Perinatal and obstetric outcomes in singleton pregnancies following fresh versus cryopreserved blastocyst transfer: a meta-analysis.

The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts is increasing in IVF centres. However, little is known about the perinatal and obstetric outcomes of this procedure. In an attempt to further elucidate these issues, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare cryopreserved transfer with fresh blastocyst embryo transfer. The results show that the risk of both preterm (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99, P = 0.04) and low birthweight births (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.04) was significantly lower after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer than after fresh blastocyst transfer. The rate of large for gestational age births was significantly higher (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.55-1.82, P < 0.00001) and the rate of small for gestational age births significantly lower (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, P < 0.00001) after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer. The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts was associated with a significantly lower risk of placental abruption (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83, P = 0.003) but a significantly higher risk of Caesarean section (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.43, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes associated with the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts differ from those associated with fresh blastocyst transfer.

No change in live birthweight of IVF singleton deliveries over an 18-year period despite significant clinical and laboratory changes.

STUDY QUESTION: Has live birthweight changed over 18 years of autologous fresh and frozen IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Regardless of changes in clinical care and laboratory practice over 18 years, birthweight has remained stable. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Birthweight has historically been used as a marker of neonatal health. Frozen embryo transfers lead to heavier live birthweights compared with fresh embryo transfers. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study included 7295 singletons from autologous fresh (n = 6265) and frozen (n = 1030) IVF cycles from 1996 to 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients undergoing autologous IVF cycles between 1996 and 2013 resulting in a singleton live born with a birthweight recorded were included. One-way ANOVA and t-tests compared mean live birthweight in fresh and frozen cycles in 6-month increments over 18 years. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of birthweight. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mean birthweight after fresh (3283 ± 601 g) and frozen (3462 ± 621 g) cycles were significantly different (P < 0.001). ANOVA demonstrated no significant difference in mean weight from fresh or frozen cycles over 6-month intervals. No difference in weight was noted between Days 3 and 5 transfers or between ICSI and standard IVF. No difference was found across known changes when comparing media, laboratory location, cryopreservation method or gonadotrophins. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Limitations include the small number of frozen low birthweight neonates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study suggests that changes in IVF practice, with the exception of fresh or frozen embryo transfer, have little impact on mean live birthweight. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding was received for this study. The authors have no conflicting interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Estradiol on trigger day: Irrelevant to live birth rates of fresh cycles but positively associated with cumulative live birth rates.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of estradiol (E2) on trigger day on cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs), and pregnancy outcomes after fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 42 315 patients from five reproductive centers. Six subgroups were divided according to E2 on trigger day (<1000, 1000-2000, 2000-3000, 3000-4000, 4000-5000, >5000 pg/mL). Smooth curve fitting and nonlinear mixed-effects models were used. RESULTS: When E2 was <5500 pg/mL, the CLBR increased by 10% for every 1000 pg/mL increase in E2. When E2 was between 5500 and 13 281 pg/mL, CLBR increased by 1.8% for every 1000 pg/mL increase in E2. When E2 was >13 281 pg/mL, CLBR decreased by 3% for every 1000 pg/mL increase in E2. From group E2 < 1000 to group E2 > 5000 pg/mL, pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles were not related to E2. The live birth rate after FET was higher in the E2 ≥ 5000 pg/mL group than in the E2 < 1000 pg/mL group (odds ratio [OR] 4.03, and 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.74-4.35; adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05-1.37). CONCLUSION: CLBR is associated with E2 on trigger day in a segmented manner. Pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles were not associated with E2. The live birth rate in FET cycles was highest when E2 ≥ 5000 pg/mL.

Is the type of gonadotropin-releasing hormone suppression protocol for ovarian hyperstimulation associated with ectopic pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles for in vitro fertilization?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and ectopic pregnancy (EP) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in fresh autologous embryo transfer cycles in the United States between 2008 and 2011 as reported to the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All autologous cycles that resulted in a clinical pregnancy after a fresh, intrauterine embryo transfer and described characteristics of cycles according to protocol were included: luteal GnRH agonist, GnRH agonist flare, or GnRH antagonist. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to investigate the association between type of protocol and EP. RESULT(S): Among 136,605 clinical pregnancies, 2,645 (1.94%) were EP. Ectopic pregnancy was more frequent with GnRH antagonist (2.4%) cycles than with GnRH agonist flare (2.1%) or luteal GnRH agonist (1.6%) cycles. After adjusting for maternal and treatment characteristics, the GnRH antagonist and the GnRH agonist flare protocols were associated with increased odds of EP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.65; and aOR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44, respectively) compared with luteal GnRH agonist. Analysis of differences in the factors related to EP in luteal GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocols indicated that diminished ovarian reserve was associated with an increased risk of EP in luteal GnRH agonist but not in GnRH antagonist cycles. CONCLUSION(S): The type of protocol used during ovarian hyperstimulation in fresh autologous cycles was associated with EP. This finding suggests a role for extrapituitary GnRH on the tubal and uterine environment during ovarian hyperstimulation treatment for IVF.