The comparison of functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures: thermoplastic custom against preprepared commercial braces.

BACKGROUND: Functional humeral bracing of midshaft humeral fractures has been widely accepted as a gold standard for nonoperative treatment. Despite reported high union rates, there is no proven superiority of any orthosis. Here we aim to compare the outcomes after the use of custom-made thermoplastic vs. commercial humeral brace with regard to time to union, nonunion rates, types of nonunion, and conversion to surgery. METHODS: Patients with humeral fractures treated between 2018 and 2021 were identified retrospectively by electronic records. Only diaphyseal humerus fractures (AO 12) were included in the study. Proximal (AO 11) or distal (AO 13) fractures, open fractures, pathologic fractures, bilateral fractures, multiple fractures, and patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Patients attending one center received a custom-made thermoplastic splint, whereas those at the other center had an off-the-shelf humeral brace applied. Radiologic union was defined as healing of at least 3 of 4 cortices determined from follow-up radiographs. Data calculations were performed using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients treated with a thermoplastic brace and 43 with a commercial brace were identified. A total of 52 men were included, and the cohort's mean age was 60.1 years (standard deviation: 16.1 years). Both groups had similar gender and age distributions. More patients achieved union with a thermoplastic brace (79.2%) than those with a commercial brace (76.7%), which was statistically significant (χ2, P = .04). Although time to union was similar both clinically and radiologically, patients with a commercial brace converted to surgical treatment more frequently (11 vs. 14 cases). CONCLUSION: Thermoplastic custom-made braces provide better fracture stability, allowing for statistically significantly higher rates of fracture union during a similar treatment period to commercially available splints. Patients wearing a commercial splint were significantly more likely to develop hypertrophic nonunion requiring surgery.

Tibialis posterior tendon entrapment in posterior malleolar and pilon injuries of the ankle: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Tibialis Posterior tendon (TPT) is the only tendon to encounter the distal tibia and is therefore at greatest risk of injury in fractures of the distal tibia. Although TPT injury has been reported rarely with injuries around the ankle, they often have been missed and present late. AIM: Our aim was to analyse the rate to TPT entrapment in fractures involving the posterior tibia, i.e. Pilon (PLM) and posterior malleolar fractures (PMF). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PMF and Pilon fractures over an 8-year period was undertaken. Patients who had undergone surgical fixation of their PMF or PLM were identified from 2014 to 2022, using our prospectively collected database. Any fracture which had undergone a preoperative CT was included. Analysis of their pre-operative CT imaging was utilised to identify TPT entrapment, where if < 50% of the tendon cross section was present in the fracture site, this was denoted as a minor entrapment and if ≥ 50% of the tendon was present in the fracture site was denoted as major. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients were identified for further analysis, 220 who had a PMF and 143 with PLM injury. The incidence of TPT entrapment was 22% (n = 79) with 64 minor and 15 major entrapments. If the fracture line entered the TPT sheath, there was a 45% rate (72/172) of entrapment as compared to 3.7% (7/190) in fractures not entering the sheath (p < .001). There was no significant difference in TPT entrapment in PMF as compared to PML (p = 0.353). CONCLUSION: In our assessment, we found significant prevalence of 22% of TPT entrapment in fractures involving the posterior tibia. PMF and PLF had no statistically significant difference in the rate of TPT entrapment. Additionally, we found that there was a significant risk of TPT entrapment when the CT images display the fracture line entering the tendon sheath. We recommend that surgeons consider taking care assessing pre-operative imaging to seek to identify the TPT and to assess intraoperatively where entrapment does occur.

Maintaining Postgraduate Healthcare Education During COVID-19: Does a Virtual Format Allow Effective Engagement and Personal Development?

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges in health care, leading to a dramatic change in service provision and impacting surgical training. The availability of a virtual meeting platform allowed our team to develop a new educational programme aiming to maintain an ethos of education safely, focusing on providing an opportunity to develop non-technical skills and maintain reflective practice. Materials and Methods Microsoft Teams was used to conduct two streams of weekly education: a journal club focussing on developing critical evaluation skills, and case-based in-depth discussion forum to develop presentation skills and evidence-based management. A questionnaire after 10 weeks was used to evaluate the effectiveness and engagement of the two streams. Results Fifty-three responses were received. Seventy-two percent felt that their engagement in teaching was increased on a virtual platform. There was 88% satisfaction with the platform. Reflective practice increased and 40% of respondents felt their non-technical skills improved. Sixty-eight percent stated that they would like to continue the virtual format going forward and 88% would recommend this to their peers. Ninety-two percent felt that the platform played a pivotal role in helping maintain team morale during this period. Conclusion Our experience of using a virtual tool to maintain education within our department is very positive. There has been good engagement with positive reflection and learning at a time of great change in the NHS. Both trainees and non-trainees have benefited. With ongoing COVID still influencing clinical practice, we recommend utilising virtual platforms to maintain education in surgical departments.

Neck of Femur Fractures in the First Eight Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients have significant 30-day mortality. The incidence of NOF fractures remained high during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United Kingdom. Consequently, numerous cases were complicated with concurrent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies from the United Kingdom related to NOF fractures and 30-day mortality outcomes during the pandemic.   A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two reviewers independently searched on Medline for studies that were published between the 1st of March 2020 and the 1st of November 2020 in the United Kingdom. The following outcomes were compared: 30-day mortality, time to surgery, and anaesthetic risk.   A total of five articles were included in this review. In total, 286 patients with NOF fractures and COVID-19 infection were identified, with 30-day mortality ranging from 30.5% to 50% (odds ratio = 6.02; 95% confidence interval = 4.10-8.85; χ2 = 4.82; I2 = 58%). Increased time to surgery due to COVID-19-related delays was also noted for the majority of patients in some studies. Mortality scores (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score) failed to accurately predict the mortality risk. Concurrent infection of COVID-19 in patients with NOF fractures increases the 30-day mortality sixfold compared to the COVID-19-negative group. Efforts should be made to optimise time to surgery as well as consideration of postoperative care in higher dependency units. Future updates in mortality predicting scores should include COVID-19 infection as a significant factor.

Osteointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated collars in cemented massive endoprostheses following revision surgery.

AIMS: Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated collars have been shown to reduce aseptic loosening of massive endoprostheses following primary surgery. Limited information exists about their effectiveness in revision surgery. The aim of this study was to radiologically assess osteointegration to HA-coated collars of cemented massive endoprostheses following revision surgery. METHODS: Retrospective review of osseointegration frequency, pattern, and timing to a specific HA-coated collar on massive endoprostheses used in revision surgery at our tertiary referral centre between 2010 to 2017 was undertaken. Osseointegration was radiologically classified on cases with a minimum follow-up of six months. RESULTS: In all, 39 patients underwent radiological review at mean 43.5 months; 22/39 (56.4%) showed no osseointegration to the collar. Revision endoprostheses for aseptic loosening were less likely to show osseointegration compared with other indications for revision. Oncological cases with previous or current infection were more likely to show osseointegration to ≥ 1 collar side than those without evidence of prior infection. CONCLUSION: This seven-year review identified osseointegration of HA-coated collars after revision surgery is less likely (43.6%, 17/39) than after primary surgery. Young patients who undergo revision surgery following initial oncological indication may benefit the most from this collar design. Use in revision oncological cases with a history of infection may be beneficial. HA-coated collars showed limited benefit for patients undergoing revision for failed arthroplasty with history of infection. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):371-379.