On the covalent nature of lysine polyphosphorylation.

Post-translational modifications of proteins (PTMs) introduce an extra layer of complexity to cellular regulation. Although phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues is well-known as PTMs, lysine is, in fact, the most heavily modified amino acid, with over 30 types of PTMs on lysine having been characterized. One of the most recently discovered PTMs on lysine residues is polyphosphorylation, which sees linear chains of inorganic polyphosphates (polyP) attached to lysine residues. The labile nature of phosphoramidate bonds raises the question of whether this modification is covalent in nature. Here, we used buffers with very high ionic strength, which would disrupt any non-covalent interactions, and confirmed that lysine polyphosphorylation occurs covalently on proteins containing PASK domains (polyacidic, serine-, and lysine-rich), such as the budding yeast protein nuclear signal recognition 1 (Nsr1) and the mammalian protein nucleolin. This Matters Arising Response paper addresses the Neville et al. (2024) Matters Arising paper, published concurrently in Molecular Cell.

Polyphosphate attachment to lysine repeats is a non-covalent protein modification.

Polyphosphate (polyP) is a chain of inorganic phosphate that is present in all domains of life and affects diverse cellular phenomena, ranging from blood clotting to cancer. A study by Azevedo et al. described a protein modification whereby polyP is attached to lysine residues within polyacidic serine and lysine (PASK) motifs via what the authors claimed to be covalent phosphoramidate bonding. This was based largely on the remarkable ability of the modification to survive extreme denaturing conditions. Our study demonstrates that lysine polyphosphorylation is non-covalent, based on its sensitivity to ionic strength and lysine protonation and absence of phosphoramidate bond formation, as analyzed via 31P NMR. Ionic interaction with lysine residues alone is sufficient for polyP modification, and we present a new list of non-PASK lysine repeat proteins that undergo polyP modification. This work clarifies the biochemistry of polyP-lysine modification, with important implications for both studying and modulating this phenomenon. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Azevedo et al. (2015), published in Molecular Cell. See also the Matters Arising Response by Azevedo et al. (2024), published in this issue.

Development of a yeast model to study the contribution of vacuolar polyphosphate metabolism to lysine polyphosphorylation.

A recently-discovered protein post-translational modification, lysine polyphosphorylation (K-PPn), consists of the covalent attachment of inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) to lysine residues. The nonenzymatic nature of K-PPn means that the degree of this modification depends on both polyP abundance and the amino acids surrounding the modified lysine. K-PPn was originally discovered in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), in which polyP anabolism and catabolism are well-characterized. However, yeast vacuoles accumulate large amounts of polyP, and upon cell lysis, the release of the vacuolar polyP could nonphysiologically cause K-PPn of nuclear and cytosolic targets. Moreover, yeast vacuoles possess two very active endopolyphosphatases, Ppn1 and Ppn2, that could have opposing effects on the extent of K-PPn. Here, we characterized the contribution of vacuolar polyP metabolism to K-PPn of two yeast proteins, Top1 (DNA topoisomerase 1) and Nsr1 (nuclear signal recognition 1). We discovered that whereas Top1-targeting K-PPn is only marginally affected by vacuolar polyP metabolism, Nsr1-targeting K-PPn is highly sensitive to the release of polyP and of endopolyphosphatases from the vacuole. Therefore, to better study K-PPn of cytosolic and nuclear targets, we constructed a yeast strain devoid of vacuolar polyP by targeting the exopolyphosphatase Ppx1 to the vacuole and concomitantly depleting the two endopolyphosphatases (ppn1Δppn2Δ, vt-Ppx1). This strain enabled us to study K-PPn of cytosolic and nuclear targets without the interfering effects of cell lysis on vacuole polyP and of endopolyphosphatases. Furthermore, we also define the fundamental nature of the acidic amino acid residues to the K-PPn target domain.

From underlying chemistry to therapeutic potential: open questions in the new field of lysine polyphosphorylation.

Polyphosphorylation is a newly described non-enzymatic post-translational modification wherein long chains of inorganic phosphates are attached to lysine residues. The first targets of polyphosphorylation identified were S. cerevisiae proteins Nsr1 and Top1. Building on this theme, we recently exploited functional genomics tools in yeast to identify 15 new targets, including a conserved network of nucleolar proteins implicated in ribosome biogenesis. We also described the polyphosphorylation of six human proteins, suggesting that this unique post-translational modification could be conserved throughout eukaryotes. The study of polyphosphorylation seems poised to uncover novel modes of protein regulation in pathways spanning diverse biological processes. In this review, we establish a framework for future work by outlining critical questions related to the biochemistry of polyphosphorylation, its therapeutic potential, and everything in between.

A Screen for Candidate Targets of Lysine Polyphosphorylation Uncovers a Conserved Network Implicated in Ribosome Biogenesis.

Polyphosphates (polyP) are chains of inorganic phosphates found in all cells. Previous work has implicated these chains in diverse functions, but the mechanism of action is unclear. A recent study reports that polyP can be non-enzymatically and covalently attached to lysine residues on yeast proteins Nsr1 and Top1. One question emerging from this work is whether so-called "polyphosphorylation" is unique to these proteins or instead functions as a global regulator akin to other lysine post-translational modifications. Here, we present the results of a screen for polyphosphorylated proteins in yeast. We uncovered 15 targets including a conserved network of proteins functioning in ribosome biogenesis. Multiple genes contribute to polyphosphorylation of targets by regulating polyP synthesis, and disruption of this synthesis results in translation defects as measured by polysome profiling. Finally, we identify 6 human proteins that can be modified by polyP, highlighting the therapeutic potential of manipulating polyphosphorylation in vivo.