Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers.

BACKGROUND: It is assumed that robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) may facilitate complex pelvic dissection for rectal cancer compared to the laparoscopic-assisted resection (LAR). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity, short- and long-term oncologic, and functional outcomes between the RAS and LAR approaches. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2021, all rectal cancers operated on by (LAR) or (RAS) were retrospectively reviewed in two colorectal surgery centers. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients were included in the study, with 70% in the LAR group and 30% in the RAS group. The tumor location and stage were identical in both groups (not significant = NS). The overall postoperative mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups. (0% LAR; 0.5% RAS; NS). The postoperative morbidity was similar between the two groups (60% LAR vs 57% RAS; NS). The number of early surgical re-interventions within the first 30 days was similar (10% for the LAR group and 3% for the RAS group; NS). The rate of complete TME was similar (88% for the LAR group and 94% for the RAS group; NS). However, the rate of circumferential R1 was significantly higher in the LAR group (13%) compared to the RAS group (2%) (p = 0.009). The 3-year recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups (77% for both groups; NS). After a mean follow-up of three years, the incidence of anterior resection syndrome was significantly lower in the LAR group compared to the RAS group (54 vs 76%; p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a RAS was found to be reliable for oncologic outcomes and morbidity. However, the expected benefits for functional outcomes were not observed. Therefore, the added value of RAS for rectal cancer needs to be reassessed in light of new laparoscopic technologies and patient management options.

Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The influence of anastomotic leakage (AL) on local recurrence rates and survival in rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of asymptomatic anastomotic leakage (AAL) and symptomatic anastomotic leakage (SAL) on short- and long-term outcome after curative rectal cancer resection. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical resection of non-metastatic rectal cancer with curative intent from January 2005 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Short-term morbidity, long-term functional and oncological outcomes were compared between patients with SAL, AAL and without AL (WAL). RESULTS: Overall, 200 patients were included and AL was observed in 39 (19.5%) patients (10 AAL and 29 SAL) with a median follow-up of 38.5 months. Rectal cancer location and preoperative neoadjuvant treatment was similar between the three groups. Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was nil. The permanent stoma rate was higher in patients with SAL or AAL compared to WAL patients (44.8 and 30% vs 9.3%, p < 0.001). The mean wexner continence grading scale was significantly different between AAL (11,4 ± 3,8), SAL (10,3 ± 0,6) and WAL (6,4 ± 4,7) groups (p = 0.049). The 3 and 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were similar between the 3 groups (86.6% /84% vs 100%/100% vs 76%/70 and 82.9%/77% vs 100%/100% vs 94.7%/88.3% for patients with SAL, AAL, and WAL, p = 0.480 and p = 0.527). CONCLUSION: The permanent stoma rate was significant higher in patients with SAL or AAL compared to WAL patients. AL did not impair long-term oncological outcome.

Long-term hospital mortality due to small bowel obstruction after major colorectal surgery in a national cohort database.

PURPOSE: Adhesions following major colorectal surgery can be responsible for bowel obstruction, mostly occurring in the small intestine. Published data for long-term survival following major colorectal surgery complicated with intestinal obstruction are limited. The aim of this study was to identify the mortality rates and mortality risk factors in patients with primary colorectal surgery (PMCS) complicated with surgical small bowel obstruction (SBO). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective national registry of patients who underwent PMCS in 2008. RESULTS: Of 15,640 patients who underwent PMCS, 2900 required further surgery for SBO with a median follow-up of 42 months (until the end of 2014). Re-hospitalization mortality rate was 10.1%, and 65% of deaths were obstruction-related. No differences were found in SBO incidence between patients who had undergone laparoscopic or open procedures. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients who underwent open PMCS compared with those who underwent a laparoscopic procedure (11% vs. 2%, p = 0.0006). Overall 1- and 5-year survival rates in patients who underwent surgical SBO treatment were significantly lower when the initial surgery was an open procedure compared with a laparoscopy (96.8% vs. 99.4% and 86.6% vs. 95.1%, respectively, p = 0.0016). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, sex, a history of diabetes, cancer, and heart disease were mortality risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical incidence and mortality rate of PMCS complicated with SBO were elevated. Laparoscopy clearly reduced long-term postoperative mortality in patients with and without abdominal adhesions.

Prognostic Impact of Upfront Surgery for Locally Advanced Upper Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced upper rectal adenocarcinoma (LAURC) is debated. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between LAURC and locally advanced sigmoid and recto-sigmoid junction cancer (LASC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 149 consecutive patients [42 CRT/LAURC, 16 upfront surgery (US/LAURC) and 91 LASC]. Partial mesorectum excision (PME) was performed for all LAURC. Pathology results as well as short-and-long-term outcomes were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Overall mortality was nil. Morbidity was comparable (CRT/LAURC 23.8% vs. LASC: 20.8% vs. US/LAURC: 37.5%, p=0.2354). CRT was associated with a reduced risk of positive circumferential margin (CRT/LAURC: 9.5% vs. US/LAURC: 18.7%, p<0.0001). Recurrence rate, 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were similar between the three groups. CONCLUSION: CRT and PME did not improve LAURC oncological outcomes but were associated with improved margins. CRT for LAURC was not associated with increased morbidity.

Impact of Modern Management Strategies on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Low Rectal Cancer - A Retrospective, Monocentric Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the impact of intersphincteric resection (ISR) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since we implemented rectal ERAS protocol and ISR in 2016, we retrospectively assessed and compared clinical, pathological and survival outcomes of two groups of patients: group 1, treated 2000-2015 (n=242); and group 2, treated 2016-2020 (n=108). Propensity score matching using nearest-neighbor method was used to match each patient of group 1 to a patient of group 2. RESULTS: Before and after matching, the American Society of Anesthesiology score for patients in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (score of 3: 9.9% vs. 25.9%, p<0.0001) as were grade I-II complications (27.7% vs. 45.4% p<0.001). Before and after matching, the quality of the mesorectum excision was significantly lower in group 1 (complete in 31% vs. 59.2% p<0.0001). After matching, 3-year overall survival for groups 1 and 2 were similar (88.2% vs. 92.6%; p=0.988). CONCLUSION: ERAS and ISR had no negative impact on the oncological outcome of our patients and increased the preservation of bowel continuity.

Pectoralis major muscle atrophy is associated with mitochondrial energy wasting in cachectic patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by involuntary and pathological weight loss, mainly due to skeletal muscle wasting, resulting in a decrease in patients' quality of life, response to cancer treatments, and survival. Our objective was to investigate skeletal muscle alterations in cachectic cancer patients. METHODS: This is a prospective study of patients managed for pancreatic or colorectal cancer with an indication for systemic chemotherapy (METERMUCADIG - NCT02573974). One lumbar CT image was used to determine body composition. Patients were divided into three groups [8 noncachectic (NC), 18 with mild cachexia (MC), and 19 with severe cachexia (SC)] based on the severity of weight loss and muscle mass. For each patient, a pectoralis major muscle biopsy was collected at the time of implantable chamber placement. We used high-resolution oxygraphy to measure mitochondrial muscle oxygen consumption on permeabilized muscle fibres. We also performed optical and electron microscopy analyses, as well as gene and protein expression analyses. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Patients were 67% male, aged 67 years (interquartile range, 59-77). Twenty-three (51%) and 22 (49%) patients were managed for pancreatic and colorectal cancer, respectively. Our results show a positive correlation between median myofibres area and skeletal muscle index (P = 0.0007). Cancer cachexia was associated with a decrease in MAFbx protein expression (P < 0.01), a marker of proteolysis through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mitochondrial oxygen consumption related to energy wasting was significantly increased (SC vs. NC, P = 0.028) and mitochondrial area tended to increase (SC vs. MC, P = 0.056) in SC patients. On the contrary, mitochondria content and networks remain unaltered in cachectic cancer patients. Finally, our results show no dysfunction in lipid storage and endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical protocol brings unique data that provide new insight to mechanisms underlying muscle wasting in cancer cachexia. We report for the first time an increase in mitochondrial energy wasting in the skeletal muscle of severe cachectic cancer patients. Additional clinical studies are essential to further the exploring and understanding of these alterations.

Low Tie Compared to High Tie Vascular Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Cancer Surgery Decreases Postoperative Complications Without Affecting Overall Survival.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical impact of low tie ligation (LT) of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) below the left colic artery versus high tie ligation (HT) at the origin of the IMA in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2017, all consecutive patients who underwent rectal resection for non-metastatic cancer were retrospectively included. Patients who had LT were compared to those who had HT. RESULTS: Overall, 200 patients were identified (101 HT and 99 LT). Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was nil in both groups. There were significantly higher severe postoperative complications in HT versus LT patients (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) (18.8% vs. 9.1%, p=0.048). Median follow-up was 38.5 months and overall survival at 5 years was 91.5% and there was no difference between the two groups (90.1% vs. 92.9%; HT vs. LT p=0.640). CONCLUSION: LT ligation of IMA significantly decreased the severe postoperative complication rate without affecting recurrence-free or overall survival.

Complete Pathological Response Following Radiochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Short and Long-term Outcome.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) followed by total mesorectum excision has become the gold standard for locally advanced carcinoma of the low and middle rectum. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of patients in complete pathological response (PR) following this treatment sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients were retrospectively included between 2005 and 2017 in an expert centre, with 3 groups formed, according to the PR: i) complete PR (absence of tumour cells on the surgical specimen ypT0N0), ii) partial PR (T or N downsizing) and iii) without PR. RESULTS: The complete PR rate was 13.1%. The complete PR group tended to develop less symptomatic fistulas compared to partial PR and without PR groups (5.8% versus 13.5% versus 18.7, respectively; p=0.607). The 5-year disease-free survival was increased for complete-PR patients (93% versus 79% versus 47%, respectively; p=0.0003) without an improvement in overall survival. CONCLUSION: Complete PR is associated with an improvement in survival without recurrence and without an improvement in the overall survival at 5 years.

Only Surgical Treatment to Be Considered for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A New Paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) represents a heavy burden in healthcare systems worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although conservative treatment alone can lead to SBO resolution in most cases, its optimal duration is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyze different SBO evolution patterns in order to further determine when to switch to surgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: All patients who were admitted for adhesive SBO between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed. Patients who had immediate surgery (IS), a successful medical treatment (SMT), and a failed medical treatment (FMT) were compared in terms of overall morbidity, mortality, and SBO recurrence. RESULTS: Overall 154 patients were identified, including 23 (14.9%) in IS, 27 (17.5%) in FMT, and 104 (67.6%) in SMT groups. In terms of comorbidities, patients were similar in all groups. Overall morbidity rates were highest in IS and FMT groups (30% and 33%, respectively, vs. 4% in the SMT group, p < 0.001) whereas mortality rate was highest in the FMT group (22% vs. 0% and 0% in IS and SMT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). SBO recurrence rate was highest in the SMT group (22% vs. 4% and 7% in IS and FMT groups, respectively, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: FMT seems to be associated with similar overall morbidity compared with IS but with increased postoperative mortality. Patient frailty seems to be worsened by prolonged inefficient medical treatment.