Current management of xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients.

Radiotherapy (RT) continues to play a key role in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC). Xerostomia remains a principal detriment to the quality of life (QoL) for 80 % of surviving patients receiving head and neck radiation. Radiation-induced injury to the salivary glands is dose-dependent, and thus efforts have been focused on decreasing radiation to the salivary glands. Decreased saliva production reduces both short-term and long-term quality of life in head and neck survivors by impacting on taste and contributing to dysphagia. Several radioprotective agents to the salivary gland have been investigated. Although not widely practiced, surgical transfer of the submandibular gland prior to RT is the mainstay of surgical options in preventing xerostomia. This review focuses on the strategies to improve xerostomia following radiation therapy in head and neck cancers.

Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab-an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor-can preserve high survival and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. We investigated whether cetuximab would maintain a high proportion of patient survival and reduce acute and late toxicity. METHODS: RTOG 1016 was a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial at 182 health-care centres in the USA and Canada. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition clinical categories T1-T2, N2a-N3 M0 or T3-T4, N0-N3 M0; Zubrod performance status 0 or 1; age at least 18 years; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive either radiotherapy plus cetuximab or radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks, and patients were stratified by T category (T1-T2 vs T3-T4), N category (N0-N2a vs N2b-N3), Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1), and tobacco smoking history (≤10 pack-years vs >10 pack-years). Patients were assigned to receive either intravenous cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 5-7 days before radiotherapy initiation, followed by cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly for seven doses (total 2150 mg/m2), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 of radiotherapy (total 200 mg/m2). All patients received accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 6 weeks at six fractions per week (with two fractions given on one day, at least 6 h apart). The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death from any cause, with non-inferiority margin 1·45. Primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat approach, whereby all patients meeting eligibility criteria are included. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01302834. FINDINGS: Between June 9, 2011, and July 31, 2014, 987 patients were enrolled, of whom 849 were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy plus cetuximab (n=425) or radiotherapy plus cisplatin (n=424). 399 patients assigned to receive cetuximab and 406 patients assigned to receive cisplatin were subsequently eligible. After median follow-up duration of 4·5 years, radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·45, one-sided 95% upper CI 1·94; p=0·5056 for non-inferiority; one-sided log-rank p=0·0163). Estimated 5-year overall survival was 77·9% (95% CI 73·4-82·5) in the cetuximab group versus 84·6% (80·6-88·6) in the cisplatin group. Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 1·72, 95% CI 1·29-2·29; p=0·0002; 5-year progression-free survival 67·3%, 95% CI 62·4-72·2 vs 78·4%, 73·8-83·0), and locoregional failure was significantly higher in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 2·05, 95% CI 1·35-3·10; 5-year proportions 17·3%, 95% CI 13·7-21·4 vs 9·9%, 6·9-13·6). Proportions of acute moderate to severe toxicity (77·4%, 95% CI 73·0-81·5 vs 81·7%, 77·5-85·3; p=0·1586) and late moderate to severe toxicity (16·5%, 95% CI 12·9-20·7 vs 20·4%, 16·4-24·8; p=0·1904) were similar between the cetuximab and cisplatin groups. INTERPRETATION: For patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy plus cetuximab showed inferior overall survival and progression-free survival compared with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin is the standard of care for eligible patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute USA, Eli Lilly, and The Oral Cancer Foundation.

Individualized survival prediction for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in the human papillomavirus era.

BACKGROUND: Accurate, individualized prognostication in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is vital for patient counseling and treatment decision making. With the emergence of human papillomavirus (HPV) as an important biomarker in OPSCC, calculators incorporating this variable have been developed. However, it is critical to characterize their accuracy prior to implementation. METHODS: Four OPSCC calculators were identified that integrate HPV into their estimation of 5-year overall survival. Treatment outcomes for 856 patients with OPSCC who were evaluated at a single institution from 2003 through 2016 were analyzed. Predicted survival probabilities were generated for each patient using each calculator. Calculator performance was assessed and compared using Kaplan-Meier plots, receiver operating characteristic curves, concordance statistics, and calibration plots. RESULTS: Correlation between pairs of calculators varied, with coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.90. Only 3 of 6 pairs of calculators yielded predictions within 10% of each other for at least 50% of patients. Kaplan-Meier curves of calculator-defined risk groups demonstrated reasonable stratification. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.74 to 0.80, and concordance statistics ranged from 0.71 to 0.78. Each calculator demonstrated superior discriminatory ability compared with clinical staging according to the seventh and eighth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. Among models, the Denmark calculator was found to be best calibrated to observed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Existing calculators exhibited reasonable estimation of survival in patients with OPSCC, but there was considerable variability in predictions for individual patients, which limits the clinical usefulness of these calculators. Given the increasing role of personalized treatment in patients with OPSCC, further work is needed to improve accuracy and precision, possibly through the identification and incorporation of additional biomarkers.

Radiotherapy for parapharyngeal space tumors.

A wide variety of tumors, both benign and malignant, occur in the parapharyngeal space. Depending on histology and extent, treatment may include surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT). Herein we discuss the role of RT in the management of some of the more commonly encountered neoplasms, including salivary gland tumors, paragangliomas, schwannomas, and soft-tissue sarcomas.

Radiation-induced carotid artery lesions.

PURPOSE: To review the current aspects of knowledge related to the risk of cerebrovascular events in patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed. Papers meeting selection criteria were reviewed. RESULTS: We provide an update on the problem by identifying key studies that have contributed to our current understanding of the epidemiology, radiologic features, pathogenesis, and treatment of the disease. The incidence of carotid artery stenosis ranged from 18 to 38% in patients who underwent radiotherapy for head and neck cancer versus from 0 to 9.2% among the nonirradiated patients. Neck irradiation increases the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery wall. These changes are the earliest visible alteration in the carotid wall and are also detected with color Doppler ultrasonography. Endovascular treatment with a carotid angioplasty and stenting is the first-line treatment for most symptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced atherosclerosis is a different and accelerated form of atherosclerosis, which implies a more aggressive disease with a different biologic behavior. The disease is characterized by a high rate of carotid artery stenosis compared to those observed in nonirradiated control group patients. To prevent the risk of stroke, surveillance and imaging with ultrasonography should enable detection of severe stenosis. Endovascular treatment with a carotid angioplasty and stenting has been proposed as an attractive and minimally invasive alternative for some radiation-induced stenoses.

A phase II trial of the BCL-2 homolog domain 3 mimetic AT-101 in combination with docetaxel for recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: AT-101 is a BCL-2 Homolog domain 3 mimetic previously demonstrated to have tumoricidal effects in advanced solid organ malignancies. Given the evidence of activity in xenograft models, treatment with AT-101 in combination with docetaxel is a therapeutic doublet of interest in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included in this trial had unresectable, recurrent, or distantly metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) not amenable to curative radiation or surgery. This was an open label randomized, phase II trial in which patients were administered AT-101 in addition to docetaxel. The three treatment arms were docetaxel, docetaxel plus pulse dose AT-101, and docetaxel plus metronomic dose AT-101. The primary endpoint of this trial was overall response rate. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were registered and 32 were evaluable for treatment response. Doublet therapy with AT-101 and docetaxel was well tolerated with only 2 patients discontinuing therapy due to treatment related toxicities. The overall response rate was 11 % (4 partial responses) with a clinical benefit rate of 74 %. Median progression free survival was 4.3 months (range: 0.7-13.7) and overall survival was 5.5 months (range: 0.4-24). No significant differences were noted between dosing strategies. CONCLUSION: Although met with a favorable toxicity profile, the addition of AT-101 to docetaxel in R/M HNSCC does not appear to demonstrate evidence of efficacy.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Epidemiologic data have shown changes in the demographic profile of patients presenting with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) during the past 4 decades. In particular, there has been a marked increase in the number of young women without a history of smoking presenting with SCC of the tongue. A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results review of patients with head and neck cancer identified 5.3% younger than 40 years. After comparing cohorts from 1973 to 1984 with 1985 to 1997, a 60% increase in tongue cancer in patients younger 40 years was noted. Epidemiologic data also have shown that women are tending to delay childbearing to an older age. These 2 factors have resulted in an increasing prevalence of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy. If current trends continue, oral surgeons and maternal fetal medicine obstetric specialists will see an increasing number of pregnant patients presenting with malignancies. This in turn will lead to a number of complex surgical and adjuvant treatment considerations resulting in ethical and moral decisions for which limited data exist to guide best practice. The treatment chosen will affect not only the health of the patient, but also the health of the fetus and ongoing pregnancy. This report describes the case of a woman who was diagnosed with SCC of the tongue at 14 weeks' gestational age. This report presents her treatment course and a review of the literature to support her decisions related to the care given.

Should patients with laryngeal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma receive prophylactic cranial irradiation?

While small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNCs) most often arise in the lung, extrapulmonary SCNCs arise in a variety of locations-including the head and neck region. In particular, laryngeal SCNCs-while rare tumors-are nevertheless recognized as distinct lesions. The rarity of laryngeal SCNC gives rise to two distinct difficulties: first (particularly with small biopsy specimens), laryngeal SCNC can be difficult to diagnose by routine light microscopy; second, limited experience with these tumors can make the crafting of a treatment plan for individual patients difficult. As regards the first problem, pathologic diagnosis is greatly enhanced by the application of immunohistochemistry. The second problem-crafting a successful treatment strategy-presents a much larger difficulty. It is tempting to extrapolate from experience with the (more common) pulmonary SCNC in search of a strategy applicable to laryngeal SCNC; such an extrapolation, however, may not be uniformly successful. In particular, while a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy appears to be as valuable in the treatment of extrapulmonary as it is in the treatment of pulmonary SCNC, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI)-which has enjoyed some success in the treatment of some patients with pulmonary SCNC-does not appear to have similar utility in patients with laryngeal SCNC. Accordingly, the use of PCI does not appear to have a role to play at this point in time in the treatment of patients with laryngeal SCNC.

Management of locally advanced HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: where are we?

HPV-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has a better prognosis compared to HPV unrelated (HPV-) OPC. This review summarizes and discusses several of the controversies regarding the management of HPV+ OPC, including the mechanism of its treatment sensitivity, modern surgical techniques, chemotherapy regimens, and treatment de-intensification protocols. We also discuss and reconsider potential adverse prognostic factors such as tumor EGFR expression, tumor hypoxia, and patient smoking history, as well as the significance of retropharyngeal adenopathy. Finally, we discuss elective nodal treatment of uninvolved lymph node stations. While this review does not exhaust all controversies related to the management of HPV+ OPC, it aims to highlight some of the most clinically relevant ones.

A phase II study evaluating axitinib in patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Axitinib is an oral, potent, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with selective inhibition of VEGFR 1,2, 3, as well as inhibition of potential downstream effectors of the EGFR pathway. Given the upregulation of EGFR and VEGFR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treatment with axitinib holds promise as a rational targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were included in this open label, single arm, phase II trial. Primary endpoint was 6 month progression free survival. All patients received single agent axitinib with planned dose escalation based on tolerability. A planned interim efficacy analysis was performed after enrollment of 30 patients. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were registered, 30 were evaluable. While treatment was well-tolerated with no severe bleeding events, only 19 patients were able to achieve full planned dose. The best overall response rate was 6.7% (two partial responses) with a disease control rate of 76.7%. Median progression free survival was 3.7 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 3.5-5.7) and overall survival was 10.9 months (95% CI: 6.4-17.8). Exploratory analysis demonstrated that patients with a smaller sum of diameter of target lesions experienced improved response rates, and better progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Treatment with single agent axitinib should be considered due to acceptable toxicity profile and favorable median overall survival compared to standard therapies.

MRI to delineate the gross tumor volume of nasopharyngeal cancers: which sequences and planes should be used?

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been found to be better than computed tomography for defining the extent of primary gross tumor volume (GTV) in advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. It is routinely applied for target delineation in planning radiotherapy. However, the specific MRI sequences/planes that should be used are unknown. METHODS: Twelve patients with nasopharyngeal cancer underwent primary GTV evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced axial T1 weighted image (T1) and T2 weighted image (T2), coronal T1, and sagittal T1 sequences. Each sequence was registered with the planning computed tomography scans. Planning target volumes (PTVs) were derived by uniform expansions of the GTVs. The volumes encompassed by the various sequences/planes, and the volumes common to all sequences/planes, were compared quantitatively and anatomically to the volume delineated by the commonly used axial T1-based dataset. RESULTS: Addition of the axial T2 sequence increased the axial T1-based GTV by 12% on average (p = 0.004), and composite evaluations that included the coronal T1 and sagittal T1 planes increased the axial T1-based GTVs by 30% on average (p = 0.003). The axial T1-based PTVs were increased by 20% by the additional sequences (p = 0.04). Each sequence/plane added unique volume extensions. The GTVs common to all the T1 planes accounted for 38% of the total volumes of all the T1 planes. Anatomically, addition of the coronal and sagittal-based GTVs extended the axial T1-based GTV caudally and cranially, notably to the base of the skull. CONCLUSIONS: Adding MRI planes and sequences to the traditional axial T1 sequence yields significant quantitative and anatomically important extensions of the GTVs and PTVs. For accurate target delineation in nasopharyngeal cancer, we recommend that GTVs be outlined in all MRI sequences/planes and registered with the planning computed tomography scans.

Dosimetric parameters predict radiation-induced temporal lobe necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review examines the role of dosimetric parameters in predicting temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). TLN is a serious late complication that can adversely affect the quality of life of NPC patients. Understanding the relationship between dosimetric parameters and TLN can guide treatment planning and minimize radiation-related complications. A comprehensive search identified relevant studies published up to July 2023. Studies reporting on dosimetric parameters and TLN in NPC patients undergoing 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT were included. TLN incidence, follow-up duration, and correlation with dosimetric parameters of the temporal lobe were analyzed. The review included 30 studies with median follow-up durations ranging from 28 to 110 months. The crude incidence of TLN varied from 2.3 % to 47.3 % and the average crude incidence of TLN is approximately 14 %. Dmax and D1cc emerged as potential predictors of TLN in 3D-CRT and IMRT-treated NPC patients. Threshold values of >72 Gy for Dmax and >62 Gy for D1cc were associated with increased TLN risk. However, other factors should also be considered, including host characteristics, tumor-specific features and therapeutic factors. In conclusion, this systematic review highlights the significance of dosimetric parameters, particularly Dmax and D1cc, in predicting TLN risk in NPC patients undergoing 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT. The findings provide valuable insights that can help in developing optimal treatment planning strategies and contribute to the development of clinical guidelines in this field.

Neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Radiotherapy is one of the mainstay treatment modalities for the management of non-metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Notable improvements in treatment outcomes have been observed in the recent decades. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and charged particle therapy, have significantly improved tumor target conformity and enabled better preservation of normal structures. However, because of the intricate anatomy of the head and neck region, multiple critical neurological structures such as the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, cranial nerves, nerve plexuses, autonomic pathways, brain vasculature, and neurosensory organs, are variably irradiated during treatment, particularly when tumor targets are in close proximity. Consequently, a diverse spectrum of late neurological sequelae may manifest in HNC survivors. These neurological complications commonly result in irreversible symptoms, impair patients' quality of life, and contribute to a substantial proportion of non-cancer deaths. Although the relationship between radiation dose and toxicity has not been fully elucidated for all complications, appropriate application of dosimetric constraints during radiotherapy planning may reduce their incidence. Vigilant surveillance during the course of survivorship also enables early detection and intervention. This article endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the various neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for HNC, summarize the current incidence data, discuss methods to minimize their risks during radiotherapy planning, and highlight potential strategies for managing these debilitating toxicities.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Curative Treatment for De Novo Mucosal Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Feasible Alternative Option for Fragile Patients with Small Lesion: A Systematic Review.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by a high dose per fraction, well-defined small targets, superior dose conformity, and a steep off-target dose gradient. A literature search was conducted to examine the experience with SBRT as a curative treatment for newly diagnosed mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck (MCHN). Four retrospective case series and one prospective phase I clinical trial published between 2012 and 2020 described 124 patients. SBRT was mainly performed in older patients with different tumor sites. The median size of the planning target volumes ranged from 5.3 to 41 cm3. Different approaches were used to create margins. In two studies, limited elective nodal irradiation was performed. The equivalent doses used were 60-83.33 Gy delivered in five fractions. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the radiation dose specification. The incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 0-8.3%, with local and regional control ranging from 73% to 100%. Improved or stable quality of life after SBRT was reported in two studies. Curative-intent SBRT for de novo MCHN appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment for small tumor targets, preferably without concomitant elective tissue irradiation. Standardization of SBRT practice and well-designed prospective clinical trials are needed to better define the role of SBRT in this setting.

Update on olfactory neuroblastoma.

Olfactory neuroblastomas are uncommon malignancies that arise from olfactory receptor cells located high in the nasal cavity. Accurate diagnosis plays a crucial role in determining clinical results and guiding treatment decisions. Diagnosis can be a major challenge for pathologists, especially when dealing with tumours with poor differentiation. The discovery of several molecular and immunohistochemical markers would help to overcome classification difficulties. Due to the paucity of large-scale studies, standardisation of diagnosis, treatment and prediction of outcome remains a challenge. Surgical resection by endoscopic techniques with the addition of postoperative irradiation is the treatment of choice. In addition, it is advisable to consider elective neck irradiation to minimise the risk of nodal recurrence. Molecular characterisation will help not only to make more accurate diagnoses but also to identify specific molecular targets that can be used to develop personalised treatment options tailored to each patient. The present review aims to summarise the current state of knowledge on histopathological diagnosis, the molecular biology and management of this disease.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Recurrent and Oligometastatic Head and Neck Tumours.

The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.

Utility of bioselection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation in patients with T4 laryngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for induction selection of definitive treatment (IS) protocols have shown excellent outcomes for organ preservation and survival in patients with T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). We seek to evaluate survival and organ preservation outcomes in T4 LSCC patients treated with IS protocols. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of advanced T3 and T4 LSCC patients who underwent IS protocols based upon potential for preserving a functional larynx. Patients received one neoadjuvant cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy with either 5-fluorouracil or docetaxel or with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy with docetaxel and a Bcl-2 inhibitor. Patients who achieved ≥ 50 % response as determined by radiographic review and/or endoscopic evaluation received definitive chemoradiation. Patients who had < 50 % response after IS underwent total laryngectomy (TL) followed by post-operative radiation +/- chemotherapy. RESULTS: Amongst T4 patients, 114 met inclusion criteria including 89 who underwent IS protocols and 25 who received an upfront TL. In total, 76.0 % of T3 patients and 71.9 % of T4 patients responded to IS and underwent definitive chemoradiation. There was no significant difference in hazard of death between T4 IS and T4 TL patients (HR: 0.9, p = 0.86). Among responders, there was no significant difference in 5-year laryngectomy-free survival (T3 - 59.6 %, T4 44.3 %, p = 0.15) or laryngeal preservation by T stage (T3 - 72.8 %, T4 - 73.0 %, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Select T4 patients may benefit from organ preservation using IS protocols with similar response rates to patients with T3 tumors, without compromising survival when compared to upfront TL.

Upfront Neck Dissection for Treatment Selection and Improvement in Quality of Life as a Novel Treatment Paradigm for Deintensification in HPV+ OPSCC.

PURPOSE: Locoregionally advanced HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has excellent cure rates, although current treatment regimens are accompanied by acute and long-term toxicities. We designed a phase II deescalation trial for patients with HPV+ OPSCC to evaluate the feasibility of an upfront neck dissection to individualize definitive treatment selection to improve the quality of life without compromising survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-3, N0-2 HPV+ OPSCC underwent an upfront neck dissection with primary tumor biopsy. Arm A included patients with a single lymph node less than six centimeters, with no extracapsular spread (ECS) and no primary site adverse features underwent transoral surgery. Arm B included patients who had two or more positive lymph nodes with no ECS, or those with primary site adverse features were treated with radiation alone. Arm C included patients who had ECS in any lymph node and were treated with chemoradiation. The primary endpoint was quality of life at 1 year compared with a matched historical control. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled and underwent selective neck dissection. On the basis of pathologic characteristics, 14 patients were assigned to arm A, 10 patients to arm B, and 9 to arm C. A significant improvement was observed in Head and Neck Quality of Life (HNQOL) compared with historical controls (-2.6 vs. -11.9, P = 0.034). With a median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year overall survival was 100% and estimated 3-year estimated progression-free survival was 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 76%-99%]. CONCLUSIONS: A neck dissection-driven treatment paradigm warrants further research as a deintensification strategy.

Intranodal cystic changes: a potential radiologic signature/biomarker to assess the human papillomavirus status of cases with oropharyngeal malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if lymph node imaging findings can predict human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment postcontrast neck computed tomographic scans of 49 patients (male, 35; female, 14; age range, 45-76 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal malignancies and with available HPV data were retrospectively reviewed. Metastatic lymph nodes were identified based on standardly accepted size and morphological criteria. Various lymph node parameters were studied, including presence of cystic foci in the metastatic lymph nodes, abnormal lymph nodes showing low-attenuation foci, matted lymph nodes, and morphologically normal smaller (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes. These parameters were then independently correlated with the available HPV status of these patients. Finally, an extended criterion, that is, intranodal cystic changes in cases with morphologically normal small (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes, was correlated with HPV status. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated. RESULTS: Of these 49 cases with oropharyngeal cancers, 27 were HPV positive, and 22 cases were HPV negative. Eight cases (3 HPV positive and 5 HPV negative) did not have metastatic lymph nodes. Of remaining 41 cases with metastatic abnormal lymph nodes, 26 were HPV positive, and 15 were HPV negative. Of these 41 cases with metastatic lymph nodes, 14 had 1 or more lymph nodes with cystic foci. Of these 14 cases, 10 (71.4%) were HPV positive. Resultant sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of cystic foci for the presence of HPV status were 38.4%, 73.3%, 71.4%, and 40.7%, respectively. Intranodal cystic changes in cases with morphologically normal small (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes were found in 5 cases; all 5 were HPV positive. Resultant accuracy was specificity and PPV of 100%, sensitivity of 19.2% and NPV of 41.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Intranodal cystic changes seen on the pretreatment postcontrast neck computed tomographic scan of patients with oropharyngeal malignancies are radiologic signatures strongly associated with the HPV status of the patient. The results in this initial study warrant larger prospective studies to determine if this finding may be used in addition to other molecular biomarkers to help identify those patients who may be amenable to the most appropriate treatment options.

Osteocutaneous free tissue transplantation for mandibular osteoradionecrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the success rate, complications, and functional outcomes of patients who are treated with osteocutaneous free tissue transplantation for grade 4 mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients (8 males, 4 females; mean age, 57.6 years) with grade 4 mandibular ORN. Three patients (25%) had a history of primary radiotherapy, two (17%) had previous concurrent chemoradiation, and seven (58%) had undergone postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Ten patients (83%) had previous major ablative surgery to treat the primary tumor and five (50%) had been reconstructed with a free tissue transplant prior to the onset of ORN. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent reconstruction with an osteocutaneous free tissue transplant for grade 4 mandibular ORN between 1999 and 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful treatment of mandibular ORN; major, minor, and late complications; gastrostomy tube (G-tube) dependence; speech and swallowing scores. RESULTS: Grade 4 mandibular ORN was successfully treated in eight (73%) evaluable patients. One patient (8%) died of a second primary tumor before the 12-month assessment. Eight patients (67%) had a major complication, three (25%) had a minor complication, and nine (75%) had a late complication. Three of the five G-tube- dependent patients prior to mandibular reconstruction were able to discontinue the use of their G-tube. Seven of the eight successfully treated patients maintained their nutrition by mouth. Median "range of liquids" score was 6/6 (range, 4 to 6). Median "range of solids" score was 4/6 (range, 3 to 6). Median "understandability of speech" score was 4/5 (range, 2 to 5). CONCLUSIONS: Grade 4 mandibular ORN was treated successfully with an osteocutaneous free tissue transfer in eight evaluable patients (73%). In successfully treated patients, median speech/swallowing scores were highly functional, but the remaining radiated soft tissue resulted in higher local wound complications and a modified diet.