Functional mapping to reveal slow conduction and substrate progression in atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The aim of our study was to analyse the response to short-coupled atrial extrastimuli to identify areas of hidden slow conduction (HSC) and their relationship with the atrial fibrillation (AF) phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF and persistent AF (10:10) underwent the first pulmonary vein isolation procedure. Triple short-coupled extrastimuli were delivered in sinus rhythm (SR), and the evoked response was analysed: sites exhibiting double or highly fragmented electrograms (EGM) were defined as positive for HSC (HSC+). The delta of the duration of the bipolar EGM was analysed, and bipolar EGM duration maps were built. High-density maps were acquired using a multipolar catheter during AF, SR, and paced rhythm. Spatial co-localization of HSC+ and complex fractionated atrial EGMs (CFAE) during AF was evaluated. Persistent AF showed a higher number and percentage of HSC+ than paroxysmal AF (13.9% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001). The delta of EGM duration was 53 ± 22 ms for HSC+ compared with 13 ± 11 (10) ms in sites with negative HSC (HSC-) (P < 0.001). The number and density of HSC+ were lower than CFAE during AF (19 vs. 56 per map, P < 0.001). The reproducibility and distribution of HSC+ in repeated maps were superior to CFAE (P = 0.19 vs. P < 0.001). Sites with negative and positive responses showed a similar bipolar voltage in the preceding sinus beat (1.65 ± 1.34 and 1.48 ± 1.47 mV, P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Functional mapping identifies more discrete and reproducible abnormal substrates than mapping during AF. The HSC+ sites in response to triple extrastimuli are more frequent in persistent AF than in paroxysmal AF.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance determinants of ventricular arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To non-invasively characterize, by means of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR), scar differences, and potential variables associated with ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurrence in chronic post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A case-control study was designed through retrospective LGE-CMR data analysis of chronic post-MI patients (i) consecutively referred for VT substrate ablation after a first VT episode (n = 66) and (ii) from a control group (n = 84) with no arrhythmia evidence. The myocardium was characterized differentiating core, border zone (BZ), and BZ channels (BZCs) using the ADAS 3D post-processing imaging platform. Clinical and scar characteristics, including a novel parameter, the BZC mass, were compared between both groups. One hundred and fifty post-MI patients were included. Four multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were created for total scar mass, BZ mass, core mass, and BZC mass, adjusting them by age, sex, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A cut-off of 5.15 g of BZC mass identified the cases with 92.4% sensitivity and 86.9% specificity [area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.93 (0.89-0.97); P < 0.001], with a significant increase in the AUC compared to other scar parameters (P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Adding BZC mass to LVEF allowed to reclassify 33.3% of the cases and 39.3% of the controls [net reclassification improvement = 0.73 (0.71-0.74)]. CONCLUSIONS: The mass of BZC is the strongest independent variable associated with the occurrence of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in post-MI patients after adjustment for age, sex, and LVEF. Border zone channel mass measurement could permit a more accurate VT risk stratification than LVEF in chronic post-MI patients.

MANual vs. automatIC local activation time annotation for guiding Premature Ventricular Complex ablation procedures (MANIaC-PVC study).

AIMS: To assess potential benefits of a local activation time (LAT) automatic acquisition protocol using wavefront annotation plus an ECG pattern matching algorithm [automatic (AUT)-arm] during premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, randomized, controlled, and international multicentre study (NCT03340922). One hundred consecutive patients with indication for PVC ablation were enrolled and randomized to AUT (n = 50) or manual (MAN, n = 50) annotation protocols using the CARTO3 navigation system. The primary endpoint was mapping success. Clinical success was defined as a PVC-burden reduction of ≥80% in the 24-h Holter within 6 months after the procedure. Mean age was 56 ± 14 years, 54% men. The mean baseline PVC burden was 25 ± 13%, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 55 ± 11%. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The most frequent PVC-site of origin were right ventricular outflow tract (41%), LV (25%), and left ventricular outflow tract (17%), without differences between groups. Radiofrequency (RF) time and number of RF applications were similar for both groups. Mapping and procedure times were significantly shorter in the AUT-arm (25.5 ± 14.3 vs. 32.8 ± 12.6 min, P = 0.009; and 54.8 ± 24.8 vs. 67.4 ± 25.2, P = 0.014, respectively), while more mapping points were acquired [136 (94-222) AUT vs. 79 (52-111) MAN; P < 0.001]. Mapping and clinical success were similar in both groups. There were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: The use of a complete automatic protocol for LAT annotation during PVC ablation procedures allows to achieve similar clinical endpoints with higher procedural efficiency when compared with conventional, manual annotation carried out by expert operators.

Arrhythmogenic substrate detection in chronic ischaemic patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation using multidetector cardiac computed tomography: compared evaluation with cardiac magnetic resonance.

AIMS: Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) permits characterizing ischaemic scars, detecting heterogeneous tissue channels (HTCs) which constitute the arrhythmogenic substrate (AS). Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance also improves the arrhythmia-free survival when used to guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation. However, its availability may be limited. We sought to evaluate the performance of multidetector cardiac computed tomography (MDCT) imaging in identifying HTCs detected by LGE-CMR in ischaemic patients undergoing VT substrate ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty ischaemic patients undergoing both LGE-CMR and MDCT before VT substrate ablation were included. Using a dedicated post-processing software, two blinded operators, assigned either to LGE-CMR or MDCT analysis, characterized the presence of CMR and computed tomography (CT) channels, respectively. Cardiac magnetic resonance channels were classified as endocardial (layers < 50%), epicardial (layers ≥ 50%), or transmural. Cardiac magnetic resonance- vs. CT-channel concordance was considered when showing the same orientation and American Heart Association (AHA) segment. Mean age was 69 ± 10 years; 90% were male. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 35 ± 10%. All patients had CMR channels (n = 76), whereas only 26/30 (86.7%) had CT channels (n = 91). Global sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive values for detecting CMR channels were 61.8% and 51.6%, respectively. MDCT performance improved in patients with epicardial CMR channels (Se 80.5%) and transmural scars (Se 72.2%). In 4/11 (36%) patients with subendocardial myocardial infarction (MI), MDCT was unable to identify the AS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to LGE-CMR, myocardial wall thickness assessment using MDCT fails to detect the presence of AS in 36% of patients with subendocardial MI, showing modest sensitivity identifying HTCs but a better performance in patients with transmural scars.

Automatic Detection of Slow Conducting Channels during Substrate Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Voltage mapping allows identifying the arrhythmogenic substrate during scar-related ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation procedures. Slow conducting channels (SCCs), defined by the presence of electrogram (EGM) signals with delayed components (EGM-DC), are responsible for sustaining VAs and constitute potential ablation targets. However, voltage mapping, as it is currently performed, is time-consuming, requiring a manual analysis of all EGMs to detect SCCs, and its accuracy is limited by electric far-field. We sought to evaluate an algorithm that automatically identifies EGM-DC, classifies mapping points, and creates new voltage maps, named "Slow Conducting Channel Maps" (SCC-Maps). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electroanatomic maps (EAM) from 20 patients (10 ischemic, 10 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy) was performed. EAM voltage maps were acquired during sinus rhythm and used for ablation. Preprocedural contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (Ce-CMR) imaging was available for the ischemic population. Three mapping modalities were analysed: (i) EAM voltage maps using standard (EAM standard) or manual (EAM screening) thresholds for defining core and border zones; (ii) SCC-Maps derived from the use of the novel SCC-Mapping algorithm that automatically identify EGM-DCs measuring the voltage of the local component; and (iii) Ce-CMR maps (when available). The ability of each mapping modality in identifying SCCs and their agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: SCC-Maps and EAM screening identified a greater number of SCC entrances than EAM standard (3.45 ± 1.61 and 2.95 ± 2.31, resp., vs. 1.05 ± 1.10; p < 0.01). SCC-Maps and EAM screening highly correlate with Ce-CMR maps in the ischemic population when compared to EAM standard (Lin's correlation = 0.628 and 0.679, resp., vs. 0.212, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The SCC-Mapping algorithm allows an operator-independent analysis of EGM signals showing better identification of the arrhythmogenic substrate characteristics when compared to standard voltage EAM.

Ventricular arrhythmia risk is associated with myocardial scar but not with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk estimation in patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a challenge. By CRT-mediated improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), many patients loose indication for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Increasing evidence shows the importance of myocardial scar for risk prediction. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of myocardial scar depending on the echocardiographic response in patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with indication for CRT were prospectively enrolled. Decision about ICD or pacemaker implantation was based on clinical criteria. All patients underwent delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Median follow-up duration was 45 (24-75) months. Primary outcome was a composite of sustained ventricular arrhythmia, appropriate ICD therapy, or SCD. A total of 218 patients with LVEF 25.5 ± 6.6% were analysed [158 (73%) male, 64.9 ± 10.7 years]. Myocardial scar was observed in 73 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (95% of ICM patients); in 62 with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (45% of these patients); and in all but 1 of 36 (17%) patients who reached the primary outcome. Myocardial scar was the only significant predictor of primary outcome [odds ratio 27.7 (3.8-202.7)], independent of echocardiographic CRT response. A total of 55 (25%) patients died from any cause or received heart transplant. For overall survival, only a combination of the absence of myocardial scar with CRT response was associated with favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: Malignant arrhythmic events and SCD depend on the presence of myocardial scar but not on CRT response. All-cause mortality improved only with the combined absence of myocardial scar and CRT response.

Influence of baseline QRS on the left ventricular ejection fraction recovery after frequent premature ventricular complex ablation.

AIMS: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can induce or worsen left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the influence of the baseline QRS in the response after PVC ablation in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen [59 ± 13 years old, 152 (71%) men] consecutive patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and frequent PVCs referred for ablation were included and followed-up for 12 months. Echocardiographic response was defined as an improvement of at least five absolute points in LVEF. Clinical, electrocardiogram, and electrophysiological characteristics were analysed. Mean baseline QRS duration was 110 ms [97-140]. Premature ventricular complex burden significantly decreased after ablation from 23% [16-33] at baseline to 1% [0-8] at 12 months, P < 0.001. Mean PVC burden reduction was 18 [8-30] points. There was a significant improvement of LVEF from 35% [29-40] at baseline to 44% [35-55] at 12 months, P < 0.001. One hundred and thirty (61%) patients were considered as echocardiographic responders. Baseline QRS duration (ms) [odds ratio (OR) 0.98 (0.97-0.99), P = 0.01] was an independent predictor of echocardiographic response. Mean LVEF improvement was 16 [10-21] points when the baseline QRS duration was <90 ms; 12 [4-20] when it was 90-110 ms; 5 [0-15] when it was 110 ± 130 ms; and 0 [0-6] points when it was >130 ms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LV systolic dysfunction, intrinsic QRS duration is inversely related to the probability and the degree of echocardiographic response after frequent PVC ablation. Patients with a QRS duration >130 ms at baseline have the poorer response after ablation.

Prediction of premature ventricular complex origin in left vs. right ventricular outflow tract: a novel anatomical imaging approach.

AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVA) are associated with hypertension (HT), older age, and LV dysfunction, suggesting that LV overload plays a role in the aetiopathogenesis. We hypothesized that anatomical modifications of the LV outflow tract (LVOT) could predict left vs. right OTVA site of origin (SOO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six (32 men, 53 ± 18 years old) consecutive patients referred for OTVA ablation were included. Cardiac multidetector computed tomography was performed before ablation and then imported to the CARTO system to aid the mapping and ablation procedure. Anatomical characteristics of the aortic root as well as aortopulmonary valvular planar angulation (APVPA) were analysed. The LV was the OTVA SOO (LVOT-VA) in 32 (57%) patients. These patients were more frequently male (78% vs. 22%, P = 0.001), older (57 ± 18 vs. 47 ± 18 years, P = 0.055), and more likely to have HT (59% vs. 21%, P = 0.004), compared to right OTVA patients. Aortopulmonary valvular planar angulation was higher in LVOT-VA patients (68 ± 5° vs. 55 ± 6°, respectively; P < 0.001). Absolute size of all aortic root diameters was associated with LVOT origin. However, after indexing by body surface area, only sinotubular junction diameter maintained a significant association (P = 0.049). Multivariable analysis showed that APVPA was an independent predictor of LVOT origin. Aortopulmonary valvular planar angulation ≥62° reached 94% sensitivity and 83% specificity (area under the curve 0.95) for predicting LVOT origin. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of APVPA as a marker of chronic LV overload is useful for the prediction of left vs. right ventricular OTVA origin.

Mortality and morbidity reduction after frequent premature ventricular complexes ablation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

AIMS: Ablation of frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) improves left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. This study aims to evaluate the long-term hard outcomes and potential prognostic variables in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective multicentre study including 101 consecutive patients [56 ± 12 years old, 62 (61%) men] with LV systolic dysfunction and frequent PVCs who underwent PVC ablation before November 2015. The last evaluation performed was considered the long-term follow-up (LTFUP) evaluation. Mean follow-up was 34 ± 16 months (range 24-84 months). Ablation was successful in 95 (94%) patients. There was a significant reduction in the PVC burden from 21 ± 12% at baseline to 3.8 ± 6% at LTFUP, P < 0.001. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 32 ± 8% at baseline to 39 ± 12% at LTFUP (P < 0.001) and New York Heart Association class from 2.2 ± 0.6% to 1.3 ± 0.6% (P < 0.001). Brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased from 136 (78-321) to 68 (32-144) pg/mL (P = 0.007). Most of this improvement occurs during the first 6 months after ablation. Persistent abolition of at least 18 points of the baseline PVC burden was independently and inversely associated with the composite endpoint of cardiac mortality, cardiac transplantation, or hospitalization for heart failure during follow-up [hazard ratio 0.18 (0.05-0.66), P = 0.01]. CONCLUSION: In patients with LV systolic dysfunction, ablation of frequent PVCs induces a significant improvement in functional, structural, and neurohormonal status, which persists at LTFUP. A sustained reduction in the baseline PVC burden is associated with a lower risk of cardiac mortality, cardiac transplantation, or hospitalization for heart failure during follow-up.

Clinical validation of automatic local activation time annotation during focal premature ventricular complex ablation procedures.

Aims: Current navigation systems incorporate algorithms for automatic identification of local activation time (LAT). However, data about their utility and accuracy in premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures are scarce. This study analyses the accuracy of an algorithmic method based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram within the window demarcated by the bipolar electrogram compared with conventional manual annotation during PVC ablation procedures. Methods and results: Forty patients with successful ablation of focal PVC in three centres were included. Electroanatomical activation maps obtained with the automatic system (WF-map) were compared with manual annotation maps (M-map). Correlation and concordance of LAT obtained with both methods were assessed at 3536 points. The distance between the earliest activation site (EAS) and the effective radiofrequency application point (e-RFp) were determined in M-map and WF-map. The distance between WF-EAS and M-EAS was assessed. Successful ablation sites included left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT; 55%), right ventricular outflow tract (40%), and tricuspid annulus (5%). Good correlation was observed between the two annotation approaches (r = 0.655; P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a systematic delayed detection of LAT by WF-map (bias 33.8 ± 30.9 ms), being higher in LVOT than in the right ventricle (42.6 ± 29.2 vs. 27.2 ± 30.5 ms, respectively; P < 0.0001). No difference in EAS-eRFp distance was observed between M-map and WF-map (1.8 ± 2.8 vs. 1.8 ± 3.4 mm, respectively; P = 0.986). The median (interquartile range) distance between WF-EAS and M-EAS was 2.2(0-6) mm. Conclusion: Good correlation was found between M-map and WF-map. Local activation time detection was systematically delayed in WF-map, especially in LVOT. Accurate identification of e-RFp was achieved with both annotation approaches.

Elucidation of hidden slow conduction by double ventricular extrastimuli: a method for further arrhythmic substrate identification in ventricular tachycardia ablation procedures.

Aims: Identification of local abnormal electrograms (EGMs) during ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation (VTSA) is challenging when they are hidden within the far-field signal. This study analyses whether the response to a double ventricular extrastimulus during substrate mapping could identify slow conducting areas that are hidden during sinus rhythm. Methods and results: Consecutive patients (n = 37) undergoing VTSA were prospectively included. Bipolar EGMs with >3 deflections and duration <133 ms were considered as potential hidden slow conduction EGMs (HSC-EGM) if located within/surrounding the scar area. Whenever a potential HSC-EGM was identified, a double ventricular extrastimulus was delivered. If the local potential delayed, it was annotated as HSC-EGM. The incidence of HSC-EGM in core, border-zone, and normal-voltage regions was determined. Ablation was delivered at conducting channel entrances and HSC-EGMs. VT inducibility after VTSA obtained was compared with data from a historic control group. 2417 EGMs were analyzed. 575 (23.7%) qualified as potential HSC-EGM, and 198 of them were tagged as HSC-EGMs. Scars in patients with HSC-EGMs (n = 21, 56.7%) were smaller (35.424.7 vs 67.639.1 cm2; P = 0.006) and more heterogeneous (core/scar area ratio 0.250.2 vs 0.450.19; P = 0.02). 28.8% of HSC-EGMs were located in normal-voltage tissue; 81.3% were targeted for ablation. Patients undergoing VTSA incorporating HSC analysis needed less radiofrequency time (17.411 vs 2310.7 minutes; P = 0.016) and had a lower rate of VT inducibility after VTSA than the historic controls (24.3% vs 50%; P = 0.018). Conclusion: Ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation incorporating HSC analysis allowed further arrhythmic substrate identification (especially in normal-voltage areas) and reduced RF time and VT inducibility after VTSA.

Multielectrode vs. point-by-point mapping for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation: a randomized study.

Aims: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation is based on detailed electroanatomical maps (EAM). This study analyses whether high-density multielectrode mapping (MEM) is superior to conventional point-by-point mapping (PPM) in guiding VT substrate ablation procedures. Methods and results: This was a randomized controlled study (NCT02083016). Twenty consecutive ischemic patients undergoing VT substrate ablation were randomized to either group A [n = 10; substrate mapping performed first by PPM (Navistar) and secondly by MEM (PentaRay) ablation guided by PPM] or group B [n = 10; substrate mapping performed first by MEM and second by PPM ablation guided by MEM]. Ablation was performed according to the scar-dechanneling technique. Late potential (LP) pairs were defined as a Navistar-LP and a PentaRay-LP located within a three-dimensional distance of ≤ 3 mm. Data obtained from EAM, procedure time, radiofrequency time, and post-ablation VT inducibility were compared between groups. Larger bipolar scar areas were obtained with MEM (55.7±31.7 vs. 50.5±26.6 cm2; P = 0.017). Substrate mapping time was similar with MEM (19.7±7.9 minutes) and PPM (25±9.2 minutes); P = 0.222. No differences were observed in the number of LPs identified within the scar by MEM vs. PPM (73±50 vs. 76±52 LPs per patient, respectively; P = 0.965). A total of 1104 LP pairs were analysed. Using PentaRay, far-field/LP ratio was significantly lower (0.58±0.4 vs. 1.64±1.1; P = 0.01) and radiofrequency time was shorter [median (interquartile range) 12 (7-20) vs. 22 (17-33) minutes; P = 0.023]. No differences were observed in VT inducibility after procedure. Conclusion: MEM with PentaRay catheter provided better discrimination of LPs due to a lower sensitivity for far-field signals. Ablation guided by MEM was associated with a shorter radiofrequency time.

Long-term prognosis of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias induced by coronary artery spasm.

Aims: Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Much controversy remains regarding the best therapeutic interventions for this specific patient subset. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with a history of life-threatening VA due to CAS with various medical interventions, as well as the need for ICD placement in the setting of optimal medical therapy. Methods and results: A multicentre European retrospective survey of patients with VA in the setting of CAS was aggregated and relevant clinical and demographic data was analysed. Forty-nine appropriate patients were identified: 43 (87.8%) presented with VF and 6 (12.2%) with rapid VT. ICD implantation was performed in 44 (89.8%). During follow-up [59 (17-117) months], appropriate ICD shocks were documented in 12. In 8/12 (66.6%) no more ICD therapies were recorded after optimizing calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy. SCD occurred in one patient without ICD. Treatment with beta-blockers was predictive of appropriate device discharge. Conversely, non-dihydropyridine CCB therapy was significantly protective against VAs. Conclusion: Patients with life-threatening VAs secondary to CAS are at particularly high-risk for recurrence, especially when insufficient medical therapy is administered. Non-dihydropyridine CCBs are capable of suppressing episodes, whereas beta-blocker treatment is predictive of VAs. Ultimately, in spite of medical intervention, some patients exhibited arrhythmogenic events in the long-term, suggesting that ICD implantation may still be indicated for all.

Automatic activation mapping and origin identification of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias.

PURPOSE: Activation mapping is used to guide ablation of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVAs). Isochronal activation maps help to predict the site of origin (SOO): left vs right outflow tract (OT). We evaluate an algorithm for automatic activation mapping based on the onset of the bipolar electrogram (EGM) signal for predicting the SOO and the effective ablation site in OTVAs. METHODS: Eighteen patients undergoing ablation due to idiopathic OTVAs were studied (12 with left ventricle OT origin). Right ventricle activation maps were obtained offline with an automatic algorithm and compared with manual annotation maps obtained during the intervention. Local activation time (LAT) accuracy was assessed, as well as the performance of the 10ms earliest activation site (EAS) isochronal area in predicting the SOO. RESULTS: High correlation was observed between manual and automatic LATs (Spearman's: 0.86 and Lin's: 0.85, both p<0.01). The EAS isochronal area were closely located in both map modalities (5.55 ± 3.56mm) and at a similar distance from the effective ablation site (0.15±2.08mm difference, p=0.859). The 10ms isochronal area longitudinal/perpendicular diameter ratio measured from automatic maps showed slightly superior SOO identification (67% sensitivity, 100% specificity) compared with manual maps (67% sensitivity, 83% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Automatic activation mapping based on the bipolar EGM onset allows fast, accurate and observer-independent identification of the SOO and characterization of the spreading of the activation wavefront in OTVAs.

Safety, long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrence after first-line combined endoepicardial ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Impact of arrhythmic substrate distribution pattern. A prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: First-line endoepicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation has been proposed for patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC). This study reports procedural safety, outcomes, and predictors of recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients [12 with left ventricle (LV) involvement, 7 left-dominant] underwent first-line endoepicardial VT substrate ablation. Standard bipolar and unipolar thresholds were used to define low-voltage areas (LVA). Arrhythmogenic substrate area (ASA) was defined as the area containing electrograms with delayed components. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator interrogations were evaluated for VT recurrence. Epicardial LVA was larger in all cases (102.5 ± 78.6 vs. 19.3 ± 24.4 cm2; P< 0.001). Consistent with an epicardium-to-endocardium arrhythmogenic substrate progression pattern, epicardial ASA (epi-ASA) was negatively correlated with bipolar endocardial LVA (r = -0.368; P= 0.035) and with endocardial bipolar/unipolar-LVA (Bi/Uni-LVA) ratio (r= -0.38; P= 0.037). A Bi/Uni-LVA ratio >0.23 predicted an epi-ASA ≤10 cm2 (100% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Patients showing an epi-ASA < 10 cm2 required less epicardial (8.4 ± 5.8 vs. 25.3 ± 16; P= 0.045) and more endocardial (16.5 ± 8.6 vs. 7.5 ± 8.2; P= 0.047) radiofrequency applications. One patient with epi-ASA < 10 cm2 died of cardiac tamponade after epicardial puncture. Acute success (no VT inducibility after procedure) was achieved in 36 patients (90%). After 32.2 ± 21.8 months, 11 (26.8%) patients had VT recurrences. Left-dominant AC was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR = 3.41 [1.1-11.2], P= 0.044; log-rank P= 0.021). CONCLUSION: First-line endoepicardial VT substrate ablation achieves good long-term results in AC. Left-dominant AC is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. The Bi/Uni-LVA ratio identifies patients with limited epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in whom the indication of epicardial approach should be more cautiously assessed.

Long-term benefit of first-line peri-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant ventricular tachycardia-substrate ablation in secondary prevention patients.

AIMS: This study assessed the benefit of peri-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant ventricular tachycardia (VT)-substrate ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with SHD and indication for secondary prevention ICD implant were prospectively included. Patients presenting with incessant and/or slow VT or frequent (≥2) VT episodes who underwent peri-ICD VT-substrate ablation (the scar dechannelling technique) were compared with those who received ICD alone and did not meet ablation criteria. The primary endpoint was any sustained VT/ICD therapy during follow-up. Of 206 patients included (43.2% non-ischaemic), 70 were assigned to ablation and 136 received ICD implant alone. During a mean follow-up of 45.6 ± 24.7 months, the primary endpoint was more frequent in the non-ablation group (47.1 vs. 22.9%; P< 0.0001). Higher VT recurrence-free survival rate [log-rank P= 0.001; HR = 0.42 (0.24-0.73), P= 0.002] and ICD shock-free survival rate [log-rank P= 0.007; HR = 0.36 (0.17-0.78); P = 0.01] were observed in the ablation group. Higher relative risk reduction was observed in ischaemic [HR = 0.38 (0.18-0.83); P = 0.015] vs. non-ischaemic patients [HR = 0.49 (0.23-1.01); P = 0.08]. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% showed no differences in VT recurrence between treatment groups (log-rank P = 0.213) although VT burden during follow-up was lower in the ablation group [median (interquartile range) 1 (1-3) vs. 4 (1-10) VT episodes; P = 0.05]. CONCLUSION: First-line peri-ICD implant VT-substrate ablation was associated with decreased VT recurrence and ICD shocks during long-term follow-up in patients with SHD and indication for secondary prevention ICD implant, especially in ischaemic patients. In patients with LVEF <35%, no benefit was observed in terms of VT recurrence-free survival, although VT burden during follow-up was lower in the ablation group.

3D delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance sequences improve conducting channel delineation prior to ventricular tachycardia ablation.

AIMS: Non-invasive depiction of conducting channels (CCs) is gaining interest for its usefulness in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. The best imaging approach has not been determined. We compared characterization of myocardial scar with late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance using a navigator-gated 3D sequence (3D-GRE) and conventional 2D imaging using either a single shot inversion recovery steady-state-free-precession (2D-SSFP) or inversion-recovery gradient echo (2D-GRE) sequence. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 30 consecutive patients with structural heart disease referred for VT ablation. Preprocedural myocardial characterization was conducted in a 3 T-scanner using 2D-GRE, 2D-SSFP and 3D-GRE sequences, yielding a spatial resolution of 1.4 × 1.4 × 5 mm, 2 × 2 × 5 mm, and 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm, respectively. The core and border zone (BZ) scar components were quantified using the 60% and 40% threshold of maximum pixel intensity, respectively. A 3D scar reconstruction was obtained for each sequence. An electrophysiologist identified potential CC and compared them with results obtained with the electroanatomic map (EAM). We found no significant differences in the scar core mass between the 2D-GRE, 2D-SSFP, and 3D-GRE sequences (mean 7.48 ± 6.68 vs. 8.26 ± 5.69 and 6.26 ± 4.37 g, respectively, P = 0.084). However, the BZ mass was smaller in the 2D-GRE and 2D-SSFP than in the 3D-GRE sequence (9.22 ± 5.97 and 9.39 ± 6.33 vs. 10.92 ± 5.98 g, respectively; P = 0.042). The matching between the CC observed in the EAM and in 3D-GRE was 79.2%; when comparing the EAM and the 2D-GRE and the 2D-SSFP sequence, the matching decreased to 61.8% and 37.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: 3D scar reconstruction using images from 3D-GRE sequence improves the overall delineation of CC prior to VT ablation.

An easy-to-use, operator-independent, clinical model to predict the left vs. right ventricular outflow tract origin of ventricular arrhythmias.

AIMS: To identify clinical characteristics able to predict a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) origin in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVAs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 117 consecutive patients (training sample) with successful radiofrequency ablation of OTVA in one centre. A predictive model for LVOT origin was obtained using clinical data. The model was prospectively validated in a second population (testing sample) of 143 patients from two additional centres. In training sample, mean age was 54 ± 17 years, 72 patients (61%) were male, and 63 (54%) had cardiovascular risk factors. Sixty (51%) patients had LVOT origin. Independent predictors for LVOT origin were the presence of hypertension [odds ratio (OR) 2.17, confidence interval (CI) 0.91-6.20, P = 0.09], male gender (OR 4.83, 95% CI 1.89-12.33, P < 0.001), and age >50 years (OR 4.46, 95% CI 1.57-12.7, P = 0.005). A simple score was constructed with these three variables to predict LVOT origin (mean predicted probability of 15% for score 0, 26% for score 1, 60% for score 2, and 87% for score 3, P < 0.001) and reached 80% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The score was validated in the testing sample and was not inferior to previously described electrocardiogram algorithms. CONCLUSION: Patients currently referred for OTVA ablation are older, more frequently men, and with a higher probability for LVOT origin than previously described. A LVOT origin is associated with the presence of hypertension, male gender, and older age, and can be anticipated by using a simple clinical score.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate and the approach needed for ablation.

AIMS: The endocardial vs. epicardial origin of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) can be inferred from detailed electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis. However, despite its clinical usefulness, ECG has limitations. Alternatively, scarred tissue sustaining VAs can be identified by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ce-CMR). The objective of this study was to determine the clinical value of analysing the presence and distribution pattern of scarred tissue in the ventricles to identify the VA site of origin and the ablation approach required. METHODS AND RESULTS: A ce-CMR study was carried out before the index ablation procedure in a cohort of 80 patients with non-idiopathic VA. Hyper-enhancement (HE) in each ventricular segment was coded as absent, subendocardial, transmural, mid-myocardial, or epicardial. The endocardial or epicardial VA site of origin was also assigned according to the approach needed for ablation. The clinical VA was successfully ablated in 77 (96.3%) patients, all of them showing HE on ce-CMR. In segments with successful ablation of the clinical ventricular tachycardia, HE was absent in 3 (3.9%) patients, subendocardial in 19 (24.7%), transmural in 36 (46.7%), mid-myocardial in 8 (10.4%), and subepicardial in 11 (14.3%) patients. Epicardial ablation of the index VA was necessary in 3 (6.1%) ischaemic and 12 (42.9%) non-ischaemic patients. The presence of subepicardial HE in the successful ablation segment had 84.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity in predicting an epicardial origin of the VA. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is helpful to localize the target ablation substrate of non-idiopathic VA and also to plan the approach needed, especially in non-ischaemic patients.