Selection of motion management in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy and its impact on treatment time.

Background and purpose: Reduction of respiratory tumour motion is important in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to reduce side effects and improve tumour control probability. We have assessed the distribution of use of voluntary exhale breath hold (EBH), abdominal compression (AC), free breathing gating (gating) and free breathing (FB), and the impact of these on treatment time. Materials and Methods: We assessed all patients treated in a single institution with liver SBRT between September 2017 and September 2021. Data from pre-simulation motion management assessment using fluoroscopic assessment of liver dome position in repeat breath holds, and motion with and without AC, was reviewed to determine liver dome position consistency in EBH and the impact of AC on motion. Treatment time was assessed for all fractions as time from first image acquisition to last treatment beam off. Results: Of 136 patients treated with 145 courses of liver SBRT, 68 % were treated in EBH, 20 % with AC, 7 % in gating and 5 % in FB. AC resulted in motion reduction < 1 mm in 9/26 patients assessed. Median treatment time was higher using EBH (39 min) or gating (42 min) compared with AC (30 min) or FB (24 min) treatments. Conclusions: Motion management in liver SBRT needs to be assessed per-patient to ensure appropriate techniques are applied. Motion management significantly impacts treatment time therefore patient comfort must also be taken into account when selecting the technique for each patient.

Multi-band whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with inversion recovery fat saturation: Effects of respiratory compensation.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare artefacts and image quality in testicular stage I cancer patients using different combinations of breathing schemes and Multi-band (MB) in whole-body DWIBS at 1.5 T.Diffusion-Weighted whole-body Imaging with Background body signal Suppression (DWIBS) using inversion recovery (IR) fat saturation is a cornerstone in oncologic whole-body MRI, but implementation is restrained by long acquisition times. The new Multi-Band (MB) technique reduces scan time which can be reinvested in respiratory compensation. METHODS: Thirty testicular cancer stage I patients were included. Three variations of whole-body DWIBS were tested: Standard free Breathing (FB)-DWIBS, FB-MB-DWIBS and Respiratory triggered (RT)-MB-DWIBS. Artefacts and image quality of b = 800 s/mm2 images were evaluated using a Likert scale. No pathology was revealed. SNR was calculated in a healthy volunteer. RESULTS: RT-MB-DWIBS was rated significantly better than FB-DWIBS in the thorax (p < 0.001) and abdomen (p < 0.001), but not in the pelvis (p = 0.569). FB-MB-DWIBS was ranked significantly lower than both FB-DWIBS (p < 0.001) and RT-MB-DWIBS (p < 0.001) at all locations. However, FB-MB-DWIBS was scanned in half the time without being less than "satisfactory". Few artefacts were encountered. SNR was similar for low-intensity tissues, but the SNR in high-intensity and respiratory-prone tissue (spleen) was slightly lower for FB-DWIBS than the other sequences. CONCLUSION: Images produced by the sequences were similar. MB enables the use of respiratory trigger or can be used to produce very fast free-breathing DWI with acceptable image quality.

Dosimetric analysis of Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold technique (DIBH) in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy and evaluation of pre-treatment predictors of cardiac doses for guiding patient selection for DIBH.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of radiotherapy-associated cardiovascular disease has been a concern for decades in breast cancer survivors. The objective of our study is to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold technique (DIBH) on organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy and to find out pre-treatment predictors of cardiac doses for guiding patient selection for DIBH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre-radiotherapy planning CT scans were done in Free Breathing (FB) and in DIBH [using Active Breathing Coordinator system (ABC™)] in 31 left sided breast cancer patients. 3DCRT plans were generated for both scans. Comparison of anatomical and dosimetric variables were done using paired t test and correlation was evaluated using Pearson correlation. Linear regression was used to get independent predictors of cardiac sparing and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to find out the specific threshold of the predictors. RESULTS: There was a 39.15% reduction in mean heart dose in DIBH compared to FB (2.4 Gy vs 4.01 Gy) (p < 0.001), 19% reduction in maximum Left Anterior Descending (LAD) dose and a 9.9% reduction in ipsilateral lung mean dose (p = 0.036) with DIBH. A significant correlation was observed between reduction in Heart Volume in Field (HVIF) and Maximum Heart Depth (MHD) with reduction in mean heart dose. Reduction in HVIF (ΔHVIF) independently predicted cardiac sparing. CONCLUSION: DIBH leads to significant reduction in OAR doses and is suggested for all patients of left-sided breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. However, HVIF and MHD predicted for cardiac sparing and threshold criteria of ΔHVIF and ΔMHD may be used by centres with high workload to select patients for DIBH.

Optimizing diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of lung tumors: A comparison of respiratory triggered and free breathing techniques.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare respiratory-triggered (RT) and free breathing (FB) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) techniques regarding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and repeatability in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) measuring the total tumor volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 57 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were analyzed. DWI was obtained by a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence, and for each MRI examination 2 consecutive RT and 2 consecutive FB DWI sequences were performed. Two radiologists independently read the images and made measurements. For each tumor the mean ADC value of the whole tumor volume was calculated. The difference in mean ADCs between FB and RT DWI was evaluated using the paired-sample t-test. The repeatability of ADC measurements related to imaging method was evaluated by intra class correlations (ICC) for each of the FB and RT DWI pairs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean ADCs between FB and RT (Reader 1 p = 0.346, Reader 2 p = 0.583). The overall repeatability of ADC measurement was good for both acquisition methods, with ICCs > 0.9. Subgroup analysis showed somewhat poorer repeatability in small tumors (50 ml or less) and tumors in the lower lung zones for the RT acquisition, with ICC as low as 0.72. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in ADC measurement or repeatability between FB and RT DWI in whole lesion ADC measurements of adenocarcinomas in the lung was demonstrated. The results imply that in this setting the FB acquisition method is accurate and possibly more robust than the RT acquisition technique.