Intersecting gender, evaluations, and examinations: Averting gender bias in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether gender bias was present in the final third-year medical student obstetrics/gynecology clerkship performance evaluation completed by faculty and resident physicians. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of third-year medical students over the course of ten years (2004 - 2014) at a private medical school in the northern US state of Wisconsin. Each student's performance during their required 6-week obstetrics/gynecology clerkship was assessed by a combination of the student's scores on a clinical performance evaluation and on a standardized national subject examination. The clinical performance evaluations are comprised of 10 domains, each using a 9-point Likert scale and completed by faculty and resident physicians. All clerkships at our institution use the same evaluation form, which was designed and validated by the medical education statistics department. Final obstetrics/gynecology clerkship average clinical evaluation scores (Scale 1-9) and obstetrics/gynecology standardized national subject examination scores (Percentile 1-99) were compared to see if a gender based difference between subject examination and performance evaluation scores existed. RESULTS: 1,976 student records were analyzed. Mean standardized national subject exam scores were significantly higher for females [74.4 (8.1)] than males [72.9 (8.2)] (Possible range 1-99) with Cohen's d = 0.2 (P = 0.001). The average female score on the clinical evaluation was mean (SD) = 7.4 (0.9), compared to an average clinical evaluation score of 7.2 (1.0) for males (P = 0.001) (range 1-9). Performance on the standardized national subject exam was significantly correlated (r = 0.3, P = 0.001) with clinical evaluation scores, and when split by gender the strength of the correlation remained. DISCUSSION: Medical student performance on the standardized national subject exam correlated with clinical evaluations independent of gender. Women had higher scores on both the subject examination and the clinical performance evaluations. There was no evidence of gender bias in the students' clinical evaluation scores.

Gendered Differences in Teaching Performance Evaluations of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Teaching performance evaluations are commonly used for career development and advancement. Due to possible gendered expectations, implicit or explicit bias may emerge in evaluations completed by learners. This study investigated how third-year medical students evaluated teaching performance of obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians based on resident gender. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. DESIGN: This retrospective mixed methods study examined teaching performance evaluations of obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians from 2010 to 2018, completed by third-year medical students. A two-sample, two-sided t-test was used to compare numerical scores. Deductive content analysis of written comments focused on specific categories: positive or negative agentic or communal demeanors and characteristics, teaching skills, character and professionalism, leadership abilities, clinical skills and knowledge, and frequency of words and phrases used to describe residents. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. RESULTS: Of 83 residents (71 females, 12 males), there was no statistical significance in the teaching performance evaluation scores between male and female residents (n = 10,753 total completed evaluations). Female residents had lower scores than male residents; males tended not to score below 4 (5-point response scale; 5 = outstanding). Of 3,813 written comments, male residents had more positive comments, with statistical significance in communal characteristics (71.4% male, 53.9% female, p = 0.01). Female residents received more negative comments, with statistical significance in communal characteristics (7.5% female, 2.8% male, p = 0.01). Frequency of words presented that male residents had more "standout" traits ("outstanding," "excellent," "exemplary"), "ability" terms ("intelligent," "bright," "talented," "smart"), and were often considered "fun," "funny," and "humorous." Female residents were described by "compassion" terms ("kind," "compassionate"). CONCLUSION: Student-completed teaching performance evaluations are a valuable assessment of teaching skills and influence department recognition, award distribution, fellowship and employment opportunities. This study found that medical students did evaluate female residents differently than male residents. Understanding gendered expectations may assist in findings ways to address discrepancies between male and female physician evaluations.

Complication rates of dilation and evacuation and labor induction in second-trimester abortion for fetal indications: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare complication rates of dilation and evacuation (D&E) to mifepristone and misoprostol labor induction for second trimester abortion for fetal indications. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing complication rates with D&E and labor induction abortion for fetal indications at 14 weeks 0 days through 23 weeks and 6 days gestation between January 1, 2009, and August 31, 2017. We extracted demographic, procedural, and outcome data, focusing specifically on complications of maternal hemorrhage, infection, emergency department visit, hospital readmission, retained tissue requiring dilation and curettage (D&C), manual placental removal, or thromboembolism. We compared complication rates between the D&E and induction groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We included outcomes from 75 (48%) D&E and 81 (52%) labor induction abortions. We identified any complication in 1 (1%) and 7 (7%) of patients, respectively (p = 0.12). The only complication in the D&E group was hemorrhage with an estimated blood loss of 1000 mL not requiring transfusion. Labor induction complications included retained tissue requiring manual removal (n = 2) or D&C (n = 1) and hemorrhage (n = 2). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in complication rates between the D&E group and the labor induction group. IMPLICATIONS: This study compared outcomes between D&E and labor induction using mifepristone and misoprostol for second trimester abortion. Our complication rate for labor induction using mifepristone and misoprostol, and particularly our rate of retained placenta requiring D&C, was lower than what has been previously reported for second trimester labor induction termination using other methods. This study suggests there is a benefit for the routine use of mifepristone with misoprostol for second trimester labor induction. Additionally, the low rate of major complications in this study for both D&E and labor induction further validates the safety of both procedures for second trimester abortion.

Safety of peripherally inserted central catheters during pregnancy: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the incidence of complications associated with peripherally inserted central line catheters, inserted using a standardized technique, during pregnancy and the postpartum period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed that included all pregnant and postpartum women who received peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) at a single institution between 2006 and 2014. Patient demographics and data on infectious, mechanical and thrombotic complications were collected. Some patients required more than one line insertion during the same pregnancy. In these instances, only the first line placement for each subject was included in the analysis of complications. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six catheters were inserted in 112 pregnant and postpartum patients. The total incidence of complications was 17% (19/112). Specific complications included infection (n = 4, 3.6%), mechanical (n = 5, 4.4%), deep venous thrombosis (n = 2, 1.8%) and other (n = 8, 7.1%). Demographics of the complication and no complication groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous studies, we report a complication rate associated with peripheral line use in pregnant and postpartum women that appears similar to that in non-pregnant populations.