RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pain outcomes may be influenced by preoperative substance use, which is often underreported due to associated stigma. This study examined the impact of urine toxicology-identified preoperative opioid and marijuana use on pain outcomes after elective spinal surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spinal surgery between September 2020 and May 2022 were recruited for this prospective cohort study. Detailed chart review was completed to collect demographic, urine toxicology, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pain medication data. Comparisons between self-reported and urine toxicology-identified substance use, preoperative/postoperative VAS ratings, and postoperative pain medication use were made using χ 2 tests, Student t -tests, and logistic regression, respectively. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Among 111 participants (mean age 58 years, 59% female, 95% with ≥1 comorbidity), urine toxicology overestimated drug use (47% vs 16%, P < .001) and underestimated alcohol use (16% vs 56%, P < .001) at preoperative baseline relative to patient reports. Two weeks postoperatively, participants with preoperative opioid metabolites reported no significant improvements in pain from baseline (6.67 preoperative vs 5.92 postoperative, P = .288) unlike nonusers (6.56 preoperative vs 4.61 postoperative, P < .001). They also had worse postoperative VAS (5.92 vs 4.61, P = .030) and heavier reliance on opioid medications (odds ratio = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.21-7.89, P = .019). Conversely, participants with preoperative marijuana reported similar improvements in pain from baseline (users: 6.88 preoperative vs 4.36 postoperative, P = .001; nonusers: 6.49 preoperative vs 5.07 postoperative, P = .001), similar postoperative pain (4.36 vs 5.07, P = .238), and similar postoperative reliance on opioid medications (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.38-2.44, P = .928). Trends were maintained among the 83 patients who returned for the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although urine toxicology-identified preoperative opioid use was associated with poor postoperative pain relief and reliance on postoperative opioids for pain management after elective spinal surgery, preoperative marijuana use was not. Preoperative marijuana use, hence, should not delay or be a contraindication to elective spinal surgery.
Assuntos
Cannabis , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
HNN-core is a library for circuit and cellular level interpretation of non-invasive human magneto-/electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) data. It is based on the Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN) software (Neymotin et al., 2020), a modeling tool designed to simulate multiscale neural mechanisms generating current dipoles in a localized patch of neocortex. HNN's foundation is a biophysically detailed neural network representing a canonical neocortical column containing populations of pyramidal and inhibitory neurons together with layer-specific exogenous synaptic drive (Figure 1 left). In addition to simulating network-level interactions, HNN produces the intracellular currents in the long apical dendrites of pyramidal cells across the cortical layers known to be responsible for macroscopic current dipole generation.
RESUMO
Cranial neuralgia (CN) can cause significant debilitating pain within a nerve dermatome. Accurate diagnosis requires detailed clinical history and examination, understanding of pathophysiology and appropriate neuroimaging to develop an optimal treatment plan. The objective of this article is to review and discuss some of the more common CNs including trigeminal neuralgia and its associated painful neuropathies, occipital neuralgia, and less common glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN). The neuroanatomy, pathophysiology, diagnostic imaging, and treatment of each of these pathologies are reviewed with emphasis on the role of CT and MR imaging findings in guiding diagnosis. Although CT is often used to initially identify an underlying cause such as neoplasm, infection, or vascular malformation, MRI is optimal. Clinical history and examination findings along with MRI constructive interference steady state/fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition sequences and MRA of the brain can be used to distinguish between primary and secondary cranial neuropathies and to discern the best treatment option. Pharmacologic and noninvasive therapy is the first-line of treatment of these cranial and cervical neuralgias. If symptoms persist, stereotactic radiosurgery is an option for some patients, although microvascular decompression surgery is the most curative option for both trigeminal and GPN. Refractory occipital neuralgia can be treated with a nerve block, an ablative procedure such as neurectomy or ganglionectomy, or more recently occipital nerve stimulation.
Assuntos
Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos , Doenças do Nervo Glossofaríngeo , Neuralgia , Radiocirurgia , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo , Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos/terapia , Doenças do Nervo Glossofaríngeo/complicações , Doenças do Nervo Glossofaríngeo/cirurgia , Cefaleia/terapia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neuralgia/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuralgia/terapia , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/complicações , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/terapiaRESUMO
The surgical management of spinal tumors has grown increasingly complex as treatment algorithms for both primary bone tumors of the spine and metastatic spinal disease have evolved in response to novel surgical techniques, rising complication rates, and additional data concerning adjunct therapies. In this review, we discuss actionable interventions for improved patient safety in the operative care for spinal tumors. Strategies for complication avoidance in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings are discussed for approach-related morbidities, intraoperative hemorrhage, wound healing complications, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, thromboembolism, and failure of instrumentation and fusion. These strategies center on themes such as pre-operative imaging review and medical optimization, surgical dissection informed by meticulous attention to anatomic boundaries, and fastidious wound closure followed by thorough post-operative care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health threat and is increasingly prevalent among enteric pathogens in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the burden of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in older children, adults, and elderly patients with acute diarrhea in LMICs is poorly understood. This study's aim was to characterize the prevalence of MDR enteric pathogens isolated from patients with acute diarrhea in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and assess a wide range of risk factors associated with MDR. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of data collected from children over 5 years, adults, and elderly patients with acute diarrhea at the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Hospital between March 2019 and March 2020. Clinical, historical, socio-environmental information, and a stool sample for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were collected from each patient. Univariate statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to assess the prevalence of MDR among enteric pathogens and the association between independent variables and presence of MRDOs among culture-positive patients. RESULTS: A total of 1198 patients had pathogens isolated by stool culture with antimicrobial susceptibility results. Among culture-positive patients, the prevalence of MDR was 54.3%. The prevalence of MDR was highest in Aeromonas spp. (81.5%), followed by Campylobacter spp. (72.1%), Vibrio cholerae (28.1%), Shigella spp. (26.2%), and Salmonella spp. (5.2%). Factors associated with having MDRO in multiple logistic regression included longer transport time to hospital (>90 min), greater stool frequency, prior antibiotic use prior to hospital presentation, and non-flush toilet use. However, pseudo-R2 was low 0.086, indicating that other unmeasured variables need to be considered to build a more robust predictive model of MDR. CONCLUSIONS: MDR enteric pathogens were common in this study population with clinical, historical, and socio-environmental risk factors associated with MDROs. These findings may help guide clinical decision-making regarding antibiotic use and selection in patients at greatest risk of complications due to MDROs. Further prospective research is urgently needed to determine what additional factors place patients at greatest risk of MDRO, and the best strategies to mitigate the spread of MDR in enteric pathogens.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine pain treatment preferences before and after participation in an N-of-1 trial. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this observational study nested within a randomized trial, we examined chronic pain patients' preferences before and after treatment in relation to N-of-1 trial results; assessed the influence of different schemes for defining comparative "superiority" on potential conclusions; and generated classification trees illustrating the relationship between pre-treatment preferences, N-of-1 trial results, and post-treatment preferences. RESULTS: Treatment preferences differed pre- and post-trial for 40% of participants. The proportion of patients whose N-of-1 trials demonstrated "superiority" of one treatment regimen over the other varied depending on how superiority was defined and ranged from 24% (using criteria that required statistically significant differences between regimens) to 62% (when relying only on differences in point estimates). Regardless of criteria for declaring treatment superiority, nearly three-fourths of patients with equivocal N-of-1 trial results nevertheless expressed definite preferences post-trial. CONCLUSION: A large segment of patients undergoing N-of-1 trials for chronic pain altered their treatment preferences. However, the direction of preference change did not necessarily correspond to the N-of-1 results. More research is needed to understand how patients use N-of-1 trial results, why preferences are "sticky" even in the face of personalized data, and how patients and clinicians might be educated to use N-of-1 trial results more informatively.
Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Musculoesquelética/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/normas , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Episodes of acute diarrhea lead to dehydration, and existing care algorithms base treatment around categorical estimates for fluid resuscitation. This study aims to develop models for the percentage dehydration (fluid deficit) in individuals with acute diarrhea, to better target treatment and avoid the potential sequelae of over or under resuscitation. METHODS: This study utilizes data from two prospective cohort studies of patients with acute diarrhea in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Data were collected on patient arrival, including weight, clinical signs and symptoms, and demographic information. Consecutive weights were obtained to determine the true volume deficit of each patient. Data were entered into two distinct forward stepwise regression logistic models (DHAKA for under 5 years and NIRUDAK for 5 years and over). RESULTS: A total of 782 patients were included in the final analysis of the DHAKA data set, and 2139 were included in the final analysis of the NIRUDAK data set. The best model for the DHAKA data achieved an R2 of 0.27 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.7 (compared to R2 of 0.06 and RMSE of 5.5 with the World Health Organization child care algorithm) and selected 6 predictors. The best performance model for the NIRUDAK data achieved an R2 of 0.28 and a RMSE of 2.6 (compared to R2 of 0.08 and RMSE of 4.3 with the World Health Organization adolescent/adult care algorithm) and selected 7 predictors with 2 interactions. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first mathematical models for patients with acute diarrhea that allow for the calculation of a patient's percentage dehydration (fluid deficit) and subsequent targeted treatment with fluid resuscitation. These findings are an improvement on existing World Health Organization care algorithms.
RESUMO
In 2016, diarrheal disease was the eighth leading cause of mortality globally accounting for over 1.6 million deaths with the majority of deaths in adults and children over 5 years. This study aims to investigate the clinical, sociodemographic, and environmental risk factors associated with common bacterial acute diarrhea among adults and children over 5. Data were collected from March 2019 to March 2020 in patients over 5 years presenting with acute gastroenteritis at icddr,b. Stool samples were collected from each patient for culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Bivariate associations between independent variables and stool-testing indicating bacterial etiology were calculated. This analysis included 2,133 diarrheal patients of whom a bacterial enteropathogen was identified in 1,537 (72%). Detection of bacteria was associated with: younger age (OR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.96), lower mean arterial pressure (OR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79-0.89), heart rate (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.10), percentage dehydration (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.13-1.55), respiration rate (OR 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.46), lower mid-upper arm circumference (OR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), confused/lethargic mental status (OR 1.85; 95% CI: 1.11-3.25), rice watery stool (OR 1.92; 95% CI: 1.54-2.41), and vomiting more than three times in the past 24 hours (OR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.06-1.58). Higher monthly income (OR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.98), > 8 years of education (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63-1.00), and having more than five people living at home (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.98) were associated with lower odds of bacterial diarrhea. These findings may help guide the development of predictive tools to aid in identifying patients with bacterial diarrhea for timely and appropriate use of antibiotics.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Diarreia/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Criança , Busca de Comunicante , Desidratação/epidemiologia , Desidratação/etiologia , Meio Ambiente , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Nutricional , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Banheiros/normas , Abastecimento de Água/métodos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated determinants of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Vibrio cholerae O1 in older children and adults. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence of MDR V. cholerae O1 and associated risk factors among patients over five years of age in Bangladesh. METHODS: Stool culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed as a part of a larger study at Dhaka Hospital in Bangladesh from March 2019-March 2020. Univariate statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to assess the association between a range of variables and MDR V. cholerae O1. RESULTS: MDR was found in 175 of 623 (28.1%) V. cholerae O1 isolates. High levels of resistance were found to erythromycin (99.2%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (99.7%), and ampicillin (88.9%), while susceptibility was high to tetracyclines (99.7%), azithromycin (99.2%), ciprofloxacin (99.8%), and cephalosporins (98.6%). MDR was associated with prior antibiotic use, longer transport time to hospital, higher income, non-flush toilet use, greater stool frequency, lower blood pressure, lower mid-upper arm circumference, and lower percent dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: MDR V. cholerae O1 was common among patients over five in an urban hospital in Bangladesh. Significant factors associated with MDR may be actionable in identifying patients with a high likelihood of MDR.