Bone turnover biomarkers identify unique prognostic risk groups in men with castration resistant prostate cancer and skeletal metastases: Results from SWOG S0421.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal metastases often occur in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) where bone biomarkers are prognostic for overall survival (OS). In those with highly elevated markers, there is preferential benefit from bone-targeted therapy. In the phase IIIS0421 docetaxel +/- atrasentan trial, clinical covariates and bone biomarkers were analyzed to identify CRPC subsets with differential outcomes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Markers of bone resorption [N-telopeptide-NTx; pyridinoline-PYD] and formation [C-terminal collagen propeptide-CICP; bone alkaline phosphatase-BAP] were measured in pre-treatment sera. Bone biomarkers and clinical covariates were included in a Cox model for OS; bone markers were added in a stepwise selection process. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for risk factor models +/- bone markers. Significant variables were allowed to compete in a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Hazard ratios(HR) were calculated by comparing OS in each of the terminal nodes to a reference group in a Cox model. RESULTS: 750 patients were included. Each bone marker significantly contributed to the risk factor-adjusted OS Cox model, with higher levels associated with worse OS. BAP (HR = 1.15, p = 0.008), CICP (HR = 1.27, p < 0.001), and PYD (HR = 1.21, p = 0.047) in combination were significantly associated with OS. Prognostic accuracy was improved by addition of bone markers to clinical covariates. CART analysis selected CICP, BAP, hemoglobin, and pain score for the final OS model, identifying five prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum bone biomarker levels are associated with worse OS in bone-metastatic CRPC. Bone biomarkers can identify unique prognostic subgroups. These results further define the role of bone biomarkers in the design of CRPC trials.

Naftifine. A review of its antimicrobial activity and therapeutic use in superficial dermatomycoses.

Naftifine is an allylamine derivative for topical administration with a mechanism of action distinct from that of other classes of antifungal agents. It inhibits squalene epoxidase and may have certain anti-inflammatory properties, but its precise mechanism of action is as yet unclear. In vitro, naftifine has potent fungistatic and fungicidal activity against dermatophytes. This correlates well with its clinical and mycological activity in patients with dermatophytoses. There is improvement in clinical symptoms and overall therapeutic success after a 2- to 5-week course of therapy in a high percentage of patients (usually over 80%) with tinea cruris or corporis, and in a slightly smaller percentage of those with tinea pedis. Naftifine is moderately active in vitro against moulds, but is generally less active against yeasts, including Candida albicans. However, it has proved reasonably effective in the treatment of patients with cutaneous candidiasis, although further studies are necessary to establish its place in therapy for this indication. In view of its good local tolerability, absence of systemic adverse effects, novel mechanism of action and effectiveness with once-daily application, naftifine offers a useful addition to available pharmaceutical options in patients with dermatomycoses.

Mexiletine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias.

As a member of the class Ib antiarrhythmic drugs mexiletine's primary mechanism of action is blocking fast sodium channels, reducing the phase 0 maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential. It increases the ratio of effective refractory period to action potential duration, but has little effect on conductivity. Unlike quinidine it does not prolong QRS and QT (QTc) intervals. In the dosage range 600 to 900 mg daily mexiletine effectively suppresses premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in 25% to 79% of patients, with or without underlying cardiac disease. In comparative studies the response rate was comparable to that with quinidine or disopyramide. However, the use of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with asymptomatic arrhythmias is controversial. More importantly, mexiletine abolishes spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the short term in 20% to 50% of patients with refractory arrhythmias. Arrhythmia suppression is maintained in 57% to over 80% of these early therapeutic successes in the long term, with mexiletine alone or in combination with another antiarrhythmic drug. As with other antiarrhythmic drugs, there is no substantial evidence that administration of mexiletine after acute myocardial infarction improves long term prognosis. Although the incidence of adverse effects associated with mexiletine is high, the majority are minor gastrointestinal or neurological effects which can be adequately controlled through dosage adjustment. Furthermore, mexiletine has minimal effects on haemodynamic variables, or on cardiac function in patients with or without pre-existing deterioration of left ventricular function, and it appears to have a low proarrhythmic potential. Thus, while the therapeutic efficacy of mexiletine for the prevention or suppression of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias may be no greater than that of other antiarrhythmic drugs, and less than that of some (e.g. amiodarone), it is effective in a significant proportion of patients refractory to other treatments and can be administered without causing adverse haemodynamic effects to patients with complicating factors such as acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure.

Inhaled pentamidine. An overview of its pharmacological properties and a review of its therapeutic use in Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

Pentamidine is an aromatic diamidine derivative which has become one of the standard therapies for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), particularly in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). However, with parenteral administration of the drug there is a high risk of toxicity. Inhaled pentamidine produces much higher concentrations of drug on the bronchoalveolar surface with minimal systemic absorption. It has been used successfully for the treatment of PCP in AIDS patients, but its most valuable contribution has been as prophylaxis in AIDS patients at high risk of developing PCP. In prospective controlled studies there has been greater than 80% reduction in relapse rate with pentamidine. The reduction in relapse rate among patients who have experienced one previous episode of PCP has been 50 to 100% compared with historical control groups, over a follow-up period averaging about 6 months. Significant systemic adverse effects to inhaled pentamidine are rare. Respiratory effects associated with inhalation are common but usually controllable without treatment discontinuation. The ideal particle size for even distribution of pentamidine throughout the lung is considered to be 1 to 2 microns. Jet nebulisers such as the 'Respirgard II' system produce a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of particles in this range. Ultrasonic nebulisers produce larger particles. The implication from this difference is that while ultrasonic nebulisers may have poorer alveolar distribution and the incidence of local side effects (common with all formulations) may be higher, total drug delivery may be more efficient allowing effective PCP prophylaxis with lower dosages (120 mg vs 300 mg monthly). However, there are no data available comparing the efficacies and tolerabilities of the different formulations of inhaled pentamidine. Nevertheless, inhaled pentamidine would seem poised to become routine prophylaxis in patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex at risk of developing PCP.

Enoxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Enoxacin is a new addition to the class of 4-quinolone antibacterial drugs. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro antibacterial activity, and is particularly potent against Gram-negative organisms and staphylococci. The pharmacokinetic profile of enoxacin is similar to that of ofloxacin, achieving higher plasma and tissue concentrations and possessing a longer half-life than norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin. In comparative studies, clinical and/or bacteriological efficacy was comparable or (in studies which statistically analysed the results) not significantly different between enoxacin and amoxycillin in acute cystitis, acute Gram-negative exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute or chronic otitis media, between enoxacin and cephalexin in skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections, between enoxacin and trimethoprim in acute cystitis, between enoxacin and co-trimoxazole in complicated urinary tract infection and between enoxacin and pipemidic acid in suppurative otitis media. Significantly (p less than 0.01) more clinical and/or bacteriological cures were effected by enoxacin than pipemidic acid in acute cystitis and complicated urinary tract infection. In uncomplicated gonococcal infections single oral doses of enoxacin were effective in over 90% of patients. Enoxacin is a well-tolerated, orally active broad spectrum antibacterial drug which should prove a worthwhile alternative to currently available antibacterial therapy.

Enprostil. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

Enprostil, a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E2, is effective in the treatment of patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers. As demonstrated in pharmacological studies in healthy volunteers and in patients with inactive ulcer disease, gastric acid secretion is suppressed by up to 80% for almost 12 hours after single doses of enprostil. The drug also reduces the secretion of pepsin, another 'aggressive' factor in peptic ulcer disease. Interestingly, in contrast to the H2-receptor antagonists, which either increase or have no effect on serum gastrin concentrations, enprostil inhibits basal and postprandial gastrin release. Although the possible effects of enprostil on 'defensive' factors in peptic ulcer disease-which are thought to protect the mucosa-require much further clarification, some evidence obtained in man indicates that bicarbonate secretion is enhanced by enprostil. Further, data from animal studies suggest that microvascular integrity may be preserved by a direct action of enprostil on the gastric mucosa. In healthy volunteers, the administration of enprostil in antisecretory doses protects the gastric mucosa against of enprostil in antisecretory doses protects the gastric mucosa against aspirin-induced injury. Cumulative rates of ulcer healing observed in patients with duodenal ulcers after 4 weeks' treatment with enprostil 35 micrograms twice daily were about 50 to 80%, which were similar to those seen in comparative trials with usual therapeutic doses of cimetidine or pirenzepine, but less than occurred with ranitidine. Moreover, enprostil has been shown to relieve daytime pain in a similar percentage of patients as do these H2-receptor antagonists, but night-time pain appears to respond less well to therapy with the prostaglandin. As evidenced by a few controlled trials in patients with gastric ulcers, treatment with enprostil 35 micrograms twice daily for 6 weeks provides ulcer healing in parallel with pain relief as effectively as cimetidine and ranitidine in a high percentage of patients (about 80% after 6 weeks). Prophylactic treatment with enprostil after initial ulcer healing has reduced the rate of duodenal ulcer relapse in patients 'at risk', but to a lesser extent than has ranitidine. Gastrointestinal symptoms-abdominal cramping and pain, flatulence, nausea and notably, diarrhoea-are the most frequently reported side effects during therapy with enprostil. Diarrhoea occurs in about 10% of patients, but is rarely of a severity necessitating treatment discontinuation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC). A review of its mechanism of action, clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction.

APSAC is a new thrombolytic agent with advantages over conventional therapy such as streptokinase. In particular, it is suitable for intravenous administration over 4 to 5 minutes, in contrast with the prolonged infusion required with intravenous streptokinase, thus facilitating treatment of acute myocardial infarction outside a coronary care unit. Additionally, its fibrinolytic action is theoretically selective for fibrin associated with thrombi, which should minimise systemic fibrinolysis. However, in practice, systemic fibrinolysis does occur to some extent in most patients, but clinically significant haemorrhagic complications are rare. At the recommended dose of 30U injected intravenously over a period of 4 to 5 minutes in patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 hours' duration, reperfusion of occluded coronary arteries occurs in about 72% of patients (range 53 to 91% in individual studies). Subsequent reocclusion has been reported in 0 to 20% of patients in most studies, with an average reocclusion rate of around 10%. The reperfusion rate compares favourably with that reported for intracoronary streptokinase and has tended to be superior to that with intravenous streptokinase. Thus, APSAC is an important advance in thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Of particular importance is its relative ease of administration, reducing the dependence on coronary care units with catheterisation facilities, and the associated costs and delays in implementing treatment. APSAC should result in effective thrombolytic therapy being rapidly introduced after acute myocardial infarction in a wider proportion of patients than was previously feasible.

Bezafibrate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hyperlipidaemia.

Bezafibrate is a lipid-lowering drug, chemically related to clofibrate. At its recommended dosage of 200 mg 3 times daily, or alternatively 400 mg once daily as a sustained-release preparation, it produces substantial reductions in plasma triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia and hypercholesterolaemia, respectively. Preliminary investigations indicate that a single daily dose of 400 mg in a sustained-release preparation is as effective as 200 mg 3 times daily. In patients with any type of hyperlipoproteinaemia bezafibrate also increases the plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration. These effects are equivalent in patients with primary hyperlipoproteinaemia or hyperlipoproteinaemia secondary to diabetes or renal disease, although dosage adjustment is important in the latter group. During long term therapy (2 to 4 years) the influence of bezafibrate on the lipid profile is sustained. The lipid-lowering effects of bezafibrate are at least equivalent to those of clofibrate, fenofibrate, colestipol, probucol or sustained release etofibrate. In addition, the increase in HDL-cholesterol tends to be at least as great as with all alternative treatments studied. Bezafibrate is rapidly eliminated, and thus does not accumulate during prolonged administration in patients with normal renal function. Experimental studies have shown bezafibrate to have a complex range of effects on lipoproteins and on the enzymes and receptors involved in lipid metabolism. However, its exact mechanism of lipid-lowering action is unclear. Bezafibrate enhances anticoagulation in hyperlipoproteinaemic patients requiring anticoagulant therapy, and preliminary investigations indicate that it reduces the plasma fibrinogen concentration, especially in patients with hyperfibrinogenaemia. These properties of bezafibrate could contribute to an antiatherogenic effect of the drug, but further investigation is required to establish the drug's potential as chronic therapy in patients with hyperfibrinogenaemic atherosclerosis. Adverse reactions to bezafibrate have largely been restricted to gastrointestinal disturbances, with some cutaneous reactions and central nervous system effects. The incidence of side effects has been no greater than with comparative lipid-lowering drugs. In patients with renal disease, a few cases of marked elevation of serum creatine phosphokinase and myoglobin, and associated muscle cramps, have been reported (diagnosed as rhabdomyolysis). Hepatic enzyme induction by bezafibrate in rats results in hepatomegaly, but there has been no case of significant hepatotoxicity in man.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Misoprostol. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

Misoprostol is an analogue of prostaglandin E1 and is the first synthetic prostaglandin analogue to be made available for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. It inhibits gastric acid secretion in man, and there is also some evidence that it limits the extent of gastrointestinal damage induced by ulcerogenic agents in animals and healthy volunteers at doses lower than those required to inhibit acid secretion. This 'cytoprotective' activity has been explained by several mechanisms, but its contribution to the clinical efficacy of misoprostol in healing established ulcers is doubtful since the drug does not appear to be effective in healing peptic ulcers at non-antisecretory dosages. In clinical trials, ulcer healing has been reported in 60 to 85% of patients with duodenal ulcers and 32 to 54% with gastric ulcers receiving misoprostol 200 micrograms 4 times daily for 4 weeks--the recommended dosage. In comparative studies, the percentage of patients with healed ulcers after misoprostol (800 micrograms daily) was not significantly different from that with cimetidine (1200 mg daily), although there was greater pain relief with cimetidine. No study has yet been published concerning the use of misoprostol as maintenance therapy for the prevention of ulcer recurrence, and no long term tolerability data are available. However, in acute ulcer healing studies (2 to 12 weeks in duration) misoprostol has been well tolerated. Diarrhoea was the most commonly reported symptom, and this was only rarely of sufficient severity to interfere with treatment. No evidence of histopathological changes in the gastric mucosa induced by misoprostol have been reported in man. Evidence of uterine stimulant effects in women receiving misoprostol during the first trimester of pregnancy has resulted in the drug being contraindicated during pregnancy. Thus, misoprostol is a new type of antiulcer drug, providing an alternative approach to the therapy of peptic ulcer disease. It has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in the healing of both gastric and duodenal ulcers. Future studies need to identify the specific types of patients likely to obtain most benefit from treatment, in order to define more clearly the place of misoprostol in the treatment of these indications, as well as addressing the possibility of ulcer prevention with lower doses of misoprostol.

Terazosin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in essential hypertension.

Terazosin is a post-synaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a similar pharmacodynamic profile to prazosin. It differs from prazosin in having a longer duration of action, with an elimination half-life some 2 to 3 times that of prazosin, allowing the convenience of once daily administration. Moreover, its absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is more complete and predictable than that of prazosin which may facilitate dose titration. Terazosin therapy results in a significant reduction in blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, with little influence on heart rate. The drug is an effective antihypertensive when administered as monotherapy or in combination with a range of antihypertensive agents including beta-blockers, diuretics and combinations of the two. In the few patients with congestive heart failure studied, terazosin produced an increase in cardiac output with a reduction in ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance, but no studies have been performed to assess the therapeutic potential of terazosin in this indication. Reductions in total plasma cholesterol and low density plus very low density lipoprotein cholesterol fractions have been reported after terazosin therapy, while high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations have tended to increase. Should such beneficial changes be confirmed in long term clinical studies they would suggest a therapeutic advantage of terazosin over some other antihypertensive drugs, particularly diuretics, which have been reported to adversely affect the plasma lipid profile. The most common side effects associated with terazosin treatment are dizziness, headache, asthenia and nasal congestion, but these are usually mild and do not require treatment discontinuation. Terazosin is normally administered once daily, starting at a dose of 1 mg/day and gradually titrating upwards as the blood pressure stabilises at each new dose, until blood pressure is adequately controlled or to a maximum dose of 20mg daily. First-dose syncope occurs rarely after terazosin, and can largely be avoided by giving the first dose at bedtime. Thus, terazosin offers a useful alternative to the drugs currently available for the management of mild to moderate essential hypertension either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.

Sufentanil. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Sufentanil, an opioid analgesic, is an analogue of fentanyl, and has been used for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, and for postsurgical analgesia. It has shorter distribution and elimination half-lives, and is a more potent analgesic than fentanyl. In clinical practice, however, intravenously administered sufentanil produces essentially equivalent anaesthesia to fentanyl and is a better anaesthetic than morphine or pethidine (meperidine) for major surgery. It would appear to maintain haemodynamic stability during surgery better than other opioids or inhalational anaesthetics. Postoperative respiratory depression has been reported in a few patients. For outpatient surgery, intravenous sufentanil produces equivalent anaesthesia to isoflurane or fentanyl. Recovery tends to be more rapid after sufentanil and the requirement for postoperative analgesia is less. Initial clinical trials with sufentanil administered epidurally to relieve pain during labour have produced encouraging results, but further studies are required to establish the drug's role in this indication. Epidural sufentanil produces a more rapid onset and better initial quality of analgesia than morphine, buprenorphine or hydromorphine when administered postoperatively, but the duration of analgesia is shorter. Thus, sufentanil's primary place in therapy at this time would appear to be as high dose anaesthesia for major surgery such as cardiac surgery, and as low dose supplement to balanced anaesthesia in general surgery. In addition, low doses administered epidurally seem to have a potential role for analgesia during labour or after surgery although further studies are required to clarify this situation.

Colloidal bismuth subcitrate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease.

Colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) possesses at least equal efficacy with histamine H2-receptor antagonist drugs in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. However, CBS has the advantage of slower ulcer relapse rates than those seen after initial healing with the H2-antagonists. It has been postulated that this effect may be partly due to the antibacterial properties of CBS against Campylobacter pylori, a bacterium found in the gastric mucosa and gastric metaplasia within the duodenum of most patients with peptic ulcer and closely associated with gastritis. However, the role of C. pylori in the aetiology of peptic disease is far from clear. The mechanism by which CBS heals ulcers has not been fully elucidated, but several actions may be involved. CBS and mucus form a glycoprotein-bismuth complex in vitro. This provides a diffusion barrier to HCl and may, therefore, provide a protective coating in the ulcer crater which allows healing of the lesion to occur. Prostaglandin E2 production is also stimulated by CBS with subsequent secretion of alkali into the mucus layer. In addition, CBS has a direct inhibitory effect on C. pylori. Administration of CBS results in low levels of bismuth absorption. Most of the ingested bismuth is excreted as bismuth sulphide, causing blackening of the faeces, and the small amount absorbed is excreted in the urine. Bismuth intoxication (encephalopathy) has been reported with prolonged administration of bismuth salts, and there has been 1 report of similar intoxication in a patient receiving unusually high doses of CBS for a prolonged period. However, no such intoxication has been reported with CBS used at its recommended dosage in the acute treatment of peptic ulcer disease, and no other serious adverse effects have been associated with CBS. Tissue accumulation during prolonged therapy seems likely, and the safety of CBS during long term maintenance therapy has not been established. The lack of effect on gastric acid secretion is seen as an added advantage for CBS, since prolonged drug-induced hypochlorhydria has been postulated to have potentially detrimental effects. Thus, while the role of C. pylori in peptic ulceration requires further clarification, CBS would appear to have an important place in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease with the advantage of relatively slow relapse rates after initial healing and treatment discontinuation.

Ofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Ofloxacin is one of a new generation of fluorinated quinolones structurally related to nalidixic acid. It is an orally administered broad spectrum antibacterial drug active against most Gram-negative bacteria, many Gram-positive bacteria and some anaerobes. Ciprofloxacin is the only other quinolone with superior in vitro antibacterial activity. However, the pharmacokinetic profile of ofloxacin is superior to that of ciprofloxacin, with more rapid absorption and a peak serum concentration several times higher. Moreover, ofloxacin achieves high concentrations in most tissues and body fluids. The results of clinical trials with ofloxacin have confirmed the potential for use in a wide range of infections, which was indicated by its in vitro antibacterial and pharmacokinetic profiles. It has proven effective against a high percentage of infections caused by Gram-negative organisms, slightly less effective against Gram-positive infections, and effective against some anaerobic infections. Clinical efficacy has also been confirmed in a variety of systemic infections as well as in acute and chronic urinary tract infections, and ofloxacin has generally appeared to be at least as effective as alternative orally administered antibacterial drugs. Ofloxacin is well tolerated and, although experience with the drug in clinical practice to date is limited, bacterial resistance does not appear to develop readily. Thus, ofloxacin is an orally active drug which offers a valuable alternative to other broad spectrum antibacterial drugs.

Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Felodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which selectively relaxes vascular smooth muscle. By acting at peripheral arterioles, it lowers systemic vascular resistance and thereby produces substantial decreases in blood pressure and increases in cardiac output. Felodipine is indicated for the management of hypertension, and in patients with mild to moderate disease felodipine monotherapy markedly lowers blood pressure. It proved as effective as atenolol, and equivalent to hydrochlorothiazide, either with or without amiloride, in terms of antihypertensive activity. Comparative studies also demonstrated that once daily administration with an extended-release formulation provides equivalent antihypertensive efficacy to the same amount of drug administered twice daily as the standard tablets. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe hypertension refractory to standard drug combinations, felodipine produced considerable reductions in blood pressure when added to beta-blockers and diuretics, either alone or in combination, in studies lasting up to 48 weeks. In comparative studies of multiple-drug treatments felodipine was found to have superior efficacy to hydralazine and prazosin, and was at least as effective as nifedipine, minoxidil and propranolol, when used with diuretics and/or beta-blockers. As an alternative to hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with beta-blockers, felodipine consistently controlled blood pressure in a greater percentage of patients and usually provided greater decreases in blood pressure. The main side effects with felodipine are ankle oedema, headache and flushing. Although the overall incidence of effects is quite high, they are usually mild in nature. Nevertheless, withdrawal due to side effects has been necessary in about 7% of patients overall. Thus, the efficacy of felodipine has been demonstrated in mild, moderate and severe hypertension. At the present time it seems particularly suitable as a second- or third-line treatment in refractory hypertension, but it also can be used as monotherapy for mild to moderate disease.

Ceforanide. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Ceforanide is a 'second generation' cephalosporin administered intravenously or intramuscularly. It is similar to cefamandole and cefonicid in its in vitro superiority to 'first generation' cephalosporins against several species of Enterobacteriaceae as well as its activity against Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. Its activity against Staphylococcus aureus is less than that of cefamandole, cefuroxime and first generation cephalosporins. The in vitro activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae is excellent. Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and Serratia species, and Bacteroides fragilis are resistant, as are many strains of Proteus and Providencia species. The elimination half-life is relatively long, although shorter than that of cefonicid, and in most clinical trials ceforanide has been administered twice daily. It appeared to be comparable in therapeutic efficacy to procaine penicillin and cephazolin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, to cephazolin in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections due to S. aureus or beta-haemolytic streptococci and to cefapirin in S. aureus endocarditis in parenteral drug abusers. Also, it was comparable in efficacy to cephalothin in the prophylaxis of infection in patients undergoing open heart surgery or vaginal hysterectomy, and to cephazolin in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Thus, ceforanide is an alternative to first and certain other second generation cephalosporins in several important therapeutic and prophylactic situations. It has no advantage over other cephalosporins with regard to spectrum of antibacterial activity, but has a longer half-life than other second generation cephalosporins, except cefonicid, and can be administered according to a twice daily dosage schedule.

Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Ciprofloxacin is one of a new generation of fluorinated quinolones structurally related to nalidixic acid. The primary mechanism of action of ciprofloxacin is inhibition of bacterial DNA gyrase. It is a broad spectrum antibacterial drug to which most Gram-negative bacteria are highly susceptible in vitro and many Gram-positive bacteria are susceptible or moderately susceptible. Unlike most broad spectrum antibacterial drugs, ciprofloxacin is effective after oral or intravenous administration. Ciprofloxacin has been most extensively studied following oral administration. It attains concentrations in most tissues and body fluids which are at least equivalent to the minimum inhibitory concentration designated as the breakpoint for bacterial susceptibility in vitro. The results of clinical trials with orally and intravenously administered ciprofloxacin have confirmed the potential for its use in a wide range of infections, which was suggested by its in vitro antibacterial and pharmacokinetic profiles. It has proven an effective treatment for many types of systemic infections as well as for both acute and chronic infections of the urinary tract. Ciprofloxacin generally appeared to be at least as effective as alternative orally administered antibacterial drugs in the indications in which they were compared, and in some indications, to parenterally administered antibacterial therapy. However, further studies are needed to fully clarify the comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin and standard antibacterial therapies. Bacterial resistance to ciprofloxacin develops infrequently, both in vitro and clinically, except in the setting of pseudomonal respiratory tract infections in cystic fibrosis patients. The drug is also well tolerated. Thus, as an orally active, broad spectrum and potent antibacterial drug, ciprofloxacin offers a valuable alternative to broad spectrum parenterally administered antibacterial drugs for use in a wide range of clinical infections, including difficult infections due to multiresistant pathogens.

The effect of food on the absorption of phenylbutazone from a commercial 100 mg enteric-coated tablet.

It is recommended that many drugs be taken with or after meals. Recently, however, food intake has been shown to alter significantly the rate and/or extent of absorption of many drugs. Such alterations may induce important changes in the clinical activity of these drugs. Enteric-coated phenylbutazone is recommended to be taken with food to minimize possible gastro-intestinal side-effects. The results of this study demonstrate that while food delays the onset of absorption from this formulation by 4-5 h, it has no significant effect on the peak concentration or area under the curve. Thus, some effect on fluctuation in plasma levels at steady-state would be expected, but the mean concentration over the recommended dosage interval would remain the same. Treatment efficacy should therefore be unaffected by food but the tolerability may be improved.