Incidentally exploring natural course of a rare entity: representative case for rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors.

Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors (RGNT) are extremely rare mostly benign tumors of the central nervous system, which are often studied for its histological aspects despite relatively small numbers of clinical especially radiological knowledge.Despite the increasing number of publications on different localizations and treatment protocols, the morphologic and temporal development process of this rare tumor entity is not clear. We were able to coincidentally observe the entire course of the tumor growth of a RGNT on subsequent MRI examinations in a typical case with mild clinical symptoms and no other neurological illnesses, thus possible clinical complications were prevented.

Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for more effective therapies for glioblastoma. Data from a previous unrandomised phase 2 trial suggested that lomustine-temozolomide plus radiotherapy might be superior to temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylation of the MGMT promoter. In the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, we aimed to further investigate the effect of lomustine-temozolomide therapy in the setting of a randomised phase 3 trial. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients from 17 German university hospitals who were aged 18-70 years, with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter, and a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70% and higher. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a predefined SAS-generated randomisation list to standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (75 mg/m2 per day concomitant to radiotherapy [59-60 Gy] followed by six courses of temozolomide 150-200 mg/m2 per day on the first 5 days of the 4-week course) or to up to six courses of lomustine (100 mg/m2 on day 1) plus temozolomide (100-200 mg/m2 per day on days 2-6 of the 6-week course) in addition to radiotherapy (59-60 Gy). Because of the different schedules, patients and physicians were not masked to treatment groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the modified intention-to-treat population, comprising all randomly assigned patients who started their allocated chemotherapy. The prespecified test for overall survival differences was a log-rank test stratified for centre and recursive partitioning analysis class. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01149109. FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2011, and April 8, 2014, 141 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups; 129 patients (63 in the temozolomide and 66 in the lomustine-temozolomide group) constituted the modified intention-to-treat population. Median overall survival was improved from 31·4 months (95% CI 27·7-47·1) with temozolomide to 48·1 months (32·6 months-not assessable) with lomustine-temozolomide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0492 for log-rank analysis). A significant overall survival difference between groups was also found in a secondary analysis of the intention-to-treat population (n=141, HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0432 for log-rank analysis). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 32 (51%) of 63 patients in the temozolomide group and 39 (59%) of 66 patients in the lomustine-temozolomide group. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that lomustine-temozolomide chemotherapy might improve survival compared with temozolomide standard therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter. The findings should be interpreted with caution, owing to the small size of the trial. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Longitudinal MRI findings in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma after intraoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-radiation treatment effects (pseudoprogression/radionecrosis) may bias MRI-based tumor response evaluation. To understand these changes specifically after high doses of radiotherapy, we analyzed MRIs of patients enrolled in the INTRAGO study (NCT02104882), a phase I/II dose-escalation trial of intraoperative radiotherapy (20-40 Gy) in glioblastoma. METHODS: INTRAGO patients were evaluated and compared to control patients who received standard therapy with focus on contrast enhancement patterns/volume, T2 lesion volume, and mean rCBV. RESULTS: Overall, 11/15 (73.3%) INTRAGO patients (median age 60 years) were included. Distant failure was observed in 7/11 (63.6%) patients, local tumor recurrence in one patient (9.1%). On the first follow-up MRI all but one patient demonstrated enhancement of varying patterns around the resection cavity which were: in 2/11 (18.2%) patients thin and linear, in 7/11 (63.6%) combined linear and nodular, and in 1/11 (9.1%) voluminous, indistinct, and mesh-like. In the course of treatment, most patients developed the latter two patterns (8/11 [72.7%]). INTRAGO patients demonstrated more often combined linear and nodular and/or voluminous, indistinct, mesh-like components (8/11 [72.7%]) in comparison to control patients (3/12 [25%], P = 0.02). INTRAGO patients demonstrated significantly increasing enhancing lesion (P = 0.001) and T2 lesion volumes (P < 0.001) in the longitudinal non-parametric analysis in comparison to the control group. rCBV showed no significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of radiotherapy to the tumor cavity result in more pronounced enhancement patterns/volumes and T2 lesion volumes. These results will be useful for the response evaluation of patients exposed to high doses of radiotherapy in future studies.

Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning with lomustine-temozolomide versus temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-methylated glioblastoma (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial showed significantly longer overall survival with combined lomustine-temozolomide therapy compared with standard temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter. The trial also aimed to investigate the effect of lomustine-temozolomide therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and neurocognitive function, which we report here. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial, newly diagnosed, chemoradiotherapy-naive patients with MGMT-methylated glioblastoma, aged 18-70 years, with a Karnofsky performance score of 70% or higher, were recruited and enrolled at 17 university hospitals in Germany. Patients received standard radiotherapy (60 Gy) and were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by centre by allocating complete blocks of six to a centre, without masking) to either six 6-week courses of oral combined lomustine (100 mg/m2 on day 1) plus temozolomide (100-200 mg/m2 on days 2-6) or standard oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily during radiotherapy plus six 4-week courses of temozolomide [150-200 mg/m2] on days 1-5, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival. HRQOL, assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core-30 and the EORTC brain cancer module (BN20); and neurocognitive function, assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), plus a neurocognitive test battery (NOA-07), including Trail Making Test A and B (TMT-A and B), working memory tests, and tests for lexical (Controlled Oral Word Association [COWA]) and semantic verbal fluency, were secondary endpoints analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT; all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study chemotherapy). We used linear mixed-model analyses to investigate differences between treatment groups regarding HRQOL (clinically relevant ≥10 points) and MMSE scores (clinically relevant ≥3 points). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01149109. FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2011 and April 8, 2014, 141 patients were randomly assigned and 129 patients began treatment and were included in the mITT population (63 in the temozolomide and 66 in the lomustine-temozolomide group). Median follow-up for HRQOL (the item global health) was 19·4 months (IQR 7·8-38·6), for MMSE was 15·3 months (4·1-29·6), and for COWA was 11·0 months (0-27·5). We found no significant impairment regarding any item of HRQOL in the lomustine-temozolomide group (difference between the groups for global health 0·30 [95% CI -0·23 to 0·83]; p=0·26). Differences in MMSE were in favour of the temozolomide group (difference -0·11 [95% CI -0·19 to -0·03]; p=0·0058) but were not clinically relevant (1·76/30 points over 4 years). We found no significant difference between the groups in any subtest of the neurocognitive test battery (difference for COWA 0·04 [95% CI -0·01 to 0·09]; p=0·14). INTERPRETATION: The absence of systematic and clinically relevant changes in HRQOL and neurocognitive function combined with the survival benefit of lomustine-temozolomide versus temozolomide alone suggests that a long-term net clinical benefit exists for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylation of the MGMT promoter and supports the use of lomustine-temozolomide as a treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for surgically resected brain metastases: outcome analysis of an international cooperative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The ideal delivery of radiation to the surgical cavity of brain metastases (BMs) remains the subject of debate. Risks of local failure (LF) and radiation necrosis (RN) have prompted a reappraisal of the timing and/or modality of this critical component of BM management. IORT delivered at the time of resection for BMs requiring surgery offers the potential for improved local control (LC) afforded by the elimination of delay in time to initiation of radiation following surgery, decreased uncertainty in target delineation, and the possibility of dose escalation beyond that seen in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study provides a retrospective analysis with identification of potential predictors of outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective data was collected on patients treated with IORT immediately following surgical resection of BMs at three institutions according to the approval of individual IRBs. All patients were treated with 50kV portable linear accelerator using spherical applicators ranging from 1.5 to 4.0 cm. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS with endpoints of LC, DBC, incidence of RN, and overall survival (OS) and p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: 54 patients were treated with IORT with a median age of 64 years. The most common primary diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer (40%) with the most common location in the frontal lobe (38%). Median follow-up was 7.2 months and 1-year LC, DBC, and OS were 88%, 58%, and 73%, respectively. LMD was identified in 2 patients (3%) and RN present in 4 patients (7%). The only predictor of LC was extent of resection with 1-year LC of 94% for GTR versus 62% for STR (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: IORT is a safe and effective means of delivering adjuvant radiation to the BM resection cavities with high rates of LC and low incidence of RN. Further studies are warranted directly comparing LC outcomes to SRS.

Heterogeneity of glioblastoma with gliomatosis cerebri growth pattern on diffusion and perfusion MRI.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is a rare growth pattern of glioblastoma whose diffuse nature is reflected by unspecific, relatively uniform findings on conventional MRI. In the present study we sought to evaluate the additional value of diffusion (DWI) and perfusion weighted (PWI) MRI for a more detailed characterization. METHODS: We analyzed the MRI findings in patients with histologically proven glioblastoma with GC growth pattern with a specific emphasis on T2 lesion pattern, volume, relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rACD), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and compared these to age-/gender-matched patients with localized glioblastoma. RESULTS: Overall, 16 patients (median age 59.5 years, 4 male) were included in the study. Of these, 8 patients had a glioblastoma with GC growth pattern, and 8 a classical localized growth pattern. While the median rADC (1.27 [IQR 1.12-1.41]) within the T2 lesion was significant lower in glioblastoma with GC growth pattern compared to localized glioblastoma (1.74 [IQR 1.45-1.96]; p = 0.003), the median T2 lesion volume and rCBV within the T2 lesion did not differ significantly. Furthermore, six patients with glioblastoma with GC growth pattern showed focal areas with significantly reduced rADC (p = 0.043), and/or increased rCBV (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Lower rADC in glioblastoma with GC growth pattern might reflect the diffuse tumor cell infiltration whereas focal areas with decreased rADC and/or increased rCBV probably indicate high tumor cell density and/or abnormal tumor vessels which may be useful for biopsy guidance.

DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The WHO classification of brain tumours describes 15 subtypes of meningioma. Nine of these subtypes are allotted to WHO grade I, and three each to grade II and grade III. Grading is based solely on histology, with an absence of molecular markers. Although the existing classification and grading approach is of prognostic value, it harbours shortcomings such as ill-defined parameters for subtypes and grading criteria prone to arbitrary judgment. In this study, we aimed for a comprehensive characterisation of the entire molecular genetic landscape of meningioma to identify biologically and clinically relevant subgroups. METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective analysis, we investigated genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of meningiomas from ten European academic neuro-oncology centres to identify distinct methylation classes of meningiomas. The methylation classes were further characterised by DNA copy number analysis, mutational profiling, and RNA sequencing. Methylation classes were analysed for progression-free survival outcomes by the Kaplan-Meier method. The DNA methylation-based and WHO classification schema were compared using the Brier prediction score, analysed in an independent cohort with WHO grading, progression-free survival, and disease-specific survival data available, collected at the Medical University Vienna (Vienna, Austria), assessing methylation patterns with an alternative methylation chip. FINDINGS: We retrospectively collected 497 meningiomas along with 309 samples of other extra-axial skull tumours that might histologically mimic meningioma variants. Unsupervised clustering of DNA methylation data clearly segregated all meningiomas from other skull tumours. We generated genome-wide DNA methylation profiles from all 497 meningioma samples. DNA methylation profiling distinguished six distinct clinically relevant methylation classes associated with typical mutational, cytogenetic, and gene expression patterns. Compared with WHO grading, classification by individual and combined methylation classes more accurately identifies patients at high risk of disease progression in tumours with WHO grade I histology, and patients at lower risk of recurrence among WHO grade II tumours (p=0·0096) from the Brier prediction test). We validated this finding in our independent cohort of 140 patients with meningioma. INTERPRETATION: DNA methylation-based meningioma classification captures clinically more homogenous groups and has a higher power for predicting tumour recurrence and prognosis than the WHO classification. The approach presented here is potentially very useful for stratifying meningioma patients to observation-only or adjuvant treatment groups. We consider methylation-based tumour classification highly relevant for the future diagnosis and treatment of meningioma. FUNDING: German Cancer Aid, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, and DKFZ/Heidelberg Institute of Personalized Oncology/Precision Oncology Program.

Metronomic chemotherapy with daily low-dose temozolomide and celecoxib in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective analysis.

Chemotherapy is often omitted in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme due to a fear of side effects. We applied metronomic chemotherapy with low-dose temozolomide and celecoxib (LD-TEM/CEL) during and after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and here report on how this regimen compares to standard temozolomide radiochemotherapy (SD-TEM) in elderly patients. We retrospectively analyzed records of 146 patients aged 65 years and older that underwent EBRT. Factors of interest were age, performance status, comorbidities, MGMT status, therapy (resection/biopsy, radiotherapy/dose, chemotherapy/regimen/dose), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) status. Irrespective of the regimen, addition of chemotherapy more than doubled median survival rates (EBRT only: 4.2 months; EBRT + LD-TEM/CEL: 8.5 months; EBRT + SD-TEM: 10.8 months; p ≤ 0.008). Although patients receiving metronomic LD-TEM/CEL were significantly older (62 % were ≥75 years vs. 22 %; p < 0.001), had significantly lower performance scores (50 % had a KPS <70 vs. 28 %; p = 0.049) and were significantly more comorbid (73 % had ≥4 comorbidities vs. 37 %; p = 0.002) than patients of the SD-TEM group, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS. Independent of other factors, omission of chemotherapy significantly impairs progression-free and overall survival. With all the limitations of a retrospective analysis, our data suggest that metronomic chemotherapy with LD-TEM/CEL may be equieffective and eventually better tolerated than SD-TEM. It may be offered to elderly patients that are not eligible for standard chemotherapy.

²³Na-MRI of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme after intraoperative radiotherapy: technical note.

INTRODUCTION: We report the first case of an intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in a patient with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who was followed up with a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method-(23)Na-MRI-in comparison to a standard contrast-enhanced (1)H-MRI and (18)F-FET-PET. METHODS: A 56-year-old female patient with diagnosed GBM in July 2012 underwent tumor resection, radiochemotherapy, and three cycles of chemotherapy. After a relapse, 6 months after the initial diagnosis, an IORT was recommended which was performed in March 2013 using the INTRABEAM system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) with a 3-cm applicator and a surface dose of 20 Gy. Early post-operative contrast-enhanced and 1-month follow-up (1)H-MRI and a (18)F-FET-PET were performed. In addition, an IRB-approved (23)Na-MRI was performed on a 3.0-T MR scanner (MAGNETOM TimTrio, Siemens Healthcare, Germany). RESULTS: After re-surgery and IORT in March 2013, only a faint contrast enhancement but considerable surrounding edema was visible at the medio-posterior resection margins. In April 2013, new and progressive contrast enhancement, edema, (23)Na content, and increased uptake in the (18)F-FET-PET were visible, indicating tumor recurrence. Increased sodium content within the area of contrast enhancement was found in the (23)Na-MRI, but also exceeding this area, very similar to the increased uptake depicted in the (18)F-FET-PET. The clearly delineable zone of edema in both examinations exhibits a lower (23)Na content compared to areas with suspected proliferating tumor tissue. CONCLUSION: (23)Na-MRI provided similar information in the suspicious area compared to (18)F-FET-PET, exceeding conventional (1)H-MRI. Still, (23)Na-MRI remains an investigational technique, which is worth to be further evaluated.

INTRAGO: intraoperative radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme­a phase I/II dose escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite multimodal therapies, almost all GBM recur within a narrow margin around the initial resected lesion. Thus, novel therapeutic intensification strategies must target both, the population of dispersed tumor cells around the cavity and the postoperative microenvironment. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a pragmatic and effective approach to sterilize the margins from persistent tumor cells, abrogate post-injury proliferative stimuli and to bridge the therapeutic gap between surgery and radiochemotherapy. Therefore, we have set up INTRAGO, a phase I/II dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IORT added to standard therapy in newly diagnosed GBM. In contrast to previous approaches, the study involves the application of isotropic low-energy (kV) x-rays delivered by spherical applicators, providing optimal irradiation properties to the resection cavity. METHODS/DESIGN: INTRAGO includes patients aged 50 years or older with a Karnofsky performance status of at least 50% and a histologically confirmed (frozen sections) supratentorial GBM. Safety and tolerability (i.e., the maximum tolerated dose, MTD) will be assessed using a classical 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are wound healing deficits or infections requiring surgical intervention, IORT-related cerebral bleeding or ischemia, symptomatic brain necrosis requiring surgical intervention and early termination of external beam radiotherapy (before the envisaged dose of 60 Gy) due to radiotoxicity. Secondary end points are progression-free and overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT02104882 (Registration Date: 03/26/2014).

Advanced Imaging of Shunt Valves in Cranial CT Scans with Photon-Counting Scanner.

This brief report aimed to show the utility of photon-counting technology alongside standard cranial imaging protocols for visualizing shunt valves in a patient's cranial computed tomography scan. Photon-counting CT scans with cranial protocols were retrospectively surveyed and four types of shunt valves were encountered: proGAV 2.0®, M.blue®, Codman Certas®, and proSA®. These scans were compared with those obtained from non-photon-counting scanners at different time points for the same patients. The analysis of these findings demonstrated the usefulness of photon-counting technology for the clear and precise visualization of shunt valves without any additional radiation or special reconstruction patterns. The enhanced utility of photon-counting is highlighted by providing superior spatial resolution compared to other CT detectors. This technology facilitates a more accurate characterization of shunt valves and may support the detection of subtle abnormalities and a precise assessment of shunt valves.

Multicentric Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combinatorial Adjuvant Brain Metastasis Treatment by Intraoperative Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: After surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) provides a promising alternative to adjuvant external beam radiation therapy by enabling superior organ-at-risk preservation, reduction of in-hospital times, and timely admission to subsequent systemic treatments, which increasingly comprise novel targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of IORT in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other targeted therapies (TTs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a multicentric approach incorporating individual patient data from 6 international IORT centers, all patients with BMs undergoing IORT were retrospectively assessed for combinatorial treatment with ICIs/TTs and evaluated for toxicity and cumulative rates, including wound dehiscence, radiation necrosis, leptomeningeal spread, local control, distant brain progression (DBP), and estimated overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 103 lesions with a median diameter of 34 mm receiving IORT combined with immunomodulatory systemic treatment or other TTs were included. The median follow-up was 13.2 (range, 1.2-102.4) months, and the median IORT dose was 25 (range, 18-30) Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. There was 1 grade 3 adverse event related to IORT recorded (2.2%). A 4.9% cumulative radiation necrosis rate was observed. The 1-year local control rate was 98.0%, and the 1-year DBP-free survival rate was 60.0%. Median time to DBP was 5.5 (range, 1.0-18.5) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing DBP, and the cumulative leptomeningeal spread rate was 4.9%. The median estimated overall survival was 26 (range, 1.2 to not reached) months with a 1-year survival rate of 74.0%. Early initiation of immunotherapy/TTs was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward improved DBP rate and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ICIs/TTs with IORT for resected BMs does not seem to increase toxicity and yields encouraging local control outcomes in the difficult-to-treat subgroup of larger BMs. Time gaps between surgery and systemic treatment could be shortened or avoided. The definitive role of IORT in local control after BM resection will be defined in a prospective trial.

AKT1E17K mutations cluster with meningothelial and transitional meningiomas and can be detected by SFRP1 immunohistochemistry.

The activating E17K mutation in the AKT1 gene has been detected in several tumor entities. Currently several clinical studies with specific AKT1 inhibitors are under way. To determine whether AKT1 mutations are involved in human tumors of the nervous system, we examined a series of 1,437 tumors including 391 primary intracranial brain tumors and 1,046 tumors of the coverings of the central and peripheral nervous system. AKT1E17K mutations were exclusively seen in meningiomas and occurred in 65 of 958 of these tumors. A strong preponderance was seen in the variant of meningothelial meningioma WHO grade I of basal and spinal localization. In contrast, AKT1E17K mutations were rare in WHO grade II and absent in WHO grade III meningiomas. In order to more effectively detect this mutation, we tested for immunohistochemical markers associated with this alteration. We observed strong up-regulation of SFRP1 expression in all meningiomas with AKT1E17K mutation and in HEK293 cells after transfection with mutant AKT1E17K, but not in meningiomas and HEK293 cells lacking this mutation.

Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases.

Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.

Optimized Intraoperative Imaging for Stereotactic Planning with a Multiaxial Robotic C-arm System: Technical Note and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative preparation of the planning dataset for frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy is often associated with logistical effort and burden on the patient. Intraoperative imaging modalities need to be investigated to overcome these limitations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop and apply a new method for the intraoperative acquisition of the planning dataset with the multiaxial robotic C-arm system Artis zeego. METHODS: An indication-customized dose-reduced protocol for Artis zeego was developed and implemented into the workflow. A sample of 14 patients who had undergone intraoperative imaging with Artis zeego was analyzed. A sample of 10 patients with conventional preoperative imaging by cranial computed tomography (CT) was used as a control group. Outcomes were compared with regard to target deviation, diagnostic value of the biopsies, complications, and procedure time. RESULTS: In all patients, a suitable intraoperative planning dataset could be acquired with Artis zeego. Total procedure time was shorter for the Artis zeego group (p = 0.01), whereas time in the operating room area was longer in the Artis zeego group (p = 0.04). Biopsy results were diagnostic in 12 patients (86%) in the Artis zeego group and in 8 patients (80%) in the control group. There were no significant differences in target size, trajectory length, or target deviation. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative imaging for frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy with Artis zeego is an easy and feasible method. Accuracy is comparable to conventional CT, whereas radiation exposure could be additionally reduced. It allows a significant reduction of the total procedure length and improves the comfort for the patient and staff.

Molecular features of glioblastomas in long-term survivors compared to short-term survivors-a matched-pair analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although glioblastoma (GB) is associated with a devastating prognosis, a small proportion of patients achieve long-term survival rates. We herein present a matched-pair analysis of molecular factors found in long- and short-term survivors (LTS, STS). METHODS: We performed a cross-institutional analysis of 262 patient records and matched a group of 91 LTS (≥ 3 years) with two groups of STS (STS-1, n = 91; STS-2, n = 80). Matching was performed according to age, Karnofsky Performance Status, initial therapy and adjuvant therapy. Molecular factors were compared between LTS (total of 91 patients) v. STS-1, and LTS (subgroup of 80 patients) v. STS-2. We included glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH-1); furthermore, the proliferation index was analyzed (Ki-67/MIB-1). RESULTS: IDH-1 and decreased Ki-67 were numerically associated with LTS but the difference was only significant compared to STS-1 (n.s. v. STS-2). LTS was associated with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (p = 0.013 and p = 0.022) and GFAP expression (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). Positivity for both factors combined compared to negativity for one factor occurred more often in the LTS group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006); negativity for both factors combined did not occur in the LTS group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, GFAP expression and MGMT promoter methylation were associated with LTS. Given the hypothesis-generating nature of our study, these observations should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for glioblastoma: an international pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: To report the results of the first international pooled analysis of patients with glioblastoma treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in addition to standard of care therapy. METHODS: Data from 51 patients treated at five centers in Germany, China and Peru were analyzed. All patients underwent tumor resection followed by a single application of IORT (10-40 Gy, prescribed to the applicator surface) with low-energy X-rays. Thereafter, standard adjuvant radiochemotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy were applied. Factors of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS (L-PFS; defined as appearance of new lesions ≤1 cm to the cavity border) and distant PFS (D-PFS; lesions >1 cm). The same endpoints were estimated at 1-, 2- and 3-years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, rates and severity (as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0) of radionecrosis (RN) were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years (range: 16-75) and the median Karnofsky Performance Status was 80 (20-100). At a median follow-up of 18.0 months (2-42.4), the median OS, PFS, L-PFS and D-PFS were 18.0 months (95% CI: 14.7-21.3), 11.4 months (95%CI: 7.58-15.22), 16 months (95%CI: 10.21-21.8) and 30.0 months (95%CI: 18.59 - 41.41), respectively. The estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year OS, PFS, L-PFS and D-PFS were 79.5%, 38.7% and 25.6%; 46.2%, 29.4%, and 5.9%; 60.9, 37.9%, and 12.6%; and 76.7%, 65.0%, and 39.0% respectively. First progression occurred locally in only 35.3% of cases. Grade 1 RN was detected in 7.8% and grade 3 in 17.6% of the patients. No grade 4 toxicity was reported and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared to historical data, this pooled analysis suggests improved efficacy and safety of IORT with low-energy X-rays for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Prospective data is warranted to confirm these findings.

Study Protocol: Early Stereotactic Gamma Knife Radiosurgery to Residual Tumor After Surgery of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (Gamma-GBM).

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adult patients. Tumor recurrence commonly occurs around the resection cavity, especially after subtotal resection (STR). Consequently, the extent of resection correlates with overall survival (OS), suggesting that depletion of postoperative tumor remnants will improve outcome. OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of adding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the standard treatment of GBM in patients with postoperative residual tumor. METHODS: Gamma-GBM is a single center, open-label, prospective, single arm, phase II study that includes patients with newly diagnosed GBM (intraoperative via frozen sections) who underwent STR (residual tumor will be identified by native and contrast enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans). All patients will receive SRS with 15 Gy (prescribed to the 50% isodose enclosing all areas of residual tumor) early (within 24-72 h) after surgery. Thereafter, all patients undergo standard-of-care therapy for GBM (radiochemotherapy with 60 Gy external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] plus concomitant temozolomide and 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy). The primary outcome is median progression-free survival, secondary outcomes are median OS, occurrence of radiation induced acute (<3 wk), early delayed (<3 mo), and late (>3 mo post-SRS) neurotoxicity and incidence of symptomatic radionecrosis. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We expect to detect efficacy and safety signals by the immediate application of SRS to standard-of-care therapy in newly diagnosed GBM. DISCUSSION: Early postoperative SRS to areas of residual tumor could bridge the therapeutic gap between surgery and adjuvant therapies.

Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (INTRAGO): An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase I/II Trial.

BACKGROUND: The median time to recurrence of glioblastoma (GB) following multimodal treatment is ∼7 mo. Nearly all cancers recur locally, suggesting that augmenting local treatments may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to the resection cavity is safe and effective. METHODS: INTRAGO was a phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IORT with 20 to 40 Gy of low-energy photons in addition to standard radiochemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02685605). The primary endpoint was safety as per occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also performed an exploratory analysis of the local PFS (L-PFS), defined as recurrence within 1 cm of the treated margin. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated at 3 dose levels. Of these, 13 underwent incomplete resection, 6 had unresected satellites, and 3 did not receive per-protocol treatment (PPT). The MGMT promoter was unmethylated in 10 patients. The median follow-up was 13.8 mo. The majority of grade 3 to 5 adverse events were deemed unrelated to IORT. Five cases of radionecrosis were observed, 2 were classified as grade 3 events. Other grade 3 events judged related to radiotherapy (external-beam radiotherapy and/or IORT) were wound dehiscence (n = 1), CSF leakage (n = 1), cyst formation (n = 1). No IORT-related deaths occurred. The median PFS was 11.2 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4-17.0) for all patients and 11.3 mo (95% CI: 10.9-11.6) for those receiving PPT. The median L-PFS was 14.3 mo (95% CI: 8.4-20.2) for all patients and 17.8 mo (95% CI: 9.7-25.9) for those receiving PPT. The median OS was 16.2 mo (95% CI: 11.1-21.4) for all patients and 17.8 mo (95% CI: 13.9-21.7) for those receiving PPT. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that IORT is associated with manageable toxicity. Considering the limitations of a 15-patient phase I/II trial, further studies aimed at assessing an outcome benefit are warranted.

Combined stereotactic biopsy and stepping-source interstitial irradiation of glioblastoma multiforme.

Patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme receiving stereotactic biopsy only either due to tumor localization or impaired clinical status face a devastating prognosis with very short survival times. One strategy to provide an initial cytoreductive and palliative therapy at the time of the stereotactic biopsy is interstitial irradiation through the pre-defined trajectory of the biopsy channel. We designed a novel treatment planning system and evaluated the treatment potential of a fixed-source and a stepping-source algorithm for interstitial radiosurgery on non-spherical glioblastoma in direct adjacency to risk structures. Using both setups, we show that radiation doses delivered to 100% of the gross tumor volume shifts from sub-therapeutic (10-12 Gy) to sterilizing single doses (25-30 Gy) when using the stepping source algorithm due to improved sparing of organs-at-risk. Specifically, the maximum doses at the brain stem were 100% of the PTV dose when a fixed central source and 38% when a stepping-source algorithm was used. We also demonstrated precision of intracranial target points and stability of superficial and deep trajectories using both a phantom and a body donor study. Our setup now for the first time provides a basis for a clinical proof-of-concept trial and may widen palliation options for patients with limited life expectancy that should not undergo time-consuming therapies.