Increased risk of ischaemic heart disease after kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports suggest increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular mortality after kidney donation. In this study we investigate the occurrence of ischaemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes and cancer in live kidney donors compared with healthy controls eligible for donation. METHODS: Different diagnoses were assessed in 1029 kidney donors and 16 084 controls. The diagnoses at follow-up were self-reported for the controls and registered by a physician for the donors. Stratified logistic regression was used to estimate associations with various disease outcomes, adjusted for gender, age at follow-up, smoking at baseline, body mass index at baseline, systolic blood pressure at baseline and time since the donation. RESULTS: The mean observation time was 11.3 years [standard deviation (SD) 8.1] for donors versus 16.4 years (SD 5.7) for controls. The age at follow-up was 56.1 years (SD 12.4) in donors versus 53.5 years (SD 11.1) in controls and 44% of donors were males versus 39.3% in the controls. At follow-up, 35 (3.5%) of the donors had been diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease versus 267 (1.7%) of the controls. The adjusted odds ratio for ischaemic heart disease was 1.64 (confidence interval 1.10-2.43; P = 0.01) in donors compared with controls. There were no significant differences for the risks of cerebrovascular disease, diabetes or cancer. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up of kidney donors, we found an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease compared with healthy controls. This information may be important in the follow-up and selection process of living kidney donors.

Predicting donor, recipient and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation to inform pretransplant counselling: the donor and recipient linked iPREDICTLIVING tool - a retrospective study.

Although separate prediction models for donors and recipients were previously published, we identified a need to predict outcomes of donor/recipient simultaneously, as they are clearly not independent of each other. We used characteristics from transplantations performed at the Oslo University Hospital from 1854 live donors and from 837 recipients of a live donor kidney transplant to derive Cox models for predicting donor mortality up to 20 years, and recipient death, and graft loss up to 10 years. The models were developed using the multivariable fractional polynomials algorithm optimizing Akaike's information criterion, and optimism-corrected performance was assessed. Age, year of donation, smoking status, cholesterol and creatinine were selected to predict donor mortality (C-statistic of 0.81). Linear predictors for donor mortality served as summary of donor prognosis in recipient models. Age, sex, year of transplantation, dialysis vintage, primary renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease and HLA mismatch were selected to predict recipient mortality (C-statistic of 0.77). Age, dialysis vintage, linear predictor of donor mortality, HLA mismatch, peripheral vascular disease and heart disease were selected to predict graft loss (C-statistic of 0.66). Our prediction models inform decision-making at the time of transplant counselling and are implemented as online calculators.

Increased long-term risk for hypertension in kidney donors - a retrospective cohort study.

Kidney donors may be at increased risk of end-stage renal disease and premature mortality. Elevated blood pressure after donation may contribute to the increased risks. In this cohort study, we have assessed long-term risk for the development of hypertension in kidney donors compared to a control group potentially eligible as donors. Follow-up data were obtained from previous living kidney donors. A healthy control group with baseline assessment from similar time periods as the donor nephrectomies was selected. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure >140/90, use of blood pressure medication, or established diagnosis of hypertension. Stratified logistic regression was used to estimate risk of hypertension at follow-up, adjusted for systolic blood pressure at baseline, age at follow-up, time since donation/baseline, gender, smoking at baseline, and BMI at baseline. A total of 368 donors (36%) had hypertension at follow-up, and 241 of these (23%) were using blood pressure medication. In adjusted stratified logistic regression analyses, odds ratio for hypertension was significantly increased (1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.39, P < 0.001) in donors compared with controls. Kidney donors appear to be at increased long-term risk for hypertension compared with healthy controls. This finding supports regular follow-up of blood pressure in kidney donors.

Genetic markers associated with long-term cardiovascular outcome in kidney transplant recipients.

There is a clear genetic contribution to the risk of cardiovascular diseases, and a composite genetic risk score (GRS) based on 27 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was reported to predict risk of cardiovascular events in the general population. We aimed to evaluate this risk score in renal transplant recipients, a population with heightened cardiovascular risk, with a yet unknown genetic contribution. A total of 1640 participants from the ALERT trial (Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation), a study comparing fluvastatin with placebo in stable renal transplant recipients, were genotyped for all SNPs making up the GRS. Risk alleles were weighted by the log of odds ratios reported in genome wide association studies and summed. Associations between GRS and time from study inclusion to first major cardiovascular event (MACE) were analyzed by Cox regression. In analyses adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, GRS was significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81, P = .006) when comparing genetic high-risk patients (quartile 4) with genetic low-risk participants (quartile 1). A 27-SNP GRS, which predicted cardiovascular events in the nontransplant population, appears to have predictive value also in kidney allograft recipients. Refining the score to better fit the transplant population seems feasible.

A Fully Automated Method for the Determination of Serum Belatacept and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Investigation in Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Belatacept (Nulojix; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY) is a biological immunosuppressive drug used for the prophylaxis of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Few studies have described belatacept pharmacokinetics, and the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been investigated. We have developed a drug-capture assay (using drug target) to measure belatacept in serum and applied this assay in a pharmacokinetic study in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: CD80 was used to trap belatacept onto streptavidin-coated wells. Captured drug was quantified using Eu-labeled protein A and time-resolved fluorescence. The assay was applied in a pilot pharmacokinetic study in renal transplanted patients receiving belatacept infusions. Belatacept serum concentrations were determined at several time points between belatacept infusions. A simple population pharmacokinetic model was developed to visualize measured and predicted belatacept serum concentrations. RESULTS: The assay range was 0.9-30 mg/L with accuracy within 91%-99% and coefficients of variation ranging from 1.2% to 3.6%. Predilution extended the measurement range to 130 mg/L with an accuracy of 90% and coefficients of variation of 3.8%. Samples were stable during storage at 4°C for 15 days and during 2 freeze-thaw cycles. Belatacept concentrations were determined in a total of 203 serum samples collected during 26 infusion intervals from 5 renal transplant recipients. The population pharmacokinetic model visualized both measured and predicted concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an automated, accurate, and precise assay for the determination of belatacept serum concentrations. The assay was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study in renal transplant recipients receiving belatacept infusions.

High tacrolimus clearance - a risk factor for development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in the transplanted kidney: a retrospective single-center cohort study.

Patients with high tacrolimus clearance are more likely to experience transient under-immunosuppression in case of a missed or delayed dose. We wanted to investigate the association between estimated tacrolimus clearance and development of graft interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) in kidney transplant recipients. Associations between estimated tacrolimus clearance [daily tacrolimus dose (mg)/trough concentration (µg/l)] and changes in IFTA biopsy scores from week 7 to 1-year post-transplantation were investigated. Data from 504 patients transplanted between 2009 and 2013 with paired protocol biopsies (7 weeks + 1-year post-transplant) were included. There were no differences in baseline biopsy scores (7 weeks) in patients with different estimated tacrolimus clearance. Increasing tacrolimus clearance was significantly associated with increased ci + ct score of ≥2 at 1 year, odds ratio of 1.67 (95% CI; 1.11-2.51). In patients without fibrosis (ci + ct ≤ 1) at 7 weeks (n = 233), increasing tacrolimus clearance was associated with development of de novo IFTA (i + t ≤ 1 and ci + ct ≥ 2) at 1 year, odds ratio of 2.01 (95% CI; 1.18-3.50) after adjusting for confounders. High tacrolimus clearance was significantly associated with development of IFTA the first year following renal transplantation.

Long-term risk for kidney donors with hypertension at donation - a retrospective cohort study.

In the general population, small increases in blood pressure are associated with increased mortality. In kidney donors this association is less certain. We therefore assessed long-term overall and cardiovascular mortality in donors who were hypertensive at the time of donation compared with normotensive donors. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure >140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs. Adequate records available in 2131 donors revealed that 140 were hypertensive and 1991 were normotensive. Multivariable regression analyses were performed for overall and cardiovascular mortality. Hypertensive donors were significantly older (mean 57.7 vs. 46.9 years), more were males (44.3% vs. 41.5%), had higher body mass index (26.4 vs. 24.7) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (91.8 vs. 101.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 ). After a median observation time of 20.8 years (interquartile range 11) 71 hypertensive donors had died and 26 of the deaths were cardiovascular. Multivariable analysis did not suggest a generalizable association between hypertension and long-term overall mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.5, P = 0.34] or cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.8, P = 0.55). These data may support the use of older healthy kidney donors with hypertension at donation.

Long-term renal allograft survival: a quiet revolution.

Short-term renal allograft survival has improved more quickly than long-term outcomes. Analysis of more than 100,000 deceased donor renal transplants in Europe from 1986 to 2015 identified a declining rate of improvement in 1-year, death-censored graft survival but a continued improvement in longer-term survival, with a year-on-year 3% reduction in the risk of graft failure. These reassuring observations likely reflect improved overall transplant management rather than specific advances.

Predictors of atherosclerotic events in patients on haemodialysis: post hoc analyses from the AURORA study.

Background: Patients on haemodialysis (HD) are at high risk for cardiovascular events, but heart failure and sudden death are more common than atherosclerotic events. The A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatinin in Subjects on Regular Hemodialysis: An Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events (AURORA) trial was designed to assess the effect of rosuvastatin on myocardial infarction and death from any cardiac cause in 2773 HD patients. We studied predictors of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in AURORA. Methods: We readjudicated all deaths and presumed myocardial infarctions according to the criteria used in the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP); these were specifically developed to separate atherosclerotic from non-atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. The readjudicated atherosclerotic end point included the first event of the following: non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, non-fatal and fatal non-haemorrhagic stroke, coronary revascularization procedures and death from ischaemic limb disease. Stepwise Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of such events. Results: During a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, 506 patients experienced the new composite atherosclerotic outcome. Age, male sex, prevalent diabetes, prior cardiovascular disease, weekly dialysis duration, baseline albumin [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-0.99 per g/L increase], high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.22 per mg/L increase) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.03-1.17 per 10 U/L increase) were selected as significant predictors in the model. Neither LDL cholesterol nor allocation to placebo/rosuvastatin therapy predicted the outcome. Conclusions: Even with the use of strict criteria for end point definition, non-traditional risk factors, but not lipid disturbances, predicted atherosclerotic events in HD patients.

Prognostic utility of estimated albumin excretion rate in chronic kidney disease: results from the Study of Heart and Renal Protection.

Background: Estimated albumin excretion rate (eAER) provides a better estimate of 24-h albuminuria than albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR). However, whether eAER is superior to ACR in predicting end-stage renal disease (ESRD), vascular events (VEs) or death is uncertain. Methods: The prognostic utility of ACR and eAER (estimated from ACR, sex, age and race) to predict mortality, ESRD and VEs was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression among 5552 participants with chronic kidney disease in the Study of Heart and Renal Protection, who were not on dialysis at baseline. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 1959 participants developed ESRD, 1204 had a VE and 1130 died (641 from a non-vascular, 369 from a vascular and 120 from an unknown cause). After adjustment for age, sex and eGFR, both ACR and eAER were strongly and similarly associated with ESRD risk. The average relative risk (RR) per 10-fold higher level was 2.70 (95% confidence interval 2.45-2.98) for ACR and 2.67 (2.43-2.94) for eAER. Neither ACR nor eAER provided any additional prognostic information for ESRD risk over and above the other. For VEs, there were modest positive associations between both ACR and eAER and risk [adjusted RR per 10-fold higher level 1.37 (1.22-1.53) for ACR and 1.36 (1.22-1.52) for eAER]. Again, neither measure added prognostic information over and above the other. Similar results were observed when ACR and eAER were related to vascular mortality [RR per 10-fold higher level: 1.64 (1.33-2.03) and 1.62 (1.32-2.00), respectively] or to non-vascular mortality [1.53 (1.31-1.79) and 1.50 (1.29-1.76), respectively]. Conclusions: In this study, eAER did not improve risk prediction of ESRD, VEs or mortality.

Kidney allograft subclinical rejection modulates systemic inflammation measured by C-reactive protein at 1 year after transplantation.

Kidney allograft inflammation is associated with proinflammatory modifications of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting that renal inflammation contributes to systemic inflammation. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between subclinical inflammation in surveillance biopsies performed at 1 year and systemic inflammation assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at the time of biopsy. We analyzed 544 surveillance biopsies performed at 1 year that were classified as normal (n = 368), borderline (n = 148), or subclinical rejection (SCR) (n = 28). CRP levels were divided into quartiles. Patients in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quartile were classified as low CRP (n = 408) and patients in the 4th quartile as high CRP (n = 136). Univariate analysis showed that the proportion of patients with SCR was higher in the high CRP group (10.3% vs 3.4%, P = 0.0067). Multivariate analysis showed that independent predictors of high CRP were body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.072 and 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.027-1.119), a positive urine culture at the day of the biopsy (OR 2.760 and 95% CI 1.205-6.323), and the presence of SCR at 1-year surveillance biopsy (OR 7.260 and 95% CI 3.530-14.935). In summary, we describe that subclinical acute rejection constitutes an independent predictor of systemic inflammation as measured by CRP.

Paricalcitol supplementation during the first year after kidney transplantation does not affect calcification propensity score.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular complications are common in kidney transplant patients and calcification propensity of blood, measured as T50, is associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Paricalcitol supplementation affects calcium/phosphate homeostasis and may affect calcification propensity. To assess this hypothesis we measured T50 in kidney transplant recipients participating in a randomized study comparing paricalcitol versus no treatment during the first year after kidney transplantation. METHODS: Stored serum samples from 76 kidney transplant recipients (paricalcitol n = 37, no treatment n = 39) were analyzed. Analyses were performed at inclusion (8 weeks after transplantation) and repeated one year after transplantation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in T50 between the paricalcitol and placebo groups, neither at baseline (p = 0.56) nor at 1 year (p = 0.61). Also, there were no significant changes in T50 over time in either group or when pooling all data (p <  0.20). In multivariate regression analysis, out of 16 potentially relevant covariates, comprising clinical and biochemical parameters, only plasma PTH and T50 at baseline were significantly correlated to T50 after one year. (p <  0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Calcium propensity measured as T50 score remained unchanged with paricalcitol treatment in kidney transplant recipients, and was not changed over time during the study period of one year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01694160 , registered 23 September 2012.

Early introduction of oral paricalcitol in renal transplant recipients. An open-label randomized study.

In stable renal transplant recipients with hyperparathyroidism, previous studies have indicated that vitamin D agonist treatment might have anti-proteinuric effects. Animal studies indicate possible anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects. Early introduction of paricalcitol in de novo renal transplant recipients might reduce proteinuria and prevent progressive allograft fibrosis. We performed a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial investigating effects of paricalcitol 2 µg/day added to standard care. Participants were included 8 weeks after engraftment and followed for 44 weeks. Primary end point was change in spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio. Exploratory microarray analyses of kidney biopsies at study end investigated potential effects on gene expression. Secondary end points included change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and endothelial function measured by peripheral arterial tonometry as reactive hyperemia index (RHI). Seventy-seven de novo transplanted kidney allograft recipients were included, 37 receiving paricalcitol. Paricalcitol treatment lowered PTH levels (P = 0.01) but did not significantly reduce albuminuria (P = 0.76), change vascular parameters (PWV; P = 0.98, RHI; P = 0.33), or influence GFR (P = 0.57). Allograft gene expression was not influenced. To summarize, in newly transplanted renal allograft recipients, paricalcitol reduced PTH and was well tolerated without negatively affecting kidney function. Paricalcitol did not significantly reduce/prevent albuminuria, improve parameters of vascular health, or influence allograft gene expression.

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate regimen and subclinical tubulo-interstitial inflammation in low immunological risk renal transplants.

The aim was to evaluate the relationship between maintenance immunosuppression, subclinical tubulo-interstitial inflammation and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in surveillance biopsies performed in low immunological risk renal transplants at two transplant centers. The Barcelona cohort consisted of 109 early and 66 late biopsies in patients receiving high tacrolimus (TAC-C0 target at 1-year 6-10 ng/ml) and reduced MMF dose (500 mg bid at 1-year). The Oslo cohort consisted of 262 early and 237 late biopsies performed in patients treated with low TAC-C0 (target 3-7 ng/ml) and standard MMF dose (750 mg bid). Subclinical inflammation, adjusted for confounders, was associated with low TAC-C0 in the early (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.92; P = 0.006) and late biopsies (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.95; P = 0.023) from Barcelona. In the Oslo cohort, it was associated with low MMF in early biopsies (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98; P = 0.0101) and with low TAC-C0 in late biopsies (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.0286). MMF dose was significantly reduced in Oslo between early and late biopsies. IF/TA was not associated with TAC-C0 or MMF dose in the multivariate analysis. Our data suggest that in TAC- and MMF-based regimens, TAC-C0 levels are associated with subclinical inflammation in patients receiving reduced MMF dose.

Should patients older than 65 years be offered a second kidney transplant?

BACKGROUND: Age and number of recipients in need of kidney re-transplantation are increasing. Re-transplantation practices and outcomes in elderly recipients are not previously explored. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of recipients 65 years and older receiving their second deceased donor allograft. METHODS: The study was designed as a retrospective registry based study. All recipients 65 years or older who received a deceased donor kidney transplant at Oslo University Hospital between 2000 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival outcomes were compared between recipients of first (TX1) and second (TX2) allograft. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models with patient survival, uncensored graft survival and death-censored graft survival as outcomes in the analyses. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty-tree recipients > 65 years received a first (n = 687) or second (n = 46) deceased donor kidney transplant. Five years uncensored graft survival rates were 64% in TX 2 and 67% in TX 1 (P= 0.789). Estimated five years graft survival rates censored for death with functioning graft were 88% in TX2 and 90% in TX1 (P=0.475). Adjusted hazard ratio for uncensored graft loss (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.24 (95% CI 0.77 - 2.00). Adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss censored for death with functioning graft (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.70 (0.72-4.02). CONCLUSIONS: Older recipients of second transplants have outcomes that are comparable to the outcomes of age-matched first transplant recipients, and far better than previously documented for older transplant candidates remaining on dialysis treatment. Advanced age by itself should not be a contraindication for re-transplantation. Best results are achieved with short time on dialysis before re-transplantation.

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetic patients after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation compared with living donor kidney transplantation.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly coronary artery disease (CAD), is high in type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We aimed to determine whether normoglycaemia, as achieved by successful simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation, could improve long-term outcomes compared with living donor kidney-alone (LDK) transplantation. METHODS: We studied 486 type 1 diabetic patients with ESRD who underwent a first SPK (n = 256) or LDK (n = 230) transplant between 1983 and 2012 and were followed to the end of 2014. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Renal Registry and hospital records. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression, with correction for recipient, donor and transplant factors, were used to examine potential associations between transplant type and all-cause and CVD- and CAD-related mortality. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (interquartile range 4.3, 12.9). The adjusted HR for CVD-related deaths in SPK recipients compared with LDK recipients was 0.63 (95% CI 0.40, 0.99; p = 0.047), while the HRs for all-cause and CAD-related mortality were 0.81 (95% CI 0.57, 1.16; p = 0.25) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.36, 1.12; p = 0.12), respectively. Compared with the LDK group, SPK recipients were younger and received grafts from younger donors. Cardiovascular mortality was higher in patients transplanted between 1983 and 1999 compared with those who received their grafts in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In patients with type 1 diabetes and ESRD, SPK transplantation was associated with reduced long-term cardiovascular mortality compared with LDK transplantation.

Total inflammation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies does not predict progression of fibrosis at one year post-transplant.

INTRODUCTION: There is an uncertainty whether total inflammation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies is associated with fibrosis progression. We investigated whether total inflammation, both in fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas, at week 6 would predict fibrosis progression at one yr post-transplant. METHODS: We included 156 single adult ABO compatible kidney recipients with adequate week 6 and one yr transplant protocol biopsies (312 biopsies). Biopsies were scored according to the current Banff criteria. In addition, fibrosis and inflammation in fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas were scored in a 10-grade semi-quantitative eyeballing system from 0% to 100%. RESULTS: Fibrosis increased significantly from week 6 to one yr both by the 10-grade scoring system from 0.69 ± 1.07 to 1.45 ± 1.86, (mean ± SD), p < 0.001 and by Banff interstitial fibrosis (ci) scoring 0.81 ± 0.65 to 1.13 ± 0.87, p < 0.001. The 10-grade scoring system detected a larger proportion of fibrosis progressors than the Banff scoring 40.4% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001. No significant positive association was found between inflammation at week 6 and progression of fibrosis in either of the scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS: Total inflammation in kidney transplant biopsies at week 6 did not predict progression of fibrosis at one yr post-transplant.

Low-target tacrolimus in de novo standard risk renal transplant recipients: A single-centre experience.

AIM: Optimal tacrolimus exposure in transplant recipients is not well established. The results from the Symphony study indicated that low-target tacrolimus (trough concentrations 3-7 µg/L) in de novo standard risk renal transplant recipients should be appropriate. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life outcomes when applying a similar strategy in a clinical setting. METHODS: A single-centre analysis was conducted in standard risk renal transplant recipients receiving low-target tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, glucocorticoids and basiliximab induction. One-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, Cockcroft-Gault), one-year biopsy-proven acute rejection rate and graft- and patient survival up to 3 years post-transplant were compared with the outcomes in the Symphony study. RESULTS: From 1 January 2009 to 31 March 2013, we included 406 patients. One year after transplantation, the mean ± SD eGFR was 76.8 ± 28.3 mL/min (Symphony: 65.4 ± 27.0 mL/min, P < 0.001). Biopsy-proven acute rejections were seen in 14.5% of the patients (Symphony: 12.3%, P = 0.35). Kaplan-Meier estimates [95% confidence interval] of three-year death-censored graft- and patient survival were 96.6% [94.2-99.0%] (Symphony: 93%) and 95.0% [92.6-97.3%] (Symphony: 95%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-target tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is safe and effective also in a standard clinical setting in de novo standard risk renal transplant recipients.

Arterial haemodynamics and coronary artery calcification in adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare arterial haemodynamics in adults with long-term juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to that of healthy controls, and explore the influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and disease characteristics on arterial haemodynamics plus coronary artery calcification. METHODS: 87 JIA patients (median age 38.4 years) with persistently active disease at least 15 years after disease onset (registered by longitudinal follow-up), were re-examined after median 29 years and compared with 87 matched controls. Arterial haemodynamics were characterised by arterial stiffness and blood pressure. Sphygmocor was used to measure the arterial stiffness markers pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx). Coronary calcification was assessed by CT. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients had significantly higher PWV (7.2 vs 6.9 m/s, p=0.035), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, p=0.050 and DBP, p=0.029). AIx was numerically higher in the patients compared to the controls, but no statistically significant difference was found. Coronary calcification was present in 22 (26%) of the patients. Daily smoking was more frequent (p=0.043), and insulin resistance was higher (p=0.034) in patients than controls.In patients, DBP, but no disease variables were determinants of PWV. Disease variables as well as traditional cardiovascular risk factors were associated with higher AIx, DBP and the presence of coronary calcification. CONCLUSIONS: JIA patients with long-term active disease had altered arterial haemodynamics compared with controls in our study. PWV was mainly determined by increased DBP, a parameter that again was associated with JIA disease and treatment variables.

Cardiac response to early conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus in renal transplant recipients--a three-yr serial echocardiographic substudy of the randomized controlled CENTRAL trial.

BACKGROUND: In transplant recipients, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are associated with adverse cardiac effects while mTOR inhibitors have been reported to be beneficial. We performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in de novo renal transplant recipients examining cardiac responses of everolimus vs. CNI. METHODS: This was a substudy of the three-yr CENTRAL study, an RCT on safety and efficacy of early (week 7 post-engraftment) conversion from cyclosporine A (CsA) to everolimus vs. continued CsA. Thirty-nine recipients [median age 64 yr, (range 31-81)] completed echocardiographic evaluations at baseline, one, and three yr. RESULTS: After three yr, there was no difference between groups in left ventricle (LV) diastolic function, LV systolic function, LV morphology, and blood pressure response. We observed a relevant decrease in LV mass (CsA; 9.6%, p = 0.008, vs. everolimus; 7.0% reduction, p = 0.15), stabilized LV diastolic function, and a trend toward lower systolic blood pressure with 6 mmHg decrease in both arms (CsA, p = 0.08; everolimus, p = 0.14). Diastolic blood pressure was significantly reduced (8 mmHg decrease, p = 0.002) only in everolimus patients. CONCLUSIONS: After three-yr follow-up, no clinically relevant effect on cardiac function of an early conversion from CsA to an everolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen was detected in de novo renal transplant recipients.