Motives for desiring children among individuals of different sexual-romantic orientations: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the reasoning behind the desire to have children in non-heterosexual individuals. This study compares the motives of different sexual-romantic orientations and their preferred ways of fulfilling this desire. METHODS: This was a monocentric cross-sectional study. Subjects were recruited via social media, personal contacts and queer organisations in Switzerland. An anonymous questionnaire comprised general questions about the participant's background, a validated survey about the desire to have children and additional non-validated questions addressing the impact of sexual-romantic orientation on the desire to have children. The inclusion criteria were adults without children and a completed questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 837 participants, 642 were included in the study. Four groups of sexual-romantic orientations consisted of more than 35 participants: bisexual-biromantic (n = 38), heterosexual-heteroromantic (n = 230), homosexual-homoromantic (n = 159) and pansexual-panromantic (n = 55). Subgroups with a positive wish for a child rated all motives in the same order and with minimal numeric difference. The most important aspect seemed to be emotional involvement. Non-heterosexual-heteroromantic showed concerns about adverse reactions regarding their wish for a child. All orientations hoped for a biological child. CONCLUSION: Our findings about bi-, hetero-, homo- and pansexual people and their motives for a desire to have children agree with the existing literature about hetero, homo and bisexual. The impact of the fear of adverse reaction and discrimination has been discussed before and is supported by our data. We suggest better support before and during the realization of the wish for a child as well as support for non-traditional aspiring parents.

Determinants of transplantation success with cryopreserved ovarian tissue: data from 196 women of the FertiPROTEKT network.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the pregnancy and live birth rates for ovarian tissue transplantation and which factors are associated with the success rate? SUMMARY ANSWER: Pregnancy and live birth rates per transplanted woman are 32.7% and 26.5% and success rate is associated with female age and first versus repeated transplantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Live birth rates after ovarian tissue transplantations have been reported to be between around 24% and 41% per patient. Success rates seem to be negatively associated with increasing female age at the time of tissue cryopreservation and with pelvic radiation. Success rates are apparently not reduced after overnight transportation of ovarian tissue before freezing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Registry analysis of 244 transplantations in 196 women, performed by 26 FertiPROTEKT network centres from 2007 to 2019 with follow-up till December 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Orthotopic ovarian tissue transplantations were performed in 196 women, 191 with previous malignant and 5 with previous non-malignant diseases. Size of transplanting centres varied between 1 and 100 transplantations per centre (median: 2). Factors possibly associated with success rate such as female age, first and repeated transplantation, experience of the transplanting centre and overnight transportation of the ovarian tissue before freezing were analysed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Average age of all 196 transplanted women was 31.3 years (SD 5.2; range 17-44) at the time of cryopreservation of tissue and 35.9 years (SD 4.8; range 23-47) at the time of transplantation. Pregnancy rate was 30.6% (95% CI, 24.2-37.6%) per first transplantation and 32.7% (95% CI, 26.1-39.7%) per patient. Pregnancy rate was higher after first transplantation (30.6% (95% CI, 24.2-37.6%)) compared to second and subsequent transplantations (11.8% (95% CI, 3.3-27.5%)). Live birth rate per first transplantation was 25.0% (95% CI, 19.1-31.7%) and per patient 26.5% (95% CI, 20.5-33.3%). Success rate decreased with increasing age at the time of ovarian tissue freezing. Live birth rate was 28.2% (95% CI, 20.9-36.3%) in women <35 years and 16.7% (95% CI, 7.9-29.3%) in women >35 years. Pregnancy rates after first transplantation were higher in centres who had performed ≥10 transplantations (35.1%) compared to centres with <10 transplantation (25.4%) (P = 0.12). Corresponding live birth rates were 27.0% and 18.6%. Success rates were not different in women with and without overnight transportation of tissue before cryopreservation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The data were drawn from a registry analysis. Data such as ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency were not available for all women. Data might be influenced by different follow-up policies of the centres. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The study reveals the high potential of ovarian tissue freezing and transplantation, but only if freezing is performed in younger women. The study suggests focus should be placed on the first and not on repeated transplantations. It also opens the discussion of whether transplantation should rather be performed by experienced centres. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding. No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The impact of micronized progesterone on cardiovascular events - a systematic review.

Biologically identical menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) including micronized progesterone (MP) has gained much attention. We aimed to assess the impact of MP in combined MHT on venous and arterial thromboembolism (VTE/ATE) (e.g. deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction [MI] and ischemic stroke). Articles were eligible if they provided endpoints regarding cardiovascular events and use of exogenous MP. Literature searches were designed and executed for the databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and interdisciplinary database Web of Science. Twelve studies consisting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies and prospective or retrospective cohort studies were included, and risk of bias was assessed. Only a minority assessed thromboembolic events as a primary endpoint, showing that in contrast to norpregnane derivatives, primary and recurrent VTE risk was not altered by combining estrogens with MP, which was also true for ischemic stroke risk. Similarly, in placebo-controlled RCTs assessing VTE/ATE as adverse events there were no significant intergroup differences. Studies on MI as a primary endpoint are missing. In conclusion, while available data suggest that MP as a component in combined MHT may have a neutral effect on the vascular system, more RCTs investigating the impact of MP alone or in combined MHT on vascular primary endpoints are needed.

Impact of progesterone on skin and hair in menopause - a comprehensive review.

In clinical practice, micronized progesterone (MP) is frequently recommended to treat signs and symptoms of skin and hair aging in menopausal women. The aim of this comprehensive review was to evaluate whether topically or systemically applied MP may effectively prevent or slow down signs of skin and hair aging. Three out of six identified studies reported an impact of MP on skin aging markers in menopausal women. Of these, two studies reported a benefit: one for topically applied MP, another for systemically applied combined menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) comprising MP as progestogen for endometrial protection. Tolerability and safety of MP were good. However, there was no study investigating the impact of MP on menopausal scalp hair. In conclusion, delay of skin aging comprises lifestyle adjustment, antioxidants, and several esthetic procedures. In menopausal women, MHT displays beneficial effects on skin aging. There is poor quality but promising scientific evidence for MP displaying anti-aging skin effects in menopausal women. However, good quality studies are needed.

Follicular flushing leads to higher oocyte yield in monofollicular IVF: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does follicular flushing increase the number of mature oocytes in monofollicular IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Follicular flushing increases the number of mature oocytes in monofollicular IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Flushing increases neither the oocyte yield nor the pregnancy rate in polyfollicular IVF or in poor responder patients. In monofollicular IVF, the effect of flushing has so far been addressed by two studies: (i) a prospective study with minimal stimulation IVF demonstrated an increased oocyte yield, and (ii) a retrospective study with natural cycle (NC)-IVF showed an increased oocyte yield and an increased transfer rate. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Randomized controlled trial including 164 women who were randomized for either aspiration with or without flushing from 2016 to 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile women 18-42 years of age with an indication for IVF treatment at a university-based infertility unit. Women undergoing monofollicular IVF were randomized to either follicular aspiration only or follicular aspiration directly followed by five follicular flushes at a 1:1 ratio. The intervention was done without anaesthesia, using a gauge 19 single-lumen needle. Flushing volume was calculated (sphere formula) based on the size of the follicle. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 164 women were included; 81 were allocated to 'aspiration only' and 83 to additional 'flushing'. Primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat: oocyte yield, defined as the collected mature oocyte rate, was higher (n = 64/83, 77.1%) in the flushing group compared to the aspiration only group (n = 48/81, 59.3%, adjusted risk difference (RD): 18.2% (95% CI 3.9-31.7%), P-value = 0.02). In the flushing group, most oocytes were retrieved within the first three flushes (63/83, 75.8%). Fertilization rate was higher in the flushing group (n = 53/83, 63.9% vs n = 38/81, 46.9%; adjusted RD: 16.8% (96% CI 1.5-31.4%), P = 0.045). Transfer rate was also higher in the flushing group (n = 52/83, 62.7% vs n = 38/81, 46.9%; RD: 15.71 (95% CI 0.3-30.3%)), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.06). The clinical pregnancy rate n = 9/83 versus n = 9/81 (RD: -0.3% (95% CI -9.9% to 9.5%)) and live birth rate n = 7/83 versus n = 8/81 (RD: -1.5% (95% CI -10.4% to 7.1%)) were not significantly different between the flushing and the aspiration group. The median duration of the intervention was significantly longer with flushing (2.38 min; quartiles 2.0, 2.7) versus aspiration only (0.43 min; quartiles 0.3, 0.5) (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean (±SD) visual analogue scales pain score between the follicular flushing (3.4 ± 1.8) and the aspiration group (3.1 ± 1.89). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Blinding of the procedure was not possible. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study proved that flushing of single follicles in NC-IVF increases the oocyte yield. In contrast to polyfollicular IVF flushing seems to be beneficial in a monofollicular setting if the technique used in our study (single-lumen needle, 5 flushings with flushing volume adaptation) is applied. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the financial sources of the division and in part by a research grant provided by NMS Biomedical SA, Switzerland. The company did not have any roles in design or conduct of the study or in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no other conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02641808. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 29 December 2015. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 22 August 2016.

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration and follicle density throughout reproductive life and in different diseases-implications in fertility preservation.

STUDY QUESTION: How do anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum concentrations and follicle densities (FDs) change with age and disease and what are the implications for fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER: AMH concentrations and FD do not correlate in young women, and AMH but not FD is reduced in some diseases, limiting the value of AMH as a predictive parameter of ovarian tissue transplantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AMH is widely used as a parameter to estimate the ovarian reserve. However, the reliability of AMH to predict total number of follicles and the FD is questionable. Women with lymphoma and leukaemia have been shown to have reduced AMH concentrations, but it is unknown if the FD is also reduced. In fertility preservation it is essential to estimate the correct total number of follicles and the FD, as ovarian tissue should only be cryopreserved if ovarian reserve is high. Furthermore, the amount of tissue to be transplanted should be based on the estimation of the real FD. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective observational study included 830 women (mean ± SD age, 28.2 ± 6.81 years; range, 4-43 years) with malignant (n = 806) and benign (n = 24) diseases who cryopreserved tissue in a single centre as part of a national fertility preservation programme. Females with ovarian surgery or known predispositions for a reduced ovarian reserve were excluded. AMH concentrations and FD were evaluated from March 2011 to September 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: AMH concentrations were analysed before gonadotoxic therapies. Standardized biopsies, obtained from different areas of ovarian cortex, were collected. FD was analysed after tissue digestion and calcein staining and was expressed as average number of primordial and primary follicles count per 3 mm biopsy and per cubic millimeter tissue. AMH concentrations and FD were analysed in relation to age and diagnosis group. Both parameters were age adjusted, and associations between the different diagnosis groups and AMH versus FD were assessed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mean ± SD AMH concentration was 3.1 ± 2.81 g/ml, mean FD per 3 mm biopsy was 137 ± 173.9 and 19.4 ± 24.60 per mm3. Maximum AMH concentrations were found in children and teenagers at the age of 6-10 years (5.71 ng/ml) and in adults at the age of 21-25 years (3.33 ng/ml). FD was highest in young children up to an age of 15 years and decreased with increasing age. AMH and FD were not correlated in women ≤20 years and weakly to moderately correlated in women 21-40 years (r = 0.24-0.39). Age-adjusted correlations between AMH and FD were demonstrated in several diagnosis groups such as breast cancer, leukaemia, sarcoma, gastrointestinal cancer and gynaecological cancer but not in the groups exhibiting Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, cerebral cancer, other types of malignancies and other types of benign diseases. Further statistical analysis supported the finding that, in some diagnosis groups such as Hodgkin's lymphoma and in gynaecological cancer, AMH concentrations but not FDs are reduced, questioning the prognostic accuracy of AMH for the FD in these diseases. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Even though biopsies were taken from different sites, heterogenous distribution of follicles might have had some effect on the accuracy of the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS: AMH should be used with care to estimate the total ovarian reserve and FD of cancer patients in young women in some diseases. Therefore, calculating the amount of ovarian tissue to be transplanted based solely on AMH might be inaccurate whereas FD might be a better parameter. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study did not receive any exterior funding.

Effectiveness of seminal plasma in in vitro fertilisation treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques, only 20-25% of the transferred embryos lead to a pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the beneficial effects of seminal plasma (SP) or semen applied at the time of oocyte aspiration or embryo transfer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases were searched from their inception up to August 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of SP or semen in IVF treatment. Trials were considered if women were exposed to any kind of SP or semen (either SP/semen injection or sexual intercourse) around the time of oocyte pickup and embryo transfer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). MAIN RESULTS: Eight RCTs on women undergoing IVF (2128 in total) were included in the meta-analysis. Women randomized in the intervention group had a significantly higher CPR compared with controls (30.0 versus 25.1%; RR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39). No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes, including livebirth rate, biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancies, and birth weight. The subgroup analyses (four RCTs, 780 participants), including only those RCTs in which prepared undiluted SP was injected just after oocyte pickup, conformed with the overall analysis for the primary outcome (46.3 versus 37.2%; RR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.45). CONCLUSION: Because intravaginal or intracervical SP application around the time of oocyte pickup is associated with higher CPR, local application SP may be considered as a potential treatment to improve implantation. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: SP at the time of oocyte pickup is associated with higher CPR.

Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations.

PURPOSE: To study if ovarian response is affected by the type of disease if fertility preservation is required. METHODS: A registry of the trinational fertility preservation network FertiPROTEKT including 992 patients aged 18-40 years undergoing ovarian stimulation and follicle aspiration for fertility preservation from 1/2007 until 3/2016 was analysed. The number of collected oocytes, days of stimulation, total gonadotropin dosage and gonadotropin dosage per day were evaluated. RESULTS: Total oocyte number was negatively correlated with increasing age (r = 0.237, p < 0.0001). Oocyte numbers were in women < 26 years 15.4 ± 8.8, 26-30 years 13.1 ± 8.5, 31-35 years 12.2 ± 7.7 and 36-40 years 9.9 ± 8.0. Age-adjusted oocyte numbers were not different in women with Hodgkin's lymphoma (12.6 ± 8.8), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (12.4 ± 8.2), leukaemia (11.7 ± 8.2), sarcoma (11.8 ± 8.2), cerebral cancer (16.5 ± 8.1), gastrointestinal cancer (13.2 ± 8.1) gynaecological cancer (10.8 ± 8.2) and other types of malignancies (15.8 ± 8.1) apart from ovarian cancer with lower oocyte yield (7.3 ± 8.3, p < 0.001) compared to women with breast cancer (13.3 ± 8.8). The total gonadotropin dose used for stimulation was only elevated in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma compared to women with breast cancer (p < 0.05). Oocyte yield was lower in women with versus without ovarian cancer (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: As ovarian response is not affected by the type of cancer, ovarian stimulation can be performed with the same oocyte yield in different malignant diseases. However, oocyte yield is reduced if ovarian surgery is required and in older women.

Practical recommendations for fertility preservation in women by the FertiPROTEKT network. Part I: Indications for fertility preservation.

PURPOSE: Most guidelines about fertility preservation are predominantly focused on scientific evidence, but are less practically orientated. Therefore, practically oriented recommendations are needed to support the clinician in daily practice. METHODS: A selective literature search was performed based on the clinical and scientific experience of the authors, focussing on the most relevant diseases and gynaecological cancers. This article (Part I) provides information on topics that are essential for the fertility preservation indication, such as disease prognosis, disease therapy and its associated risks to fertility, recommending disease-specific fertility preservation measures. Part II specifically focusses on fertility preservation techniques. RESULTS: In breast cancer patients, fertility preservation such as ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation is especially recommended in low-stage cancer and in women < 35 years of age. In Hodgkin's lymphoma, the indication is mainly based on the chemotherapy regime as some therapies have very low, others very high gonadotoxicity. In borderline ovarian tumours, preservation of fertility usually is achieved through fertility sparing surgery, ovarian stimulation may also be considered. In cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, rheumatic diseases and other malignancies such as Ewing sarcoma, colorectal carcinoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukaemia etc., several other factors must be considered to enable an individual, stage-dependent decision. CONCLUSION: The decision for or against fertility preservation depends on the prognosis, the risks to fertility and individual factors such as prospective family planning.

Gonadotrophin stimulation in IVF alters the immune cell profile in follicular fluid and the cytokine concentrations in follicular fluid and serum.

Study question: Are the immune cell profiles and the cytokine concentrations in follicular fluid (FF) and serum at the preovulatory stage different in conventional exogenous gonadotrophin stimulated IVF (c-IVF) compared with natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF)? Summary answer: The cell counts of CD45+ leucocytes and T cell subpopulations and the cytokine concentrations in FF and serum are different in c-IVF compared to NC-IVF. What is known already: FF-derived cells are heterogeneous. Immune cells are involved in intra-ovarian processes and cytokines are required for normal follicular development. Gonadotrophins stimulate the regulatory intrafollicular system and influence the local distribution of immune cells and the intrafollicular release of cytokines. Administration of exogenous gonadotrophins may have a significant effect on this local regulatory system, which then in turn could influence oocyte quality. Study design, size, duration: The study included 105 patients, 69 undergoing c-IVF and 36 undergoing NC-IVF. c-IVF was performed by exogenous ovarian stimulation with hMG and GnRH antagonists. Participants/materials, setting, methods: FF samples were collected from the first dominant follicle in c-IVF without pooling and from single leading preovulatory follicles in NC-IVF. Three different approaches were used to analyze FF samples: (i) microscopic investigation of CD45+ leucocytes, (ii) fluorescence-activated cell sorting to determine CD19+ B cells and CD3+ T cells including T cell subpopulations (CD4+, CD8+), and (iii) evaluation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (INF-γ), interleukins (IL)-2, -6, -8, -10 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in matched FF and serum samples using the Bio-Plex® platform. Main results and the role of chance: FF obtained from c-IVF contained proportionally more CD45+ leucocytes (P = 0.0384), but fewer CD8+ cytotoxic T cells than FF from NC-IVF. CD3+ T lymphocytes were the most common type of lymphocytes, and the number thereof was comparable in the two study groups. In c-IVF, serum VEGF levels were higher (P = 0.007) than in NC-IVF while FF contained marginally decreased concentrations of IL-8 in c-IVF in comparison to NC-IVF. The cytokine concentration gradient between FF and serum in c-IVF was 10-fold for IL-8 and 8-fold for VEGF and thereby markedly lower than in NC-IVF, where the differences were 32-fold and 30-fold, respectively. Strong positive correlations were determined between FF- IL-10 and FF- VEGF in c-IVF (r = 0.85, P < 0.0001) and in NC-IVF (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001). Large scale data: N/A. Limitations, reasons for caution: The ovulation of NC-IVF follicles was induced by the exogenous administration of hCG, which means that the environment did not fully correspond to the physiological situation. Wider implications of the findings: The differences in the immune profile and the cytokine concentrations in c-IVF and NC-IVF follicles support the hypothesis that conventional ovarian stimulation affects indirectly and heterogeneously the intrafollicular milieu, and thereby possibly affects the oocyte quality and the IVF outcome. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to refine stimulation protocols in the context of optimizing the intrafollicular environment during oocyte maturation. Study funding/competing interest(s): The study was supported by a research grant from IBSA Institut Biochimique SA and MSD Merck Sharp & Dohme GmbH. The authors are clinically involved in low dose mono-follicular stimulation and IVF-therapies, using gonadotrophins from all gonadotrophins distributors on the Swiss market, including Institut Biochimique SA and MSD Merck Sharp & Dohme GmbH.

Two-year development of children conceived by IVM: a prospective controlled single-blinded study.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in mental development of children conceived by IVM in comparison to IVF or ICSI, independently, at the age of 2 years? SUMMARY ANSWER: No differences could be found in mental development of IVM children compared to IVF and IVM children compared to ICSI as well. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Only few retrospective or non-controlled studies addressed the health of IVM children and did not show a negative impact of the IVM procedure. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective controlled single-blinded study including 63 pregnancies (21 per IVM, IVF and ICSI groups) with 70 children expected. Examinations of 62 embryos at first trimester screening, of 57 fetuses at 21st week of pregnancy, of 60 children at birth and of 37 children at their second birthday were performed during the study period from January 2009 until October 2016. Bayley score at the age of 2 was the primary outcome parameter. Data of 40 children after spontaneous conception from a previous prospective unrelated study were further used as control at 2 years examination and compared to the pooled ART group (IVM, IVF and ICSI). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Twenty-one IVM pregnancies achieved in the study period were included. For each of them, the following IVF- and ICSI pregnancies were recruited as controls. Ultrasound examinations during pregnancy, examinations of newborns and of children around their second birthday were done by blinded prenatal specialists, pediatricians and neuropediatricians, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Children conceived after IVM did not show differences during embryonic development, at birth nor in their neuropediatric development at the age of 2 compared to their counterparts after IVF and after ICSI (Bayley score 91.3 ± 21.0 for IVM, 96.8 ± 13.2 for IVF and 103.9 ± 13.1 for ICSI) and of the pooled ART group compared to children after spontaneous conception (96.6 ± 16.4 ART and 103.2 ± 9.4 spontaneous conception). When analyzing singleton pregnancies only, again no differences during pregnancy, at birth and at their 2-year evaluation were detected between IVM versus IVF and IVM versus ICSI. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the small sample size data must be interpreted with caution. To allow a confirmative answer that there are no health risks for children conceived by IVM, large multicenter cohort or registry-based studies are urgently needed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The study adds further information to previous uncontrolled or retrospective studies, which were unable to detect risks for the health of IVM children. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by the 'Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft' (DFG): STR 387/4-1. G.R. receives royalties from Pearson Assessment Germany (editor fee for Bayley-III). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Follicular flushing in natural cycle IVF does not affect the luteal phase - a prospective controlled study.

In contrast to multifollicular IVF, follicular flushing seems to increase the efficacy of monofollicular IVF treatments such as natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF). However, because follicular flushing causes loss of granulosa cells, it might negatively affect luteal phase length and endocrine function of the luteal body. A prospective cohort Phase II study was performed in 24 women undergoing NC-IVF. Women underwent a reference cycle with human chorionic gonadotrophin-induced ovulation without follicle aspiration and analysis of the length of the luteal phase and luteal concentrations of progesterone and oestradiol. In addition, they underwent a NC-IVF cycle which was performed identically but follicles were aspirated and flushed three times. The luteal phase was shorter in 29.2%, equal in 16.7% and longer in 50.0% of cases following flushing of the follicles. Overall, neither difference in luteal phase length was significant [median duration (interquartile range) in reference cycle: 13 (12; 14.5), IVF (flushing) cycle: 14 (12.5; 14.5), median difference (95% CI): 0.5 (-0.5 to 1.5)] nor median progesterone and oestradiol concentrations. In conclusion, follicular flushing in NC-IVF affects neither the length of the luteal phase nor the luteal phase concentrations of progesterone and oestradiol, questioning the need for luteal phase supplementation.

Intrafollicular inflammatory cytokines but not steroid hormone concentrations are increased in naturally matured follicles of women with proven endometriosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the intrafollicular cytokine profile in naturally developed follicles is different in women with endometriosis, possibly explaining the lower reproductive outcome in endometriosis patients. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted at a university-based infertility and endometriosis centre. The study population included 17 patients with laparoscopically and histologically confirmed endometriosis (rAFS stages II-IV), each undergoing one natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF) treatment cycle between 2013 and 2015, and 17 age-matched NC-IVF women without diagnosed endometriosis (control group). Follicular fluid and serum was collected at the time of follicle aspiration. The concentrations of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, IL-18, TNF-α) and hormones (testosterone, estradiol, AMH) were determined in follicular fluid and serum by single or multiplexed immunoassay and compared between both groups. RESULTS: In the follicular fluid, IL-1ß and IL-6 showed significantly (P < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively) higher median concentrations in the endometriosis group than in the control group and a tendency towards endometriosis severity (rAFS stage) dependence. The levels of the interleukins detectable in follicular fluid were significantly higher than those in the serum (P < 0.01). Follicular estradiol concentration was lower in severe endometriosis patients than in the control group (P = 0.036). Follicular fluid IL-1ß and IL-6 levels were not correlated with estradiol in the same compartment in neither patient group. CONCLUSIONS: In women with moderate and severe endometrioses, some intrafollicular inflammatory cytokines are upregulated and not correlated with intrafollicular hormone concentrations. This might be due to the inflammatory microenvironment in endometriosis women, affecting follicular function and thereby possibly contributing to the reproductive dysfunction in endometriosis.

Ninety-five orthotopic transplantations in 74 women of ovarian tissue after cytotoxic treatment in a fertility preservation network: tissue activity, pregnancy and delivery rates.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the success rate in terms of ovarian activity (menstrual cycles) as well as pregnancy and delivery rates 1 year after orthotopic ovarian transplantations conducted in a three-country network? SUMMARY ANSWER: In 49 women with a follow-up >1 year after transplantation, the ovaries were active in 67% of cases and the pregnancy and delivery rates were 33 and 25%, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue in advance of cytotoxic therapies and later transplantation of the tissue is being performed increasingly often, and the total success rates in terms of pregnancy and delivery have been described in case series. However, published case series have not allowed either a more detailed analysis of patients with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) or calculation of success rates based on the parameter 'tissue activity'. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective analysis of 95 orthotopic transplantations in 74 patients who had been treated for cancer, performed in the FertiPROTEKT network from 2008 to June 2015. Of those 95 transplantations, a first subgroup (Subgroup 1) was defined for further analysis, including 49 women with a follow-up period >1 year after transplantation. Of those 49 women, a second subgroup (Subgroup 5) was further analysed, including 40 women who were transplanted for the first time and who were diagnosed with POI before transplantation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Transplantation was performed in 16 centres and data were transferred to the FertiPROTEKT registry. The transplantations were carried out after oncological treatment had been completed and after a remission period of at least 2 years. Tissue was transplanted orthotopically, either into or onto the residual ovaries or into a pelvic peritoneal pocket. The success rates were defined as tissue activity (menstrual cycles) after 1 year (primary outcome) and as pregnancies and deliveries achieved. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The average age of all transplanted 74 women was 31 ± 5.9 years at the time of cryopreservation and 35 ± 5.2 at the time of transplantation. Twenty-one pregnancies and 17 deliveries were recorded. In Subgroup 1, tissue was cryopreserved at the age of 30 ± 5.6 and transplanted at 34 ± 4.9 years. Ovaries remained active 1 year after transplantation in 67% of cases (n = 33/49), the pregnancy rate was 33% (n = 16/49) and the delivery rate was 25% (n = 12/49). In Subgroup 5, tissue was cryopreserved at the age 30 ± 5.9 years and transplanted at 34 ± 5.2 years. Ovaries remained active 1 year after transplantation in 63% of cases (n = 25/40), the pregnancy rate was 28% (n = 11/40) and the delivery rate was 23% (n = 9/40). The success rates were age dependant with higher success in women who cryopreserved at a younger age. In Subgroup 5, tissue was exclusively transplanted into the ovary in 10% (n = 4/40) of women and into a peritoneal pocket in 75% (n = 30/40), resulting in spontaneous conceptions in 91% of patients (n = 10/11). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The data were drawn from a retrospective analysis. The cryopreservation and transplantation techniques used have changed during the study period. The tissue was stored in many tissue banks and many surgeons were involved, leading to heterogeneity of the procedures. However, this does reflect the realistic situation in many countries. Although patients with POI were evaluated before transplantation to allow specific analysis of the transplanted tissue itself, the possibility cannot be excluded that residual ovarian tissue was also reactivated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the largest case series worldwide to date and it confirms that cryopreservation and transplantation of ovarian tissue can be a successful option for preserving fertility. Persistent tissue activity 12 months after transplantation suggests that the pregnancy and delivery rates may increase further in the future. As transplantation into the peritoneum results in a high success rate, this approach may be an alternative to transplantation into the ovary. However, in order to establish the best transplantation site, a randomized study is required. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: This study was in part funded from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (# DI 1525) and the Wilhelm Sander Foundation (2012.127.1) and did not receive any funding from a commercial company. No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: None.

Ultra-low dose - new approaches in menopausal hormone therapy.

Despite increasing life expectancy, the age of onset of natural menopause has not significantly changed in recent decades. Thus, women spend about one-third of their lives in an estrogen-deficient state if untreated. There is a need for appropriate treatment of acute symptoms and prevention of the sequelae of chronic estrogen deficiency. International guidelines call for the use of the lowest effective hormone dosage for vasomotor symptom relief, the major indication for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). In 2011, an oral continuous combined ultra-low-dose MHT was approved in Switzerland. This publication was elaborated by eight national menopause specialists and intends to review the advantages and disadvantages of ultra-low-dose MHT after the first years of its general use in Switzerland. It concludes that, for many women, ultra-low-dose MHT may be sufficient to decrease vasomotor symptoms, but not necessarily to guarantee fracture prevention.

Gonadotrophin stimulation for in vitro fertilization significantly alters the hormone milieu in follicular fluid: a comparative study between natural cycle IVF and conventional IVF.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the steroid hormone profile in follicular fluid (FF) at the time of oocyte retrieval different in naturally matured follicles, as in natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF), compared with follicles stimulated with conventional gonadotrophin stimulated IVF (cIVF)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) concentrations are ∼3-fold higher, androstenedione (A2) is ∼1.5-fold higher and luteinizing hormone (LH) is ∼14-fold higher in NC-IVF than in cIVF follicles, suggesting an alteration of the follicular metabolism in conventional gonadotrophin stimulated IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In conventional IVF, the implantation rate of unselected embryos appears to be lower than in NC-IVF, which is possibly due to negative effects of the stimulation regimen on follicular metabolism. In NC-IVF, the intrafollicular concentration of AMH has been shown to be positively correlated with the oocyte fertilization and implantation rates. Furthermore, androgen treatment seems to improve the ovarian response in low responders. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study involving 36 NC-IVF and 40 cIVF cycles was performed from 2011 to 2013. Within this population, 13 women each underwent 1 NC-IVF and 1 cIVF cycle. cIVF was performed by controlled ovarian stimulation with HMG and GnRH antagonists. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Follicular fluid was collected from the leading follicles. AMH, T, A2, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), E2, FSH, LH and progesterone (P) were determined by immunoassays in 76 women. Aromatase activity in follicular fluid cells was analysed by a tritiated water release assay in 33 different women. For statistical analysis, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon tests were used. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: In follicular fluid from NC-IVF and from cIVF, median levels were 32.8 and 10.7 pmol/l for AMH (P < 0.0001), 47.2 and 18.8 µmol/l for T (P < 0.0001), 290 and 206 nmol/l for A2 (P = 0.0035), 6.7 and 5.6 pg/ml for DHEA (n.s.), 3292 and 1225 nmol/l for E2 (P < 0.0001), 4.9 and 7.2 mU/ml for FSH (P < 0.05), 14.4 and 0.9 mU/ml for LH (P < 0.0001) and 62 940 and 54 710 nmol/l for P (n.s.), respectively. Significant differences in follicular fluid concentrations for AMH, E2 and LH were also found in the 13 patients who underwent both NC-IVF and cIVF when they were analysed separately in pairs. Hormone analysis in serum excluded any relevant impact of AMH, T, A2, and E2 serum concentration on the follicular fluid hormone concentrations. Median serum concentrations were 29.4 and 0.9 mU/ml for LH (P < 0.0001) and 2.7 and 23.5 nmol/l for P (P < 0.0001) after NC-IVF and c-IVF, respectively. Positive correlations were seen for FF-AMH with FF-T (r = 0.35, P = 0.0002), FF-T with FF-LH (r = 0.48, P < 0.0001) and FF-E2 with FF-T (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). The analysis of aromatase activity was not different in NC-IVF and cIVF follicular cells. LIMITATION, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Any association between the hormone concentrations and the implantation potential of the oocytes could not be investigated as the oocytes in cIVF were not treated individually in the IVF laboratory. Since both c-IVF and NC-IVF follicles were stimulated by hCG before retrieval, the endocrine milieu in the natural cycle does not represent the pure physiological situation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The endocrine follicular milieu and the concentration of putative markers of oocyte quality, such as AMH, are significantly different in gonadotrophin-stimulated conventional IVF compared with natural cycle IVF. This could be a cause for the suggested lower oocyte quality in cIVF compared with naturally matured oocytes. The reasons for the reduced AMH concentration might be low serum and follicular fluid LH concentrations due to LH suppression, leading initially to low follicular androgen concentrations and then to low follicular AMH production. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding for this study was obtained from public universities (for salaries) and private industry (for consumables). Additionally, the study was supported by an unrestricted grant from MSD Merck Sharp & Dohme GmbH and IBSA Institut Biochimique SA. The authors are clinically involved in low-dose monofollicular stimulation and IVF therapies, using gonadotrophins from all gonadotrophin distributors on the Swiss market, including Institut Biochimique SA and MSD Merck Sharp & Dohme GmbH. Otherwise, the authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Low-dosage clomiphene reduces premature ovulation rates and increases transfer rates in natural-cycle IVF.

Natural-cycle IVF has been suggested as an alternative IVF treatment. However, efficacy is limited due to high premature ovulation rates, resulting in low transfer rates. This study investigates whether low dosages of clomiphene citrate reduce premature ovulation rate and increase transfer rate. Of 112 women included (aged 35.2 ± 4.5 years) 108 underwent one natural-cycle IVF cycle with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) to induce ovulation and 103 underwent one natural-cycle IVF cycle with 25 mg/day clomiphene from about day 7 until HCG administration. Before retrieval, 1.2 monitoring consultations per cycle were required. Clomiphene reduced premature ovulation rate, from 27.8% without to 6.8% with clomiphene (P < 0.001) and increased transfer rate from 39.8% to 54.4% (P = 0.039). Clinical pregnancy rates without and with clomiphene were 27.9% versus 25.0% per transfer and 11.1% versus 13.6% per initiated cycle. Use of clomiphene resulted in mild hot flushes and headache in 5% of patients. Nausea and persisting ovarian cyst formation was not observed. In conclusion, clomiphene citrate led to very few side effects, required 1.2 monitoring consultations, significantly reduced premature ovulation rate and significantly increased transfer rate per initiated cycle, an effect which was not age dependent.