Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Unfallchirurg ; 123(10): 792-796, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100092

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint is a common and painful affliction that can be diagnosed using conventional X­ray imaging as well as arthroscopy and if necessary treated; however, the X­ray classification often does not sufficiently demonstrate the cartilage damage found in arthroscopy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of conventional X­ray imaging compared to arthroscopy for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The preoperative conventional X­ray images of 23 patients were presented to 10 experienced hand surgeons who were blinded to the arthroscopy results. Their ratings were compared to the results found with arthroscopy. RESULTS: Of the patients 11 were found to have grade 4 cartilage lesions according to the Outerbridge classification, 8 grade 3 lesions, 4 grade 2 lesions and no grade 1 lesions. Overall, 43% (95% confidence interval, CI 37-49%) of the cartilage lesions were diagnosed correctly using conventional X­rays. For grade 4 lesions 73% (95% CI 65-81%) of the surgeons made the correct diagnosis, in the case of grade 3 lesions 38% (95% CI 27-49%) and in grade 2 lesions 13% (95% CI 3-23%). CONCLUSION: This study presents an arthroscopy classification system that is specific for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint and provides an additional method of assessment if the X­ray grading of osteoarthritis according to Eaton and Littler is too unspecific. Arthroscopy can be used to safely differentiate the treatment-relevant stage and also includes treatment options.


Assuntos
Cartilagem Articular , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Raios X , Artroscopia , Cartilagem , Humanos , Radiografia
2.
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab ; 13(3): 237-240, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28228789

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of Steadman microfracture technique in the management of high-grade chondral defects at the level of the knee by clinical follow-ups at eleven years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a study conducted on fifteen patients suffering from Outerbridge grade III and IV chondral lesions of the knee, who underwent Steadman microfracture surgery between 2003 and 2004. Selective exclusion criteria to prevent that other treatments or comorbidities could invalidate the results were used. Patients were clinically evaluated with Lysholm and IKDC scale scores before surgery and at follow-ups at eleven years. RESULTS: There has been an improvement in the Lysholm scores (59.33 ± 18.2 at time zero vs 82.13 ± 14.16 at time t; p value: 0.0342) and in the IKDC scores (45.13 ± 17.07 at time zero vs 68.66 ± 21.47 at time t; p value: 0.04) that appears statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Currently microfracture surgery is not indicated in patients with high-grade chondral defects, but at the same time, it is a technique of easy execution, low cost and good results. The clinical improvement observed appears statistically significant, but we have also noticed a slight clinical worsening in two patients, possibly caused by: improper treatment, new trauma, incorrect rehabilitation and age at time of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The study has shown significant clinical improvements in patients, despite the fact that indications to the use of microfracture are still very limited and selective. It's essential to underline the importance of the single patient assessment process, taking into account a variety of aspects including the site, the number and extent of the lesion, the degree of functionality, activity level, age and previous trauma. This shows the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the patient in order to choose the most suitable surgical option, which not necessarily has to strictly adhere to standard practice.

3.
Orthop Surg ; 16(5): 1187-1195, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488230

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The decision on whether or not and how to treat a local cartilage defect is still made intraoperatively based on the visual presentation of the cartilage and findings from indentations with an arthroscopic probe. The treatment decision is then usually based on grading according to established classifications systems, which, therefore, need to have high reliability and accuracy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the Outerbridge classification in staging cartilage defects. METHODS: We performed an observer arthroscopic study using the Outerbridge classification on seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, which collectively exhibited nine cartilage defects. To evaluate accuracy, defect severity was verified through histological examination. Interrater and intrarater reliabilites were calculated using Cohen's kappa and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC 3.1). RESULTS: The interrater and intrarater reliability for the Outerbridge classification ranged from poor to substantial, with 0.24 ≤ κ ≤ 0.70 and κ = 0.55 to κ = 0.66, respectively. The accuracy evaluated by comparison with the histological examination was 63% overall. The erroneous evaluations were, however, still often at the discrimination of grade 2 and 3. We did not find any relationship between higher experience and accuracy or intraobserver reliability. Taken together, these results encourage surgeons to further use diagnostic arthroscopy for evaluating cartilage lesions. Nevertheless, especially in grade 2 and 3, deviations from the histology were observed. This is, however, the point where a decision is made on whether to surgically address the defect or not. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic arthroscopy is the standard for cartilage lesion assessment, yet interobserver reliability is fair to substantial. Caution is warranted in interpreting varied observer results. The accuracy of the "simpler" Outerbridge classification is insufficient compared to histological examinations, highlighting the need for improved techniques in guideline-based intraoperative decision-making.


Assuntos
Artroscopia , Cadáver , Cartilagem Articular , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Artroscopia/métodos , Cartilagem Articular/patologia , Cartilagem Articular/cirurgia , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Doenças das Cartilagens/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA