Exploring the Potential of Robotic Single-Port Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer: Initial Insights and Future Prospects.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has demonstrated outcomes comparable or superior to open and laparoscopic surgeries for extended cholecystectomy.1-8 Despite its advantages, the minimally invasive robotic single-port (SP) system remains underutilized in complex hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery due to instrument limitations and retraction issues.9,10 This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the da Vinci SP system in gallbladder cancer surgery. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of OOO University Hospital (IRB no. DAUH IRB-24-081) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the study's retrospective design. METHODS: A 62-year-old woman with a diagnosis of gallbladder cancer was referred for surgery. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans showed no evidence of metastasis (T2N0). Therefore, a robotic SP extended cholecystectomy was planned. Figure 1 shows a 30-mm SP port and a 1-mm assistant port inserted for the procedure. Due to the absence of an energy device for the liver wedge resection, Maryland bipolar forceps were used, mimicking the Kelly clamp crushing technique. A monopolar cautery hook was used for lymph node resection of stations 7, 8, 12, and 13 (Fig. 2). Fig. 1 Port placement for robotic extended cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Xi system Fig. 2 Demonstration of full lymph node dissection RESULTS: The total duration of the operation was 226 min, with an estimated blood loss of 200 ml. The CT scan on day 5 showed no abnormalities, and the patient was discharged routinely on day 7 (Fig. 3). The pathologic examination confirmed adenocarcinoma (T2a) with clear resection, and all six lymph nodes tested negative for malignancy. Fig. 3 The wound 2 weeks after surgery CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the adequacy of robotic surgeries and emphasizes the potential of the da Vinci SP system in hepatobiliary surgery. Despite current challenges related to instrument limitations, the authors are confident that the SP system will evolve into a crucial asset for hepatobiliary surgical practices in the foreseeable future.

Single Port Robotic Liver Resection: Metastasectomy for Recurrent Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising approach for managing complex hepatic malignancies. This report presents a case of a single-port robotic liver resection for a patient with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastases, focusing on the surgical technique and outcomes. METHOD: An 18-year-old female with a history of left hepatectomy for fibrolamellar HCC underwent robotic liver resection using the Da Vinci SP Surgical System. The procedure entailed excising a 30 mm tumor in liver segment 4 (Sg4) along with peritoneal metastases in the superior pole of the spleen and cardiophrenic lymph node metastasis. Surgical techniques comprised adhesiolysis, resection of the peritoneal nodule, Sg4 partial liver resection, and excision of the cardiophrenic lymph node. RESULTS: The operative time was 310 min, with a blood loss of 37 mL. The patient experienced an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home after 8 days. Partial liver resection of Sg4 revealed a moderately differentiated HCC with negative resection margins. Additionally, excision of peritoneal metastases in the superior pole of the spleen and cardiophrenic lymph nodes, consistent with metastasis, was performed. Notably, the Da Vinci SP system's relocation function proved useful in this case, particularly in slender patients with multiple distant metastases. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the importance of technological advancements in robotic surgery. The Da Vinci SP system, with its advantageous features, shows promise in challenging clinical scenarios. Its ability to facilitate precise navigation and manipulation within the patient's restricted abdominal cavity contributed to the observed successful outcome.

Long-term outcomes of pelvic exenterations for gynecological malignancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, with the advancement of medical technology, the postoperative morbidity of pelvic exenteration (PE) has gradually decreased, and it has become a curative treatment option for some patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies. However, more evidence is still needed to support its efficacy. This study aimed to explore the safety and long-term survival outcome of PE and the feasibility of umbilical single-port laparoscopic PE for gynecologic malignancies in a single medical center in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PE for gynecological cancers except for ovarian cancer conducted by a single surgical team in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between July 2014 and December 2019 were included and the data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-one cases were included and median age at diagnosis was 53 years. Cervical cancer accounted for 87.8% of all cases, and most of them received prior treatment (95.1%). Sixteen procedures were performed in 2016 and before, and 25 after 2016. Three anterior PE were performed by umbilical single-site laparoscopy. The median operation time was 460 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 600 ml. There was no perioperative death. The years of the operations was significantly associated with the length of the operation time (P = 0.0018). The overall morbidity was 52.4%, while the severe complications rate was 19.0%. The most common complication was pelvic and abdominal infection. The years of surgery was also significantly associated with the occurrence of severe complication (P = 0.040). The median follow-up time was 55.8 months. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 17.9 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.3 months. The 5-year DFS was 28.5%, and the 5-year OS was 30.8%. CONCLUSION: PE is safe for patient who is selected by a multi-disciplinary treatment, and can be a curative treatment for some patients. PE demands a high level of experience from the surgical team. Umbilical single-port laparoscopy was a technically feasible approach for APE, meriting further investigation.

Predictors for selection of outpatient single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the different perioperative variables that may serve as important clinical predictors when selecting patients for outpatient single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on the Institutional Review Board-approved, prospectively maintained database to identify 485 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RARP between 2018 and 2023. A comparison analysis was performed on patients who were managed as outpatients vs inpatients following their respective SP-RARP. A separate analysis was performed after excluding patients with pre-planned admissions to identify the risk factors for unplanned admissions. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without any conversion or additional ports. After excluding patients with pre-planned admissions, outpatient SP-RARP was successfully achieved in 86.6% with a median (interquartile range) length of stay of 4.6 (3.8-6.1) hours. Our multivariate regression analysis identified cardiac comorbidity and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as predictors of outpatient SP-RARP. In addition, the absence of cardiac comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, and lower postoperative pain score were protective against the risk of unplanned admission. Furthermore, both inpatient and outpatient encounters had comparable 90-day rates of postoperative complication (P = 0.136) and hospital re-admission (P = 0.942). CONCLUSION: Outpatient management models could be successfully achieved in most patients who underwent SP-RARP (86.6%) while maintaining similarly low perioperative morbidity profile. Nevertheless, appropriate patient selection based on the baseline clinicodemographic characteristics remains essential to ensure the safety and ongoing success of outpatient SP-RARP.

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port (SP) versus multi-port (MP) robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries. METHODS: A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA criteria for primary outcomes of interest, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. Four databases were systematically searched: Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search time range is from database creation to December 2022. Stata16 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 17 studies involving 5015 patients. In urological surgeries, single-port robotics had shorter length of stay (WMD = - 0.63, 95% Cl [- 1.06, - 0.21], P < 0.05), less estimated blood loss (WMD = - 19.56, 95% Cl [- 32.21, - 6.91], P < 0.05), less lymph node yields (WMD = - 3.35, 95% Cl [- 5.16, - 1.55], P < 0.05), less postoperative opioid use (WMD = - 5.86, 95% Cl [- 8.83, - 2.88], P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, positive margins rate, overall complications rate, and major complications rate. CONCLUSION: Single-port robotics appears to have similar perioperative outcomes to multi-port robotics in urological surgery. In radical prostatectomy, single-port robotics has shown some advantages, but the specific suitability of single-port robots for urological surgical types needs to be further explored.

Robot-assisted single-port retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy with a novel purpose-built single-port robotic system with deformable surgical instruments.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of using a novel purpose-built single-port robotic system (the SHURUI Robotic Surgical System) with deformable surgical instruments to perform retroperitoneal single-port partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to recruit patients with a single renal tumor no more than 4 cm. Robot-assisted single-port partial nephrectomy was performed by using the novel purpose-built single-port robotic system with deformable surgical instruments. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative parameters were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were recruited to the study. The median tumor size was 2.0 cm (IQR: 1.2-2.4 cm). The median R.E.N.A.L score was 6 (IQR: 4-4.5). In 3 cases, pure single-port surgery was carried out, and all the assistance was through the robotic port. Median docking time was 15.5 min (IQR: 14.25-22.25 min). Median operating time was 148.5 min (IQR: 178-238.5 min). Median console time was 107 min (IQR: 92.75-149.75 min). Median warm ischemic time was 26.5 min (IQR: 24.5-30 min). Median blood loss was 17.5 ml (IQR: 10-50 ml). CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy can be safely performed with this novel purpose-built single-port robotic system (SHURUI) with deformable surgical instruments. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the role of this new platform.

Single incision robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion.

PURPOSE: In this review, we aim to provide readers with a balanced understanding of all aspects of single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC) and urinary diversion using the single-port (SP) robot. The review will trace the historical progression from open surgery to the introduction of minimally invasive approaches and present an in-depth description of the SIRC technique, offering a step-by-step guide for reference. Emphasis will be placed on indications and patient selection criteria to equip surgeons with well-rounded insights for decision-making. METHODS: The review analyzes preliminary surgical outcomes by drawing from existing literature and clinical experiences, endeavoring to present a balanced view of the potential benefits and limitations. Addressing the learning curve and training prerequisites is paramount, and this review explores strategies and challenges in preparing surgeons for proficiency. Finally, the focus shifts to current challenges and future directions, identifying key issues and potential advancements in the field. CONCLUSIONS: By presenting historical context, technical insights, clinical evidence, and strategic foresight, the review aims to provide a comprehensive resource that engages surgeons, researchers, and trainees from diverse perspectives.

Surgical outcomes of novel retroperitoneal low anterior vs posterior and transperitoneal access in single-port partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Single-Port Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (SP-RAPN) can be performed by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. However, there is a lack of surgical outcomes for novel Retroperitoneal Low Anterior Access (LAA) in SP-RAPN. The study compared outcomes of the standard approach (SA), considering transperitoneal (TP) and posterior retroperitoneal (RP) access vs LAA in SP-RAPN series. METHODS: 102 consecutive patients underwent SP-RAPN between 2019 and 2023 at a tertiary referral robotic center were identified. Baseline characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes were collected. Patients were stratified according to surgical approach into standard (RP or TP) vs LAA and, subsequently, RP vs LAA. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test the probability of the same-day discharge adjusting for comorbidity indexes. RESULTS: Overall, 102 consecutive patients were included in this study (68 SA - 26 TP and 42 posterior RP vs 34 LAA). Median age was 60 (IQR 51.5-66) years and median BMI was 31 (IQR 26.3-37.6). No baseline differences were observed. LAA exhibited significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (median 10 [IQR 8-12] vs 24 [IQR 12-30.2.] hours, p < .0001), reduced post-operative pain (p < .0001) and decreased narcotic use on 0-1 PO Day (p < .001) compared to SA and RP only. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for comorbidities, identified LAA as a strong predictor for Same-Day Discharge. CONCLUSION: LAA is an effective approach as well as RP and TP, regardless of the renal mass location, whether it is anterior or posterior, upper/mid or lower pole, yielding favorable outcomes in LOS, post-operative pain and decreased narcotics use compared to SA in SP-RAPN.

Low anterolateral incision for single-port extraperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty: description of technique and initial experience.

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe the surgical steps for the single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal approach to pyeloplasty, report its feasibility, and share the initial outcomes of our experience. METHODS: We analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The surgical steps included a pure single-port approach through a 3.5 cm low anterolateral incision two fingerbreadths above the superior pubic ramus. The ureter was localized and followed cranially, a dismembered pyeloplasty was performed, and a running ureteropelvic anastomosis was completed. No drains were placed. The urinary catheter was removed upon discharge, and the ureteral stent after 3-5 weeks. RESULTS: A total of eight cases (two adults and six children) were completed successfully, without complications or conversions. Median operative time, console time, and estimated blood loss were 208.5 min, 114.5 min, and 10.0 ml, respectively. All patients were discharged within 24 h, except for one that required urinary output observation due to retention. There were no major postoperative complications. The median pain score at discharge was 0/10. Only one patient was prescribed PRN opioids at discharge. The readmission rate was 0.0%. All patients were asymptomatic on their last follow-up with no definitive obstruction on imaging, and no requirement for additional procedures or stents. CONCLUSION: Single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative for surgical treatment of UPJO in adult and pediatric patients with improved recovery outcomes.

Managing prostate cancer after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: feasibility and outcomes of single-port transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (PC-IPAA) face unique challenges in managing prostate cancer due to their hostile abdomens and heightened small bowel mucosa radiosensitivity. In such cases, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is contraindicated, and while brachytherapy provides a safer option, its oncologic effectiveness is limited. The Single-Port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (SP TV-RARP) offers promise by avoiding the peritoneal cavity. Our study aims to evaluate its feasibility and outcomes in patients with PC-IPAA. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was done on patients with PC-IPAA who had undergone SP TV-RARP from June 2020 to June 2023 at a high-volume center. Outcomes and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent SP TV-RARP without experiencing any complications. The median hospital stay was 5.7 h, with 89% of cases discharged without opioids. Foley catheters were removed in an average of 5.5 days. Immediate urinary continence was seen in 39% of the patients, rising to 76 and 86% at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Half of the cohort had non-organ confined disease on final pathology. Two patients with ISUP GG3 and GG4 exhibited detectable PSA post-surgery and required systemic therapy; both had SVI, multifocal ECE, and large cribriform pattern. Positive surgical margins were found in 44% of cases, mostly Gleason pattern 3, unifocal, and limited. After 11.1 months of follow-up, no pouch failure or additional BCR cases were found. CONCLUSION: Patients with PC-IPAA often exhibit aggressive prostate cancer features and may derive the greatest benefit from surgical interventions, particularly given that radiation therapy is contraindicated. SP TV-RARP is a safe option for this group, reducing the risk of bowel complications and promoting faster recovery.

Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive update on the different techniques and outcomes of contemporary Single-Port (SP) Robotic Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) approaches. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify cohort studies that have utilized the purpose-built SP robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California) for RARP. All published approaches of SP-RARP were included in our review. Baseline clinical, perioperative, and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were collected from the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies involving 1159 patients were identified. To date, five approaches of SP-RARP have been described, namely Transperitoneal, Extraperitoneal, Retzius-Sparing, Transperineal, and Transvesical. The surgical steps and clinical outcomes of the aforementioned approaches were discussed. While operating times were still faster in the Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal cohorts, the novel and more regionalized Transvesical approach allowed for radical prostatectomy to be pursued in more patients with previous abdominal surgeries and contributed to significantly improved postoperative outcomes, including the earlier return of urinary continence and with most patients being discharged on the same day without any opioids. CONCLUSION: Based on the existing literature, the introduction of SP-RARP not only enriched the repertoire of minimally-invasive surgical treatment options for prostate cancer but also provided the opportunity for urologists to develop new techniques that can improve perioperative outcomes and postoperative quality of life. Given the limited number of patients and heterogeneity in the patient selection and reporting of postoperative outcomes, further research remains necessary to better understand the different benefits and improve patient selection algorithms for the different techniques.

Single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: techniques and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical techniques and to analyse the outcomes of single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) procedure for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried to identify studies reporting on the technical aspects and outcomes of SP RASP. Different combinations of keywords were used, according to a free-text protocol, to identify retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) describing surgical techniques for SP RASP and the associated surgical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: The transvesical approach represents the most common approach for SP RASP. A decrease in terms of estimated blood loss was observed when SP RASP was compared to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) and multi-port (MP) RASP. Furthermore, this technique allowed for a shorter length of hospital stay (LoS) and a lower post-operative complication rate, compared to OSP. Post-operative subjective and objective functional outcomes are satisfying and comparable to OSP and MP RASP. CONCLUSION: SP RASP represents a safe and feasible approach for the surgical management of BPH. It provides comparable surgical and functional outcomes to MP RASP, enabling for minimal invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and potential for improving patient care.

An extraperitoneal single-port robotic approach to low anterior resection-Cadaveric experience.

AIM: A minimally invasive surgery (MIS) extraperitoneal (XP) approach to left-sided colorectal resection utilizing the laparoscopic approach has recently been shown to be safe and feasible and to have potential advantages over the transperitoneal approach, especially in high-risk surgical patients. The aim of this article is to provide a first cadaveric demonstration of the use of a single-port robotic platform in performing XP low anterior resection by MIS. METHOD: A single-port robotic platform (DaVinci®SP™) was used to perform XP single-port low anterior resection in two cadavers with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 19 and 40 kg/m2. RESULTS: The single-port robotic platform with versatile arms was successfully used to perform a complete low anterior resection with splenic flexure mobilization and total mesorectal excision through a single port. CONCLUSIONS: A single-port robotic platform enhances complete XP dissection in the supine patient in extreme BMI ranges. Clinical studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Robot-assisted laparoscopy does not have demonstrable advantages over conventional laparoscopy in endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with endometriosis-related pain and infertility being the leading symptoms. Currently, the gold standard treatment approach to surgery is conventional laparoscopy (CL); however, the increasing availability of robot-assisted surgery is projected as a competitor of CL. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) and CL in endometriosis surgery. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two procedures. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases. Studies investigating different perioperative outcomes of endometriosis-related surgeries were included. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Our search yielded 2,014 records, of which 13 were eligible for data extraction. No significant differences were detected between the CL and RAL groups in terms of intraoperative complications (OR = 1.07, CI 0.43-2.63), postoperative complications (OR = 1.3, CI 0.73-2.32), number of conversions to open surgery (OR = 1.34, CI 0.76-2.37), length of hospital stays (MD = 0.12, CI 0.33-0.57), blood loss (MD = 16.73, CI 4.18-37.63) or number of rehospitalizations (OR = 0.95, CI 0.13-6.75). In terms of operative times (MD = 28.09 min, CI 11.59-44.59) and operating room times (MD = 51.39 min, CI 15.07-87.72;), the RAL technique remained inferior. CONCLUSION: RAL does not have statistically demonstrable advantages over CL in terms of perioperative outcomes for endometriosis-related surgery.

Initial case series experience with robotic-assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery performed with da Vinci single-port system for the excision of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is widely used for rectal lesion excision. Robot-assisted TA TAMIS (R-TAMIS) may improve surgical ergonomics. The introduction of the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robot, designed for endoluminal surgery, has brought new possibilities. Our primary objective herein was to assess the technical and oncological feasibility and efficacy of Single-port robotic TAMIS (SPR-TAMIS) in rectal cancer excision. The secondary objective was to analyze the perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 14 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent SPR-TAMIS between April 2021 and February 2023. Patient data, surgical details, and clinical outcome data were collected to assess the safety and feasibility of SPR-TAMIS. RESULTS: The median participant age was 72 years, and full-thickness excision was performed without specimen fragmentation in all cases. The median tumor diameter was 2.7 cm, positioned between 10 cm proximally and 7 cm distally from the anal verge. Negative margins were achieved in 93% of cases, with one case requiring further resection. The median operative time was 175 min, and the median hospital stay was 5 days. No intraoperative conversion from SPR-TAMIS to laparoscopic or conventional transanal excision was required. No mortalities or major postoperative complications occurred; however, one patient (7.1%) experienced minor morbidity manifesting as wound dehiscence (Clavien-Dindo grade I). No recurrence was observed during the 24-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our early experience, SPR-TAMIS is a safe and feasible surgery for selected early stage rectal cancers, offering enhanced visualization and stable maneuverability transanally. This platform may have potential advantages for the excision of larger or more proximal lesions.

Laparoscopic appendectomy with single port vs conventional access: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Conventional three-access laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) is currently the gold standard treatment, however, Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy (SILA) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis was to evaluate safety and efficacy of SILA compared with conventional approach. METHODS: Per PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CLA vs SILA for acute appendicitis. The randomised Mantel-Haenszel method was used for the meta-analysis. Statistical data analysis was performed with the Review Manager software and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" assessment tool. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (RCTs) were selected (2646 patients). The operative time was significantly longer in the SILA group (MD = 7,32), confirmed in both paediatric (MD = 9,80), (Q = 1,47) and adult subgroups (MD = 5,92), (Q = 55,85). Overall postoperative morbidity was higher in patients who underwent SILA, but the result was not statistically significant. In SILA group were assessed shorter hospital stays, fewer wound infections and higher conversion rate, but the results were not statistically significant. Meta-analysis was not performed about cosmetics of skin scars and postoperative pain because different scales were used in each study. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis show that SILA, although associated with fewer postoperative wound infection, has a significantly longer operative time. Furthermore, the risk of postoperative general complications is still present. Further studies will be required to analyse outcomes related to postoperative pain and the cosmetics of the surgical scar.

Comparing advanced platforms for local excision of rectal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Transanal surgery facilitates organ preservation in select patients with benign and early malignant rectal lesions to avoid the functional consequences of radical surgery. The transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) platform created a standard for local excision with lower margin positivity and recurrence rates than traditional transanal excision. The single-port robot (SP r) presents a promising alternative transanal platform. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative and pathologic outcomes of TEM and SP r for excision of rectal lesions. METHODS: A review of consecutive patients who underwent local excision of rectal lesions at a tertiary referral center from 1/2001 to 5/2022 was performed. Cases were stratified into TEM or SP rTAMIS in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, adjusting for all baseline characteristics. Clinical, tumor-specific, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, and Mann-Whitney U-tests. The main outcomes were oncologic quality measures, complications, and operative time. RESULTS: Matching resulted 50 patients in each cohort. Groups had similar age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, diagnosis, lesion characteristics, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation rates. There were no intraoperative complications in either cohort. Three SP rTAMIS cases were converted intraoperatively; there were no conversions in TEM. SP rTAMIS had significantly shorter operative times than TEM (mean 104 vs. 245, p = 0.027). The rates of positive distal margins (2% TEM, 0% SP rTAMIS) and piecemeal resection (4% TEM, 0% SP rTAMIS) were similar. SP rTAMIS had significantly lower postoperative morbidity rates than TEM (9% vs. 20%, p = 0.031). There was no mortality in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: SP robotics provided high-quality outcomes similar to TEM for local excision of rectal lesions. SP robotics had faster operative time with comparable clinical and oncologic outcomes to TEM. These early data are promising for expanding use of SP robotic platforms.

Reduced-port robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with optimized surgical field deployment: early results of single-site plus-two ports method.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasing globally. Meanwhile, reduced-port RPD (RPRPD) remains uncommon, requiring robot-specific techniques not possible with laparoscopy. We introduce a unique RPRPD technique optimizing surgical field exposure. METHODS: Our RPRPD utilizes a single-site plus-two ports technique, facilitated by a single-port platform through a 5-cm incision. The configuration of robotic arms (arm1, arm2, arm3, and arm4) were strategically designed for optimal procedural efficiency, with the arms2 and arm3, alongside the assistant trocar, mounted on the single-port platform, while the arms1 and arm4 were positioned laterally across the abdomen. Drainage was established via channels created at the arm1 and arm4 insertion sites. A "gooseneck traction" was principally employed with the robotic instrument to prop up the specimen rather than grasp, improving the surgical field's visibility and access. Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RPRPD performed between August 2020 and September 2023 by a single surgeon across two centers in Taiwan and Japan were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent RPRPD using the single-site plus-two ports technique. The gooseneck traction technique enabled goodsurgical field deployment and allowed for unrestricted movement of robotic arms with no collisions with the assistant instruments. The median operative time was 351 min (250-488 min), including 271 min (219-422 min) of console time and three minutes (2-10 min) of docking time. The median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (1-872 mL). All RPRPD procedures were successfully performed without the need for conversion to open surgery. Postoperative major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) was observed in 6 (12%) patients and median postoperative hospital stay was 13 days. CONCLUSIONS: The single-site plus-two ports RPRPD with the gooseneck traction proves to be a safe, feasible option, facilitating surgical field visibility and robotic arm maneuverability.

Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci Single-Port Robot System (DVSP) allows three robotic instruments and an articulated scope to be inserted through a single small incision. It received FDA approval in 2014 and was first introduced in 2018. The aim of this new system was to overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Since then, it has been approved for use only for urologic and transoral surgeries in some countries. It has been used as part of experimental protocols in general surgery. OBJECTIVE: By obtaining the CE mark at the end of January 2024, DVSP will soon enter the European market. This review aims to comprehensively describe the applications of DVSP in general surgery. DESIGN: A search of PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco databases up to March 2024 was conducted, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024536430), following the preferred reporting items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses for scoping review (PRISMA-Scr) guidelines. All the studies about the use of DVSP in general surgery were included. RESULTS: Fifty-six studies were included. The following surgical areas of use were identified: transabdominal and transanal colorectal, cholecystectomy, abdominal wall repair, upper gastroesophageal tract, liver, pancreas, breast, and thyroid surgery. The reported surgical and short-term outcomes are promising; a wide range of procedures have been performed safely. Some groups have found advantages, such as faster discharge, shorter operative time, and less postoperative pain compared to multiport robotic surgery. CONCLUSION: Five years after its initial clinical applications, the use of the DVSP in general surgery procedures has demonstrated feasibility and safety. Hernia repair, cholecystectomy, and colorectal surgery emerge as the most frequently conducted interventions with this robotic system. Nevertheless, there is anticipation for further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods to provide more comprehensive insights and data on the long-term outcomes, including the incidence of incisional hernia.

Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) may offer improved cosmesis, reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery than conventional platforms, but widespread implementation was limited by technical demands. A single-port robotic platform was recently introduced, with components that further enhance SILS benefits without the technical challenges. No study to date has compared the two platforms to validate benefits. Our goal was to compare outcomes of SP robotics and SILS in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A prospective cancer registry was reviewed for CRC patients undergoing curative resection through a SILS or SP robotic approach from 2010 to 2022. Patient and cancer demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were compared in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, adjusting for baseline characteristics. The main outcome measures were complications, operative time, and oncologic quality measures. RESULTS: Matching resulted 50 SP robotic and 50 SILS patients. Cohorts were well matched in all demographics, but SP robotic rectal cancer cases were significantly closer to the anorectal ring than SILS (1.8 cm vs. 3.4 cm, p = 0.018). SP robotic and SILS platforms had similar operative times. Intraoperative conversions was comparable, but more SILS cases required additional ports to be placed (p = 0.040). The intraoperative complications rate, complete total mesorectal excision rates, and lymph node yield were not statistically significantly different. There were no positive margins in either group. Postoperatively, groups had analogous day of return of bowel function, comparable morbidity, and discharge destination. There was no mortality in either group. The length of stay was significantly shorter with SP robotics than SILS (mean 4.135 vs. 5.282 days, median 4 (2-8) vs. 5 (2-14) days; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Single-port robotics provided high quality oncologic surgery, adding the technical benefits of robotics to clinical and cosmetic benefits of single-port surgery. There were comparable operative time, complication rates, and oncologic outcomes in CRC cases, with shorter hospital stays with SP robotics. This early data is encouraging for expansion SP robotic technology.