Equity and Quality of Global Chronic Kidney Disease Care: What Are We Waiting for?

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important but insufficiently recognized public health problem. Unprecedented advances in delaying progression of CKD and reducing kidney failure and death have been made in recent years, with the addition of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and other newer medication to the established standard of care with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. Despite knowledge of these effective therapies, their prescription and use remain suboptimal globally, and more specially in low resource settings. Many challenges contribute to this gap between knowledge and translation into clinical care, which is even wider in lower resource settings across the globe. Implementation of guideline-directed care is hampered by lack of disease awareness, late or missed diagnosis, clinical inertia, poor quality care, cost of therapy, systemic biases, and lack of patient empowerment. All of these are exacerbated by the social determinants of health and global inequities. SUMMARY: CKD is a highly manageable condition but requires equitable and sustainable access to quality care supported by health policies, health financing, patient and health care worker education, and affordability of medications and diagnostics. KEY MESSAGES: The gap between the knowledge and tools to treat CKD and the implementation of optimal quality kidney care should no longer be tolerated. Advocacy, research and action are required to improve equitable access to sustainable quality care for CKD everywhere.

Dialysis Distress.

This communication conceptualizes and characterizes the phenomenon of dialysis distress, commonly encountered in persons living with end stage kidney disease on dialysis. Dialysis distress can be defined as an emotional state, marked by extreme apprehension, anxiety, despair and/or dejection, due to a perceived inability to cope with the challenges and demands of living with dialysis. This concept can be extrapolated to persons who undergo renal replacement therapy such as renal transplant. Dialysis distress should be identified in a timely manner, and managed using appropriate support, counselling and education, delivered in an empathic manner.

Assessment of Biomedical Waste Generation in Dialysis Units: A Prospective Observational Study-Is it Time for "Green Dialysis"?

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease and as a consequence end-stage kidney disease (EKSD) is increasing globally. More and more people across the world are requiring hemodialysis (HD). The HD procedure produces a large quantity of biomedical waste. In addition, HD consumes a large quantity of water. In this study, we estimated the waste generated from our government-funded HD unit. Materials and methods: It is a prospective study that was carried out in the dialysis unit in the nephrology department over a period of 1 year. The daily dialysis waste generated by the unit was measured using a spring balance. The proportion of plastic and nonplastic waste was determined. The quantity of biomedical waste generated per person in 1 year was calculated. Water input to the dialysis unit was noted. Water consumption per dialysis was calculated. Liquid chemical waste consumed was determined. Electricity consumed by the unit was measured by the electricity meter. The cost of waste disposal was calculated. The cost of electricity consumption and water consumption was also calculated. Results: The approximate weight of waste disposables generated in one dialysis was 0.75 kg. Approximately each person generates 1.29 kg of waste per dialysis. Each dialysis required 125 L of reverse osmosis (RO) water and to generate 125 L of RO water 250 L of raw water was used. This happens as 125 L of water are rejected during the generation of 125 L of RO water. Thus, the net water consumption for each dialysis was 250 L. Chemical waste generated per dialysis includes 90 mL citric acid per dialysis and 130 mL bleach. Each dialysis consumes 3 kWh (three units) of electricity. The cost of electricity for each dialysis was 25.5 INR and the cost of water was 25 INR per dialysis. The cost of waste disposal for each dialysis bed was 6 INR. Discussion: Each dialysis patient produced 1.29 kg of waste per dialysis which was like other studies. Unlike other studies, the waste was not being reprocessed or recycled. Conclusion: Hemodialysis produces substantial biomedical waste. Proper waste disposal techniques and policies to promote reduction, reuse, and recycling will go a long way toward promoting green dialysis and reducing environmental as well as economic burdens. How to cite this article: Sahay M, Sahay RK, Seshadri B, et al. Assessment of Biomedical Waste Generation in Dialysis Units: A Prospective Observational Study-Is it Time for "Green Dialysis"? J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(10):49-52.

Plasma levels and dietary intake of minerals in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the primary cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide. Altered mineral levels leading to adverse outcomes are widely reported in diabetes but limited in DKD, in the Indian scenario, hence this study was taken up to address this issue. METHODS: A hospital-based case-control study was taken up with 54 healthy controls (C) and 140 subjects with type 2 diabetes wherein 74 subjects with diabetes and CKD formed the DKD group, and 66 subjects with diabetes but no CKD formed the diabetic no-chronic kidney disease (DNCKD) group. High-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to evaluate the blood levels of minerals (calcium (Ca), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and selenium (Se)), and a raw food-based food frequency questionnaire for dietary intakes. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (mL/min/1.73 m2) and albuminuria. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between the categorical variables. RESULTS: The median values of plasma Ca in the DKD group were significantly lower compared with the DNCKD and C groups (10.5 mg/dL vs. 11.0 mg/dL and 11.7 mg/dL, p<0.001). Furthermore, plasma Ca levels lowered with declining kidney function, as evidenced by the eGFR and albuminuria segregation. Dietary intake of minerals did not correlate with the corresponding plasma levels. However, in the DKD group, eGFR correlated positively with the plasma levels of Ca (r= 0.422, p=0.001), Cr (r= 0.351, p=0.008), Mn (r= 0.338, p=0.011), Fe (r= 0.403, p=0.002), Cu (r= 0.274, p=0.041) and negatively with Se (r= -0.486, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Plasma Ca levels are lower in the DKD group with a strong positive association with eGFR, indicating its role in predicting the onset and progression of kidney function decline.

Protocol and Methods: Role of Levothyroxine on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Subclinical Hypothyroid Populations (LP-CKD) - A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is highly prevalent and associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, it is still unanswered whether the restoration of euthyroid status in these patients will be beneficial in retarding a decline in glomerular filtration rate in early CKD patients. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of levothyroxine therapy versus placebo in slowing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline among CKD patients (stage 2-4) with SCH. Methods: This study will be a multicentric, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. A total of 500 CKD patients, 250 patients in the treatment group and 250 patients in the placebo group, will be randomized. The randomization between the treatment arm and placebo arm will be performed as per the computer-generated random number table in a 1:1 ratio. The sample size was calculated based on the assumed reduction in eGFR after 1-year follow-up in the treatment and placebo groups of 10% and 25%, respectively, at a minimum two-sided 99% confidence interval and 90% power of the study and considering 20% loss on follow-up. Each patient will be followed every 3 months for at least 1 year after randomization. Individuals completing 1-year follow-up visits will be considered for analysis. The baseline and follow-up data will be compared between the treatment and placebo groups. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of levothyroxine therapy versus placebo in slowing eGFR decline among CKD patients (stage 2-4) with SCH. The primary endpoint will be the end of follow-up of the patients, reduction of eGFR by ≥50% from a baseline of that patient, or development of ESKD or death of the patients. The secondary endpoint will be any cardiovascular event or arrhythmia after the institution of the drug.