Free-breathing three-dimensional simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping based on multi-parametric SAturation-recovery and Variable-flip-Angle.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative myocardial tissue characterization with T1 and T2 parametric mapping can provide an accurate and complete assessment of tissue abnormalities across a broad range of cardiomyopathies. However, current clinical T1 and T2 mapping tools rely predominantly on two-dimensional (2D) breath-hold sequences. Clinical adoption of three-dimensional (3D) techniques is limited by long scan duration. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a time-efficient 3D free-breathing simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping sequence using multi-parametric SAturation-recovery and Variable-flip-Angle (mSAVA). METHODS: mSAVA acquires four volumes for simultaneous whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping. We validated mSAVA using simulations, phantoms, and in-vivo experiments at 3T in 11 healthy subjects and 11 patients with diverse cardiomyopathies. T1 and T2 values by mSAVA were compared with modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) and gradient and spin echo (GraSE), respectively. The clinical performance of mSAVA was evaluated against late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging in patients. RESULTS: Phantom T1 and T2 by mSAVA showed a strong correlation to reference sequences (R2 = 0.98 and 0.99). In-vivo imaging with an imaging resolution of 1.5 × 1.5 × 8 mm3 could be achieved. Myocardial T1 and T2 of healthy subjects by mSAVA were 1310 ± 46 and 44.6 ± 2.0 ms, respectively, with T1 standard deviation higher than MOLLI (105 ± 12 vs 60 ± 16 ms) and T2 standard deviation lower than GraSE (4.5 ± 0.8 vs 5.5 ± 1.0 ms). mSAVA T1 and T2 maps presented consistent findings in patients undergoing LGE. Myocardial T1 and T2 of all patients by mSAVA were 1421 ± 79 and 47.2 ± 3.3 ms, respectively. CONCLUSION: mSAVA is a fast 3D technique promising for clinical whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping.

Free-breathing whole-heart multi-slice myocardial T1 mapping in 2 minutes.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a saturation-delay-inversion recovery preparation, slice tracking and multi-slice based sequence for measuring whole-heart native T1 . METHOD: The proposed free-breathing sequence performs T1 mapping of multiple left-ventricular slices by slice-interleaved acquisition to collect 10 electrocardiogram-triggered single-shot slice-selective images for each slice. A saturation-delay-inversion recovery pulse is used for T1 preparation. Prospective slice tracking by the diaphragm navigator and retrospective registration are used to reduce through-plane and in-plane motion, respectively. The proposed sequence was validated in both phantom and human subjects (12 healthy subjects and 15 patients who were referred for a clinical cardiac MR exam) and compared with saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) and modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI). RESULTS: Phantom T1 measured by the proposed sequence had excellent agreement (R2  = 0.99) with the ground-truth T1 and was insensitive to heart rate. In both healthy subjects and patients, the proposed sequence yielded nine left-ventricular T1 maps per volume in less than 2 minutes (healthy volunteers: 1.8 ± 0.4 minutes; patients: 1.9 ± 0.2 minutes). The average T1 of whole left ventricle for all healthy subjects and patients were 1560 ± 61 and 1535 ± 49 ms by SASHA, 1208 ± 42 and 1233 ± 56 ms by MOLLI5(3)3, and 1397 ± 34 and 1433 ± 56 ms by the proposed sequence, respectively. The corresponding coefficient of variation of T1 were 6.2 ± 1.4% and 5.8 ± 1.6%, 5.3 ± 1.1% and 5.1 ± 0.8%, and 4.9 ± 0.8% and 4.5 ± 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed sequence enables quantification of whole heart T1 with good accuracy and precision in less than 2 minutes during free breathing.

Optimization of image sampling rate to lower the radiation dose of dynamic myocardial CT perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) has emerged as a potential strategy to combine anatomical and functional evaluation in a single modality. However, this method results in a high radiation dose. METHODS: Dynamic CTP was performed in 56 patients with suspected or known ischemic heart disease of whom 48 had complete CT-data. Datasets with reduced sampling rate of 2- and 3 RR-intervals (2RR and 3RR) were constructed post hoc. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimates from the 2RR and 3RR datasets were compared with estimates based on the full dataset (1RR) using the two one-sided test of equivalence for paired samples. RESULTS: Significant equivalence was found for rest MBFLV (p â€‹< â€‹0.001), stress MBFLV (p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and for the CFRLV (p â€‹= â€‹0.005) when comparing 2RR blood flow estimates with the results based on the 1RR dataset. The 2RR reconstruction protocol led to an estimated reduction in radiation dose of 35.4 â€‹± â€‹3.8%. CONCLUSION: MBF can be quantitated with dynamic CTP using a sampling strategy of one volume for every second heartbeat. This strategy could lead to a significant reduction in radiation dose.

Plaque quantification by coronary computed tomography angiography using intravascular ultrasound as a reference standard: a comparison between standard and last generation computed tomography scanners.

AIMS: The emerging role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a non-invasive tool for atherosclerosis evaluation is supported by data reporting a good correlation between CCTA and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for plaque volume quantification. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a last generation CT-scanner may improve coronary plaque volume assessment using IVUS as standard-of-reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a registry of 1915 consecutive, all-comers, patients who underwent a clinically indicated IVUS evaluation we enrolled 59 patients who underwent CCTA with a 64-slice CT (Group 1) and 59 patients who underwent CCTA with whole-heart coverage CT scanner (Group 2). Patients who underwent CCTA with unfavourable heart rhythm were not excluded from the analysis. Image quality (4-point Likert scale) focused on plaque analysis was evaluated. Plaque volume quantification by CCTA was compared to IVUS. No difference in clinical characteristics was found between Group 1 and Group 2. Plaque volume quantification by CCTA was considered not feasible in 11 plaques of Group 1 and in 4 plaques of Group 2 (P = 0.09). Higher correlation for plaque volume quantification by CCTA vs. IVUS was demonstrated in Group 2 when compared with Group 1 (r = 0.9888 vs. 0.9499; P < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed plaque volume overestimation by CCTA of 11.9 mm3 in Group 1 and 4 mm2 in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Effective radiation dose of CCTA was significantly lower in Group 2 vs. Group 1 (2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 8.1 ± 3.6 mSv, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CCTA using a new scanner generation showed to be an accurate non-invasive tool to assess and quantify coronary plaque volume.