had RCCs and LCCs, respectively. RCCs were more frequent than LCCs in those who were female, had renal comorbidities, and had a history of abdominal surgery. Regarding tumor characteristics, RCCs were larger, invaded more deeply, and were diagnosed as either mucinous or signet ring-cell carcinoma more frequently than LCCs. Regarding the prognosis, patients with RCCs had a significantly longer cancer-specific survival (CS-S) and cancer-specific relapse-free survival (CS-RFS) than those with LCCs. Furthermore, sidedness was determined to be an independent prognostic factor for CS-S and CS-RFS. CONCLUSION: RCCs, which accounted for half of the cases in patients ≥ 80 years old, showed better long-term outcomes than LCCs.

Exploring Nasal Wall Cartilage Asymmetry in Rhinoplasty: Implications for Postoperative Symmetry.

INTRODUCTION: Facial symmetry is prized for its association with health, genetic quality, and attractiveness, but minor asymmetries are common. Human asymmetry tends to favor the left side and is noticeable in various nose parts. However, the discrepancy in cartilage thickness between the nose's right and left sides remains understudied. METHOD: This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients undergoing primary open rhinoplasty. During routine rhinoplasty Procedure, upper and lower lateral cartilage strips were excised from each patient, yielding four tissue samples. Tissue thickness and width were measured using a microscope stage calibration slide. This approach systematically assessed left and right cartilage thickness differences in primary open rhinoplasty patients, offering insights into nasal asymmetry and potential surgical implications. RESULTS: Out of 60 patients, 43 were female (72%) and 17 were male (28%). The mean thickness of upper lateral (UL) cartilage was 0.53 mm on the right and 0.54 mm on the left side (P value= 0.52). For lower lateral (LL) cartilage, the mean thickness was 0.50 mm on the right and 0.54 mm on the left side (P value < 0.001), indicating significant left-sided dominance. This dominance was consistent across both sexes. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the significance of addressing subtle nasal cartilage asymmetries to improve postoperative symmetry. Modifying nasal cartilage microstructures during rhinoplasty can enhance both aesthetic and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.

BACKGROUND: Pattern of dental anomalies encountered in cleft patients shows subtle signs of genetic involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth in Thai cleft population according to the cleft type. METHODS: Data collected from patients with cleft lip and palate, who had been treated at Tawanchai Cleft Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, available during year 2012-2022, were investigated. Records from 194 patients with non-syndromic clefts met the inclusion criteria. Standard dental records, and at least either orthopantomogram (OPG) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Prevalence of tooth agenesis was higher (77.3%) than that of supernumerary teeth (5.7%) and was more common in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (88.1%) than in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (72.6%) (p = 0.017). The upper lateral incisor was more frequently affected (46.4%), followed by the upper second premolar. The number of missing teeth observed on the left side was significantly higher. Patients with left UCLP (ULCLP) had the highest prevalence of tooth agenesis. A total of 41 tooth agenesis code (TAC) patterns was found. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was comparable with 6.6% of ULCLP, 5.1% of BCLP, and 4.5% of URCLP. Tooth-number anomalies were observed more often in the BCLP and were most likely to occur on the left side of the maxilla. Both types of anomalies could be featured in a small proportion of cleft patients. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in this study, presented with tooth-number anomalies. Tooth agenesis was approximately 10-time more prevalent than supernumerary teeth. Tooth agenesis was likely to appear on the left-side of the maxilla regardless of the laterality of the cleft.

Comparative Analysis of First-Line FOLFOX Treatment With and Without Anti-VEGF Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: A Real-World Data Study.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOX (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) combined with or without anti-VEGF therapy represents one of the primary first-line treatment options for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). However, there is limited comparative data on the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on treatment effectiveness, survival outcomes, and tumor location. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative study utilized data from the AIM Cancer Care Quality Program and commercially insured patients treated at medical oncology clinics in the US. We analyzed 1652 mCRC patients who received FOLFOX, of which 1015 (61.4%) were also treated with anti-VEGF therapy (VEGF cohort). RESULTS: Patients in the VEGF cohort exhibited a higher frequency of lung (33% vs 23%; P < .001) and liver metastases (74% vs 62%; P < .001), underwent fewer liver surgeries prior to treatment (1.2% vs 3.6%; P = .002), and had a higher proportion of right-sided tumors (27% vs 18%; P = .001). Adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without anti-VEGF (median survival: 25.4 vs 26.0 months; P = .4). FOLFOX-only treated patients experienced higher rates of post-treatment hospitalizations (22% vs 15%; P < .001). Notably, left-sided tumors treated with anti-VEGF showed a trend toward decreased OS (median survival: 26.8 vs 33 months; P = .09). CONCLUSION: Our real-world data analysis suggests that the addition of anti-VEGF to FOLFOX offers limited and short-lived benefits in the context of mCRC and may provide differential survival benefit based on tumor sidedness.

Race, age, and sex differences on the influence of obesity on colorectal cancer sidedness and mortality: A national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) sidedness is recognized as a prognostic factor for survival; left-sided colorectal cancer is associated with better outcomes than right-sided colon cancer (RsCC). We aimed to evaluate the influence of obesity on CRC sidedness and determine how race, age, and sex affect mortality among overweight and obese individuals. METHODS: A survey-weighted analysis was conducted using data obtained from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS: Of the 24 549 patients with a diagnosis of CRC and a reported body mass index (BMI), 13.6% were overweight and 49.9% were obese. The race distribution was predominantly non-Hispanic Whites (69.7%), followed by Black (15.6%), Hispanic (8.7%), and other race (6.1%). Overweight (BMI: 25-29.9) and obese (BMI: ≥30) individuals were more likely to have RsCC (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.17-1.39, p < 0.001 and aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.37-1.54, p < 0.001, respectively). Obese Black individuals were more likely to have RsCC as compared to their White counterparts (aOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of RsCC. In addition, racial disparities in CRC sidedness and outcomes are most pronounced among obese patients.

Relationship between prognostic impact of N3 lymph node metastasis at the root of the feeding artery and location of colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether N3 nodal involvement predicts outcomes and whether its prognostic implications vary with tumor location in patients with Stage III colon cancer (CC). METHODS: We defined N3 as lymph node metastases near the bases of the major feeding arteries. We retrospectively examined recurrence rates and patterns by tumor location and sites of lymph node metastases in 57 patients with N3 CC who had undergone curative resections between January 2000 and March 2019. Survival analysis was performed to compare the prognoses of patients with and without N3 lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: Most N3 patients had large tumors (T ≥ 3); five had T2 disease. Recurrence occurred quickly in one patient with T2N3M0 disease. Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that N3 lymph node metastasis is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in Stage III CC patients (P < 0.001). Categorizing N3 patients according to UICC-TNM staging system does not stratify risk of recurrence (P = 0.970). To investigate the impact of tumor location on recurrence risk, we classified N3 CC into two subtypes according to tumor location: metastasis at the base of the superior mesenteric artery in right-sided CC and inferior mesenteric artery in left-sided CC. The former was found to have a statistically significant poorer prognosis than the latter (P = 0.091). CONCLUSION: N3 is a robust prognostic marker in CC patients. Recurrence risk varies by tumor location. N3 right-sided CCs with lymph node metastasis at the base of the superior mesenteric artery have poorer prognoses than do N3 left-sided CCs.

Clinical Characterization of Targetable Mutations (BRAF V600E and KRAS G12C) in Advanced Colorectal Cancer-A Nation-Wide Study.

BRAF V600E and KRAS mutations that occur in colorectal cancer (CRC) define a subpopulation of patients with an inferior prognosis. Recently, the first BRAF V600E-targeting therapy has been approved and novel agents targeting KRAS G12C are being evaluated in CRC. A better understanding of the clinical characteristics of the populations defined by those mutations is needed. We created a retrospective database that collects clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic CRC evaluated for RAS and BRAF mutations in a single laboratory. A total of 7604 patients tested between October 2017 and December 2019 were included in the analysis. The prevalence of BRAF V600E was 6.77%. Female sex, primary in the right colon, high-grade, mucinous, signet cell, partially neuroendocrine histology, perineural and vascular invasion, and surgical tissue sample were factors associated with increased mutation rates. The prevalence of KRAS G12C was 3.11%. Cancer of primary origin in the left colon and in samples from brain metastases were associated with increased mutation rates. The high prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation in cancers with a neuroendocrine component identifies a potential candidate population for BRAF inhibition. The association of KRAS G12C with the left part of the intestine and brain metastases of CRC are new findings and require further investigation.

The Implications of Laterality in Unilateral Cleft Lip Reconstruction: A Global Survey of Cleft Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of directional laterality in complete Unilateral Cleft Lip (UCL) amongst the global cleft surgeon community. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Global distribution of online survey distributed in English and Spanish. PARTICIPANTS: Cleft surgeons from around the world. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey participant perception of the impact of laterality on: (1) cleft presentation (2) surgical challenge and (3) surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Responses were received from 453 cleft surgeons located in 54 countries around the world. 221 (49%) had previously considered differences in patients presenting with a left- versus right-sided UCL. 95 (21%) considered right-sided clefts more difficult to reconstruct, 37 (8%) reported left-sided clefts to be more difficult and 321 (71%) reported no difference in difficulty between the cleft sides. Higher volume cleft surgeons, characterised by those reporting cleft as their principal area of practice and performing >20 cleft operations per year, were more likely to have both previously considered differences in laterality in cleft and to report right-sided unilateral cleft lip to be more difficult to primarily reconstruct. 395 (87%) did not consider surgical outcomes to be influenced by cleft laterality. CONCLUSIONS: This survey reports perceptions on cleft laterality from a large body of global surgeons and suggests a trend for increased difficulty in right-sided compared to left-sided cleft lip reconstruction, where such laterality-associated difficulty is perceived.

Tumour genotypes account for survival differences in right- and left-sided colon cancers.

AIM: We sought to identify genetic differences between right- and left-sided colon cancers and using these differences explain lower survival in right-sided cancers. METHOD: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with colon cancer was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas, a cancer genetics registry with patient and tumour data from 20 North American institutions. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. Predictors for survival were identified using directed acyclic graphs and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 206 right- and 214 left-sided colon cancer patients with 84 recorded deaths were identified. The frequency of mutated alleles differed significantly in 12 of 25 genes between right- and left-sided tumours. Right-sided tumours had worse survival with a hazard ratio of 1.71 (95% confidence interval 1.10-2.64, P = 0.017). The total effect of the genetic loci on survival showed five genes had a sizeable effect on survival: DNAH5, MUC16, NEB, SMAD4, and USH2A. Lasso-penalized Cox regression selected 13 variables for the highest-performing model, which included cancer stage, positive resection margin, and mutated alleles at nine genes: MUC16, USH2A, SMAD4, SYNE1, FLG, NEB, TTN, OBSCN, and DNAH5. Post-selection inference demonstrated that mutations in MUC16 (P = 0.01) and DNAH5 (P = 0.02) were particularly predictive of 5-year overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that genetic mutations may explain survival differences between tumour sites. Further studies on larger patient populations may identify other genes, which could form the foundation for more precise prognostication and treatment decisions beyond current rudimentary TNM staging.

Primary tumor location as a predictor of survival in patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer who receive molecularly targeted drugs as first-line therapy: a multicenter real-world observational study by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.

BACKGROUND: Primary tumor location is considered a predictor of overall survival (OS) in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab (BEV) or an anti-epidermal growth factor antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab [CET/PAN]) as first-line molecularly targeted therapy. BEV is recommended for right-sided mCRC and CET/PAN for left-sided mCRC based on post-hoc analyses of clinical trial data, but real-world evidence is lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of patients who started BEV or CET/PAN plus 5-fluorouracil-based doublet chemotherapy between January 2013 and December 2016 as first-line treatment for RAS WT mCRC at any of 24 Japanese institutions. OS was compared between the BEV and CET/PAN groups according to primary tumor location by Cox multivariate regression analysis in the full cohort and in a propensity score-matched cohort. RESULTS: In total, 935 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 24.6 months with BEV and 20.9 months with CET/PAN in right-sided mCRC (n = 213; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06) and 35.7 months and 30.0 months, respectively, in left-sided mCRC (n = 722; adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.13). In the propensity score-matched cohort, OS was significantly better in the BEV group than in the CET/PAN group in right-sided mCRC (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96) but was not significantly different in left-sided mCRC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.07). CONCLUSION: Real-world data showed that OS was better with BEV than with CET/PAN in right-sided mCRC. However, there was no significant difference in OS in left-sided mCRC.

Embryologic Origin of the Primary Tumor and RAS Status Predict Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Background and objectives. In colorectal cancers, the embryologic origin of the primary tumor determines important molecular dissimilarities between right-sided (RS) and left-sided (LS) carcinomas. Although important prognostic differences have been revealed between RS- and LS-patients with resected colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), it is still unclear if this observation depends on the RAS mutational status. To refine the impact of primary tumor location (PTL) on the long-term outcomes of patients with resected CLMs, the rates of overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) were compared between RS- vs. LS-patients, according to their RAS status. Material and Methods. All patients with known RAS status, operated until December 2019, were selected from a prospectively maintained database, including all patients who underwent hepatectomy for histologically-proven CLMs. A log-rank test was used to compare survival rates between the RS- vs. LS-group, in RAS-mut and RAS-wt patients, respectively. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess if PTL was independently associated with OS, RFS or SAR. Results. In 53 patients with RAS-mut CLMs, the OS, RFS and SAR rates were not significantly different (p = 0.753, 0.945 and 0.973, respectively) between the RS and LS group. In 89 patients with RAS-wt CLMs, the OS and SAR rates were significantly higher (p = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively) in the LS group vs. RS group, while RFS rates were similar (p = 0.438). The multivariate analysis performed in RAS-wt patients revealed that RS primary (p = 0.009), extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.001), N-positive (p = 0.014), age higher than 65 (p = 0.002) and preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.004) were independently associated with worse OS, while RS location (p < 0.001) and N-positive (p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for poor SAR. Conclusions. After resection of CLMs, PTL had no impact on long-term outcomes in RAS-mut patients, while in RAS-wt patients, the RS primary was independently associated with worse OS and SAR.

Association between cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer sidedness: A multi-center big-data platform-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sidedness (right/left) of colorectal cancer (CRC) is essential for treatment. Whether carcinogenesis of tobacco varies by sidedness remains unclear. The present study aims to evaluate the sidedness tendency of cigarette smoking and to explore its impact on prognosis. METHODS: In the multi-center retrospective study, data on 46 166 Chinese CRC patients were extracted from a big-data platform. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate qualitative and quantitative associations between smoking and tumor sidedness. Survival analyses were conducted in metastatic CRC. RESULTS: History of smoking was associated with left-sided CRC (LSCRC; Adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16 - 1.34; P < .001). The sidedness tendency towards LSCRC increased from non-smokers, to ex-smokers, and to current smokers (P for trend < .001). Longer duration (P for trend < .001) and larger total amount of cigarette smoking (P for trend < .001) were more associated with LSCRC, respectively. The association was confirmed in both left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer, but was stronger for rectal cancer (P = .016). Alcoholism significantly enhanced the association by 7% (P = .027). Furthermore, prognostic advantage of metastatic LSCRC diminished among ever-smokers, with contrary survival impacts of smoking on either side of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: History of smoking was associated with LSCRC in a positive dose-response relationship, and presented opposite prognostic impacts on right- and left-sided tumors. Smoking potentially plays an instrumental role in the mechanism for sidedness heterogeneity in CRC.

Molecular Biomarkers according to Primary Tumor Location in Colorectal Cancer: Current Standard and New Insights.

According to the 2018 GLOBOCAN database, colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies and leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. During the last decades, considerable progress has been made in understanding the complex pathogenetic mechanisms involved in this neoplastic disease. Due to the need to improve treatment responses and clinical outcomes of colorectal cancer patients, the identification of new molecular biomarkers became a crucial spot in clinical oncology. As biological indicators of a specific pathological or physiological process, molecular markers play a central role in cancer detection, diagnosis, outcome prediction, and treatment choice. Considering the existing evidence that malignancies originating from distinct colonic regions behave differently, it is clear that specific biomarkers can be associated to right- or left-sided colon carcinomas, reflecting the distinct molecular signatures of these different tumor entities. The aim of this review is to summarize the main differences among tumors arising from proximal and distal colon in terms of current and emerging biomarkers.

Impact of biomarkers and primary tumor location on the metastatic colorectal cancer first-line treatment landscape in five European countries.

Background: Advances in therapies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and improved understanding of prognostic and predictive factors have impacted treatment decisions. Materials & methods: This study used a large oncology database to investigate patterns of monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus chemotherapy treatment in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in mCRC patients treated in first line in 2018. Results: Anti-EGFR mAbs were most often administered to patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and those with left-sided tumors, while anti-VEGF mAbs were preferred in RAS mutant and right-sided tumors. Adopted treatment strategies differed between countries, largely due to reimbursement. Conclusion: Biomarker status and primary tumor location steered treatment decisions in first line. Adopted treatment strategies differed between participating countries.

Lay abstract Each patient's cancer is unique. For example, colon cancer on the left side is different from colon cancer on the right side. Colon cancer is different from cancer of the rectum. Cancers also have changes in their genes, which means some treatments should work, while others may not. Doctors can select among different medicines to find the drug that works best for each patient. We looked at patients with cancer of the colon or rectum that has spread to other organs. We tried to find out how doctors in Europe select drugs for their patients after performing tests called RAS or BRAF. We found that doctors make different choices in different countries.

Role of Up-Front Primary Tumor Resection and Tumor Sidedness in the Survival of Synchronous Metastatic Colon Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Uncertainty exists about a possible survival benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in synchronous metastatic colon cancer (mCC). Since sidedness of the primary tumor is regarded as an important prognostic factor, our objective was to study the interaction between PTR and sidedness in synchronous mCC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we used data from 2 first-line phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed Cox regression model was used to study the multiplicative interaction between PTR and sidedness. We adjusted for age, treatment arm, WHO performance status, number of affected organs by metastases, serum lactate dehydrogenase, and year of enrollment. RESULTS: We found that PTR is associated with better survival in both right-sided (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.42-0.8 2]) and left-sided mCC (HR 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.52-0.93]). The interaction between PTR and sidedness was not significant (p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the prognostic value of PTR is independent of sidedness. Validation of these results will be performed in ongoing RCTs.

Effect of sidedness on survival among patients with early-stage colon cancer: a SEER-based propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Most previous studies compared survival between left-sided and right-sided colon cancer without adjustment for clinicopathological parameters. We investigated the effect of sidedness on survival among patients with early-stage colon cancer, using a propensity score matching method. METHODS: The 18 registry custom data within the SEER database were used to identify patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer between 2010 and 2014. A propensity score matching analysis was performed using the nearest neighbor method. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine the prognostic factors. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, 25,094 (35.72%) patients were diagnosed with left-sided colon cancer and 45,156 (64.28%) with right-sided colon cancer. After propensity score matching, each cohort included 5118 patients, and the clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced. In the unmatched cohort, left-sided colon cancer had superior all-cause (χ2=315, P<0.01) and cancer-specific (χ2=43, P<0.01) survival than right-sided tumors. However, in the matched cohort, no difference was observed for all-cause (χ2=0.7, P=0.4) and cancer-specific (χ2=0, P=0.96) survival between left and right colon cancer. The Cox model did not indicate sidedness as a prognostic factor. In the subgroup analysis, stage II right-sided colon cancer had a better survival outcome, while stage III left-sided tumors had a better survival outcome. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics in this study, sidedness showed no impact on survival in early-stage colon cancer. However, sidedness was associated with prognostic differences in stages II and III early-stage colon cancer.