Reduction of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy by PCI: Quantification and Correlation With Outcome After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) might improve outcome at severe stages of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) among patients after heart transplantation (HTx). Yet, risk stratification of HTx patients after PCI remains challenging. AIMS: To assess whether the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) CAV classification remains prognostic after PCI and whether risk-stratification models of non-transplanted patients extend to HTx patients with CAV. METHODS: At 2 European academic centers, 203 patients were stratified in cohort 1 (ISHLT CAV1, without PCI, n = 126) or cohort 2 (ISHLT CAV2 and 3, with PCI). At first diagnosis of CAV or first PCI, respectively, ISHLT CAV grades, SYNTAX scores I and II (SXS-I, SXS-II) were used to quantify baseline and residual CAV (rISHLT, rSXS-I, rSXS-II). RSXS-I > 0 defined incomplete revascularization (IR). RESULTS: SXS-II predicted mortality in cohort 1 (P = 0.004), whereas SXS-I (P = 0.009) and SXS-II (P = 0.002) predicted mortality in cohort 2. Post-PCI, IR (P = 0.004), high rISHLT (P = 0.02) and highest tertile of rSXS-II (P = 0.006) were associated with higher 5-year mortality. In bivariable Cox analysis, baseline SXS-II, IR and rSXS-II remained predictors of 5-year mortality post-PCI. There was a strong inverse relationship between baseline and rSXS-I (r = -0.55; P < 0.001 and r = -0.50; P = 0.003, respectively) regarding the interval to first reintervention. CONCLUSION: People with ISHLT CAV classification could apply for risk stratification after PCI. SYNTAX scores could be complemental for risk stratification and individualization of invasive follow-up of HTx patients with CAV.

Extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair is optimal therapy in acute complicated type B dissection.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) represents optimal therapy for complicated acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). Persistent knowledge gaps remain, including the optimal length of aortic coverage, impact on distal aortic remodeling, and fate of the dissected abdominal aorta. METHODS: Review of the Emory Aortic Database identified 92 patients who underwent TEVAR for complicated aTBAD from 2012 to 2018. Standard TEVAR covered aortic zones 3 and 4 (from the left subclavian to the mid-descending thoracic aorta). Extended TEVAR fully covered aortic zones 3 though 5 (from the left subclavian to the celiac artery). Long-term imaging, clinical follow-up, and overall and aortic-specific mortality were reviewed. RESULTS: Extended TEVAR (n = 52) required a greater length of coverage vs standard TEVAR (n = 40) (240 ± 32 mm vs 183 ± 23 mm; P < .01). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.4% of patients (7.7% vs 2.5%; P = .27) owing to mesenteric malperfusion (n = 3) or rupture (n = 2). The overall incidences of postoperative stroke, transient paraparesis, paraplegia, and dialysis were 5.4% (3.9% vs 7.5%; P = .38), 3.2% (5.8% vs 0%; P = .18), 0%, and 0% respectively, equivalent between groups. Follow-up was 96.6% complete to a mean of 6.1 years (interquartile range, 3.5-8.6 years). There were significantly higher rates of complete thrombosis or obliteration of the entire thoracic false lumen after Extended TEVAR (82.2% vs 51.5%; P = .04). Distal aortic reinterventions were less frequent after extended TEVAR (5.8% vs 20%; P = .04). Late aorta-specific survival was 98.1% after extended TEVAR vs 92.3% for standard TEVAR (P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: Extended TEVAR for complicated aTBAD is safe, results in a high rate of total thoracic false lumen thrombosis/obliteration, and reduces distal reinterventions. Longer-term follow-up will be needed to demonstrate a survival benefit compared to limited aortic coverage.

Outcomes of endovascular therapy for Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with sleep apnea syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the influences of varying severity of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) on the outcomes after thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: This observational study focused on individuals with TBAD plus SAS who received TEVAR between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into groups according to the results of the portable sleep-breathing monitoring systems: mild SAS (MSAS) and moderate-to-severe SAS (MSSAS). Clinical profiles were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 121 cases with TBAD plus SAS who underwent TEVAR were enrolled in this study. Two groups were formed by stratifying these cases: MSAS (74 cases) and MSSAS (47 cases). The MSSAS cases were found to be older relative to MSAS cases (51.7 ± 8.3 years vs 57.1 ± 12.8 years; P = .012) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 25.7 ± 2.3 kg/m2vs 27.0 ± 2.3 kg/m2; P = .038). The investigation did not find any appreciable differences between the MSAS and MSSAS groups in terms of complications (endoleak, P = .403; stent-induced new entry, P >.999; and stent displacement: P >.999). However, the MSSAS group exhibited a significantly higher overall mortality rate compared with the MSAS group (log-rank P = .027). The tendency continued when examining cases with Marfan syndrome combined with MSSAS, where the overall mortality rate was significantly greater compared with Marfan syndrome cases with MSAS (log-rank P = .037). The absence of a significant difference was noteworthy in the freedom from reintervention between the MSAS and MSSAS groups (log-rank P = .278). The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in MSSAS group even after adjusting for varying potential confounders in the multivariate cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.875; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.238-2.586; P = .012). A markedly higher rate of distal stent dilation in the MSSAS group was also observed compared with the MSAS group (HR, 2.5 mm/year [95% CI, 2-3 mm/year] vs HR, 4 mm/year [95% CI, 2.0-5.5 mm/year]; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: MSSAS is associated with a significantly higher risk of overall mortality and dilation rate of the distal stent after TEVAR for TBAD patients. Hence, aggressive efforts to reverse the severity of SAS in time in these individuals seem to be necessary.

Reinterventions and sac dynamics after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair with physician-modified endografts for index aneurysm repair and following proximal failure of prior endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The high frequency of reinterventions after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) with physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) has been well-studied. However, the impact of prior EVAR on reinterventions and sac behavior following these procedures remains unknown. We analyzed 3-year rates of reinterventions and sac dynamics following PMEG for index aneurysm repair compared with PMEG for prior EVAR with loss of proximal seal. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 122 consecutive FEVARs with PMEGs at a tertiary care center submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration in support of an investigational device exemption trial. We excluded patients with aortic dissection (n = 5), type I to III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (n = 13), non-elective procedures (n = 4), and prior aortic surgery other than EVAR (n = 8), for a final cohort of 92 patients. Patients were divided into those who underwent PMEG for index aneurysm repair (primary FEVAR) and those who underwent PMEG for rescue of prior EVAR with loss of proximal seal (secondary FEVAR). The primary outcomes were freedom from reintervention and sac dynamics (regression as ≥5 mm decrease, expansion as ≥5 mm increase, and stability as <5 mm increase or decrease) at 3 years. Secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality and 3-year survival. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients included, 56 (61%) underwent primary FEVAR and 36 (39%) underwent secondary FEVAR. Secondary FEVAR patients were older (78 years [interquartile range (IQR), 74.5-83.5 years] vs 73 years [IQR, 69-78.5 years]; P < .001), more frequently male (86% vs 68%; P = .048), and had larger aneurysms (72.5 mm [IQR, 65.5-81 mm] vs 59 mm [IQR, 55-65 mm]; P < .001). Perioperative mortality was 1.8% for primary FEVAR and 2.7% for secondary FEVAR (P = .75). At 3 years, overall survival was 84% for primary FEVAR and 71% for secondary FEVAR (P = .086). Freedom-from reintervention was significantly higher for primary FEVAR than secondary FEVAR, specifically 82% vs 38% at 3 years (P < .001). Primary FEVAR also had more desirable sac dynamics relative to secondary FEVAR at 3 years (primary: 54% stable, 46% regressed, 0% expanded vs secondary: 33% stable, 28% regressed, and 39% expanded; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: FEVAR for primary aortic repair and FEVAR for rescue of prior EVAR with loss of proximal seal are two distinct entities. Following primary FEVAR, less than a quarter of patients have undergone reintervention at 3 years, and sac expansion was not seen in our cohort. Comparatively, 3 years after secondary FEVAR, over one-half of patients have undergone reintervention and over one-third have had ongoing sac expansion. Vigilant surveillance and a low threshold for further interventions are crucial following secondary FEVAR.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of fenestrated or branched devices after previous open surgical aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Despite open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms being considered as a durable solution, disease progression and para-anastomotic aneurysms may require further repair, and fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) may be applied to address these pathologies. The aim of this systematic review was to assess technical success, mortality, and morbidity (acute kidney injury, spinal cord ischemia) at 30 days, and mortality and reintervention rates during the available follow-up, in patients managed with F/BEVAR after previous OSR. METHODS: The PRISMA statement was followed, and the study was pre-registered to the PROSPERO (CRD42022363214). The English literature was searched, via Ovid, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, through November 30, 2022. Observational studies and case series with ≥5 patients (2000-2022), reporting on F/BEVAR outcomes after OSR, were considered eligible. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence. The primary outcome was technical success, mortality, and morbidity at 30 days. Data on the outcomes of interest were synthesized using proportional meta-analysis. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1694 articles. Eight retrospective studies (476 patients) were considered eligible. In 78.3% of cases, disease progression set the indication for reintervention. Technical success was estimated at 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-98%; I2 = 0%; 95% prediction interval [PI], 79%-99%). Thirty-day mortality was 2% (95% CI, 1%-9%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-28%). The estimated spinal cord ischemia and acute kidney injury rates were 3% (95% CI, 1%-9%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-30%) and 6% (95% CI, 2%-15%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 1%-40%), respectively. During follow-up, overall mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%-12%; I2 = 34%; 95% PI, 0%-45%) and aorta-related mortality was 1% (95% CI, 0%-2%; I2 = 0%; 95% PI, 0%-3%). The rate of reinterventions was 16% (95% CI, 9%-26%; I2 = 22%; 95% PI, 3%-50%). CONCLUSIONS: According to the available literature, F/BEVAR after OSR may be performed with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity during the perioperative period. Follow-up aortic-related mortality was 1%, whereas the reintervention rates were within the standard range following F/BEVAR.

Presentation and patterns of reinterventions after revascularization in patients with premature peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: Premature peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (age ≤50 years) has been shown to negatively impact the outcomes of lower extremity revascularization (LER). Patients with premature PAD have an increased risk of major amputation compared with older patients. The primary goal of this study is to compare the frequency of reinterventions after LER in patients with premature PAD to their older counterparts with common age of presentation (ie, 60-80 years). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing LER for PAD in a single center was performed. Clinical, procedural, and socioeconomic characteristics were compared between patients with premature PAD and the older group. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were captured and compared including mortality, major amputation, reintervention rate and frequency, as well as major adverse limb events. RESULTS: There were 1274 patients who underwent LER (4.3% premature, 61.8% age 60-80). Patients with premature PAD were more likely to be females of racial minorities. Notably, the mean Distressed Communities Index score was significantly higher in the premature PAD group compared with the older patients. Patients with premature PAD were significantly more likely to have end-stage renal disease but less likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease compared with older patients. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, patients with premature PAD were significantly more likely to undergo more frequent reinterventions compared with older patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar overall survival and major adverse limb event-free survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with premature PAD are likely to undergo more frequent reinterventions after initial LER and have similar 5-year survival curves compared with patients at least 20 years older. Demographic and socioeconomic differences impacting patients with premature PAD, even in this relatively underpowered institutional experience, are striking and warrant further investigation.

Patient-specific risk factors for reintervention following primary endovascular treatment of iliac artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Predictive models for reintervention may guide clinicians to optimize selection, education, and follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular iliac revascularization. Although the impact of lesion- and device-related characteristics on iliac restenosis and reintervention risk is well-defined, data on patient-specific risk factors are scarce and conflicting. This study aimed to explore the value of patient-related factors in predicting the need for clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) in patients undergoing primary endovascular treatment of iliac artery disease. METHODS: Consecutively enrolled patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for symptomatic iliac artery disease at a tertiary vascular referral center between January 2008 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and secondary outcomes were CD-TVR occurrence within 24 months and time to CD-TVR, respectively. Patients who died or did not require CD-TVR within 24 months were censored at the date of death or at 730 days, respectively. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data in primary analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1538 iliac interventions were performed in 1113 patients (26% females; 68 years). CD-TVR occurred in 108 limbs (74 patients; 7.0%) with a median time to CD-TVR of 246 days. On multivariable analysis, increasing age was associated with lower likelihood of CD-TVR (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.83; P = .001) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84; P = .001). Similarly, a lower likelihood of CD-TVR (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P = .017) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; P = .009) were observed with higher glomerular filtration rates. Lastly, revascularization of common vs external iliac artery disease was associated with lower likelihood of CD-TVR (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.93; P = .030) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92; P = .027). No associations were observed between traditional cardiovascular risk factors (sex, hypertension, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, higher hemoglobin A1c, smoking) and CD-TVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, younger age, impaired kidney function, and external iliac artery disease were associated with CD-TVR. Traditional markers of cardiovascular risk were not seen to predict reintervention.

Long-term results of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in young and fit patients.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAa) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with fenestrated and branched devices (F/BEVAR) represents the first-line treatment in old or unfit patients. Currently, the widespread diffusion of these techniques has led to a progressive increase of complex endovascular procedures also in younger and fitter patients, but the related results have been only minimally reported, without long-term data. We investigated the long-term results of F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA repair in young and fit patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients, aged ≤70 years, who underwent F/BEVAR for CAAA and TAAA over the last 13 years at two tertiary institutions were included in the study. All subjects presented a low to intermediate risk according to the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical comorbidity grading system. The primary end points were technical and clinical success and late overall and aortic-related survival. Major complications and specific target vessel-related outcomes were investigated as secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients (155 males [84.7%]; mean age, 64.5 ± 5.7 years; range, 33-70 years) underwent F/BEVAR during the study period, for a total of 167 degenerative (91.3%) and 16 postdissection (8.7%) aneurysms, including 44 (24%) juxtarenal, 33 (18%) pararenal, and 106 (58%) TAAAs. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 176 patients (96.2%) and 171 patients (93.4%), respectively. Four patients (2.2%) died perioperatively, of which two (1.1%) operated in emergency. Postoperatively, five patients (2.7%) presented permanent grade 3 spinal cord injury and three (1.6%) renal failure needing permanent dialysis. The mean follow-up was 65.7 ± 39.6 months (range, 1-158 months). The estimated overall and aortic-related survival at 12, 60, and 120 months was 94.0%, 85.1%, 72.2%, and 97.8%, 97.8%, 96.2%, respectively, and reintervention and branch instability-free survival at the same time points were 84.4%, 71.8%, 71.8%, and 93.2%, 86.3%, 72.2%, respectively. An aneurysm growth of >5 mm was detected in six patients (3.3%), and a sac shrinkage of >5 mm was achieved in 118 cases (64.5%). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated the need for unplanned procedure as the only risk factor for overall mortality (odds ratio, 3.331; 95% confidence interval, 1.397-7.940; P < .01]. CONCLUSIONS: F/BEVAR in young and fit patients led to low perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates and a favorable overall survival rate in the long-term, making this technique particularly appealing in such a subgroup of patients. The availability of long-term data derived from the results of young patients, may additionally provide helpful information to redefine the indications for treatment and allow future targeted device and technique improvements.

Laparoscopy versus endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review.

Minimally invasive surgery is a useful alternative to open repair for patients with nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We aim to compare the clinical outcomes for three different minimally invasive techniques: hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), total laparoscopic surgery (TLS), and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched between January and March 2023. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two minimally invasive techniques were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, or 1-year) and reintervention rates (30-day or 1-year). Length of surgery, blood loss, transfusion volume, conversion to open surgery, major complication rates, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay were also evaluated. Eight cohort studies and one RCT were included comparing patients undergoing HALS (n = 500), TLS (n = 263), and EVAR (n = 438) for elective AAA repair. The TLS group had the highest rate of 30-day postoperative reinterventions (p = 0.00056), the longest surgical duration (p = 0.0311), and the highest rate of conversion to open surgery (p < 0.001). TLS was also associated with the most blood loss during surgery, the highest blood transfusion volumes, and the longest length of ICU stay, although these results did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analysis revealed superior contemporary EVAR outcomes compared to TLS. Laparoscopic surgery (LAS) and EVAR have comparable mortality rates. However, LAS, particularly TLS, is significantly less efficacious than EVAR in terms of intraoperative conversions to open surgery and 30-day reintervention rates. Further controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the evidence.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of re-intervention rates of new surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the re-intervention rates of new surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) interventions, as the clinical durability of new surgical interventions for BPH is not widely known. METHODS: A critical review of new surgical BPH therapies namely 'UroLift®', 'Aquablation', 'Rezum', 'prostatic artery embolisation (PAE)' and 'temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND)' was performed on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases between May 2010 and December 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. All relevant articles were reviewed, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Of the 32 studies included, there were 10 randomised controlled trials and 22 prospective observational cohorts. A total of 2400 participants were studied with a median patient age of 66 years, a median prostate volume of 51.9 mL, and a median International Prostate Symptom Score of 22. The lowest re-intervention rate at 12 months was for Aquablation at 0.01%, followed by Rezum at 0.02%, iTIND at 0.03%, and PAE at 0.05%. Network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that the best-ranked treatment at 12 months was transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), followed by Aquablation, iTIND, Rezum, and UroLift. Re-intervention rates with these new BPH interventions are comparable, although some interventions reported better outcomes than TURP in the shorter term. CONCLUSIONS: While this systematic review and NMA showed that the re-intervention rate with these new surgical BPH interventions appears to be comparable to TURP in the short term, further studies are required to directly compare these various BPH procedures.

In-Hospital Risk Factors for Reintervention and Amputation in Brachial Arterial Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Brachial artery trauma is a rare but potentially devastating injury. There is little data regarding risk factors for reintervention and amputation prevention in this population, as well as anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) regimens and outcomes after discharge in trauma patients with vascular injuries requiring repair. This study aims to identify in-hospital risk factors for reintervention and amputation and stratify outcomes of follow-up by discharge AC or AP regimen. METHODS: The AAST Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial database was queried for all patients who underwent traumatic brachial arterial repair from 2013 to 2022. Patients were evaluated by need for reintervention, amputation, and outcomes at follow-up by AC or AP regimen. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients required brachial repair, 28 (9%) required reoperation, and 8 (2.6%) required amputation. High injury severity score and an increased number of packed red blood cells and platelets showed a significant increase for reoperation and amputation. Damage control and shunt use were significant for the need to reoperate. Seventy-four percent (221/298) of patients were discharged with postoperative AC or AP regimens. There was no significant difference of short-term follow-up by type of AC or AP regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Damage control and temporary shunt may lead to additional operations but not an increase in amputations. However, anticoagulation intraoperatively and postoperatively does not appear to play a significant role in reducing reintervention. It also suggests that there is no increase in short-term follow-up complications with or without AC or AP therapy.

Outcomes of Nonagenarian Patients in Vascular Surgery Service in a Tertiary Institution.

INTRODUCTION: With the world population growing and aging, nonagenarians have become a distinct patient cohort with specific characteristics that render the prediction of outcomes essential. We aimed to investigate the specific characteristics of this patient's cohort in a tertiary vascular center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted for all consecutive patients 90 years and above referred or treated in the Department of Vascular Surgery between January 2017 and December 2022 for vascular pathologies. The main endpoint was to analyze the type of vascular services required for nonagenarians. Additional endpoints involved evaluation of treatment outcomes during the study period based on medical records. The analysis was patient-based. RESULTS: A total of 148 nonagenarians were included in the study. In all, 71 (48%) of the patients underwent surgery, whereas 77 (52%) had conservative treatment. Most of the patients were referred for peripheral arterial (PAD; 56, 37.8%) and aortic-related (39, 26.4%) diseases. Other pathologies encountered involved acute limb ischemia (ALI; 25, 16.9%), carotid diseases (12, 8.1%), renal/dialysis-related consultations (8, 5.4%), and referrals from other departments (12, 5.4%). Urgent interventions were performed in 27% of the cases. Indications for surgery included PAD Rutherford Stages IV, V, and VI; symptomatic and ruptured aortic aneurysms; ALI Rutherford Stages I, IIa, and IIb; symptomatic and near total occlusion asymptomatic carotid disease; and dialysis-related procedures for patients with chronic renal failure on regular hemodialysis. Perioperative complications were experienced in 22 patients (14.9%), the 30-day reintervention rate was 7.4%, and 30-day mortality was 4.7%. The overall length of hospital stay for operated patients was a median of 8 nights. CONCLUSION: The proportion of nonagenarians in the population is growing and so is their referral to vascular surgery. Satisfactory short-term treatment outcomes can be achieved in this highly selected cohort of patients. Thirty-day mortality is higher in patients undergoing urgent procedures. Follow-up mortality was higher in the operated nonagenarians as compared with those who were treated conservatively. Careful patient selection and thorough preparation are crucial to enhance clinical outcomes. Further research on therapy outcomes of nonagenarians will enable physicians to make better evidence-based approaches to individual patients and should be encouraged. CLINICAL IMPACT: The study highlights the growing need to manage vascular diseases in nonagenarians, emphasizing that age alone should not exclude patients from surgical interventions. By demonstrating acceptable short-term outcomes with careful patient selection, this research challenges the traditional bias against operating on the elderly. Clinicians should refine risk assessment and treatment plans, particularly when balancing surgical and conservative options. Comorbidities, rather than age, are key determinants of patient suitability, encouraging more individualized, evidence-based approaches in this expanding demographic.

Effectiveness and Safety of Endoanchors in Abdominal and Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to summarize the effectiveness and safety of endoanchor, a stabilizing device for the proximal endograft designed to prevent endoleak and stent migration in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Literature up to May 31, 2023 was searched and independently screened from 4 databases. Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Primary outcomes included intraoperative and follow-up endoleak, stent migration, and reintervention rates; sac regression; and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen EVAR (n=1145) and 6 TEVAR studies (n=163) using the Heli-Fx EndoAnchor system were included from 2225 retrieved records. For EVAR patients (mean follow-up=11.9 months), the endoleak, graft migration, and reintervention rates were 3.97% (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.36%-1.99%), 0.004% (95% CI=0.00%-0.76%), and 5.43% (95% CI=0.86%-12.54%), respectively. The endoleak rates for primary and revision EVAR were 0.16% (95% CI=0.00%-1.65%) and 3.60% (95% CI=0.14%-9.72%), respectively. Only 4 cases of 30-day mortality (n=4) were reported in the literature. For TEVAR patients, the endoleak, stent migration, and reintervention rates were 7.4% (95% CI=0.03%-0.13%), 0.2% (95% CI=0.00%-0.06%), and 17.1% (95% CI=0.01%-0.45%), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 0.9% (95% CI=0%-0.12%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoanchor fixation in EVAR and TEVAR is effective and safe in preventing and treating endoleak and stent migration. The mortality is minimal in EVAR but higher in TEVAR. CLINICAL IMPACT: Endoleak, graft migration, and reintervention in EVAR and TEVAR with endoanchor use were rare. Mortality in EVAR was low. The adjunctive deployment of endoanchors is an effective and safe means to prevent and treat endoleak and stent migration in EVAR and TEVAR. Yet, long-term efficacy and safety data and randomized controlled trials would be required to definitively recommend endoanchor use in routine clinical practice.

Comparison of Subsequent Inframalleolar Bypass Surgery and Repeat Endovascular Therapy for Infrapopliteal Restenosis in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Primary Endovascular Therapy.

PURPOSE: Although endovascular therapy (EVT) is considered a vital strategy for treating infrapopliteal lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the recurrence rate after EVT exceeds that after bypass surgery (BSX). The optimal approach for managing infrapopliteal lesion recurrence in patients with CLTI and unhealed ulcers remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat EVT and subsequent inframalleolar BSX for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 140 patients with CLTI (mean age, 70±10 years; male, 71.4%; diabetes mellitus, 73.6%; dialysis, 74.3%; Rutherford 5, 79.3%; and Rutherford 6, 20.7%) who had an unhealed wound due to the recurrence of infrapopliteal lesions between January 2015 and May 2020. We compared the clinical outcomes of 40 patients who underwent the subsequent inframalleolar BSX with those of 100 patients who underwent repeat EVT. The outcome measures were amputation-free survival (AFS) and wound healing rate. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted to minimize differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Propensity score matching extracted 38 pairs (38 patients in the subsequent BSX group and 83 patients in the repeat EVT group). AFS was not significantly different between the repeat EVT and subsequent BSX groups (81.9% vs 82.6% at 1 year, p=0.97). Neither was cumulative wound healing (42.8% vs 43.3% at 1 year, p=0.55). No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effect on the association between repeat EVT, subsequent BSX, and failure of AFS. CONCLUSION: This study using propensity score matching revealed that the clinical outcomes following repeat EVT were comparable with those following subsequent inframalleolar BSX, indicating that repeat EVT may be a viable treatment option for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. CLINICAL IMPACT: Although endovascular therapy (EVT) has expanded the treatment options for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the recurrence rate after EVT is higher than that after bypass surgery (BSX). This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of repeat EVT with those of subsequent BSX for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. After propensity score matching, amputation-free survival (AFS) was not significantly different between the repeat EVT and subsequent BSX groups (81.9% vs 82.6% at 1 year, p=0.97). Neither was cumulative wound healing (42.8% vs 43.3% at 1 year, p=0.55). There was no difference between the 2 revascularization strategies when treating infrapopliteal restenosis lesions.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Within and Outside the Instructions for Use in Korean Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been used worldwide to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Outcomes after EVAR within and outside the instruction for use (IFU) remain controversial. We analyzed long-term outcomes of EVAR within-the-IFU compared with that outside-the-IFU and baseline clinical/anatomical characteristics that influence outcomes of EVAR. METHODS: The study included 546 patients who underwent EVAR for infrarenal AAA from 1997 to 2021 at 2 Korean medical centers. The primary endpoint was graft-related adverse events (GRAEs), including type 1 or 3 endoleak, reintervention (included open conversion), aneurysm sac enlargement, aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), rupture, stent-graft migration, and stent thrombotic occlusion. RESULTS: The patients who underwent EVAR outside the IFU were 287 (52.6%). A neck angle of >60° was most common outside the IFU criteria (n=146, 50.9%). This study revealed that patients outside the IFU had a higher rate of GRAEs compared with patients within the IFU (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.879; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.045-2.386). A neck angle of >60° was a significant risk factor for GRAEs (adjusted HR: 2.229; 95% CI: 1.418-3.503), type 1 or 3 endoleak (adjusted HR: 2.640; 95% CI: 1.343-5.189), and reintervention (adjusted HR: 1.891; 95% CI: 1.055-3.388). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed EVAR with outside the IFU was associated with increased GRAEs, mainly attributed to endoleak and ARM, compared with EVAR with within the IFU. In addition, severe neck angulation was an independent risk factor for GRAEs, type 1 or 3 endoleak, and reintervention. CLINICAL IMPACT: Our study revealed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with outside-the-instruction for use (IFU) was associated with increased graft-related adverse events (GRAEs) compared with EVAR with within-the-IFU. In the low-risk population, the incidence of GRAEs and Aneurysm related mortality were higher in the outside-the-IFU group rather than within-the-IFU group. In addition, severe neck angulation was an independent risk factor for GRAEs, type 1 or 3 endoleak and reintervention.

Radiomics-Based Risk Assessment Correlates With Outcomes in Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Repair.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to investigate the correlations between radiomics-based assessment and outcomes, including positive aortic remodeling (PAR), reintervention for dissection at 1 year, and overall survival, in patients with Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. The cohort comprised 104 patients who had undergone TEVAR of TBAD in our institution between January 2010 and October 2022. We segmented preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the patients' descending aorta regions, then extracted a comprehensive set of radiomic features, including first-order features, shape features (2D and 3D), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level size zone matrix, gray-level run length matrix, gray-level dependence matrix, neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix, from the regions of interest. Next, we selected radiomics features associated with total descending aorta positive aortic remodeling (TDA-PAR) and reintervention by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and features associated with survival by LASSO-Cox regression. This enabled us to calculate radiomics-based risk scores for each patient. We then allocated the patients to high and low radiomics-based risk groups, the cutoff being the median score. We used 3 different models to validate the radiomics-based risk scores. RESULTS: The patients' baseline characteristics did not differ between those who achieved TDA-PAR and those who did not. The radiomics-based risk scores were significantly and independently associated with all 3 outcomes. As to the impact of specific radiomics features, we found that GLSZM_SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis and shape_Maximum2DDiameterColumn had positive impacts on both reintervention and survival outcomes, whereas GLCM_Idmn positively affected survival but negatively affected reintervention. We found that radiomics-based risk for TDA-PAR correlated most significantly with zone 6 PAR. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics-based risk scores were significantly associated with the outcomes of TDA-PAR, reintervention, and overall survival. Radiomics has the potential to make significant contributions to prediction of outcomes in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR. CLINICAL IMPACT: In this study of 104 patients with Type B aortic dissection, we demonstrated associations between radiomics-based risk and postoperative outcomes, including total descending aorta positive aortic remodeling, reintervention and survival. These findings highlight radiomics' potential as a tool for risk stratification and prognostication in acute Type B aortic dissection management.

Time Dependent Correlation Between Sac Behaviour and Re-intervention after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and time to re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent EVAR at a single centre between January 2008 and November 2011 and who were followed up for a mean of 6.6 ± 2.9 years was conducted. Based on sac appearances on pre-operative imaging and imaging at the end of follow up, patients were stratified into two groups: (1) sac regression; and (2) no sac regression. The no sac regression group was further subdivided into stable sac group and sac expansion group. Sac regression and expansion throughout follow up were defined as a decrease or increase in the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter of ≥ 5 mm compared with the pre-operative size. A Cox proportional hazards model using multiple failure per subject data was used to identify sac behaviour as a predictor of re-intervention free time. RESULTS: Patients with sac regression had a higher probability of freedom from re-intervention compared with those with a stable or expanding aneurysm sac (94%, 57%, and 16% at 12 years, respectively; log rank, p < .001). Mean time to re-intervention was 11.3 years for the sac regression group, 8.8 years for the stable sac group, and 5.0 years for the sac expansion group (p < .001). In the stable sac group, the risk of re-intervention increased sharply six years after EVAR, whereas in the sac expansion group a sharp rise in re-intervention was noted 3.5 years after EVAR, reaching a plateau after year 6. CONCLUSION: A time dependent correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and re-intervention was found. Such findings have implications for surveillance strategies.

Two-year Outcomes of Micra AV Leadless Pacemakers in the Micra AV CED Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leadless pacing is a safe and effective alternative to transvenous pacing for bradycardia. Micra AV is a leadless, single-device solution that provides AV-synchronous ventricular pacing therapy. Early results from the Micra AV CED study showed reductions in short-term complications associated with the Micra AV leadless pacemaker among US Medicare patients. The objective of this study is to compare chronic complications, reinterventions, and all-cause mortality at 2 years between patients implanted with a Micra AV leadless pacemaker and a traditional dual-chamber transvenous (DC TV) pacemaker. METHODS: Patients implanted with a Micra AV leadless pacemaker (N=7,552) or a DC TV pacemaker (N=110,558) in 2020 and 2021 were identified using device registration-linked Medicare administrative claims data. Competing risk models compared the unadjusted and propensity score overlap weight-adjusted complication, reintervention, and all-cause mortality rates of Micra AV and DC TV patients at two years. RESULTS: Micra AV patients had significantly more comorbidities (end-stage renal disease 14.9% vs. 2.0%, p-value <0.0001; renal dysfunction: 47.9% vs. 34.2%, p-value <0.0001; diabetes 46.2% vs. 38.3%, p-value <0.001; congestive heart failure 41.4% vs. 30.6%, p-value <0.0001). Two years post-implant, Micra AV patients had lower complication rates (adj. 5.3% vs. 9.6%, HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.61, p-value <0.0001) and lower reintervention rates (adj. 3.5% vs. 5.6%, HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.72, p-value <0.0001) than DC-TV patients. Upgrades to cardiac resynchronization therapy were low in both groups (adj. 1.6% vs. 1.7%, p-value=0.40), as were Micra AV upgrades to a dual-chamber system (adj. 1.4%). All-cause mortality rates remained higher in Micra AV than in DC-TV patients (unadj. HR=2.48, 95% CI 2.35-2.62, p-value <0.0001; adj. HR=1.53, 95% CI 1.44-1.62, p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients implanted with Micra AV had lower complications and reintervention rates at two years than patients implanted with a traditional DC-TV pacemaker. All-cause mortality remained higher in Micra AV patients, likely due to their higher comorbidity burden and other differences in baseline characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04235491.

Two cases of silent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrode displacement.

We describe two cases of secondary prevention subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation and subsequent S-ICD electrode displacement which initially went undetected. One presentation was a result of a coincidental chest x-ray for respiratory exacerbation and another with an untreated episode highlighted via remote monitoring, both patients were booked to clinic for further investigation. Our findings highlighted had there been a comparison of the existing subcutaneous electrogram (S-ECG) to captured S-ECGs at time of implant the electrode displacement would have been detected beforehand. This underpins the importance of introducing the simple management strategy into routine follow-up.

Endovascular Treatment for Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: 10 Years' Experience from a Single Center.

INTRODUCTION: Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a common post-renal transplant complication. Although endovascular treatment is widely used to treat TRAS, previous research has been limited by small sample sizes. This article aimed to present the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for TRAS in a large sample. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2019, this study included patients with TRAS who were admitted to our center. All patients' clinical symptoms, comorbidities, imaging data, treatment, and follow-up results were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Seventy two patients participated in this study. The median time between renal transplantation and TRAS was 5.25 months. Out of 72 patients, 55 (76.4%) received balloon dilatation in conjunction with stent deployment, 10 (13.9%) received drug-coated balloon dilatation alone, and 7 (9.7%) received balloon dilatation alone. The median follow-up period was 27 months. Primary patency rates were 100%, 81.8%, 74.5%, 64.6%, and 61.8% at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. A total of 23 patients were found to have restenosis during follow-up, with 6 (26.1%) requiring reintervention and none remaining restenosis after the second treatment. In the subgroup analysis of the three types of stenosis, patients with transplant renal stenosis at the anastomosis had a significantly higher rate of primary patency. Between endovascular treatments, the primary patency rate, postoperative creatinine clearance, and mean systolic blood pressure did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment resulted in favorable short-term patency as well as effective relief of renal dysfunction and renal hypertension in TRAS patients.