How I treat refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 represent a promising salvage immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), offering ~40% of long-term responses. In everyday clinical practice, haematologists involved in CAR T cell treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL have to deal with diagnostically complex cases and difficult therapeutic choices. The availability of novel immunotherapeutic agents for R/R DLBCL and recent advances in understanding CAR T-cell failure mechanisms demand a rational approach to identify the best choice for bridging therapy and managing post-CAR T-cell therapy relapses. Moreover, positron emission tomography/computerised tomography may result in false-positive interpretation, highlighting the importance of post-treatment biopsy. In this review, we discuss all above issues, presenting four instructive cases, with the aim to provide criteria and new perspectives for CAR T-cell treatment of DLBCL.

Thrombotic Events Are Unusual Toxicities of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has greatly transformed the treatment and prognosis of B-cell hematological malignancies. As CAR T-cell therapy continues to be more readily adopted and indications increase, the field's recognition of emerging toxicities will continue to grow. Among the adverse events associated with CAR T-cell therapy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are the most common toxicities, while thrombotic events represent an under-reported, life-endangering complication. To determine thrombosis incidence post CAR T-cell therapy, we performed a multi-center, retrospective study on CAR T-cell therapy adult patients (N = 140) from Indiana University Simon Cancer Center and the University of North Carolina Medical Center treated from 2017 to 2022 for relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, N = 3), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, N = 92), follicular lymphoma (FL, N = 9), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, N = 2), and multiple myeloma (MM, N = 34). We report 10 (7.14%) thrombotic events related to CAR T-cell therapy (DLBCL: N = 8, FL: N = 1, MM: N = 1) including 9 primary venous events and 1 arterial event that occurred with median time of 23.5 days post CAR T-cell infusion. In search of parameters associated with such events, we performed multivariate analyses of coagulation parameters (i.e., PT, PTT, and D-Dimer), scoring for adverse events (Padua Score and ISTH DIC Score) and grading for CAR T-cell toxicity severity (CRS grade and ICANS grade) and found that D-Dimer peak elevation and ICANS grade were significantly associated with post-CAR T-cell infusion thrombosis. While the pathophysiology of CAR T-cell associated coagulopathy remains unknown, our study serves to develop awareness of these emerging and unusual complications.

Management of adults and children receiving CAR T-cell therapy: 2021 best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association (EHA).

BACKGROUND: Several commercial and academic autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products targeting CD19 have been approved in Europe for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Products for other diseases such as multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma are likely to be approved by the European Medicines Agency in the near future. DESIGN: The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association collaborated to draft best practice recommendations based on the current literature to support health care professionals in delivering consistent, high-quality care in this rapidly moving field. RESULTS: Thirty-six CAR-T experts (medical, nursing, pharmacy/laboratory) assembled to draft recommendations to cover all aspects of CAR-T patient care and supply chain management, from patient selection to long-term follow-up, post-authorisation safety surveillance and regulatory issues. CONCLUSIONS: We provide practical, clinically relevant recommendations on the use of these high-cost, logistically complex therapies for haematologists/oncologists, nurses and other stakeholders including pharmacists and health sector administrators involved in the delivery of CAR-T in the clinic.

Priming treatment with T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody ERY974 reduced cytokine induction without losing cytotoxic activity in vitro by changing the chromatin state in T cells.

CD3 bispecific constructs are anticipated to become an important form of cancer immunotherapy, but they frequently cause cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that is difficult to manage in clinical contexts. A combination of intra-patient dose escalation and immunosuppressive treatment is widely used to mitigate CRS. Studies suggest that CRS after subsequent doses of CD3 bispecific constructs is less severe than after the priming dose, and that step-up dosing reduces cytokine levels in animals and humans. However, the mechanism underlying the reduced cytokine induction after priming treatment with CD3 bispecific constructs is unclear. To understand human T-cell activation and chromatin states after priming treatment with CD3 bispecific construct targeting CD3ɛ and glypican 3 (ERY974), we examined cytokine levels, cytokine mRNA expression, CD3ɛ expression, CD3-mediated signal transduction, T cell activation markers, cytotoxicity against target cells, and chromatin states in T cells after ERY974 priming treatment or negative control. The second ERY974 treatment decreased cytokines on Day 8, and ERY974 priming treatment changed the chromatin state in T cells. CD3ɛ expression, CD3-mediated signal transduction, T cell activation markers, and cytotoxicity were similar between the priming treatment with ERY974 and negative control. The present study suggests that chromatin state changes in T cells after the priming treatment was a pivotal factor in the mitigation of cytokine release after the second ERY974 treatment.

Need for aligning the definition and reporting of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in immuno-oncology clinical trials.

As cancer immunotherapies continue to expand across all areas of oncology, it is imperative to establish a standardized approach for defining and capturing clinically important toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). In this paper, we provide considerations for categorizing the variety of adverse events that may accompany CRS and for recognizing that presentations of CRS may differ among various immunotherapies (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, CAR T cell therapies and T cell engagers, which can include bispecific antibodies and other constructs). The goals of this paper are to ensure accurate and consistent identification of CRS in patients receiving immunotherapies in clinical studies to aid in reporting; enable more precise evaluation of the therapeutic risk-benefit profile and cross-study analyses; support evidence-based monitoring and management of important toxicities related to cancer immunotherapies; and improve patient care and outcomes. These efforts will become more important as the number and variety of molecular targets for immunotherapies broaden and as therapies with novel mechanisms continue to be developed.

CD20-specific chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells as salvage therapy in rituximab-refractory/relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells that target specific tumor-associated antigens is a promising strategy that has exhibited encouraging results in clinical trials. However, few studies have focused on the effectiveness and safety of CD20 CAR T cells in rituximab-refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) patients, particularly those treated with rituximab for a short time. This prospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of CD20 CAR T cells in R/R B-NHL patients previously treated with rituximab. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, single-center phase I study on the effectiveness and toxicity of CD20 CAR T cells in rituximab-treated R/R B-NHL patients (no. ChiCTR2000036350). A total of 15 patients with R/R B-NHL were enrolled between November 21, 2017, and December 1, 2021. RESULTS: An overall response rate of 100% was shown in enrolled patients, with 12 (80%) achieving complete remission and three (20%) achieving partial remission for the best response. The median follow-up time was 12.4 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were not yet reached by the data cutoff day. No patient developed grade 4 cytokine release syndrome, and only one patient had immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: All enrolled B-NHL patients who were previously R/R to rituximab achieved different degrees of clinical response with tolerable toxicities. Notably, patients who had received rituximab within 3 months had a poorer prognosis.

Side-effect management of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against the B-cell marker CD19 are currently changing the landscape for treatment of patients with refractory and/or relapsed B-cell malignancies. Due to the nature of CAR T cells as living drugs, they display a unique toxicity profile. As CAR T-cell therapy is extending towards other diseases and being more broadly employed in hematology and oncology, optimal management strategies of side-effects associated with CAR T-cell therapy are of high relevance. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias constitute challenges in the treatment of patients with CAR T cells. This review summarizes the current understanding of CAR T-cell toxicity and its management.

CAR T Cells.

In 1891, Dr. William B. Coley, an American surgeon, made a compelling observation that immune system can be triggered to shrink tumors. The quest to exploit the power of immunotherapy however was forestalled by an era of chemotherapy that ensued. During World War II, the accidental sinking of a US naval ship led to a group of sailors developing pancytopenia due to poisoning from mustard gas (nitrogen mustard). The observation prompted wide-scale screening of these chemical compounds with cytotoxic potential; further clinical trials led to the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a chemotherapy drug, nitrogen mustard. Immunotherapy field took further impetus, not until the last two decades, due to our deeper understanding of the immune system and the cellular and molecular pathways leading to tumor development. Two groundbreaking therapies which have shown great promise in this field involve "taking the breaks off" and "pushing the pedal" of the immune system. These therapies, namely, immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy, respectively, have been successful in a variety of malignancies, while the former mostly in solid tumors and the latter in hematological malignancies.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inactivation in CAR T-cells prevents monocyte-dependent release of key cytokine release syndrome mediators.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has been shown to be clinically effective for managing a variety of hematological cancers. However, CAR T-cell therapy is associated with multiple adverse effects, including neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). CRS arises from massive cytokine secretion and can be life-threatening, but it is typically managed with an anti-IL-6Ra mAb or glucocorticoid administration. However, these treatments add to a patient's medication burden and address only the CRS symptoms. Therefore, alternative strategies that can prevent CRS and neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell treatment are urgently needed. Here, we explored a therapeutic route aimed at preventing CRS rather than limiting its consequences. Using a cytokine-profiling assay, we show that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) is a key CRS-promoting protein. Through a combination of in vitro experiments and gene-editing technology, we further demonstrate that antibody-mediated neutralization or TALEN-mediated genetic inactivation of GMCSF in CAR T-cells drastically decreases available GMCSF and abolishes macrophage-dependent secretion of CRS biomarkers, including monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL) 6, and IL-8. Of note, we also found that the genetic inactivation of GMCSF does not impair the antitumor function or proliferative capacity of CAR T-cells in vitro We conclude that it is possible to prevent CRS by using "all-in-one" GMCSF-knockout CAR T-cells. This approach may eliminate the need for anti-CRS treatment and may improve the overall safety of CAR T-cell therapies for cancer patients.

Management of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Toxicities: A Review and Guideline for Emergency Providers.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an adoptive cellular immunotherapy that is being utilized more frequently due to its initial success in advanced-stage cancers. Unfortunately, CAR T-cell therapy is often associated with acute systemic toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity (neurotoxicity). OBJECTIVE: We created a review that addresses the potential common emergency department (ED) presentations associated with CAR T-cell therapy. We reviewed the relevant research and clinical guidelines to develop a guide tailored toward addressing the needs of the emergency medicine community to manage these complications. In addition, a case is presented and the evaluation and management of CRS and neurotoxicity are reviewed in detail. DISCUSSION: Despite CAR T-cell designs showing promising results, the risk of acquiring an acute toxicity is high, with CRS and neurotoxicity reported most often. The systemic toxicities associated with these adverse events can lead to end-organ damage and compromise the patient acutely or jeopardize the continuation in treatment of their underlying malignancy. Depending on the severity of the toxicity, treatment typically starts with vigilant supportive care, but may include administration of tocilizumab and possibly high-dose corticosteroids if the toxicity is deemed of high severity. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing administration of CAR T-cell therapy, emergency physicians will likely encounter more patients with associated adverse events, including CRS and neurotoxicity. It is increasingly important that emergency physicians are aware of these potential toxicities in order to rapidly diagnose and treat patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.

American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pharmacy Special Interest Group Survey on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Administrative, Logistic, and Toxicity Management Practices in the United States.

Administration of immune effector cell (IEC) therapy is a complex endeavor requiring extensive coordination and communication of various healthcare and administrative teams. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are the most established IEC therapy available. As of July 2018 two commercial gene therapy products, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. To gain insight into the infrastructure and practices across the country, the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pharmacy Special Interest Group conducted an electronic survey on the current administrative, logistic, and toxicity management practices of CAR T cell therapy across the United States. This survey consists of 52 responses from institutions of varying sizes, most of which (∼80%) had previous investigational experience with CAR T cell therapy. Absorbing the energy of this exciting new treatment has challenged hematopoietic cell transplant programs across the country to strengthen department infrastructure, develop new committees and policies, and implement significant education to ensure safe administration. With the variety of experience with CAR T cell therapy, we hope this survey can contribute to the existing published literature and provide support and consensus to established and developing IEC programs and practice guidelines.

Daily ascending dosing in cynomolgus monkeys to mitigate cytokine release syndrome induced by ERY22, surrogate for T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody ERY974 for cancer immunotherapy.

CD3 bispecific constructs show promising therapeutic potential as anti-tumor antibodies, but it has concurrently been difficult to manage cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in clinical use. Currently, the most effective measure for reducing CRS is considered a combination of intra-patient/animal dose escalation and corticosteroid premedication. To examine how effectively an intra-animal ascending dose regimen without premedication would mitigate CRS, we compared plasma cytokine levels in two groups of cynomolgus monkeys; one group was given a single dose, and the other a three-fold daily ascending dose of a CD3 bispecific construct that targets and cross-reacts with both glypican 3 and CD3 (ERY22). Ascending doses up to 1000 µg/kg of ERY22 dramatically reduced the peak cytokine levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, IL-2 as well the clinical severity of CRS compared with a single dose of 1000 µg/kg. Peak cytokine levels following the single and ascending doses were 60,095 pg/mL and 1221 pg/mL for IL-6; 353 pg/mL and 14 pg/mL for TNF-α; 123 pg/mL and 16 pg/mL for IFN-γ; and 2219 pg/mL and 42 pg/mL for IL-2. The tolerance acquired with daily ascending doses up to 1000 µg/kg remained in effect for the following weekly doses of 1000 µg/kg.

From a Patient Advocate's Perspective: Does Cancer Immunotherapy Represent a Paradigm Shift?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) announced immunotherapy as the year's top cancer advance in its "Clinical Cancer Advances 2016: ASCO's Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer." Further, ASCO again named "Immunotherapy 2.0" as the 2017 advance of the year, emphasizing the recent, rapid pace of research into new agents that harness and enhance the innate abilities of the immune system to recognize and fight cancers-and stressing that such agents have extended the lives of many patients with late-stage cancers for which there have been few treatment options. This article discusses the history of cancer immunotherapy and the recent promising advances, yet also presents a note of caution on limitations of immunotherapies, their potential harms, and the critical need for oncologists to appropriately engage with and educate patients to effectively manage their expectations. RECENT FINDINGS: Learning how to effectively harness the immune system to treat cancer represents an investigative journey of more than 100 years. However, after many failures and disappointments, this decade has seen several important successes. In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first immunotherapy agent known as a "checkpoint inhibitor." Beginning in 2014, several additional checkpoint blockage drugs have been FDA-approved, and new indications and drug combinations have emerged. Further, on August 30, 2017, the FDA announced its first approval of a new form of immunotherapy known as CAR T cell therapy. Since the 2011 approval of the first checkpoint inhibitor, cancer immunotherapy research among the pharmaceutical industry and research institutions has exploded, with thousands of clinical trials currently taking place. The current "cancer immunotherapy revolution" is in the headlines daily and is also the primary topic of conversation among major cancer research conferences and symposia attendees. However, a once quiet voice has begun to emerge, where an increasing number of scientists, clinicians, and patient advocates are stressing the need for caution concerning the limitations and potential harms associated with cancer immunotherapy. Many oncologists, scientists, medical professional associations, and advocates agree that no recent cancer advance has been as successful, transformative, and potentially paradigm-shifting as immunotherapy. With this decade, we have seen the approval of several immunotherapy agents that have successfully treated a percentage of patients with notoriously resistant cancers, an increasing number of combination immunotherapy treatments, and new indications for approved agents. However, patients need to be aware that much of the popular media has breathlessly inflated positive outcomes of cancer immunotherapies, while neglecting to stress that just a small percentage of patients actually benefit from such treatments. Further, they often completely overlook the unique, potentially life-threatening harms that may be associated with these agents and fail to cover negative findings where immunotherapies have appeared to paradoxically accelerate cancer growth. Fortunately, the majority of journal articles presenting trial results and comprehensive review articles appropriately discuss the important limitations associated with immunotherapies, the unique spectrum of adverse effects, and the need for further research to improve our ability to identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents, sparing other patients from exposure to agents that will not be effective, yet may carry potentially life-threatening toxicities.

Severe Cytokine-Release Syndrome after T Cell-Replete Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Is Associated with Poor Survival and Anti-IL-6 Therapy Is Safe and Well Tolerated.

Use of high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis has expanded the use of unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation. The immediate post-transplantation course in T cell-replete peripheral blood haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is often complicated by symptoms resembling cytokine-release syndrome (CRS), previously described in recipients of targeted cellular therapeutics. However, we know little about the incidence and impact of CRS on outcomes in these patients. To understand this syndrome in haplo-HCT patients, we reviewed data from 75 consecutive patients who received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized T cell-replete peripheral blood haplo-HCT at a single center. Using CRS criteria described in recipients of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, we found 65 of 75 (87%) met criteria for CRS, although most cases were only mild (grades 1 or 2). However, 9 patients (12%) experienced severe (grades 3 or 4) CRS. Median survival was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], .43 to 5.8) in patients with severe CRS, compared with 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.1 to not reached) in patients with mild CRS. Transplantation-related mortality was worse in the severe CRS cohort with a hazard ratio of 4.59 (95% CI, 1.43 to 14.67) compared with that in the mild CRS cohort. Severe CRS patients had a significant delay in median time for neutrophil engraftment. Serum IL-6 levels were measured in 10 haplo-HCT patients and were elevated in the early post-transplantation setting. Seven patients with CRS were treated with tocilizumab, resulting in a complete resolution of their CRS symptoms. Severe CRS represents a potential complication of peripheral blood haplo-HCT and is associated with worse outcomes. Anti-IL-6 receptor therapy is associated with rapid resolution of the CRS symptoms.

Corrigendum: Prediction of severe CRS and determination of biomarkers in B cell-acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with CAR-T cells.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1273507.].

Identification of early predictive biomarkers for severe cytokine release syndrome in pediatric patients with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

CAR-T cell therapy is a revolutionary new treatment for hematological malignancies, but it can also result in significant adverse effects, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) being the most common and potentially life-threatening. The identification of biomarkers to predict the severity of CRS is crucial to ensure the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy. To achieve this goal, we characterized the expression profiles of seven cytokines, four conventional biochemical markers, and five hematological markers prior to and following CAR-T cell infusion. Our results revealed that IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 are the key cytokines for predicting severe CRS (sCRS). Notably, IL-2 levels rise at an earlier stage of sCRS and have the potential to serve as the most effective cytokine for promptly detecting the condition's onset. Furthermore, combining these cytokine biomarkers with hematological factors such as lymphocyte counts can further enhance their predictive performance. Finally, a predictive tree model including lymphocyte counts, IL-2, and IL-6 achieved an accuracy of 85.11% (95% CI = 0.763-0.916) for early prediction of sCRS. The model was validated in an independent cohort and achieved an accuracy of 74.47% (95% CI = 0.597-0.861). This new prediction model has the potential to become an effective tool for assessing the risk of CRS in clinical practice.

Engineered CAR-T cells: An immunotherapeutic approach for cancer treatment and beyond.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a type of adoptive immunotherapy that offers a promising avenue for enhancing cancer treatment since traditional cancer treatments like chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy have proven insufficient in completely eradicating tumors, despite the relatively positive outcomes. It has been observed that CAR-T cell therapy has shown promising results in treating the majority of hematological malignancies but also have a wide scope for other cancer types. CAR is an extra receptor on the T-cell that helps to increase and accelerate tumor destruction by efficiently activating the immune system. It is made up of three domains, the ectodomain, transmembrane, and the endodomain. The ectodomain is essential for antigen recognition and binding, whereas the co-stimulatory signal is transduced by the endodomain. To date, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for six CAR-T cell therapies. However, despite its remarkable success, CAR-T therapy is associated with numerous adverse events and has certain limitations. This chapter focuses on the structure and function of the CAR domain, various generations of CAR, and the process of CAR-T cell development, adverse effects, and challenges in CAR-T therapy. CAR-T cell therapy also has scopes in other disease conditions which include systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, and myocardial fibrosis, etc.

CAR-T cell therapy: Efficacy in management of cancers, adverse effects, dose-limiting toxicities and long-term follow up.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a groundbreaking and highly promising approach for the management of cancer. This paper reviews the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in the treatment of various hematological malignancies, also, with a mention of its effect on solid tumors, for which they have not received FDA approval yet. Different common and uncommon side effects are also discussed in this paper, with attention to the effect of each drug separately. By reviewing the recommendations of the FDA for CAR-T therapy research, we have extensively discussed dose-limiting toxicities. This further highlights the need for precise dosing strategies, striking a balance between therapeutic benefits and potential risks. Additionally, we reviewed the long-term follow-up of patients receiving CAR-T therapy to gain valuable insights into response durability and late-onset effects.

SMAD7 expression in CAR-T cells improves persistence and safety for solid tumors.

Despite the tremendous progress of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in hematological malignancies, their application in solid tumors has been limited largely due to T-cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and systemic toxicity caused by excessive cytokine release. As a key regulator of the immunosuppressive TME, TGF-ß promotes cytokine synthesis via the NF-κB pathway. Here, we coexpressed SMAD7, a suppressor of TGF-ß signaling, with a HER2-targeted CAR in engineered T cells. These novel CAR-T cells displayed high cytolytic efficacy and were resistant to TGF-ß-triggered exhaustion, which enabled sustained tumoricidal capacity after continuous antigen exposure. Moreover, SMAD7 substantially reduced the production of inflammatory cytokines by antigen-primed CAR-T cells. Mechanistically, SMAD7 downregulated TGF-ß receptor I and abrogated the interplay between the TGF-ß and NF-κB pathways in CAR-T cells. As a result, these CAR-T cells persistently inhibited tumor growth and promoted the survival of tumor-challenged mice regardless of the hostile tumor microenvironment caused by a high concentration of TGF-ß. SMAD7 coexpression also enhanced CAR-T-cell infiltration and persistent activation in patient-derived tumor organoids. Therefore, our study demonstrated the feasibility of SMAD7 coexpression as a novel approach to improve the efficacy and safety of CAR-T-cell therapy for solid tumors.